FTFY.nighthob said:Because you're Jimmy Irsay and you stopped thinking clearly about eight [oxycodone] ago?
FTFY.nighthob said:Because you're Jimmy Irsay and you stopped thinking clearly about eight [oxycodone] ago?
I hear ya, but I'm done being baited by idiots. That's how they win. Sometimes you just have to shake your head, smile, and embrace the courage of your convictions. I don't have time to argue with idiots anymore, never mind let them get under my skin. It hasn't always been this way, but let me tell ya, it's really fucking liberating.JimBoSox9 said:Maybe I'm just not as good at ignoring the noise as you are. It's about not having to deal with a certain volume of garbage. It's about the percentage of my conversations about football where I need to recite the same damn talking points over and over and over. it gets annoying, no different from when I was sitting in a call center telling a customer where the save button is for the 100th time. I don't care because it affects what I think, I care because I just want to stop being forced to argue against it or sit there and listen to it.
And, for a bonus, there is one thing that does chap my ass a lil extra. I'd put Belichick's integrity up against any head coach or anyone in the league office. And I'd win. I've never heard him do a song and dance to the media because he wants to get an indicted All-Pro in the lineup. I've never heard of him being less than forthright about the situation even in his coldest contract moves. I've never seen him put a player in the doghouse for personal reasons. I've never seen him block a coordinator from a better job opening. Turn a blind eye to abusive racism in his locker room? Laughable. The man has a sort of professional integrity that is commonplace in offices of all industries, but is utterly alien to the unique profession of Football Head Coach. Compared to your average HC or league suit, not only is he not Belicheat, he likely grades out on a relative scale as a white fucking knight. It's 110% been driven from day one by petty sore losers and butthurt media, and for seven years they've been winning the narrative battle. It's fucking infuriating.
E5 Yaz said:
Bad assumption on your part. I'm not choosing to disbelieve them ... I'm just waiting to see whether the actual facts emerge
There is no Rev said:I think I may have underestimated how people read E5 Yaz.
He's saying that the Patriots are not likely to be vindicated in the court of public opinion. And I would expect that he will be proven correct.
riboflav said:Yaz is saying how can you have, at this point, any confidence in any outcome, including that the Patriots did nothing wrong.
EDIT: He has also said what Rev wrote above me.
Hoya81 said:
New Deflategate theory: Colts deflated ball after D'Qwell Jackson's pick http://t.co/jJZz3pRnC5
— ProFootballTalk (@ProFootballTalk) February 7, 2015
They can say whatever they want, but anyone with half a brain should know that would happen, and the NFL could make it a rule if they wanted it to be a rule, and they didn't, so how is it cheating to not anticipate a rule that doesn't exist and that they've never even pretended existed before?My question in all of this...what happens if it comes out that the balls were indeed at the bottom end of the psi allowance, but due to air temperature fell to below by half time? Is that still cheating? Can the NFL say that the Pats should have known that would happen?
Not cheating by the wording of the rule.lars10 said:My question in all of this...what happens if it comes out that the balls were indeed at the bottom end of the psi allowance, but due to air temperature fell to below by half time? Is that still cheating? Can the NFL say that the Pats should have known that would happen?
After the host proposed to Schefter that “The Colts deflated the one ball that D’Qwell Jackson intercepted, and all the other balls were just a tick under,” Schefter said that’s a theory he’s heard.
“I do think there are people who believe that,” Schefter said. “I know there are people who believe that. . . . I’ll just say, I’m not even going to specify, there are people who believe that, OK? There are people who believe that. And I think there are people who have heard that theory and who say, ‘That’s impossible.'”
I agree. I just wonder if Goodell will interpret the rule in a way that allows him to still punish the team.judyb said:They can say whatever they want, but anyone with half a brain should know that would happen, and the NFL could make it a rule if they wanted it to be a rule, and they didn't, so how is it cheating to not anticipate a rule that doesn't exist and that they've never even pretended existed before?
I imagine it's also the way things have been done for years. The alternative would be compensatorily adding more air to the ball on cold days. I doubt anyone was doing this.drleather2001 said:Not cheating by the wording of the rule.
SumnerH said:
I have a well-connected inside source who can confirm that the Patriots did, in fact, use actual footballs during the Colts game.
DrewDawg said:
But Stitch said the same thing, that other fans will still think they cheated. But he said he thinks they didn't cheat. When E5 asked why, he said he believes BB, Brady, and Kraft.
That's all.
I feel very confident in saying the Pats didn't cheat, so whatever bullshit is in that report (and it might be blah blah blah we cant prove anything but docked a third round pick meow chow) isn't going to show proof of that.
DrewDawg said:
So if I predicted the score of the Super Bowl as 21-17, NE that doesn't mean that I have utmost confidence that's actually going to be the score. We're discussing things on a discussion board and making guesses. This is why we're here.
Stich and others saying that they believe BB, Brady, and Kraft isn't some out of LF opinion. I think we all know there are other possible outcomes.
riboflav said:Yaz is saying how can you have, at this point, any confidence in any outcome, including that the Patriots did nothing wrong.
EDIT: He has also said what Rev wrote above me.
The best thing - particularly the last bit about BB - that I have read on this in a long while.JimBoSox9 said:Maybe I'm just not as good at ignoring the noise as you are. It's about not having to deal with a certain volume of garbage. It's about the percentage of my conversations about football where I need to recite the same damn talking points over and over and over. it gets annoying, no different from when I was sitting in a call center telling a customer where the save button is for the 100th time. I don't care because it affects what I think, I care because I just want to stop being forced to argue against it or sit there and listen to it.
And, for a bonus, there is one thing that does chap my ass a lil extra. I'd put Belichick's integrity up against any head coach or anyone in the league office. And I'd win. I've never heard him do a song and dance to the media because he wants to get an indicted All-Pro in the lineup. I've never heard of him being less than forthright about the situation even in his coldest contract moves. I've never seen him put a player in the doghouse for personal reasons. I've never seen him block a coordinator from a better job opening. Turn a blind eye to abusive racism in his locker room? Laughable. The man has a sort of professional integrity that is commonplace in offices of all industries, but is utterly alien to the unique profession of Football Head Coach. Compared to your average HC or league suit, not only is he not Belicheat, he likely grades out on a relative scale as a white fucking knight. It's 110% been driven from day one by petty sore losers and butthurt media, and for seven years they've been winning the narrative battle. It's fucking infuriating.
He's making an assumption based on his interpretation of what he's observed.E5 Yaz said:
Bad assumption on your part. I'm not choosing to disbelieve them ... I'm just waiting to see whether the actual facts emerge
SumnerH said:
That's not all, and that's not why E5 called him out. He got called out not for believing that the Pats are innocent, but for proclaiming such a degree of confidence as to either predict that everything in the report is bullshit that won't show otherwise or dismiss it as such a priori.
DrewDawg said:
So, he's too confident in his opinion?
Schefter said some"people around league" believe the Colts tampered with the ball. That doesn't even come close to implying the league office. This could be coaches, players, or more likely reporters who actually are around the league, not in it.naclone said:the important thing about the schefter assertion is not that the Colts might be responsible, but that it further supports the idea that the league has absolutely nothing on the pats. this theory, likely or not, wouldnt even be being considered by anyone in the league office if there was even a shred of evidence incriminating new england.
He didn't even say "people around the league", he just said "people". Could be you, me or Roger Goodell. He was purposefully vague.NWsoxophile said:Schefter said some"people around league" believe the Colts tampered with the ball. That doesn't even come close to implying the league office. This could be coaches, players, or more likely reporters who actually are around the league, not in it.
TheoShmeo said:That's not been my experience. Most of the people I talk to in the NY area think the story is ridiculous, overblown and media nonsense.
And they have a new, more credible meme: Seattle lost the Super Bowl more than the Pats won it!
E5 Yaz said:
Anyone at this stage who still looks at espn.com or watches ESPN and expects a different approach to Deflategate deserves the aggravation they feel
snowmanny said:If, and this is a big if, but if the Colts deflated that ball, the NFL should fine them $25,000, have them switch draft positions with NE in round 1, and literally burn Indianapolis to the ground.
This is Jimmy Irsay we're talking about, it was probably both.MarcSullivaFan said:FTFY.
Fucking awesome. Every week they fuck up a new batch of bad guys and blow shit up.There is no Rev said:I think I may have underestimated how people read E5 Yaz.
He's saying that the Patriots are not likely to be vindicated in the court of public opinion. And I would expect that he will be proven correct.
As I posted a few days ago, at best, they are The A-Team.
CNN has picked up on the Rice admission.BannedbyNYYFans.com said:Jerry Rice should have an * placed next to his HOF bust, apparently. Oh, and throw out those two SB rings, Charles Haley.
Complete article. Of course Florio never put it on the front page of PFT....
Eh. Even if that is true, who really cares?pc33 said:I haven't seen mention here and don't know how to post a link. Chris Carter's son Duron signed with INDY the day after the superbowl. probably had the deal in place well beforehand and may have had something to do with Carters rants.
SumnerH said:
There's a difference between being confident in an opinion and writing off the league report ahead of time as bullshit if it contradicts you. It's reasonable to ask what you've seen so far that would inspire the latter.
Stitch01 said:I think we are all talking past each other. When I say "whatever bullshit is in the league report" I'm not saying there's nothing they could put in the report to show the Pats have cheated. I'm saying that because I don't think BB, Brady and Kraft are idiots or liars, I'm confident there isn't going to be any hard evidence in the league report. If the league want to dress the report up in bullshit about how an old guy took a piss and there was a ball under the limit so blah, blah, blah integrity blah blah lower burden of proof we are taking a third round pick, whatever. They could put in the league report video of the Colts deflating the footballs and the narrative that the Pats cheated isn't going to change among the muppets. Good for them, guarantee you I've had more fun watching football my entire adult life.
I've already said I could be naive and they all could be lying and I could be proven wrong, but going all in on fighting such a stupid minor infraction without knowing what happened would be a dumb and dishonest move by people who usually arent very dumb and dishonest. Since we have exactly as much evidence that the Colts did anything wrong as that the Patriots deflated the balls at this point and the bar for accusations has been set so low on this by, oh, every media outlet ever, fuck it, Colts cheated Pats are innocent. Come at me bro.
My guess? Based on the BB press conference, where he twice said something like "we told the refs to inflate the balls to 12.5 psi and then they did whatever they did" was that the Pats under inflated some balls and they were never inflated to 12.5. That's not against the rules and almost certainly common practice. League wants to slap a penalty on the Pats for that? Whatever, the league is run by morons. Still would be confident the Pats did nothing wrong if that's the outcome of the report.
soxhop411 said:
PatriotsSB50 @PatriotsSB49 2m2 minutes ago
Schefter on @WEEI today said there are people around the league who sincerely believe the Colts tampered with the intercepted football.
HA!
E5 Yaz said:Schefter interview
http://media.weei.com/a/101661717/adam-schefter-espn-on-super-bowl-xlix-2-6-15.htm
Sounds to me like he acknowledges that this version of what happened is out there ... but nothing in his tone suggests it's the prominent theory
It falls into the category of acknowledging there are people out there who believe the Patriots have cheated in every game Belichick ever coached
E5 Yaz said:
No mention of what Schefter said on EEI
ed: Schefter, fwiw, hasn't bothered to tweet what he said on EEI.
JimBoSox9 said:
Here's the 'full' Schefter quote:
It doesn't sound to me like he's implying this theory has any more weight than the one being espoused by your local bartender. It sounds like he's trying to give a non-answer beyond 'ya everyone has a theory and I've heard that one too'.
I agree with the overall sentiment, but you're not representing the discussion fairly. Almost immediately after the tweet was posted several posters questioned its veracity and whether Schefter's words were being taken out of context. Although several posters said they hoped it was true, I don't think anyone said that it was true, or that the Colts were cheaters. Several people (including yours truly) said that there was no evidence that the Colts had done anything wrong.soxfan121 said:
Twitter sucks. As you can tell from listening to the audio, Schefter "said" this. And used his "holy shit, is this a stupid theory" tone of voice. But...
Hey! Someone actually provided context!!
Then you shitheels spent 50-odd posts ripping him for not being...something.
Just for reference, that's exactly how crazy people run their shit; hear a rumor, turn on the guy who provides a little proof, lather, rinse, repeat.
The lesson here is that when someone SAYS something outrageous...you should listen to the audio to find out he was giving it all the credence of a report that Ferris passed out at a 31 Flavors last night.
Uh....kinda important point for the "Colts did it!" crowd. But whatever, those of you crapping and squatting in this thread for 3 weeks now couldn't care less about facts. You just want something awesome for your echo chamber and innate sense of how much you've been wronged.
HOLY FUCK! JimBoSox9 listened to the audio you guys!! And says the same thing EVERYONE who bothered to hear the audio thought - "this isn't a serious report. This is hogwash."
Thus ends today's "How to Take a Tweet Out of Context" lesson.
CR67dream said:Edit: And I don't give two fucks what fans of other teams or idiots in the media think about it if all we get is a "we don't know what happened" from the NFL. Why should I? Why should any of us? Are we that fucking insecure that we need those idiots to like us? Fuck 'em.
One Red Seat said:You would think that if the NFL did have any smoking gun that they likely would have released it on Parade Day since they spent the 2 weeks leading up to the SB metaphorically pissing on our parade.