Darryl Roberts, CB - Marshall - 7th Round #30

ZMart100

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2008
3,218
I like him - very good in coverage needs work in run support.
Good measureables.
 
Running indoors on Field Turf, cornerback Darryl Roberts clocked times of 4.39 and 4.36 in the 40-yard dash, including a 1.48 10-yard split. He also had a 39-inch vertical and 11-1 broad jump. He ran a 4.08 short shuttle and 6.66 3-cone drill, and had 23 bench-press reps.
 
Senior highlights.
[media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wU-H3R4rTUA[/media]
Junior highlights
[media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEabT_eIe24[/media]
 
Apr 7, 2006
2,552
All caveats about highlight reels aside, I liked what I saw. Certainly seems to play aggressively and with a good deal of confidence. A willing hitter, too. Interesting player.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,024
Mansfield MA
BigSoxFan said:
Is that really a minus? You don't see many guys stay with their teams more than a few years anyways.
I think the issue is that older players might look good on tape because they're 23-year-olds competing with less-physically-mature 19- and 20- year-olds. It's not a death knell, obviously - Vollmer was an older rookie, as was Butler last year. But it's a factor that has to be contextualized when evaluating a prospect.
 

Phragle

wild card bitches
SoSH Member
Jan 1, 2009
13,154
Carmine's closet
Super Nomario said:
I think the issue is that older players might look good on tape because they're 23-year-olds competing with less-physically-mature 19- and 20- year-olds. It's not a death knell, obviously - Vollmer was an older rookie, as was Butler last year. But it's a factor that has to be contextualized when evaluating a prospect.
 
That's part of it. Less physically mature, but also less mentally mature. Older prospect have had more experience and time to hone their skills. When comparing a 20 YO to a 23 YO I always wonder what the older prospect looked like when he was 20 and what the younger prospect will look like when he's 23.
 
But it's not a reason why I would dislike Roberts. Age is a lot more important to me in the high and mid rounds than in the UDFA period. Plus I'm just happy to get a CB. 
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,024
Mansfield MA
One of the interesting things to me about the Roberts pick - and about the interest in Kevin Johnson - is what it suggests about the style of DB play the Pats plan to play in 2015. Johnson and Roberts both have some press experience, but neither of them are guys who are going to jam the crap out of WR at the LOS and keep them from getting upfield. Johnson played this season at 175 pounds. They seem to want to move away from the Brandon Browner style of play, which is a little odd since they did just win a Super Bowl with it.
 

mauf

Anderson Cooper × Mr. Rogers
Moderator
SoSH Member
Super Nomario said:
One of the interesting things to me about the Roberts pick - and about the interest in Kevin Johnson - is what it suggests about the style of DB play the Pats plan to play in 2015. Johnson and Roberts both have some press experience, but neither of them are guys who are going to jam the crap out of WR at the LOS and keep them from getting upfield. Johnson played this season at 175 pounds. They seem to want to move away from the Brandon Browner style of play, which is a little odd since they did just win a Super Bowl with it.
I don't think they want to move away from that system; they're just acknowledging that they won't have the personnel to run it. I think that's why they let Browner go once they were unable to retain Revis.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,024
Mansfield MA
maufman said:
I don't think they want to move away from that system; they're just acknowledging that they won't have the personnel to run it. I think that's why they let Browner go once they were unable to retain Revis.
That was still pretty early in free agency, though. There's no replacing Revis, but they could have kept Browner and tried to add more of a press guy in FA or via the draft.
 

BarrettsHiddenBall

New Member
Jul 15, 2005
438
Super Nomario said:
That was still pretty early in free agency, though. There's no replacing Revis, but they could have kept Browner and tried to add more of a press guy in FA or via the draft.
I think the idea is that having a press guy like Browner on one side worked because they had Revis shutting down the other side, so if someone got past Browner there was theoretically help available.
 

MarcSullivaFan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 21, 2005
3,412
Hoo-hoo-hoo hoosier land.
Is it possible that we're overrating just how good the secondary was in 2014?

They were 12th against the pass by DVOA, with a 84 passer rating against.

In 2013 they were 14th against the pass by DVOA, with a 81 passer rating against.

The secondary made some huge plays (stating the obvious here!) against Baltimore and Seattle, but for periods of those games they were shredded. So, I guess my point is that while we saw a pretty significant upgrade in secondary play the last couple years, they weren't dominant.

Going into this season, they have neither Talib nor Browner/Revis. But, at least on paper, they have improved their pass rush in quality and depth, and relatively inexpensively.

I know I'm not breaking any new ground here, but it seems likely that they decided that they couldn't commit the resources necessary to retain Revis/Browner without hurting the team in other areas, and by focusing on improving the pass rush and changing to coverage schemes that do not require top end talent, they could get similar overall results against the pass while staying level or improving elsewhere (pass pro and run defense in particular).
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,024
Mansfield MA
MarcSullivaFan said:
Is it possible that we're overrating just how good the secondary was in 2014?

They were 12th against the pass by DVOA, with a 84 passer rating against.

In 2013 they were 14th against the pass by DVOA, with a 81 passer rating against.

The secondary made some huge plays (stating the obvious here!) against Baltimore and Seattle, but for periods of those games they were shredded. So, I guess my point is that while we saw a pretty significant upgrade in secondary play the last couple years, they weren't dominant.

Going into this season, they have neither Talib nor Browner/Revis. But, at least on paper, they have improved their pass rush in quality and depth, and relatively inexpensively.

I know I'm not breaking any new ground here, but it seems likely that they decided that they couldn't commit the resources necessary to retain Revis/Browner without hurting the team in other areas, and by focusing on improving the pass rush and changing to coverage schemes that do not require top end talent, they could get similar overall results against the pass while staying level or improving elsewhere (pass pro and run defense in particular).
I think you're partially correct. The pass defense in 2014 was not, on the whole, a lot better than the pass defense in 2013, but the pass defense encompasses more than just the secondary. The pass rush was worse in 2014, particularly when Chandler Jones was out (he went from playing 98% of snaps in 2013 to 58% in 2014, and his sacks dropped off from 11.5 to 6.0), dropping from 48 sacks and a 7.5% sack rate to 40 and 6.5%. I'm not a huge fan of DVOA but it's worth noting how the passing D breaks down to get the results you're seeing. The 2013 team was below-average at defending WR by DVOA (16th vs #1s, 29th vs #2s, 21st vs other) but good at defending TEs (13th). Last year they were much better at defending WR by DVOA (7th vs #1 WR, 17th vs #2, 7th vs other) but lousy at defending TEs (30th). I think it would be accurate to see the secondary was clearly better in 2014, but the pass defense was similar - which, as you note, provides hope that in 2015 the secondary can be worse but the pass defense about the same, if the pass rush and coverage on TEs improves.
 

bakahump

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 8, 2001
7,563
Maine
My son was the youngest in his class (Sept 28th Bday.....october 1st cutoff).  He struggled the first 3 or 4 months.  After talking with the teachers and guidance staff they made the point
"He is 10-20% behind in physical and mental growth compared to some of his classmates.  Thats not anything against him.  Its that he is 60 months old and his classmates are 70 months old.  Thats a huge difference."
 
Had never occured to me in that persepective.  5yos was 5yos.   6 was 6.
 
Probably not quit that linear (or dramatic)  especially at 22 or 24 compared to 20 and 22.....but certainly worth considering when the "maturity" idea comes up.
 

Morgan's Magic Snowplow

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 2, 2006
22,416
Philadelphia
Super Nomario said:
I think you're partially correct. The pass defense in 2014 was not, on the whole, a lot better than the pass defense in 2013, but the pass defense encompasses more than just the secondary. The pass rush was worse in 2014, particularly when Chandler Jones was out (he went from playing 98% of snaps in 2013 to 58% in 2014, and his sacks dropped off from 11.5 to 6.0), dropping from 48 sacks and a 7.5% sack rate to 40 and 6.5%. I'm not a huge fan of DVOA but it's worth noting how the passing D breaks down to get the results you're seeing. The 2013 team was below-average at defending WR by DVOA (16th vs #1s, 29th vs #2s, 21st vs other) but good at defending TEs (13th). Last year they were much better at defending WR by DVOA (7th vs #1 WR, 17th vs #2, 7th vs other) but lousy at defending TEs (30th). I think it would be accurate to see the secondary was clearly better in 2014, but the pass defense was similar - which, as you note, provides hope that in 2015 the secondary can be worse but the pass defense about the same, if the pass rush and coverage on TEs improves.
 
Yup.  Its also worth noting that a fair number of those 40 sacks were generated either by blitzing the ILBs (Hightower and Collins had 10 between them) or, by my hazy recollection at least, as coverage sacks.  I'd like to see data on the number of sacks teams generate within 3 or 3.5 seconds while rushing four or less men.  I would not be surprised if we were near the bottom of the NFL on that metric last year.
 

crystalline

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 12, 2009
5,771
JP
Super Nomario said:
One of the interesting things to me about the Roberts pick - and about the interest in Kevin Johnson - is what it suggests about the style of DB play the Pats plan to play in 2015. Johnson and Roberts both have some press experience, but neither of them are guys who are going to jam the crap out of WR at the LOS and keep them from getting upfield. Johnson played this season at 175 pounds. They seem to want to move away from the Brandon Browner style of play, which is a little odd since they did just win a Super Bowl with it.
Do I rememember correctly that the coaches benched Browner after a penalty in the playoffs? Was that against the Ravens?

If so that might suggest they didn't like his style much last year either, and would like to get away from pressing.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,470
Hingham, MA
crystalline said:
Do I rememember correctly that the coaches benched Browner after a penalty in the playoffs? Was that against the Ravens?

If so that might suggest they didn't like his style much last year either, and would like to get away from pressing.
 
Browner got hurt against the Ravens and didn't return to the game
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,024
Mansfield MA
crystalline said:
Do I rememember correctly that the coaches benched Browner after a penalty in the playoffs? Was that against the Ravens?

If so that might suggest they didn't like his style much last year either, and would like to get away from pressing.
He also got benched in the Indy game for Logan Ryan - injury was a factor there, but Indy was also a bad matchup in terms of personnel.
 
I have a full profile of Darryl Roberts up on ITP: http://insidethepylon.com/nfl/nfl-draft/2015/05/05/meet-patriots-draftee-darryl-roberts/
 
I like his coverage skills, but he is pretty soft in the run game, something he will need to improve to make the team:
 
 

Kenny F'ing Powers

posts way less than 18% useful shit
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2010
14,479
I wouldn't call that soft as much as I'd call it horrid technique.
 
Get low and wrap up you big dummy.
 

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
19,592
Somewhere
Super Nomario said:
That was still pretty early in free agency, though. There's no replacing Revis, but they could have kept Browner and tried to add more of a press guy in FA or via the draft.
 
Has to be money, right?
 

BarrettsHiddenBall

New Member
Jul 15, 2005
438
Devizier said:
 
Has to be money, right?
I don't think so, no. Again, Browner works if you have a 'shut-down' corner on one side so that the rest of the defensive backfield is available to help if the WR gets past Browner. Without a Revis or Talib (let alone in conjunction with another Browner-style CB) you don't have that luxury and he'll either get exposed or give up a ton of penalties.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,024
Mansfield MA

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
Dreaming, but would be incredible if after all the high draft capital spent on cornerbacks the Pats solidified the position long-term with a Butler/Roberts combo.
 

SeoulSoxFan

I Want to Hit the World with Rocket Punch
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
22,104
A Scud Away from Hell
Stitch01 said:
Dreaming, but would be incredible if after all the high draft capital spent on cornerbacks the Pats solidified the position long-term with a Butler/Roberts combo.
 
Besides McCourty, it's certainly a low bar to clear. All secondary picks from 2009-2014:
 

 
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/play-index/draft-finder.cgi?request=1&year_min=2009&year_max=2015&type=&round_min=1&round_max=30&slot_min=1&slot_max=500&league_id=&team_id=nwe&pos_new=db&college_id=all&conference=any&show=all&order_by=
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,024
Mansfield MA
Roberts left last night with an injury, but before that I was really encouraged. He tackled well - a weak point for him in college - and played everywhere, on both sides on D and on special teams. 
 
Mark Daniels ‏@MarkDanielsPJ  1h1 hour ago
Darryl Roberts injured his hand/wrist last night, per source. He went for x-rays to see the extent of the damage. That's all I know for now.
 

jsinger121

@jsinger121
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
17,686
Super Nomario said:
Pats cut Jimmy Jean and currently have just 7 CB on the roster. Maybe a good sign for Roberts?
 
Doubt it right now. Roberts likely may have to go on IR but they don't want to expose him to waivers right now. They will put him on IR at the end of camp likely.