I mean, it is literally the most viral thing going at the moment. I feel more bad for him in that he is WAY too old to be wearing a hat (it's corny as shit as it is) like that.Just saw a pic of World Class D-Bag Jim Murray from today's show wearing a "Hawk Tuah '24" baseball cap. He's got his finger on the pulse of 2 weeks ago.
No he was wearing it when I turned it on at 5:30I saw something on twitter that suggested that he wasn't wearing the hate anymore at some point during the show. Can anyone confirm? That would be kind of funny if a boss told him to take it the F off.
Ahh, ok. ThanksNo he was wearing it when I turned it on at 5:30
When did he say that? This week?Duran most certainly doesn't look like a 4A player since Mazz called him that
Posted on 6/20.When did he say that? This week?
Shank had a good trivia question- the 6 starting Red Sox All Star Game left fielders since Ted retired.They were mocking the concept of Duran being an All Star. Basically Mazz just listed off the few players he knows off the top of his head as an All Star.
"When I think of an All Star I think of Aaron Judge, Mike Trout, Othani, guys like that"
(There's a significant chance Mazz doesn't know Trout hasn't played in about 10 weeks)
To his "credit" on The Baseball Hour with Carrabis this week he reversed course and said he's an All Star.
I missed 4 and 6 and added TroyShank had a good trivia question- the 6 starting Red Sox All Star Game left fielders since Ted retired.
Yaz, Rice, Manny, Jurassic Carl, Jason Bay and JBJ
I mention the final one here because he wasn't a left fielder, the year he got the nod, Trout was put in center.
He made it twice, but was not in the starting lineup (Jose Canseco in ‘88 and Bo Jackson in ‘89).Greenwell was never an All-Star?
He called Jeremy Jacobs a crook (or something to that effect) in print for the Herald and Jacobs threatened to sue if he wasn't removed from the beat. That's how I remember it, at least.Earlier this week, Felger mentioned that in the late 90's he was "kicked off" the Bruins beat for the Herald. I was not reading a lot of newspapers back then, does anyone have any context around that? I thought he was mostly on the Patriots beat.
First time I ever felt positive reading a sentence about something Jeremy Jacobs did.He called Jeremy Jacobs a crook (or something to that effect) in print for the Herald and Jacobs threatened to sue if he wasn't removed from the beat. That's how I remember it, at least.
The word was “thief,” I believeHe called Jeremy Jacobs a crook (or something to that effect) in print for the Herald and Jacobs threatened to sue if he wasn't removed from the beat. That's how I remember it, at least.
I don't know, I liked him. I thought that he knew the game (I think that he played at Tufts) and was a down-the-middle type of reporter. In other words, he didn't jump into advanced stats like others did and he kind of turns his nose up when he's on the radio, but I don't recall him doing much of that at the Herald or Globe. I thought that he was pretty fair in his dealings with the team and I don't recall him being much of a muckraker. He had his opinions and I didn't agree with all of them, but they seemed to be logical at least. He wasn't someone that could turn a phrase. His writing was very business like and he was no Peter Gammons or Leigh Montville or Dan Shaughnessy (when he gives a shit). He'd tell you what he observed in plain English, which is fine. Especially for the Herald.Was Mazz a good beat writer for the Sox? Again, I wasn't reading a lot of newspapers at the time but I always loved the Red Sox. Mazz seems like he does really love baseball deep down, but he has to put on the character for the radio show. Was he good in print?
I have never seen Mike Reiss get angry before. I didn't think it was possible. Wow.Oh this is good......go Mike Reiss!!!
View: https://twitter.com/IAmJamesStewart/status/1821278130797253038
Its sad and predictable that Felgers justification for continuing to insist Mike Reiss is getting used, is that he allowed himself to be used when he was in the job. Perfect.I have never seen Mike Reiss get angry before. I didn't think it was possible. Wow.
Absolutely this. Truly a mask off moment.Its sad and predictable that Felgers justification for continuing to insist Mike Reiss is getting used, is that he allowed himself to be used when he was in the job. Perfect.
gold jerry this is goldOh this is good......go Mike Reiss!!!
View: https://twitter.com/IAmJamesStewart/status/1821278130797253038
View: https://twitter.com/bostonradio/status/1821034712871170177Man, Felger’s brand should take a huge hit here. A big piece of his brand is that while his opinions are salacious he knows football and used to cover the team. To admit he would just pass along information from single sources without even checking on them is devastating.
it's summer. I'm guessing all ratings take a dive. What were they last summer?View: https://twitter.com/bostonradio/status/1821034712871170177
It would appear they have taken a major hit. Still in 1st but a 12 share for them is super low, no?
Man, Felger’s brand should take a huge hit here. A big piece of his brand is that while his opinions are salacious he knows football and used to cover the team. To admit he would just pass along information from single sources without even checking on them is devastating.
Mazz did JV baseball. Which is probably one step above intramurals. I know I know thats a cheap shot below the belt to Tony the Phony.I don't know, I liked him. I thought that he knew the game (I think that he played at Tufts) and was a down-the-middle type of reporter. In other words, he didn't jump into advanced stats like others did and he kind of turns his nose up when he's on the radio, but I don't recall him doing much of that at the Herald or Globe. I thought that he was pretty fair in his dealings with the team and I don't recall him being much of a muckraker. He had his opinions and I didn't agree with all of them, but they seemed to be logical at least. He wasn't someone that could turn a phrase. His writing was very business like and he was no Peter Gammons or Leigh Montville or Dan Shaughnessy (when he gives a shit). He'd tell you what he observed in plain English, which is fine. Especially for the Herald.
I wasn't a big fan of Nick Cafardo, but a lot of people loved him. His writing style, his reporting, just bugged me. I read a lot of his stuff, but I didn't learn much from it. But from all accounts he was a really nice and generous person, and that's all well and good. I guess what I'm saying is that there might be a bunch of different POVs on Tony Mazz, the writer.
If someone doesn’t enjoy these clowns (and I know thousands of people do because their ratings are huge) why would they want to listen tomorrow?Tomorrow should fun.
To be clear, by “fun” I mean seeing how they twist an exciting, encouraging feel-good win into something unrecognizably negative and unpleasant.If someone doesn’t enjoy these clowns (and I know thousands of people do because their ratings are huge) why would they want to listen tomorrow?
The Pats had a nice, satisfying unexpected win. I’m sure F&M will shit all over it for 4 hours tomorrow. Who needs to listen to that?
Oh I got it.To be clear, by “fun” I mean seeing how they twist an exciting, encouraging feel-good win into something unrecognizably negative and unpleasant.
Fuck these two.