Haliburton has always been a rough defender to my eye, but he also doesn't look healthy to me. No quick twitch or explosion. I really wonder if he's still dealing with something.
Poole is the only one of that group who seems to give as little resistance at his size as Halliburton. (Although I don't watch Portland or Utah much). They're very similar, in that guys just go right through them when going up for shots, as if their arms aren't even there.He capitulates at the first bit of contact. He never digs in defensively (I'll probably eat these words tomorrow)
Halliburton came with a decent defensive reputation from college. It just shows the massive difference between the power/brute strength of NBA players relative to NCAA kids.
He was the only NCAA Division I true freshman, other than Zion Williamson, to accumulate at least 50 steals and 30 blocks.
Off the top of my head, bad defensive NBA guards that start & teams hunt:
Halliburton, Trae, Poole, Dame, DLo, Simons, Sexton, CJ McCollum, Ball
Herro, though it makes some sense given that he’s 6’5 with just a 6’3 wingspan.Random thought from the Indy game last night: does anyone else play as small as Halliburton? He's 6-5 but plays like he's 5-11. Guys just go right through him consistently, like he's not even there. Pritchard took him right under the hoop with ease. Never is able to contest--may as well not have arms. It's definitely a strength issue, but there are plenty of guys with similar body types who don't play THAT small.
Pride begins in the offseason, in Tyrese's case.Herro, though it makes some sense given that he’s 6’5 with just a 6’3 wingspan.
Pritchard bullying Haliburton under the basket on back to back possessions, including getting a couple of offensive rebounds and resulting in 5 points, should be an embarrassing wakeup call. Pritchard is really strong for his size and the deserving favorite for 6th MOY (he’s a bigger favorite for the award than any player is for any award), but Haliburton is 4 inches taller, an all-NBA player and Olympian just entering his prime. Have some fucking pride.
StatMuse with worst defensive PG by rating (could only get 1-16 in my snip). Funny seeing "Offnight" at #2 (with standard disclaimer that DRtg is very context- and teammate-dependant).Off the top of my head, bad defensive NBA guards that start & teams hunt:
Halliburton, Trae, Poole, Dame, DLo, Simons, Sexton, CJ McCollum, Ball
Ha, OFF-NIGHT! another player living off their NCAA reputation.StatMuse with worst defensive PG by rating (could only get 1-16 in my snip). Funny seeing "Offnight" at #2 (with standard disclaimer that DRtg is very context- and teammate-dependant).
View attachment 93890
Cite: https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/worst-defensive-rating-point-guards-in-the-nba
You can ask the people who are at every game in every city.Engagement? I mean…yeah? Sellouts? Yeah. Shitting on a fanbase like Charlotte who once cared so much then cared so little that they voted for a new publicly funded arena without even knowing that they voted for it until the next morning would make more sense.
I would add Brunson, Garland, Maxey, Cam Thomas, LavineOff the top of my head, bad defensive NBA guards that start & teams hunt:
Halliburton, Trae, Poole, Dame, DLo, Simons, Sexton, CJ McCollum, Ball
Lavine is real high up there in a list of players that defend a lot smaller than they actually are, but I wouldn’t have him (or anyone else in this list) with the aforementioned list of worst defenders in the league, other than Cam Thomas (who might actually be worse than all of them). Darko D-DPM agrees, has Thomas far below the other 4 guys here.I would add Brunson, Garland, Maxey, Cam Thomas, Lavine
The Cs hunted Garland HARD in last year's playoffs, but I was impressed at how much stronger and tougher he seemed when the teams played this year.I would add Brunson, Garland, Maxey, Cam Thomas, Lavine
DFS is sub-0 DPM, and -1 O-DPM on DARKO. He's just not that good, 3 point % notwithstanding. He also has a $15M player option next year.FFS, why do teams insist on allowing LA to undo their terrible personnel mistakes. I get the tanking but stop helping them.
Think of it as helping them to make new and exciting personnel mistakes. BTW, where did they get three seconds?FFS, why do teams insist on allowing LA to undo their terrible personnel mistakes. I get the tanking but stop helping them.
Hahaha, thank you.Think of it as helping them to make new and exciting personnel mistakes.
Lakers offense has been OK though. Ranked 12th. Their defense, and in particular perimeter defense has been poor. DFS certainly helps that. He is an excellent 3 and D guy who will stand in the corner and make 40% of his threes while giving them a perimeter option on defense that they just don't haveDFS is sub-0 DPM, and -1 O-DPM on DARKO. He's just not that good, 3 point % notwithstanding. He also has a $15M player option next year.
Freeing up that salary next season, plus getting 3 2nds, is a quite solid deal for the Nets, and definitely not "helping" LA in any sense beyond teams getting helped whenever they are fine to trade some assets for a player.
Yeah, he can help LA, it's just not some sort of giveaway/heist, as the other poster said.Lakers offense has been OK though. Ranked 12th. Their defense, and in particular perimeter defense has been poor. DFS certainly helps that. He is an excellent 3 and D guy who will stand in the corner and make 40% of his threes while giving them a perimeter option on defense that they just don't have
Yea. I am surprised that BRK couldn't get a late or even fake first for him though. Three seconds and Russell is pretty mehYeah, he can help LA, it's just not some sort of giveaway/heist, as the other poster said.
The Lakers have made normal trades and paid normal prices for those trades the past couple years.
The Lakers desperately need Rui to carry the load of defending opposing wings, especially when Lebron is out, which he does quite ably. Unless a wing upgrade becomes available, like a Giannis-type deal, I have a very hard time seeing them moving Hachimura.Lakers still have Rui’s $17 mil as trade ballast but this deal makes it tougher for them to add a material guy. DFS is a solid two way wing…which is certainly a need…but not an impact guy.
From Brooklyn’s perspective, I’m not so sure that they don’t win more games with DAR than with DFS. Russell seems like a guy who can pile up numbers on a bad team, and he did make his only AS team with the Nets.Yeah, this strikes me as rearranging deckchairs. Can't see it moving the needle for LAL. Brooklyn, I guess, had won too many games recently so they needed to pull a trigger, and at age 31, DFS wasn't a player they were building around for the future.
The Lakers desperately need Rui to carry the load of defending opposing wings, especially when Lebron is out, which he does quite ably. Unless a wing upgrade becomes available, like a Giannis-type deal, I have a very hard time seeing them moving Hachimura.
DFS is the wing defender they need. Rui has been fine and I am unsure they move him, but the reason for this move was to have a legit 3 and D guyYeah, this strikes me as rearranging deckchairs. Can't see it moving the needle for LAL. Brooklyn, I guess, had won too many games recently so they needed to pull a trigger, and at age 31, DFS wasn't a player they were building around for the future.
The Lakers desperately need Rui to carry the load of defending opposing wings, especially when Lebron is out, which he does quite ably. Unless a wing upgrade becomes available, like a Giannis-type deal, I have a very hard time seeing them moving Hachimura.
Yeah, that’s right - just like Schroeder. That said, they could waive D’Lo if they can’t trade him again.From Brooklyn’s perspective, I’m not so sure that they don’t win more games with DAR than with DFS. Russell seems like a guy who can pile up numbers on a bad team, and he did make his only AS team with the Nets.
The Stein report above claims Grizz offered a protected late 1st (with “F. You, Kennard!” and Konchar (overpaid now, but useful) and Brooklyn preferred 3 Laker 2nds.Yea. I am surprised that BRK couldn't get a late or even fake first for him though. Three seconds and Russell is pretty meh
And that was without Suggs, who sprained his wrist in the 2nd quarter and didn’t return. Unbelievably bad injury luck.7 minutes left: BKN 97, ORL 80
Final: ORL 102, BKN 101
Who is even healthy for them right now?And that was without Suggs, who sprained his wrist in the 2nd quarter and didn’t return. Unbelievably bad injury luck.
KCP, who has shot like absolute dog shit this season (.297 from 3 so far, after shooting .415 in two years in Denver).Who is even healthy for them right now?
Jonathan Issac, somehow, right? But beyond that I have no idea…
I have no supporting evidence but I am convinced that the vast majority of NBA fans would love to do exactly what Thompson did here to Tyler.Amen Thompson tosses Herro like a rag doll to the ground.
View: https://twitter.com/BricksCenter/status/1873556161255100461?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
Herro really is the perfect villain. Scrawny white dude who is really good and really cocky.I have no supporting evidence but I am convinced that the vast majority of NBA fans would love to do exactly what Thompson did here to Tyler.
So now Darko is irrefutable evidence of a player's value? Clasic 3-D guy for who context matters greatly.DFS is sub-0 DPM, and -1 O-DPM on DARKO. He's just not that good, 3 point % notwithstanding. He also has a $15M player option next year.
Somehow Herro gets tossed twice since he was ejected as well lol. And Rozier, embedded Celtic dirtdog/good teammate, jumping at Thompson after the throw.Amen Thompson tosses Herro like a rag doll to the ground.
View: https://twitter.com/BricksCenter/status/1873556161255100461?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
I don't think it's irrefutable at all. Just giving context as to why the league didn't value DFS that highly.So now Darko is irrefutable evidence of a player's value? Clasic 3-D guy for who context matters greatly.
This article from a NOP website - Lakers-Nets trade reveals disappointing reality for the Pelicans - says that the MEM pick was top 17 protected. If that is the case, yeah, taking the 3 seconds is understandable, particularly given the way the cap works.Given the cap implications, there's also a case for seconds over a late first at this point, generically. That's certainly true if you get three chances at a 'good' second and three bites at the apple, seems to me
I'd guess they went back to Memphis and said that they'd have to offer a first with at least a small chance of real upside to beat that Laker offer, and Memphis passed
I’ve also seen somewhere (can’t find it quickly now, but it felt reputable; Stein?) that not only did Memphis want to protect their 2025 1st, but they wanted Brooklyn’s 2nd back in the deal, too.This article from a NOP website - Lakers-Nets trade reveals disappointing reality for the Pelicans - says that the MEM pick was top 17 protected. If that is the case, yeah, taking the 3 seconds is understandable, particularly given the way the cap works.
It appears that it was Pelton who reported that MEM wanted BRK's 2025 second, at least according to this article: Why Nets rejected Grizzlies offer for Dorian Finney-Smith featuring first-round pick (Pelton's article is paywalled).I’ve also seen somewhere (can’t find it quickly now, but it felt reputable; Stein?) that not only did Memphis want to protect their 2025 1st, but they wanted Brooklyn’s 2nd back in the deal, too.
So it might not even have been an outright 1st, it was more like Brooklyn moving up from the mid-30s to the mid-20s. Depending how far BRK can fall in the standings, and how high MEM finishes, a very high 2nd (31-33) might actually be more valuable than a very late first (27-30), so that kind of swap could end up being negative value for the Nets.
Three likely post-LeBron, including 1-2 potentially post-AD 2nds from the Lakers DEFINITELY feels more valuable than the Nets swapping their own 2025 2nd for a top-17 protected MEM 1st.