Cutting the Cord Early. How Have the Sox Done?

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,213
I wish Kiké was hitting that good
Sure. 252/337/388 is not terrible, especially for a SS. But of course, Kike is a FA after this year and Xander has a huge contract for 10 more seasons.


Exactly. The Red Sox are usually smart cutting the cord early. Pedro, Ellsbury, Damon, Manny and others proved right.
The only one still up in the air is Mookie Betts.
In every sport, the batting average for cutting the cord early is not 1.000, but it still makes Ted Williams look like Sandy Leon.
 

scottyno

late Bloomer
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2008
11,339
I disagree
Manny put up 1232 OPS in 2008 in a pitcher’s park.
And then got popped for steroids while Bay finished 7th in mvp voting in 2009. And then the Sox smartly let him walk at the right time as well. Also ignoring the part where swapping out Bay for Manny somehow just gives them 2 more rings because reasons
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,872
Maine
Let's not forget that Manny was traded because he wanted out. In the weeks before the trade, he was begging out of games because his knee hurt and he couldn't even keep straight which knee it was. Then he was magically all better once he hit L.A. and tore the cover off the ball. That trade not happening would not have resulted in a World Series title in 2008 or 2009.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,462
Let's not forget that Manny was traded because he wanted out. In the weeks before the trade, he was begging out of games because his knee hurt and he couldn't even keep straight which knee it was. Then he was magically all better once he hit L.A. and tore the cover off the ball. That trade not happening would not have resulted in a World Series title in 2008 or 2009.
and pushed traveling secretary Jack McCormick
https://www.boston.com/sports/extra-bases/2008/06/30/manny_ramirez_w/
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
14,925
So ignore the other parts of those seasons? They counted too.
Ramirez had 6.3 bWAR in his 2 seasons with the Dodgers from trade deadline '08 to late August '10 when they waived him & made like $50m (I think?).

Bay had 7.1 bWAR in his 14 months or so in Boston & made like $10m.

Of course, as usual, the Pirates were the biggest loser. They received:

Andy LaRoche 0.4 bWAR
Bryan Morris 0.3 bWAR
Craig Hansen -0.5 bWAR
Brandon Moss -3.2 bWAR
 

RobertS975

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2005
367
Theo Epstein put Manny on irrevocable waivers to prove to John Henry that not only was Manny difficult to trade, you couldn't even give him away!
 

CR67dream

blue devils forevah!
Dope
SoSH Member
Oct 4, 2001
7,554
I'm going home
Topics stray, the conversation is both fine and interesting.

For a deeper dive, a new thread would be called for. Feel free, anyone, to start one, I';d definitely read it. I'd break out but gotta go and running late.
 
Last edited:

Benj4ever

New Member
Nov 21, 2022
363
Exactly. The Red Sox are usually smart cutting the cord early. Pedro, Ellsbury, Damon, Manny and others proved right.
The only one still up in the air is Mookie Betts.
The Sox didn't exactly pull the plug on Damon. The Yankees offered him a bit more (don't remember the number exactly, but it seems to me is was in the range of $1 - $3 million), and he jumped ship. I think he pulled a similar stunt on KC when signing with the Sox in the first place
 

trekfan55

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 29, 2004
11,632
Panama
The Sox didn't exactly pull the plug on Damon. The Yankees offered him a bit more (don't remember the number exactly, but it seems to me is was in the range of $1 - $3 million), and he jumped ship. I think he pulled a similar stunt on KC when signing with the Sox in the first place
That was Oakland, where he played for one year (it's in the beginning of the Moneyball movie too).

Several players were offered more either in years or money and the Sox let them walk. Damon to the Yankees. Pedro to the Mets. And back on topic Xander to the Padres.

Manny was different because he wanted out and it was well rumored that Boras was manipulating things because he would not get any comissions if his two extensions were picked up.
 

snowmanny

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
15,747
And then got popped for steroids while Bay finished 7th in mvp voting in 2009. And then the Sox smartly let him walk at the right time as well. Also ignoring the part where swapping out Bay for Manny somehow just gives them 2 more rings because reasons
There's a better argument for a ring in 2008 than there is for 2009. If we are citing MVP voting,, Manny finished 4th in MVP voting in 2008. Ed- but the trade was logical, probably
 

CoolPapaBellhorn

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2006
1,120
Medfield
There is no universe where the Red Sox would have had Manny in 2009. His contract was up in 2008 and he never would have re-signed. There may be an option that I'm forgetting, but I doubt the Sox would have wanted him back after how '08 played out.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,662
All I have to say is: I miss prime Manny. Guy was super fun to watch, and was one of the best hitters I've ever seen. Over 8 seasons, he gave Boston this:

274 hr, 868 rbi, .312/.411/.588/.999, 155 ops+, 33.2 bWAR, 8 all-star appearances, and 2 World Series championships

 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,872
Maine
There is no universe where the Red Sox would have had Manny in 2009. His contract was up in 2008 and he never would have re-signed. There may be an option that I'm forgetting, but I doubt the Sox would have wanted him back after how '08 played out.
There 100% was an option, for 2009 and 2010. It was the existence of those options that prompted Manny to effectively shoot his way out of town. He'd signed with Boras and Boras wanted a cut, which he wasn't going to get if the Sox picked up the options. So part of the trade, since Manny had 10/5 rights, was the Dodgers agreeing to turn down the options and let him be a free agent following the 2008 season.
 

LogansDad

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
29,714
Alamogordo
There 100% was an option, for 2009 and 2010. It was the existence of those options that prompted Manny to effectively shoot his way out of town. He'd signed with Boras and Boras wanted a cut, which he wasn't going to get if the Sox picked up the options. So part of the trade, since Manny had 10/5 rights, was the Dodgers agreeing to turn down the options and let him be a free agent following the 2008 season.
Sometimes I forget just how much I abhor Scott Boras. I should stop doing that.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,330
Hingham, MA
All I have to say is: I miss prime Manny. Guy was super fun to watch, and was one of the best hitters I've ever seen. Over 8 seasons, he gave Boston this:

274 hr, 868 rbi, .312/.411/.588/.999, 155 ops+, 33.2 bWAR, 8 all-star appearances, and 2 World Series championships

I miss more than just Manny. I miss the days of more consistent year to year personnel and less roster turnover. Of being invested in the players and the team on a deeper level over a longer period of time. Short term, year to year contracts may make good business, and even baseball, sense. But there is nothing engaging about it.

Get off my lawn?!
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
I miss more than just Manny. I miss the days of more consistent year to year personnel and less roster turnover. Of being invested in the players and the team on a deeper level over a longer period of time. Short term, year to year contracts may make good business, and even baseball, sense. But there is nothing engaging about it.

Get off my lawn?!
That's how you operate when you have nothing to elevate through the ranks. Things are looking more hopeful
 

Max Power

thai good. you like shirt?
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
7,999
Boston, MA
That's how you operate when you have nothing to elevate through the ranks. Things are looking more hopeful
Manny, Pedro, Ortiz, Wakefield, and Varitek all came from other organizations. Keeping your own drafted and IFA players isn't the only way to build a team with guys who stick around for more than a year or two.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member

Sin Duda

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
840
(B)Austin Texas
Imagine if a wide receiver caught a sideline pass, ran towards the sideline seemingly to go out of bounds, but then high-fived the chain crew guy without ever stepping out of bounds, back-cut past a charging tackler, picked up a couple blocks from fellow WRs, and scored a touchdown? That would be the play of the century (the Stanford band play being the play of the century from the 20th century).

[Yes, I know touching someone out of bounds makes the ball carrier out of bounds by rule.]
 

Benj4ever

New Member
Nov 21, 2022
363
That was Oakland, where he played for one year (it's in the beginning of the Moneyball movie too).

Several players were offered more either in years or money and the Sox let them walk. Damon to the Yankees. Pedro to the Mets. And back on topic Xander to the Padres.

Manny was different because he wanted out and it was well rumored that Boras was manipulating things because he would not get any comissions if his two extensions were picked up.
Yeah, I forgot he was in Oakland; didn't bother to look it up. I thought Damon took the heat from Sox fans on that one, because he sold us out for pennies on the dollar. In any case, I think we just have different perspectives on this one.

Back to Xander. The Padres offered way too much for him. It's really too bad he chose Boras as his agent, or the Sox might(?) have been able to do a reasonable extension.
 

Bergs

funky and cold
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2005
21,695
Back to Xander. The Padres offered way too much for him. It's really too bad he chose Boras as his agent, or the Sox might(?) have been able to do a reasonable extension.
Not for X it isn't.
 

Tony Pena's Gas Cloud

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 12, 2019
372
Yeah, I forgot he was in Oakland; didn't⁷ bother to look it up. I thought Damon took the heat from Sox fans on that one, because he sold us out for pennies on the dollar. In any case, I think we just have different perspectives on this one.

Back to Xander. The Padres offered way too much for him. It's really too bad he chose Boras as his agent, or the Sox might(?) have been able to do a reasonable extension.
What do you mean "pennies on the dollar"? Damon had three main suitors in free agency: Sox, Yankees, Dodgers. The Dodgers went with Kenny Lofton instead. The Yankees gave Damon a fourth year and a guarantee that he'd be the starting center fielder. Justifiably, the Sox were not willing to give a fourth year with Ellsbury waiting in the wings. Like most free agents, he took the best deal.
I'm not sure how that's "selling out for pennies on the dollar".
 

Benj4ever

New Member
Nov 21, 2022
363
What do you mean "pennies on the dollar"? Damon had three main suitors in free agency: Sox, Yankees, Dodgers. The Dodgers went with Kenny Lofton instead. The Yankees gave Damon a fourth year and a guarantee that he'd be the starting center fielder. Justifiably, the Sox were not willing to give a fourth year with Ellsbury waiting in the wings. Like most free agents, he took the best deal.
I'm not sure how that's "selling out for pennies on the dollar".
So, in your opinion, then, did the Sox let Damon walk, or did they simply make a rational business decision? Do you believe that there's a difference between the two?
 

Archer1979

shazowies
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
7,947
Right Here
The only one cutting the cord when Manny left was Manny. Sox simply had enough of a player who didn't want to play.

And for all the talk of cutting the cord early, its more than outweighed by getting overly enamored with other team's players and paying way too much... for example... Crawford, Sandoval, etc.

In other words, Free Agency is a crap shoot both when letting players go and signing other team's free agents.
 

inJacobyWeTrust

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 12, 2007
1,248
Watertown
What do you mean "pennies on the dollar"? Damon had three main suitors in free agency: Sox, Yankees, Dodgers. The Dodgers went with Kenny Lofton instead. The Yankees gave Damon a fourth year and a guarantee that he'd be the starting center fielder. Justifiably, the Sox were not willing to give a fourth year with Ellsbury waiting in the wings. Like most free agents, he took the best deal.
I'm not sure how that's "selling out for pennies on the dollar".
Had to reply to this one given the quote in my signature. IIRC the anger towards Damon came because of where he signed, and what he had stated publicly before signing there. (see below)
 

Tony Pena's Gas Cloud

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 12, 2019
372
So, in your opinion, then, did the Sox let Damon walk, or did they simply make a rational business decision? Do you believe that there's a difference between the two?
When it comes to free agents, teams don't "let players walk". Players sign wherever they choose.
 

Yelling At Clouds

Post-darwinian
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
3,432
I miss more than just Manny. I miss the days of more consistent year to year personnel and less roster turnover. Of being invested in the players and the team on a deeper level over a longer period of time. Short term, year to year contracts may make good business, and even baseball, sense. But there is nothing engaging about it.

Get off my lawn?!
I don’t necessarily miss what you’re describing, but what I do miss is the days when I could just be excited about getting a new player - like I was when they signed Manny - instead of immediately switching into hyper-analytical mode, which always leads to this “yeah, but look at all those years and dollars!!!” mindset.

I was going to say that people would be aghast at the Manny deal nowadays, and I think that is true, but I also remember a lot of people saying they were against it at the time. And I've also noticed a growing segment of baseball fans who are in favor of teams spending more of their money these days. But I still think people would savage the 2023 equivalent of a Manny deal. "He doesn't play defense, going to be ugly when he turns 35!"
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,330
Hingham, MA
Cross posting

Just wanted to point out that Wacha and Eovaldi are a combined 14-4, 2.67 ERA in 148.1 IP over 24 starts (nearly 6.1 IP per start).

Seems to me the 2023 Red Sox might be pretty good if they had that kind of performance at the top of the rotation.
 

Lose Remerswaal

Experiencing Furry Panic
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Cross posting

Just wanted to point out that Wacha and Eovaldi are a combined 14-4, 2.67 ERA in 148.1 IP over 24 starts (nearly 6.1 IP per start).

Seems to me the 2023 Red Sox might be pretty good if they had that kind of performance at the top of the rotation.
Cross posting as well: did you know they would be so good and Rich Hill wouldn’t be?