#DFG: Canceling the Noise

Is there any level of suspension that you would advise Tom to accept?


  • Total voters
    208

Hoya81

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 3, 2010
8,494

Ben Volin
Ben Volin – Verified account ‏@BenVolin

Troy Vincent today whe I asked him to clarify what "no violations" means:ImageUploadedBySons of Sam Horn1458242764.358475.jpg
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,481
Vincent's a fucking idiot with only the slightest grasp on the English language so who knows what he means but that reads like they didn't actually test any balls at any point.
 

DaDudeAbides

Euthyphro
Jul 31, 2015
7
Yeah, reads as if they either didn't measure the footballs or they measured the footballs and didn't like the results.

Guy is a moron, but smart enough to completely ignore the question regarding if any balls were under 12.5
 

RIFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
3,090
Rhode Island

Ben Volin
Ben Volin – Verified account ‏@BenVolin

Troy Vincent today whe I asked him to clarify what "no violations" means:View attachment 1836
In other words, they are positioning themselves that the fact that the ideal gas doesn't matter and the Patriots' penalities are not for the underinflation, but the process issues where McNally took the balls without explicit approval and went into the bathroom with them where evidence shows he tampered with the balls even if there was no substantial deflation at the time. This would be a ridiculous argument since the Wells report went to great lengths to "explain" that the balls could not have ended at the PSI they were. Taking the ideal gas law out of play as a defense removes the most conclusive evidence that nothing happened to the balls and shuts down any talk of giving back the picks. (Of course, Vincent is a known idiot and is probably still unaware of the IGL and isn't calculating enough to go with that as a plan.)
 

RIFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
3,090
Rhode Island
Let's not pretend that Troy Vincent is making any decisions of consequence with regard to this case and how it has been or was handled.

Edit: to RIFan
Oh I agree with you, a far more devious and calculating person would couch everything they say in regards to this whole nightmare. Vincent is not that person. He is speaking from a cue card with instructions not to make things worse.
 

Average Reds

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 24, 2007
35,413
Southwestern CT
Oh I agree with you, a far more devious and calculating person would couch everything they say in regards to this whole nightmare. Vincent is not that person. He is speaking from a cue card with instructions not to make things worse.
Kind of stunning that he still finds a way to muck things up.
 

NortheasternPJ

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 16, 2004
19,340
In other words, they are positioning themselves that the fact that the ideal gas doesn't matter and the Patriots' penalities are not for the underinflation, but the process issues where McNally took the balls without explicit approval and went into the bathroom with them where evidence shows he tampered with the balls even if there was no substantial deflation at the time. This would be a ridiculous argument since the Wells report went to great lengths to "explain" that the balls could not have ended at the PSI they were. Taking the ideal gas law out of play as a defense removes the most conclusive evidence that nothing happened to the balls and shuts down any talk of giving back the picks. (Of course, Vincent is a known idiot and is probably still unaware of the IGL and isn't calculating enough to go with that as a plan.)
Thank god they didn't "randomly" audit the Pats game against the Chiefs when the refs forgot them at the hotel, didn't notice until an hour after the time they were supposed to check it and had the State Police escort go get them. INTEGRITY!
 

djbayko

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
25,948
Los Angeles, CA
So after making a huge deal out of ball pressure, they didn't even follow their own revised procedures...in Year 1?

At designated games, selected at random, the game balls used in the first half, will be collected by the kicking ball coordinator (KBC) at halftime and the league's security representative will escort the KBC to the locker room.

During halftime, the balls from both teams will be inspected and the PSI results will be measured and recorded by the two designated members of the crew who inspected them during the pregame. Once measured, those game balls will then be secured by the security representative and removed from play. The backup balls will then be used for the second half.
 

djbayko

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
25,948
Los Angeles, CA
They don't want to know, and they certainly don't want to create an evidentiary trail that will unmask them as the fools that we know them to be.
Right, so they should have been a bit smarter about how they designed their new procedure. I thought there was no way they would deviate from it, given the attention. They even gave themselves an out by saying it would only be done in randomly selected games, but they can't even admit to following that much.
 

yecul

appreciates irony very much
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 8, 2001
18,482
Where did he say that they didn't test the psi? My read is that they are very specifically speaking to the procedures here in order to make a statement about no violations. They can say that and be truthful. They just aren't being terribly honest about it not pertaining to psi as the vast majority would read it. We all know what the psi readings indicated and 1 we won't get the numbers and 2 they won't address it.
 

djbayko

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
25,948
Los Angeles, CA
Where did he say that they didn't test the psi? My read is that they are very specifically speaking to the procedures here in order to make a statement about no violations. They can say that and be truthful. They just aren't being terribly honest about it not pertaining to psi as the vast majority would read it. We all know what the psi readings indicated and 1 we won't get the numbers and 2 they won't address it.
Yes, he didn't say they didn't test the PSI, but we're pointing out how transparently deceptive all of their statements are. If all they have to do to make sure that there are no violations is have a ball handling procedure, then there would be no need to randomly test the balls at halftime.

There was also a ball handling procedure in place last year, and that (allegedly) didn't prevent misconduct.
 

edmunddantes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2015
4,737
Cali
Ummm... I'd like to see that letter to see the hoops and loops he parsed his sentence about Tom not talking about ball inflation with Jastremski through.
 

Average Reds

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 24, 2007
35,413
Southwestern CT
If he has to defend himself to thr 2nd circuit against the allegations, does that means it has enough legs to potentially damage his case?
Only the judges themselves know how much weight they will give it, but by definition, it has that potential.

Writing a letter explaining that the portion of your argument that was clearly fabricated wasn't really a lie is not a good look.
 
Last edited:

edmunddantes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2015
4,737
Cali
Here is a tweet with the letter in it.


Blecker got under his skin a bit. Surprising, but not unexpected when someone calls you a liar.
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,481
This whole thing is just an exercise in finding out how many ways the league and its lawyers can parse language to the point that it's meaningless.
 

allstonite

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 27, 2010
2,491
Isn't there a huge difference between the conversations "exclusively" about ball prep and "primarily" about ball prep considering it's one of the reasons he's being punished becauseRoger didn't find it credible that Brady would talk "exclusively" about it when he never said that. Isn't that the entire argument Blecker (among others) made? Doesn't seem like an immaterial distinction there.
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,481
Isn't there a huge difference between the conversations "exclusively" about ball prep and "primarily" about ball prep considering it's one of the reasons he's being punished becauseRoger didn't find it credible that Brady would talk "exclusively" about it when he never said that. Isn't that the entire argument Blecker (among others) made? Doesn't seem like an immaterial distinction there.
Yeah but deference.
 

pappymojo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2010
6,680
The conclusion that the unprecedented discussion and meeting focused on the deflation allegations is the unhelpful inference that Mr. Brady’s Super Bowl preparation explanation was designed to avoid. Thus, what is relevant is that the Commissioner rejected as not credible the only innocent explanation Mr. Brady offered. Such a finding not only is entitled to deference but underscores that Mr. Brady’s credibility was front and center in the appeal before the Commissioner, which was the point of the colloquy at oral argument.
Italics are from the letter itself.

Is he suggesting that if Brady had discussed the deflation charges with Jastremski prior to the Super Bowl it would not have been innocent and would only be the work of a guilty party? What the fuck?
 

edmunddantes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2015
4,737
Cali
How did Blecker get his hands on the confidential note from Goldberg to Clement? Was it filed with the court as a normal course of business or did someone on the Pats feed it to him?
 

Hoya81

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 3, 2010
8,494
No surprise here:

Judy Battista
Judy Battista – Verified account ‏@judybattista

An NFL source on Patriots request to get draft pick back. "Zero chance."
2:15 PM - 21 Mar 2016
 

SeoulSoxFan

I Want to Hit the World with Rocket Punch
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
22,102
A Scud Away from Hell
Per Goodell's press conference this morning:

@AlbertBreer Roger Goodell said he responded to Pats owner Robert Kraft's letter two weeks ago -- "There'll be no changes to the discipline."

Yeah, seriously, go fuck off.
 

PaulinMyrBch

Don't touch his dog food
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 10, 2003
8,316
MYRTLE BEACH!!!!
Does anyone really believe Goodell would hedge an inch on his bad science with the Brady litigation still in process? He's not going to voluntarily admit he wasted $12m of the owners money. No shock here.
 

H78

Fists of Millennial Fury!
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2009
4,613
I honestly view him as a conduit to what all the owners are telling him behind closed doors.

Goodell is awful by association, but the other 31 owners letting this happen for no reason other than they're sore losers is the real problem.

If all 31 stood up and asked, "Roger, did IGL prove to be a factor in football PSI levels in 2015?"

And Goodell responds, "Yes."

And the owners said, "Then they didn't do anything wrong, let's not ruin competitive balance in the league because of a false accusation."

This wouldn't be an issue anymore.

The other owners want to penalize the Patriots because they've been too good for too long. That's at the root of what's happening here. These DG team sanctions need to be referred to as "Excessive Dominance Sanctions." That's what they are; it has really little to do with Goodell at the end of the day. He's just a puppet; a figurehead. We can't lose track of how important it is to realize that.
 

pappymojo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2010
6,680
I honestly view him as a conduit to what all the owners are telling him behind closed doors.

Goodell is awful by association, but the other 31 owners letting this happen for no reason other than they're sore losers is the real problem.

If all 31 stood up and asked, "Roger, did IGL prove to be a factor in football PSI levels in 2015?"

And Goodell responds, "Yes."

And the owners said, "Then they didn't do anything wrong, let's not ruin competitive balance in the league because of a false accusation."

This wouldn't be an issue anymore.

The other owners want to penalize the Patriots because they've been too good for too long. That's at the root of what's happening here. These DG team sanctions need to be referred to as "Excessive Dominance Sanctions." That's what they are; it has really little to do with Goodell at the end of the day. He's just a puppet; a figurehead. We can't lose track of how important it is to realize that.
I agree with most of this, but would add that it was the cronies under Goodell who made the initial mistakes. Goodell backed up his guys and then took any questions about the process as a personal insult.
 

H78

Fists of Millennial Fury!
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2009
4,613
But I think he's been so adamant about protecting the "process" they used because other owners are telling him, "Stick it to Kraft this time! We don't care about scientific evidence, we just KNOW they cheated!" And because Kraft is only 1 of 32, Goodell is going to do what'll please the other 31 before giving a damn about Kraft, The Patriots, or their fans. That's how he keeps his job forever.

It's gutless, but it's Corporate America at its finest.
 
Last edited:

H78

Fists of Millennial Fury!
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2009
4,613
Agreed. I've been waiting to see which writer was going to step up with the headline "Don't blame Goodell, blame the 31 sour grapes"
 

PaulinMyrBch

Don't touch his dog food
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 10, 2003
8,316
MYRTLE BEACH!!!!
I think its the opposite. I think the owners for large part, don't have this issue at the top of their radar. Those that do are more than happy for Roger to take bullets for the NFL. They truly don't give a shit about something that doesn't effect their franchise and they're not even aware enough to realize they could be next. I think if enough owners really understood the IGL, the investigation, etc., they would be slowly forming a voice of reason and pressuring Goodell to get it right. It's not happening and the fact that a bunch of billionaires don't give a shit is the main reason.