Guy says to customer, "I am going to shit on your head." Customer removes hat and places his head below the guy's ass to make it easier for the guy to hit the target. I dont get the appeal.I saw a clip on twitter where Felger says "we are here to talk about the celts clinching their 18th title, and let you bask in it. We wont try and ruin it too much for you...but the program being what it is I cant promise you anything." That really sums them up perfectly.
I go back and forth...Ill throw them on for a segment on way home from work occasionally. But as entertainment only. There are times where their takes can be such troll jobs to that it's straight up comedy to me. There are also people in my real life (aka not the internet) who spout F&M nonsense as if it's actual knowledge, so it's nice to be able to form the counter arguments ahead of time...which is where SoSH is so valuable!Guy says to customer, "I am going to shit on your head." Customer removes hat and places his head below the guy's ass to make it easier for the guy to hit the target. I dont get the appeal.
Mazz joins Kidd in trying to drive a wedgeGuy says to customer, "I am going to shit on your head." Customer removes hat and places his head below the guy's ass to make it easier for the guy to hit the target. I dont get the appeal.
mazz joins kidd in trying to drive a wedge between tatum and brown the morning after they win the nba championshipGuy says to customer, "I am going to shit on your head." Customer removes hat and places his head below the guy's ass to make it easier for the guy to hit the target. I dont get the appeal.
Was listening for a bit earlier and they played this montage of the Cs coming up short the last couple of seasons and Stephen A calling a Mavs upset. - Remarkably Mazz calling Dallas in six didn't make the cut.Mazz have anything to say today?
Think I was also listening to this segment where he also talked about how it was also weird that after a Pats SB win Brady was immediately featured in an ad talking about the win.and that a Tatum-voiced Nike ad aired as soon as the game ended
They do this in every sport, there used to be 19-0 official Patriots gear that would show up on ebayMade me think a little bit about how (at least this used to be) in baseball they'd have t-shirts made up for the ALCS/ NLCS winners that the players would throw on in the locker room during the party and that the loser's t-shirts would be donated to a 3rd world charity never to be seen again.
These guys are just actors. It really *is* the people listening and regurgitating that are the miserable shits.Don’t turn it on today. Opening segment is talking about Brown and Tatum leaving the Celtics.
TATUM IS A LAKER FAN. HE DOESNT WANT TO BE HERE LONG TERM!
BROWN ISNT HAPPY WITH HIS MARKETING IN BOSTON! IT’S TOUGH BEING THE NUMBER 2.
Gave it 1 day before going full troll.
And reports are saying Tatum is signing a supermax this offseason. It’s not even close to an issue.I don't follow the NBA closely enough to know or understand contracts or their salary cap stuff, but from what I can find Tatum is signed for two more years and Brown is signed for four. How is the universal response to their trolling not "that's a 2026 problem, not a 2024 problem" followed by silence?
agree. This afternoon right now actually Murray and Mazz shitting on Duran. Not a dynamic player. He’s not nearly as good as Judge. Or Bryce Harper. Or Ohtani. So he can’t be an all star. I wonder if either one of them even watches games any more or are smart enough to understand what they are watching if they do. Too bad Shertenlieb isn’t on in the afternoon tooYeah... I now occasionally tune in to see what's going on, and over the past couple of months in particular I've tuned out after about 5 minutes. I've mentioned it before in this thread that I don't think they know fuck-all about basketball. Their takes on other sports are alternately antagonistic, annoying, or contrived but sometimes there may be shred of detail about how the games are played; the basketball/NBA discussion has crossed into being just flat out offensive and disgusting to me. I don't know much about the game at all, but I am interested in style of play, in-game team adjustments, individual player adjustments, team composition, player development, and the commitment to defense as well as offense from a team's stars. F&M are incapable of talking about any of this at even a basic level.
Interpersonal tension will continue to exist because Jaylen Brown's marketing team sucks? Tatum makes too many commercials and it annoys you, so the team dynamic is fragile? Joe Mazz is weird and unorthodox? Fuck outta here with all of that...
What they actually said(Mazz did) is that Duran is a good player but since the Red Sox have been irrelevant in the baseball landscape the last few years he's not getting the recognition. That's all true by the way.agree. This afternoon right now actually Murray and Mazz shitting on Duran. Not a dynamic player. He’s not nearly as good as Judge. Or Bryce Harper. Or Ohtani. So he can’t be an all star. I wonder if either one of them even watches games any more or are smart enough to understand what they are watching if they do. Too bad Shertenlieb isn’t on in the afternoon too
Mazz literally called him a typical 4A playerWhat they actually said(Mazz did) is that Duran is a good player but since the Red Sox have been irrelevant in the baseball landscape the last few years he's not getting the recognition. That's all true by the way.
Mazz couldn't hack it at the Herald.* That's right. The Herald.Mazz literally called him a typical 4A player
He's desperate. A championship in June leaves them nothing to dive into about why it failed and with the Red Sox being sort of decent and a boring Pats team that doesn't start it's preseason for 6 weeks he's got little material to drive up controversy.Felger is insufferable today, but it’s actually funny. You can see him in physical pain over this feeling of joy and happiness in the city today.
dont they start to use vaction time at this pointHe's desperate. A championship in June leaves them nothing to dive into about why it failed and with the Red Sox being sort of decent and a boring Pats team that doesn't start it's preseason for 6 weeks he's got little material to drive up controversy.
True, though Felger still seems to work remote from Nantucketdont they start to use vaction time at this point
Next hour: Looking back on the San Antonio pick swap: was Derrick White really worth it?F&M are national treasures and should be studied for years to come....
They are currently hammering Red Sox ownership for firing/not retaining Cora at the end of the season.
So tomorrow they'll be discussing why Bob Kraft fired Jerod Mayo this coming January? Or perhaps bemoaning that Joe Mazzula should still have his job come June 2025?Just so I'm clear...they were trashing ownership for firing/not retaining him at the end of THIS season. Not a few years ago.
If they are so good at predicting the future why are their sports takes so dogshit?Just so I'm clear...they were trashing ownership for firing/not retaining him at the end of THIS season. Not a few years ago.
I think the more interesting phenomenon is the people listening to them.F&M are national treasures and should be studied for years to come....
It’s the Twitter of terrestrial radio.I think the more interesting phenomenon is the people listening to them.
Guy who gets paid to say outrageous thing said something outrageous and I'm outraged. I'll listen even harder tomorrow to teach him a lesson.
This all started the night before on BST, Shaughnessy was on the panel saying Cora has done a very good job this year, he'll have plenty of options/suitors "IF" the Red Sox do not extend him/fire him.Just so I'm clear...they were trashing ownership for firing/not retaining him at the end of THIS season. Not a few years ago.
It’s always been odd to me that Boston still has a subset of miserable sports writers.. with Borges, McDonough, Shaugnessy it sort of made sense.. but Felger’s career has basically spanned the entirety of Boston winning a ton of titles.. and he somehow stays continuously miserable.. at some point his schtick should wear off.. for me he became irrelevant in 2004. He’s a cheap copy of Dan.This all started the night before on BST, Shaughnessy was on the panel saying Cora has done a very good job this year, he'll have plenty of options/suitors "IF" the Red Sox do not extend him/fire him.
So now Felger had turned that into ownership will fire him/not retain him.
Fellowship of the miserable indeed.
That's pretty complimentary as CHB quotes go. Still don't know how people don't see right through Felger.This all started the night before on BST, Shaughnessy was on the panel saying Cora has done a very good job this year, he'll have plenty of options/suitors "IF" the Red Sox do not extend him/fire him.
I know what you're saying, but I'd argue (and I'm sure Felger would too) that he's not being "miserable" he's simply being a contrarian and that he's just calling bullshit when he sees it. Which, I think to an extent, that's what he does and he's pretty good at doing it. The problem with Felger (and his ilk) is that after a while being a contrarian just to be a contrarian kinda leaves you without a center. Deep down, what does Felger* believe in? Probably nothing, which is fine, except if you're just being a nihilist and saying everything sucks (when there are times when it clearly doesn't) then you sound dumb and more than a little crazy.It’s always been odd to me that Boston still has a subset of miserable sports writers.. with Borges, McDonough, Shaugnessy it sort of made sense.. but Felger’s career has basically spanned the entirety of Boston winning a ton of titles.. and he somehow stays continuously miserable.. at some point his schtick should wear off.. for me he became irrelevant in 2004. He’s a cheap copy of Dan.
Yeah.. at some point it's just not interesting to me. I get that everyone loving the local teams gets boring, but so does always being negative about the local teams.. I get that he's a contrarian, but I can't think of all that many people that I like that are always a contrarian just to be a contrarian. Besides that he also congratulates himself for those takes... saying things like 'I'm not a fanboy' or whatever to try and justify his takes. There's a market for intelligent talk about sports in the Boston area, but nobody is really looking to fill that void.I know what you're saying, but I'd argue (and I'm sure Felger would too) that he's not being "miserable" he's simply being a contrarian and that he's just calling bullshit when he sees it. Which, I think to an extent, that's what he does and he's pretty good at doing it. The problem with Felger (and his ilk) is that after a while being a contrarian just to be a contrarian kinda leaves you without a center. Deep down, what does Felger* believe in? Probably nothing, which is fine, except if you're just being a nihilist and saying everything sucks (when there are times when it clearly doesn't) then you sound dumb and more than a little crazy.
I like writers and commentators like Craig Calcatarra who punches up and cuts through the bullshit. Felger does this sometimes and Shaughnessy does this too, though way less than even Felger.
* My guess is that Felger is not how he acts "in real life". My guess is that if you held Felger down and made him answer you truthfully, he'd tell you that the Michael Felger on air for four hours is a character. He'd also tell you, and I've heard him say this a bunch of times, that a four-hour "We are Family" show is not great for the ratings and he has to heel it up (to use wrestler parlance) for people to engage with him. There's no one better at doing this than Felger and I think that the dude works hard but like you say, he can be a lot.
Like last night on Boston Sports Tonight, he was talking to the Globe's Chris Gasper about the Sox. Felger said that the Sox should unequivically go for it today, start cashing in chips and start preparing for the post season. Gasper said something like, "The Sox had similar records the last two years and crashed and burned. I don't think that the Sox FO is going to go for it." Felger got all pissed off and was yelling at Gasper, "When your team is in position to go to the postseason you have to go for it. You have to." And Gasper was saying that he wasn't wrong but in his opinon, the Sox FO isn't going to do it. He was being subtle but he was agreeing with Felger but saying that the Sox FO doesn't and they're not going to chase a dream with a dumpy team.
Felger wouldn't let it go and Gasper was like, what do you want me to tell you.
It was a pretty interesting discussion and I could see both sides of it. But Felger's pretty good at that, I guess. Better than the other people on the radio in this market anyway.
Which is fine. But there's room for a little bit of We Are Family. And without listening I bet it lasted maybe half of the show after the Celtics won? And then they were on to well, anyone can win one. This is a dynasty? Let's see it. These guys hate each other. (And from listening to Rich he went heavy on the Perkins thing as an example of how dysfunctional it really is over there and these guys are still a bunch of babies. Wahhhh! They said something mean about us Wahhhhh.)He'd also tell you, and I've heard him say this a bunch of times, that a four-hour "We are Family" show is not great for the ratings and he has to heel it up (to use wrestler parlance) for people to engage with him. There's no one better at doing this than Felger and I think that the dude works hard but like you say, he can be a lot.
And if they did that he would immediately go into "why are they trading these guys? We've been told how they need to rebuild the farm system, how can they do that when they keep trading these guys (and draft picks?) Don't they believe in their youth? Which is it? What's the plan?"Like last night on Boston Sports Tonight, he was talking to the Globe's Chris Gasper about the Sox. Felger said that the Sox should unequivically go for it today, start cashing in chips and start preparing for the post season. Gasper said something like, "The Sox had similar records the last two years and crashed and burned. I don't think that the Sox FO is going to go for it." Felger got all pissed off and was yelling at Gasper, "When your team is in position to go to the postseason you have to go for it. You have to." And Gasper was saying that he wasn't wrong but in his opinon, the Sox FO isn't going to do it. He was being subtle but he was agreeing with Felger but saying that the Sox FO doesn't and they're not going to chase a dream with a dumpy team.
One thing to bear in mind is Felger isn't a local guy. He's been in Boston since college but he grew up in Milwaukee. He didn't grow up watching and rooting for the Boston teams. He's only ever interacted with them as a "neutral" member of the press. I can see where his contrarian schtick developed because while there are curmudgeons like Borges and McDonough and Shaughnessy, there are also a lot of homers in the Boston media (particularly radio). He saw his lane as the unbiased outside observer poking at the homers. I think the biggest problem with him is he doesn't have someone to spar with to keep him sharp. I think he needs a homer with a bit of pollyanna-ishness to their point of view. Instead, he's got a fellow curmudgeon as a co-host. So he's gotten lazy and stale, especially in the face of all the success the city has seen.It’s always been odd to me that Boston still has a subset of miserable sports writers.. with Borges, McDonough, Shaugnessy it sort of made sense.. but Felger’s career has basically spanned the entirety of Boston winning a ton of titles.. and he somehow stays continuously miserable.. at some point his schtick should wear off.. for me he became irrelevant in 2004. He’s a cheap copy of Dan.
I don't disagree with any of this. And I agree, aside from maybe 10-20 minutes a day, it's not really interesting to me. What I find kinda perversely interesting is how he takes a positive and spins it into a negative. I don't think it necessarily takes talent, but he's pretty decent at it and it makes me laugh most times.Yeah.. at some point it's just not interesting to me. I get that everyone loving the local teams gets boring, but so does always being negative about the local teams.. I get that he's a contrarian, but I can't think of all that many people that I like that are always a contrarian just to be a contrarian. Besides that he also congratulates himself for those takes... saying things like 'I'm not a fanboy' or whatever to try and justify his takes. There's a market for intelligent talk about sports in the Boston area, but nobody is really looking to fill that void.
I agree. Sports is supposed to be fun and when your team wins or is winning, that's the most fun time to be a fan. But Felger and his ilk suck the joy out of that with their takes, like I said I listen maybe 20 minutes a day, a few times a week. I don't know how someone could turn on TSH or EEI in the morning and listen all day to this shit. I'd stab a knitting needle in my ear by Tuesday.Which is fine. But there's room for a little bit of We Are Family. And without listening I bet it lasted maybe half of the show after the Celtics won? And then they were on to well, anyone can win one. This is a dynasty? Let's see it. These guys hate each other. (And from listening to Rich he went heavy on the Perkins thing as an example of how dysfunctional it really is over there and these guys are still a bunch of babies. Wahhhh! They said something mean about us Wahhhhh.)
And if they did that he would immediately go into "why are they trading these guys? We've been told how they need to rebuild the farm system, how can they do that when they keep trading these guys (and draft picks?) Don't they believe in their youth? Which is it? What's the plan?"
"There's no plan, Mike"
"Right! It's these nerds that are in charge that don't know anything about how the game is actually played"
"The nerds are ruining baseball!"
The only way to win is to not play.
Boston Sports Tonight is pretty good if you're looking for some Felger push back. Michael Holley is probably the most articulate, rational sports voice in the region. Yes, he does have his blind spots, but for the most part he seems like a good dude, with interesting thoughts and knows that it's just sports. He tells Felger that he's full of it all the time and Felger just goes back and moves the goal posts. And Holley tells him he's crazy then and Felger might chuckle. It's better than his radio show where Mazz and Murray roll over for him like good doggies.One thing to bear in mind is Felger isn't a local guy. He's been in Boston since college but he grew up in Milwaukee. He didn't grow up watching and rooting for the Boston teams. He's only ever interacted with them as a "neutral" member of the press. I can see where his contrarian schtick developed because while there are curmudgeons like Borges and McDonough and Shaughnessy, there are also a lot of homers in the Boston media (particularly radio). He saw his lane as the unbiased outside observer poking at the homers. I think the biggest problem with him is he doesn't have someone to spar with to keep him sharp. I think he needs a homer with a bit of pollyanna-ishness to their point of view. Instead, he's got a fellow curmudgeon as a co-host. So he's gotten lazy and stale, especially in the face of all the success the city has seen.
I don't think think Felger is a contrarian if he's just always negative. During times that everyone agrees the the Sox are bad, does he come out shouting about how things aren't as bad as they seem and the fans shouldn't panic?I'd argue (and I'm sure Felger would too) that he's not being "miserable" he's simply being a contrarian and that he's just calling bullshit when he sees it. Which, I think to an extent, that's what he does and he's pretty good at doing it. The problem with Felger (and his ilk) is that after a while being a contrarian just to be a contrarian kinda leaves you without a center.