Divisional Weekend Gamethread

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
Kliq said:
I couldn't imagine being a San Diego fan. They didn't come out to play this game at all, and they somehow still have a chance to make a run at the game and they fuck that up in  horrific fashion. A joke of a performance by their defense in the 4th quarter.
Life as SD can through different coaching regimes.

Don't be too dismissive on the defense. We have been on the wrong side of 3rd and 17 conversions more times than I care to recall
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,171
Here
Reggie's Racquet said:
If you call the timeout on the other side of the 2 min you save 30 seconds...not 2 seconds...right?
 
Not really, since you run an extra play by calling it with 2 seconds left.
 

finnVT

superspreadsheeter
SoSH Member
Jul 12, 2002
2,154
johnmd20 said:
 
Yes. Time is at a premium here. They saved 2 seconds with that TO.
What?  No, they were going to call the timeout regardless. 
 
Look, there are two plays, one of which is followed by a TO, one of which is followed by the 2 minute warning.  You can do it in either order.  Having the TO one first saves a couple seconds compared to the other, by either way you're using a TO.  It's not that complicated.
 
edit: sorry, probably quoting the wrong one for this, i think johnmd20 is making the same point.
 

Helmet Head

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
4,626
Central Mass
San Diego would have won it if they weren't so conservative on offense until the 4th. What a fuck up that is. San Diego has the weapons to expose Denver all day down field but they decide to try to
establish the run with a gimpy Matthews and Woodhead for 3 quarters with no success. Idiotic


I think Denver was pretty average today.
 

brandonchristensen

Loves Aaron Judge
SoSH Member
Feb 4, 2012
38,569
Can't wait for the Manning narrative about how his playoff performances were overstated and that this is a new Manning and blah blah blha.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,086
I don't even understand what's going on.  You can't use the timeout with 2:02 left.  You let it run to the 2 minute warning, then you have them run a play, and then you use a timeout.  Then they run another play, and you use your second one.  If you stop them on third down, you get the ball back without about a minute left.  By using that timeout before the two minute warning, the absolute best case scenario is you get it back with 20-30 seconds.  It makes no sense.
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
13,742
Deathofthebambino said:
You guys are missing the point.  They used a timeout to save two seconds. 
 
They made them run a play before the 2 minute warning.  That's the equivalent of saving 40 seconds after the minute warning.
 
Game over.... they didn't have a chance after that moronic 3rd and 17 coverage.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,171
Here
San Diego deserved to lose this one. They didn't show up and attack the Denver defense until it was way too late. Brady and company could put up 35 plus on this defense next week no doubt.
 

Dogman

Yukon Cornelius
Moderator
SoSH Member
Mar 19, 2004
15,201
Missoula, MT
Deathofthebambino said:
I don't even understand what's going on.  You can't use the timeout with 2:02 left.  You let it run to the 2 minute warning, then you have them run a play, and then you use a timeout.  Then they run another play, and you use your second one.  If you stop them on third down, you get the ball back without about a minute left.  By using that timeout before the two minute warning, the absolute best case scenario is you get it back with 20-30 seconds.  It makes no sense.
 
 
That was their last TO before the 2 minute.
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
13,742
Deathofthebambino said:
I don't even understand what's going on.  You can't use the timeout with 2:02 left.  You let it run to the 2 minute warning, then you have them run a play, and then you use a timeout.  Then they run another play, and you use your second one.  If you stop them on third down, you get the ball back without about a minute left.  By using that timeout before the two minute warning, the absolute best case scenario is you get it back with 20-30 seconds.  It makes no sense.
 
You're not thinking it through. Take a deep breath, go through the scenario to completion, and then get back to us.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,171
Here
They aren't the 1 and 2 seeds, but these are the 2 best teams in each conference. YOu rarely get that.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
Deathofthebambino said:
I don't even understand what's going on.  You can't use the timeout with 2:02 left.  You let it run to the 2 minute warning, then you have them run a play, and then you use a timeout.  Then they run another play, and you use your second one.  If you stop them on third down, you get the ball back without about a minute left.  By using that timeout before the two minute warning, the absolute best case scenario is you get it back with 20-30 seconds.  It makes no sense.
They only had one TO left. The problem calling TO was it let Denver pass with impunity since the clock stopped. Doesn't matter clock wise
 

smastroyin

simpering whimperer
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2002
20,684
So next week is there any chance the Patriots don't put up at least 6 scores?
 
That Denver secondary can't hold coverage very long.  If the Patriots can hold the pass rush, the Broncos don't have a chance to stop them.
 

scottyno

late Bloomer
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2008
11,342
Deathofthebambino said:
I don't even understand what's going on.  You can't use the timeout with 2:02 left.  You let it run to the 2 minute warning, then you have them run a play, and then you use a timeout.  Then they run another play, and you use your second one.  If you stop them on third down, you get the ball back without about a minute left.  By using that timeout before the two minute warning, the absolute best case scenario is you get it back with 20-30 seconds.  It makes no sense.
no because you use the timeout at 2:02, play 1 runs the clock down to the 2 minute warning, on play 2 you use your 2nd timeout at about 1:50 then play 3 runs the clock down to 1-1:10. You're saving a few seconds, but trading that denver can run whatever it wants without worrying about the clock.
 

ivanvamp

captain obvious
Jul 18, 2005
6,104
johnmd20 said:
Yes. Time is at a premium here. They saved 2 seconds with that TO.
I don't really get it.

Scenario 1 - use the TO at 2:02. Denver then runs another play, two minute warning sounds at, say, 1:58. One time out used, one play run, 4 seconds run off the clock.

Scenario 2 - let the clock go down to the two minute warning. Denver then runs another play that takes the same four seconds, then call time out at 1:56. One time out used, one play run, six seconds run off the clock.

Scenario 1 saves more time, using the same number of time outs.
 

H78

Fists of Millennial Fury!
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2009
4,613
Peyton's face looks like it's gradually melting as he gets older.
 

Leather

given himself a skunk spot
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
28,451
So next week is there any chance the Patriots don't put up at least 6 scores?

That Denver secondary can't hold coverage very long. If the Patriots can hold the pass rush, they don't have a chance.


Well, every other pass in the first half won't be to Woodhead, so that's a start.
 

redsoxcentury

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
2,220
NYC
smastroyin said:
So next week is there any chance the Patriots don't put up at least 6 scores?
 
That Denver secondary can't hold coverage very long.  If the Patriots can hold the pass rush, the Broncos don't have a chance to stop them.
They seemed to have an issue with the Chargers' hurry up offense too.  That works in the Patriots favor
 
Dec 10, 2012
6,943
radsoxfan said:
 
You're not thinking it through. Take a deep breath, go through the scenario to completion, and then get back to us.
He's thinking it through
 
Do you really think 2:02 with zero timeouts is better than 2:00 with 1 timeout?
 
take a breath. Then get back to us.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,171
Here
RIrooter09 said:
Over/under on BS calls in Manning's favor next week?
 
I'm actually hoping that horrible call was buzzed in and overturned by the NFL today, so that there will be some sort of oversight against the really shitty stuff.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,024
Mansfield MA
Do you think Belichick went home after the game last night, said, "We've already played Denver and know what to expect," decided to watch some Chargers film, and then shut it off after 15 minutes thinking "there's no way the Broncos will lose to these assholes?"
 

DaughtersofDougMirabelli

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 17, 2006
3,016
Dan to Theo to Ben said:
He's thinking it through
 
Do you really think 2:02 with zero timeouts is better than 2:00 with 1 timeout?
 
take a breath. Then get back to us.
 
Sigh.
 
In you first scenario there has been a play run already. In your second no play has been run. They are completely equal. 
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
13,742
This upcoming game would be so epic with Gronk, Hernandez, Dobson, Wilfork, and Mayo playing.
 
As it is, still very excited for it, but a Pats win would be a pretty huge upset.