Edwin Diaz stays in Queens

koufax32

He'll cry if he wants to...
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2006
9,108
Duval
Do the Mets understand this is an MLB contract and not an NFL one?
Wow.

Putting that much $ into a RP is crazy. I can maybe see it if I squint enough and it’s a relief ace who pitches 100 innings, but even then…

Cohen is going to do aTop Gun style flyby of the LT thresholds this off-season, isn’t he?
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,511
Wayyy to much for a RP. given how volatile they are. Just ask chapman or Kimbrel
 

BigJay

New Member
Jul 22, 2022
86
Whew. Dodged a bullet there. Way to much for a Closer/RP. Especially in the modern era, where RP tend to flame out after 3-4 good years.
 

AlNipper49

Huge Member
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 3, 2001
44,902
Mtigawi
Ouch. I get that he’s a top tier fan favorite but we are talking contracts that could cripple them for a decade.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,248
I don't get the surprise. Adjusted for inflation, this is what it costs when an elite closer is a FA. For better or for worse.
 

snowmanny

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
15,763
I don't get the surprise. Adjusted for inflation, this is what it costs when an elite closer is a FA. For better or for worse.
Has any RP had a contract close to this? I’m having trouble finding more than $60,000,000 guaranteed but maybe I’m missing someone.

mph I am dead wrong.
Chapman $86 mill
Jansen $80 mill

probably others.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,193
The Chapman contract would have been good if NY had let him go when he opted out after three years (after 2019), but instead they gave him an additional year (meaning three remaining) and that second deal was pretty bad.
 

Gdiguy

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
6,261
San Diego, CA
There’s some ancillary things going on here -

1) the Mets have had huge problems with their bullpen in recent years; if you have someone who’s been great, why leave that to take a random shot on the free agent market (and you’re probably still overpaying on that shot anyway)

2) if DeGrom leaves (especially if as rumored simply because he wants to be closer to home), I think the optics would be really bad to then also have the bullpen take a hit just over $
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,193
There’s some ancillary things going on here -

1) the Mets have had huge problems with their bullpen in recent years; if you have someone who’s been great, why leave that to take a random shot on the free agent market (and you’re probably still overpaying on that shot anyway)

2) if DeGrom leaves (especially if as rumored simply because he wants to be closer to home), I think the optics would be really bad to then also have the bullpen take a hit just over $
Also they have a ton of other bullpen FAs, they have a lot of work to do there:

Adam Ottavino, Seth Lugo, Trevor May, Joely Rodríguez, and Tommy Hunter are all FAs.
 

Yelling At Clouds

Post-darwinian
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
3,441
I don't get the surprise. Adjusted for inflation, this is what it costs when an elite closer is a FA. For better or for worse.
Yep, I don't think I would have made the deal, but this is what he was going to get. And I'm not so sure it will matter all that much to the Mets, even if he has a few down years. Their owner seems pretty committed to spending regardless of the penalties.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,480
deep inside Guido territory
I don’t get the hand wringing with this contract. Steve Cohen is literally made of money and has shown he doesn’t care about the luxury tax. If this doesn’t work out, he’ll just spend his way out of the mistake.
 

LogansDad

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
29,778
Alamogordo
The next highest current relief pitcher contract is Raisel Iglesias's 4/$58m.

https://www.spotrac.com/mlb/rankings/contract-value/relief-pitcher/

This seems like a dangerous time to be giving a guy who is not nearly as good in odd years a big contract with an opt out.

Odd years - 84 earned runs in 186.2 innings (4.05 ERA)
Even years - 46 earned runs in 212.2 innings (1.95 ERA)
The odd year bads are messed up by an atricously bad 2019, though, which is the only year he has been truly bad.

He's 28 and I think he will be effective through the whole deal. "Worth it" may be a different story, but I don't have major concerns about him being terrible.

Bad
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,094
The odd year bads are messed up by an atricously bad 2019, though, which is the only year he has been truly bad.

He's 28 and I think he will be effective through the whole deal. "Worth it" may be a different story, but I don't have major concerns about him being terrible.

Bad
I mean, even omitting that year he's still at 3.36 in odd years, but it was obviously mostly a joke based on the 1st thing that jumped out at me when I looked at his career numbers.

In terms of "worth it" I think my biggest concern there is that it's a lot of $$$ for a guy who pitches 4% of your innings each year - & to a lesser extent the inconsistency that is inherent in most relief pitchers.
 

LogansDad

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
29,778
Alamogordo
That's totally fair. That said, if you look at his xAVG against, he has been very, very consistent and very, very good every season, even 2019. I'm of the mindset that having that true, shutdown closer allows you to really use the rest of the bullpen in the best way you can, and I believe in Diaz as that guy. I think his value extends to players other than him, as well.

Edit to add: Also, his 2019 season was largely skewed by 4 really, really bad games, including two where he let up 5 ER's in just a third of an inning each. Other than that he was pretty darn solid.