Stoudamire really turned that Pacific program around from being a bottom feeder to one of the best teams in the WCC in a couple years.
Stoudamire really turned that Pacific program around from being a bottom feeder to one of the best teams in the WCC in a couple years.
He's going to be someone that the Jays can instantly respect and take advice from having played in the league for so long. Instant credibility.Stoudamire really turned that Pacific program around from being a bottom feeder to one of the best teams in the WCC in a couple years.
So you think the best NBA coach of his time had a guy at the top of his coaching ranks that wasn't a good coach? That's an interesting take.Hmmm. Loyal, reliable, and hardworking. He said nothing about being good at coaching. Maybe it’s in the rest of the interview.
He's going to be someone that the Jays can instantly respect and take advice from having played in the league for so long. Instant credibility.
The cool thing about these hires is that its likely to enhance the Celtics as a destination team. In addition to Tatum/Brown they now have a buzzy young coach but this time the person comes with a well rounded NBA pedigree. Furthermore, these coaches have been doing actual development work in the trenches with players from across the globe so they likely have insight into fits, personalities and tendencies which may prove useful.Thrilled with the Stoudemire hire. Great rep, long career at a position with multiple young developing players on the roster, I'm just a touch surprised he left college to be an assistant, but the relationship with Udoka helps explain that.
I don't disagree with your point in general, though Brad Stevens playing the role of Mark Jackson doesn't exactly compute.Given where the Cs are on their development curve, the choice of Udoka and the timing of his arrival may be optimal as far as the Cs taking the next step. The Udoka hiring feels a bit like when Kerr joined the Warriors in terms of where the teams were on their respective progressions.
I had a longer paragraph qualifying that part of the equation. I failed by editing myself.I don't disagree with your point in general, though Brad Stevens playing the role of Mark Jackson doesn't exactly compute.
Read: “It was boring as F#%! playing for Brad. His energy put us to sleep.”View: https://twitter.com/RedsArmy_John/status/1412889080724135940?s=20
John Karalis: Tatum on Udoka: what stands out the most is ... I can tell he's really really excited. It's going to be fun. We're going to try to accomplish something big
I know people like to think money didn’t matter to those who have made a lot of money in the past. Salary is stature and in most cases leads to career progression. He just signed a 5-year extension at Pacific likely for (relative) peanuts. I’d guess his Celtics deal is 3-4x larger as an Assistant than as the Head Coach of his college team. It’s also a much quicker path toward his likely ultimate goal of being an NBA Head Coach.Thrilled with the Stoudemire hire. Great rep, long career at a position with multiple young developing players on the roster, I'm just a touch surprised he left college to be an assistant, but the relationship with Udoka helps explain that.
Here's the full quote from Pop:Hmmm. Loyal, reliable, and hardworking. He said nothing about being good at coaching. Maybe it’s in the rest of the interview.
Here's the full quote from Pop:
“The guy is a stalwart. People overemphasize Os-and-Xs in the league. All the coaches know their Os-and-Xs. It’s basketball. It’s not analytical geometry or something like that. That stuff’s not tough, but to understand how to get the most out of people, to develop relationships with players, to make people accountable and make them want to play for you are really the keys and he’s got all that. He’s really a gifted communicator, although with him less is more. He’s not a talker, he’s a communicator and more than anything he’s genuine.”
At least for myself, I like to think that people are individuals, and what motivates may be different. You clearly don't.I know people like to think money didn’t matter to those who have made a lot of money in the past. Salary is stature and in most cases leads to career progression. He just signed a 5-year extension at Pacific likely for (relative) peanuts. I’d guess his Celtics deal is 3-4x larger as an Assistant than as the Head Coach of his college team. It’s also a much quicker path toward his likely ultimate goal of being an NBA Head Coach.
I don’t understand what this means. What do you think motivates Stoudamire (and 99.9% of those involved in coaching at this level?)At least for myself, I like to think that people are individuals, and what motivates may be different. You clearly don't.
Some people would rather be the head guy where they are than an assistant somewhere else, even if that pro assistant job is the fastest way to advance. It's not the only way to advance. Would it be weird to keep that Pacific job until a better D1 job opens up first, then try to get NBA attention that way?I don’t understand what this means. What do you think motivates Stoudamire (and 99.9% of those involved in coaching at this level?)
I’m guessing career advancement and money are at the top of everyone’s list. If you feel that Damon got involved in coaching to be the head guy at Pacific University for the next 20 years then I’ll disagree with that opinion.
Thanks. I expected that there was a lot left out. Stalwart is more a term I would use for 20-30 year career assistant rather then a rising young coach. Both coaches and journalists use words for a living and their word choices carry meaning above and beyond the dictionary.Here's the full quote from Pop:
“The guy is a stalwart. People overemphasize Os-and-Xs in the league. All the coaches know their Os-and-Xs. It’s basketball. It’s not analytical geometry or something like that. That stuff’s not tough, but to understand how to get the most out of people, to develop relationships with players, to make people accountable and make them want to play for you are really the keys and he’s got all that. He’s really a gifted communicator, although with him less is more. He’s not a talker, he’s a communicator and more than anything he’s genuine.”
Yes very much so as it would prolong the time to each what is likely his desired goal as a former NBA player when he has that attention right now.Some people would rather be the head guy where they are than an assistant somewhere else, even if that pro assistant job is the fastest way to advance. It's not the only way to advance. Would it be weird to keep that Pacific job until a better D1 job opens up first, then try to get NBA attention that way?
Yeah, you're right. The D1 rising star former player coaches get lots of love, but best way to get noticed is to take these jobs.Yes very much so as it would prolong the time to each what is likely his desired goal as a former NBA player when he has that attention right now.
My point is that I (and you) have no idea what motivates Damon Stoudamire. You can guess all you want.I don’t understand what this means. What do you think motivates Stoudamire (and 99.9% of those involved in coaching at this level?)
I’m guessing career advancement and money are at the top of everyone’s list. If you feel that Damon got involved in coaching to be the head guy at Pacific University for the next 20 years then I’ll disagree with that opinion.
Who the F says "Os and Xs"?Here's the full quote from Pop:
“The guy is a stalwart. People overemphasize Os-and-Xs in the league. All the coaches know their Os-and-Xs. It’s basketball. It’s not analytical geometry or something like that. That stuff’s not tough, but to understand how to get the most out of people, to develop relationships with players, to make people accountable and make them want to play for you are really the keys and he’s got all that. He’s really a gifted communicator, although with him less is more. He’s not a talker, he’s a communicator and more than anything he’s genuine.”
That’s as narrow and limited a reading of Pop’s words as I can imagine. He is quite explicitly saying that all NBA coaches know the tactical side of things, and is clearly including Udoka in that. He’s also saying that being a mere tactician is insufficient for being a top-notch head coach. He is quite literally saying that what separates Udoka is precisely the skill set required to be a top notch coach. In other words, he is both a tactician AND a communicator/motivator. I mean, this is the best coach in modern NBA history, and he is giving the Celtics’ new coach a full-throated endorsement. There are no caveats in his statement.Thanks. I expected that there was a lot left out. Stalwart is more a term I would use for 20-30 year career assistant rather then a rising young coach. Both coaches and journalists use words for a living and their word choices carry meaning above and beyond the dictionary.
I would read this as Pop feels that he is not a tactician but a motivator. No surprise.
He's more of a hugger than a kisser.Who the F says "Os and Xs"?
Well said.That’s as narrow and limited a reading of Pop’s words as I can imagine. He is quite explicitly saying that all NBA coaches know the tactical side of things, and is clearly including Udoka in that. He’s also saying that being a mere tactician is insufficient for being a top-notch head coach. He is quite literally saying that what separates Udoka is precisely the skill set required to be a top notch coach. In other words, he is both a tactician AND a communicator/motivator. I mean, this is the best coach in modern NBA history, and he is giving the Celtics’ new coach a full-throated endorsement. There are no caveats in his statement.
It’s not really a guess though. “Guessing” would imply that we have no idea if Stoudamire wants to be an NBA Head Coach in two years or the Head Coach at Pacific. I’m pretty confident I know the answer.My point is that I (and you) have no idea what motivates Damon Stoudamire. You can guess all you want.
It’s certainly worth something that the new development coach on the Celtics has those four success stories on his resume. I wonder if they will retain Joe Mazzulla, who seemed to have a role in player development.FWIW, Miles coached guys like Juan Toscano-Anderson, Kendrick Nunn, Chris Boucher and Georges Niang. Also, a bit of trivia I just read - when Miles was cut from the Trailblazers back in 2006, the person who got his roster spot was Udoka.
From what I've seen, Miles also has credibility around the league. At the very least, Udoka is giving the C's a completely new coaching perspective but again, there is some leverage here. At the margin, you would hope these hires might swing a player or two towards Boston in free agency or when requesting a trade.
There has already been multiple reports and a confirmation that Mazzulla will be retained.It’s certainly worth something that the new development coach on the Celtics has those four success stories on his resume. I wonder if they will retain Joe Mazzulla, who seemed to have a role in player development.
FWIW, USA Today says Mazzulla and video assistant Evan Bradds will be the holdovers.There has already been multiple reports and a confirmation that Mazzulla will be retained.
Not sure I'd say that, Sullivan was there for 3 seasons, Giannis has 2 of his 3 best shooting years from:Giannis hasn't gotten any better at shooting outside of 3 feet the last few years...
Guru seems like an aggressive adjective.
They're his ages 24-26 seasons. He's supposed to improve. This past season he was worse than his age 23 season from 16-3p, on 3p & on ft.Not sure I'd say that, Sullivan was there for 3 seasons, Giannis has 2 of his 3 best shooting years from:
3pt
16-3pt
10-16
Not sure how much you can take from it, but teams he was the shooting coach on have been very good shooting teams
Fair, Giannis is still a shitty shooter. I do think his shot looks better even if the results are inconsistent.They're his ages 24-26 seasons. He's supposed to improve. This past season he was worse than his age 23 season from 16-3p, on 3p & on ft.
He may very well be an amazing shooting coach, but I don't see where he's done much for Giannis.
Well, there's a reason no one has the title "John Wasdin's pitching guru".Imagine if every piching coach and batting coach were judged by the worst players on the team. Some guys get better, some don't. These cats are judged against their peers, not some impossible standard where everyone turns into Steph Curry.
FTFY.Well, there's a reason no one claims the title "John Wasdin's pitching guru".
Yup:Ime Udoka keeps talking about the Celtics’ assist rate from last season.
“We got two elite scorers and I want to help them be playmakers,” Udoka said. “We got a ton of great shooters, so we want to play more team basketball. Obviously, have a defensive mindset, do a lot of different things, because we can go big-small, a lot of different ways there. In general, an exciting brand, just share the ball a little bit more. In general Jaylen and Jayson can take a huge step as far as that."
Summer coach-speak?“We got two elite scorers and I want to help them be playmakers,” Udoka said. “We got a ton of great shooters, so we want to play more team basketball. Obviously, have a defensive mindset, do a lot of different things, because we can go big-small, a lot of different ways there. In general, an exciting brand, just share the ball a little bit more. In general Jaylen and Jayson can take a huge step as far as that."
Music to my ears.