Yes. His name is Sully.loshjott said:Doesn't every single guy at a Patriots tailgate look like that?
Yes. His name is Sully.loshjott said:Doesn't every single guy at a Patriots tailgate look like that?
Sorry:ipol said:Yup. I only went to St. John's.
drleather2001 said:My comment was actually a fist bump.
Right, that makes much more sense. Wut?riboflav said:So Marshall clarified his remarks saying that he was not opining on Judge Berman's decision to overturn Brady's suspension. Rather, he was merely discussing the preferential treatment shown to Brady (and other white players, especially QBs) by the NFL because he is white.
http://espn.go.com/new-york/nfl/story/_/id/13625356/brandon-marshall-new-york-jets-race-remarks-not-judge-richard-m-berman
ipol said:I honestly thought that Keteyian's piece with Blackler was so powerful that it would substantially change how people thought about the entire episode. I was very fucking wrong. "Well, he's clearly not a scientist," was the most common response.
AB in DC said:
Out of what, all 500 people who saw the interview on Showtime? Or are you going by Youtube comments?
ipol said:
Fair questions. Rationality is long gone. I want the Pats to enter every stadium to Darth Vader's theme.
There is no Rev said:
Darth Vader doesn't really have his own theme, I don't think--he comes in to the Imperial March.
I think you're missing my implicit commentary on the Patriots' paradigm shift of having all the players run out together as a team rather than have individual players be singled out.johnmd20 said:aka Darth Vader's theme.
If CBS had any balls, they would have run the Keteyian's DFG piece on the "real" 60 Minutes, with some promotion, to millions in prime-time, rather than bury it on Showtime. But they do have an interest in not poking the bear too hard or publicly.AB in DC said:
Out of what, all 500 people who saw the interview on Showtime? Or are you going by Youtube comments?
There is no Rev said:May have been too subtle, but I take my Star Wars very seriously.
That article is only okay. It doesn't point out that the Wells report dismissed the refs best recollection of which gauge he used, that the numbers from when the Colts measured the balls on the sideline was in line with where science would expect them to be (not to mention that it was against the rules for the Colts to measure them in the first place), and the rest of the flawed science. I also disagree that most Patriots fans think Brady did something.riboflav said:Rolling Stone article on us, you know... Pats' fans. It features our own Chad Finn. And John Dowd's opening remarks are great.
http://www.rollingstone.com/sports/features/the-persecution-of-patriots-nation-20150910
There are multiple GIF worthy scenes from the video. Such as the commissioner taking a piss on our "spying" equipmentdrleather2001 said:Oh I'm saving that
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/09/12/teams-should-tread-lightly-when-complaining-about-other-teams/?ocid=Yahoo&partner=ya5nbcs[SIZE=15.52px]Here’s the problem with Pittsburgh’s approach: The NFL’s Constitution and Bylaws prohibit teams from airing [/SIZE]out [SIZE=15.52px]dirty laundry regarding other teams. Specifically, Article IX, Section 9.1(C)(4) provides that teams may not “[p]ublicly criticize any member club or its management, personnel, employees, or coaches and/or any football official employed by the League. All complaints or criticism in respect to the foregoing shall be made to the Commissioner only and shall not be publicized directly or indirectly.”[/SIZE]
The league office probably wants all of this to go away quickly, and publicly chasing the Steelers for publicly chastising the Patriots serves only to prolong the story.
Still, the league would be wise at a minimum to circulate a memo reminding all teams of Section 9.1(C)(4). Otherwise, every coach who loses to the Patriots this year will be tempted to blame the outcome not on something the coach or his team failed to do but on something the Patriots supposedly did that violated the rules.
This provision didn't prevent Harbaugh from accusing the Patriots of running illegal plays after the AFC Divisional Game. It's a joke. This is the NFL Roger Goodell has created where whiners and crybabies are rewarded.jacklamabe65 said:
McBride11 said:Oh it is awesome being in Pittt. Any rational response to their cheating accusations is met with some variation of 'well we have 6 super bowls'. Ok sure and how were the steroids back then? Also, you were born the 80s and didnt see the 70s.
But the Steelers - Ravens is the toughest of the tough competition. These days I hope Bane actually does show up and destroy Heinz during the game.
Spot on. And I wonder if contempt for the brainy, precise, strategy driven side of the Pats approach, by the blustering, "smash-mouth football" crowd, is driving some of this idiotic whining/ resentment of them. I've actually encountered otherwise intelligent fans of other teams who deride the Pats for having to resort to "trickery" in order to win, rather than just physically beating teams. It echoes some of the sniping that used to be directed at the 49ers of the 80's and 90's for being a "finesse" team. In both cases it's complete horeshit. The Niners at their core were a very tough, plenty physical team. As have been the Pats during most of this run.dcmissle said:Well then just start a thread. "Who is the biggest baby, Harbaugh or Tomlin?" Don't get bitter -- have fun with it.
It's hilarious really. I have had a front row seat to the testosterone competition between those two teams for 20 years. The mythology is awesome -- we hate each other but we respect each other because we are (the only) manly men playing big boy football.
Yet these two are the biggest crybabies you ever will see -- and it's particularly ridiculous in Tomlin's case because the Pats have consistently curb stomped his teams, sometimes by huge margins, and often after some punk on the Steelers gets mouthy pre-game
Unless being physical and aggressive is the way through which they are cheating. If it's convenient to the narrative of unfairness, they'll cry about the Pats roughing up receivers and Rodney Harrison decapitating people down the middle of the field.cornwalls@6 said:Spot on. And I wonder if contempt for the brainy, precise, strategy driven side of the Pats approach, by the blustering, "smash-mouth football" crowd, is driving some of this idiotic whining/ resentment of them. I've actually encountered otherwise intelligent fans of other teams who deride the Pats for having to resort to "trickery" in order to win, rather than just physically beating teams. It echoes some of the sniping that used to be directed at the 49ers of the 80's and 90's for being a "finesse" team. In both cases it's complete horeshit. The Niners at their core were a very tough, plenty physical team. As have been the Pats during most of this run.
Yes, I think this is very much part of it, underscored by Belichick's Wesleyan background.OilCanShotTupac said:I've also wondered if the perception of/dislike of the Pats nationally as "brainy" and effete is colored by their home.
You know, where all the sissy pointy head pantywaist libruls are from, who aren't real Muricans.
Do the Pats play differently nationally if based in Texas? Probably, at the margins.
Well that is a leap too far. Marv Levy never had any of this crap directed his way. BB is not Jewish, nor, if I had to guess, is any high profile coach on the staff.wiffleballhero said:Yes, I think this is very much part of it, underscored by Belichick's Wesleyan background.
I also fear that you can go even further with this point and say that part of the hostility to the Pats is coded antisemitism.
dcmissle said:Well that is a leap too far. Marv Levy never had any of this crap directed his way. BB is not Jewish, nor, if I had to guess, is any high profile coach on the staff.
Bill Walsh and John Madden played their college football at the College of San Mateo, with Walsh later transferring to a slightly higher profile college. Both were very bright coaches. Walsh is often regarded as a synonym for genius.drleather2001 said:It is absolutely in part because Belichick is "smart" and a guy who never played real football. That and Brady being a pretty boy.
These are supposed to be the type of guys that FOOTBALL PLAYERS stuff into lockers, not lose games to.