MiracleOfO2704 said:Well, they're right on the last line.
Whoever wrote that is obviously too young to remember the 70s and 80s. Enjoy it while we can, kids!
MiracleOfO2704 said:Well, they're right on the last line.
That's just unfair and prejudiced; no special needs kid deserves to be compared to Phins/Jests fans, there's already enough of a stigma associated with special needs.dirtynine said:Dolphins forum bringing it...
bsj said:Cossack to Schefter "You are better off leaving the legal analysis to others"
dirtynine said:Dolphins forum bringing it...
This is my impression as well -- from the "it's just like PEDs" argument to Goodell's enhanced contention in the arbitration decision that Brady was the ringleader of the deflation scheme, it seems, in general, that Berman was largely sympathetic to the "railroading" argument.DennyDoyle'sBoil said:It seems like the lawyers who were advising Goodell didn't do a great job here -- or at least took calculated risks that really backfired. The Pash problem was a trap they fell into. Having Wells' partner appear at the hearing to cross-examine Brady, while the Covington lawyers made objections was unnecessary. And the gamesmanship of jumping to SDNY simultaneously while releasing the decision probably wasn't lost on Berman. I think when a party basically signals to a judge (or in this case a court) "we want you," they run the risk that the judge will bend over backwards to be fair. Although, as Boggs' chicken dinner notes, it might not have mattered.
this one ?Zososoxfan said:If someone could help me track down a gif of Brady looking for hi-fives with a stupid grin on his face (you all know the one) that would be great. Because it perfectly encapsulates what it's like to be Pats fan outside of NE right now.
Jed Zeppelin said:NFL can have its "technicality" complaint all it wants. It doesn't take a fuckin genius to see that if the league had run a clean and open investigation and appeals process that was "technicality-proof" the entire thing would have blown up when an actual independent report wouldn't have fabricated results to get the verdict it was paid to get.
Only took three lines of thought to get to the real heart of the issue. Not bad.
DennyDoyle'sBoil said:It seems like the lawyers who were advising Goodell didn't do a great job here -- or at least took calculated risks that really backfired. The Pash problem was a trap they fell into. Having Wells' partner appear at the hearing to cross-examine Brady, while the Covington lawyers made objections was unnecessary. And the gamesmanship of jumping to SDNY simultaneously while releasing the decision probably wasn't lost on Berman. I think when a party basically signals to a judge (or in this case a court) "we want you," they run the risk that the judge will bend over backwards to be fair. Although, as Boggs' chicken dinner notes, it might not have mattered.
Yep. Used to be an L.A. prosecutor.joe dokes said:Is Roger Cossack a lawyer?
Harry Hooper said:Of course, NESN has been running infomercials this morning.
joe dokes said:Although I don't agree that the forum-shopping had any effect, I would love to be a fly on the wall to see where the lawyers' recommendations and the clients' actions diverge. In-house lawyers for your client can be the litigator's biggest nemesis, given that they often have different goals.
Oh, so much, much more than just a "lawyer". About ten minutes ago, he referred to himself as "a legal expert".joe dokes said:Is Roger Cossack a lawyer?
Cellar-Door said:Yep. Used to be an L.A. prosecutor.
Hopefully with Favre's dick pics.LuckyBen said:Kraft has to be taunting Goodell via text, right?
The lawyers had no choice. They played the hand they were dealt.
Had Wells been involved from the get-go, I'm sure he would have pointed out the potential pitfalls of the NFL's plan of attack, and found ways to foolproof things so the punishment ended up the same by fit within the limits of the CBA.
Goodell should have talked to lawyers before taking a single step toward punishing Brady (or the Patriots). I'm guessing he didn't, and the resulting trail of bullshit was impossible to wash away even with some of the best lawyers in the country trying to help.
Yeah....that's what people who don't think they should actually call themselves lawyers call themselves. Maybe he's just being honest-ish.Oh, so much, much more than just a "lawyer". About ten minutes ago, he referred to himself as "a legal expert".
Might Berman have wanted to stay away from this issue entirely for fear of being overturned? IANAL, but the "evident partiality" issue seems to go directly to the "Sure it sucks, but the players agreed to this" argument -- i.e., the fundamental unfairness of having the administrator of discipline also hear the appeal in the CBA. By sidestepping the issue entirely, isn't Berman essentially not ruling on whether the CBA itself was fair or not but arguing that Goodell failed to abide by the agreement?DennyDoyle'sBoil said:Fantastic! Wish he'd ruled on evident partiality, but the reality is that Brady still has all those arguments available to fight off an NFL appeal. Berman called it just like he saw it at oral argument. Right down the line.
Just so fucking nice someone neutral finally looked at this.
I wonder how many arbitration awards in all the rest of the companies of the U.S. have been vacated in the last two years compared to the NFL.NavaHo said:Yes, Adam Schefter and everyone here should defer to Roger Cossack and Lester Munson's "The arbitrator can do whatever he wants, it's that clear-cut" brand of legal analysis.
PedroKsBambino said:
Agreed---I think it's nearly inconceivable that Covington and Akin did not say to Goodell/Pash "this is a bad idea" at a couple points in this process.
There is nothing we've seen from Goodell that suggests he is able to process complicated advice and make good decisions.
On June 23,2015, an arbitration appeal hearing was conducted before Commissioner (and
Arbitrator) Goodell.
crystalline said:Smart Harvard graduates actually restrain their ego. Moderately intelligent Harvard graduates think they really are very smart compared to everyone else, but they never tell anyone because they know it makes them look bad. And Harvard graduates that are complete idiots brag about it not only to others, but in a proceeding that has a written transcript.
ifmanis5 said:Cossack sounds genuinely pissed. Deflecting everything and wants to see what the 2nd circuit does. Basically sticking his hands in his ears and angrily shouting 'I can't hear you.' What a clown.
DennyDoyle'sBoil said:I guess a postscript to what I said above is that maybe it's premature to criticize the NFL's strategy of going to SDNY until we see what the second circuit might do.
crystalline, on 03 Sept 2015 - 11:10 AM, said:
crystalline said:Smart Harvard graduates actually restrain their ego. Moderately intelligent Harvard graduates think they really are very smart compared to everyone else, but they never tell anyone because they know it makes them look bad. And Harvard graduates that are complete idiots brag about it not only to others, but in a proceeding that has a written transcript.
loshjott said:
That's my thought also. I keep thinking of the final scene of Eight Men Out when the Black Sox are celebrating at the restaurant while Landis is issuing the "banned for life" order.
Are we the Black Sox celebrating prematurely? Or is Berman in the Landis role slapping down Goodell and company.
drleather2001 said:
The lawyers had no choice. They played the hand they were dealt.
Had Wells been involved from the get-go, I'm sure he would have pointed out the potential pitfalls of the NFL's plan of attack, and found ways to foolproof things so the punishment ended up the same by fit within the limits of the CBA.