Import78 said:He should be there in effigy.
Nah, Pats fans need to be the ones holding themselves to a higher standard
Import78 said:He should be there in effigy.
PedroKsBambino said:
I think going out alone for the coin-toss makes sense. If he's not otherwise planning to play why risk anything?
Second the motion. Comments are scathing with very little name calling.Don Buddin's GS said:Once again, the comments section of Lester's POS opinions are pure comedy gold.
I resemble that remark.JimD said:The folks who were advising Brady to accept some form of punishment and 'get it over with' are like the schlubs on 'Deal or No Deal' who would panic after having a few cases going against them and accept a $30,000 offer, only to watch the hot babe open up their case and see '$500,000' or '$750,000'.
Goodell: You're suspended. I'm in charge here.
Brady, placing an open hand on Goodell's shoulder: Do you feel in charge?
Goodell, sweating: I've paid you a small fortune.
Brady: And this gives you... power over me?
Com. Goodell: Who paid you to deflate the ball?
[No answer, the comissioner fires his gun away from the Jastremski’s head]
Com. Goodell: He didn’t fly so good!
[pulls the ball boy back into the plane]
Com. Goodell: Who wants to try next?
[grabs Julian Edelman]
Com. Goodell: Tell me about Brady! Why does he wear the mask? A lot of loyalty, for a free agent!
Helmeted figure: Or perhaps he’s wondering why someone would suspend a man for four games before throwing him out of a plane?
Com. Goodell: At least you can talk. Who are you?
Helmeted figure: It doesn’t matter who we are, what matters is our plan.
[the Comissioner removes the helmet, revealing Tom Brady]
Tom Brady: No one cared who I was until I put on the rings.
Com. Goodell: If I pull those off, would you die?
Tom Brady: It would be extremely painful.
Com. Goodell: You’re a big guy!
Tom Brady: For you.
Com. Goodell: Was getting caught part of your plan?
Tom Brady: Of course… D'Qwell Jackson refused our offer in favor of yours, we had to find out what he told you.
D'Qwell: Nothing! I said nothing!
Com. Goodell: Well, congratulations! You got yourself caught! Now what’s the next step in your master plan?
Tom Brady: Winning the superbowl… with no shurvivorsh!
Link not working.Don Buddin's GS said:E5 Yaz, on 03 Sept 2015 - 2:46 PM, said:
Ladies and germs, Lester Munson:
http://espn.go.com/e...r-munson-writes
Once again, the comments section of Lester's POS opinions are pure comedy gold.
Don Buddin's GS said:Once again, the comments section of Lester's POS opinions are pure comedy gold.
Would be a lot funnier if the Pats box said "Those who are right"Pandemonium67 said:
j44thor said:
Shotgun snap to RB draw, don't see much risk in that. About as much risk in walking out to the coin toss by himself.
Extra tasty that they are playing the Mara's tonight. Wonder if we will get any shots of the visiting owners booth.
Ouch. That's not fair to Trent RichardsonE5 Yaz said:
I like this one:
Tyler King ·
Oklahoma State University College of Osteopathic Medicine Alumni
Munson is the nickleback/ trent richardson of the reporting/ legal world
Shelterdog said:
As long as Suggs isn't playing.
I know it was just a joke about Bradford getting smashed with a draw out of a shotgun snap.j44thor said:
He isn't and their best pass rusher is out, not that he would lay a hand on Brady either way.
At this stage it would only be a notice of appeal, not the actual appellate briefs, unless they are seeking a stay.GregHarris said:NFL appeal filed. Can't find the doc yet.
https://twitter.com/MikeGarafolo/status/639508886995771392"]1m1soxhop411 said:
And I followed up with a joke about JPP missing part of his hand, my sarcasm raises your sarcasm.Shelterdog said:I know it was just a joke about Bradford getting smashed with a draw out of a shotgun snap.
All true except, to quote Shefter, his job is not in jeopardy. The owners see #DFG as just an annoyance, not a tipping point like Ray Rice could have been.lambeau said:Kudos to the SOSH lawyers who got this right--that despite all the deference to arbitrators, Roger had crossed over into tyranny.
Considering that Doty cited the same language of "own brand of industrial justice" from another case, I would think this really empowers the NFLPA going forward. Kessler has Roger's number, played things beautifully, and I would think at least some owners might recognize Roger is over his head, as someone mentioned.
Delicious.nattysez said:3 hours of "Where is Roger?" chants sounds about right.
This is good. Well done.NWsoxophile said:Is he sending Troy Vincent in his stead?
j44thor said:And I followed up with a joke about JPP missing part of his hand, my sarcasm raises your sarcasm.
Kenny F'ing Powers said:Fuck you, Robert. Notice he blames it all on the lawyers?
Don Buddin's GS said:E5 Yaz, on 03 Sept 2015 - 2:46 PM, said:
Ladies and germs, Lester Munson:
http://espn.go.com/espn/otl/story/_/id/13572474/nfl-appeal-tom-brady-decision-lead-precedent-setting-court-ruling-lester-munson-writes
Once again, the comments section of Lester's POS opinions are pure comedy gold.
Goodell, in contrast to his bungling of the Rice, Peterson and Bountygate investigations, led a process that produced a solid investigation.
I'll start it from sec 325.nattysez said:3 hours of "Where is Roger?" chants sounds about right.
Brady and Bonds went to the same high school in San Mateo, CA.soxhop411 said:“@BarryBonds: Congratulations to #TomBrady on today’s decision. Best of luck this season, Tom. [emoji458]”
Kliq said:
Munson actually writes this line:.
Quote
Goodell, in contrast to his bungling of the Rice, Peterson and Bountygate investigations, led a process that produced a solid investigation.
You can do what I'm doing, start on my legal brief suing the NFL for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.djhb20 said:So serious question-
What am I supposed to do now? I mean, I haven't worked in months because I've done nothing but read and reload the two threads.
I'm thoroughly confused...
Jed Zeppelin said:I'm sure this was already the case, but after this result I can't imagine the lengths the NFL will go to keep the results of this season's ball-testing under wraps.
I'm guessing many local reporters will do this on their own -- certainly it'll happen in Boston and when the Pats are on the road. I'm not sure how they'll get the locker room temps right (maybe just do it in the press box) but isn't this sort of tailor-made for local news teams that need something to talk about?geoduck no quahog said:Don't know about that, but it's curious that the NFL will pick "random" games to test the footballs at halftime and end of game.
This would be rational. But, and I think it's been lost in all this, I believe Walt Anderson reads the rule book and did HIS job before the AFCCG. I believe he measured the PSI in the footballs (as required). I'll bet, even, that every ref did this before games. Whether it matters, the rules call for it, so they did it. I think that's noteworthy.nighthob said:The rational response to this new knowledge would be to say "You know what, this has obviously been going from the start, and it doesn't seem to have made a difference, so screw it" Alas the NFL is presently run by fucking idiots so they're doubling down on the stupidty.
Of course we are. The fans will have a ball, but the coach -- and therefore the team -- are going to do what he thinks is necessary to win another Super Bowl.Al Zarilla said:Nope. We're on to normalcy.
Which games do they decide to forfeit? 4 random games? All 16 plus playoffs and Super Bowl? The answer is no.Reggie's Racquet said:Here is my concern.
Tom plays this season.
The league appeals and eventually wins.
Maybe even after we win another Superbowl.
The league makes the Patriots forfeit the games Tom has played in.
If there is a chance this could happen I wouldn't set foot on the field unless the league agrees to not make them forfeit any games.
Reggie's Racquet said:Here is my concern.
Tom plays this season.
The league appeals and eventually wins.
Maybe even after we win another Superbowl.
The league makes the Patriots forfeit the games Tom has played in.
If there is a chance this could happen I wouldn't set foot on the field unless the league agrees to not make them forfeit any games.
Reggie's Racquet said:Here is my concern.
Tom plays this season.
The league appeals and eventually wins.
Maybe even after we win another Superbowl.
The league makes the Patriots forfeit the games Tom has played in.
If there is a chance this could happen I wouldn't set foot on the field unless the league agrees to not make them forfeit any games.
Get some restReggie's Racquet said:Here is my concern.
Tom plays this season.
The league appeals and eventually wins.
Maybe even after we win another Superbowl.
The league makes the Patriots forfeit the games Tom has played in.
If there is a chance this could happen I wouldn't set foot on the field unless the league agrees to not make them forfeit any games.
Something like that happened to Pete Carroll, but that was the NCAAReggie's Racquet said:Here is my concern.
Tom plays this season.
The league appeals and eventually wins.
Maybe even after we win another Superbowl.
The league makes the Patriots forfeit the games Tom has played in.
This is an irony worth repeating.snowmanny said:It's nice that the NFL went after Brady for not being forthcoming with requested documentation and the Patriots for withholding witnesses and they were beaten in court (in part) because they were not forthcoming with requested documentation and withheld a witness. Anything Brady/Pats supposedly did the NFL actually did, even worse.