While I get that, the criticism there isn't that the run D is bad, it's that you are calling your players soft as an excuse. Bill points out all those guys played tough football last year. Sure they are missing 3 key guys (1 by choice) but there are a whole bunch of guys out there who played a lot of snaps of tough defense last year.There's a way of making that point while also recognizing Barmore/Bentley/Peppers were all pretty key in last year's run D. Im confident that if Bill were still here the run D would be better than it is now, but would still pale in comparison to last years. The delta in between the two is on Mayo...
Ok that's fair...I didnt really listen with that lens.[\
While I get that, the criticism there isn't that the run D is bad, it's that you are calling your players soft as an excuse. Bill points out all those guys played tough football last year. Sure they are missing 3 key guys (1 by choice) but there are a whole bunch of guys out there who played a lot of snaps of tough defense last year.
The defense presents exhibit 10..Mac Jones. He reallllly sucked."Bill, if the team was # 1 in rushing defense last year, everything else must have *really* sucked to go 4-13, no?"
Which is why the reports came out that after Mac Year 2 BB wanted to trade him and sign Mayfield (or less charitably, Davis Mills) and Krafted told him no.The defense presents exhibit 10..Mac Jones. He reallllly sucked.
I like him, too, but yeah...not a good look. Antonio Pierce with the Raiders is in some general sense analogous: ex-player; deep ties to their organization; supposedly has "it" (some sort of charisma or whatever); support from players; inexperienced as a coach; no particular analytical bent. Turns out the latter two are much more important than all the vibes stuff. That said, i think Pierce is a loser; still have hope for Mayo.Mayo wants to ‘demanding without demeaning’
Yet he rips Polk last week and the whole team this week. I want to like Mayo but he is over his head right now
Ok, but what BB said is fair game when you call the players “soft.” He was defending the players. Good for him imo."Bill, if the team was # 1 in rushing defense last year, everything else must have *really* sucked to go 4-13, no?"
The point was about toughness. You can’t be soft and dominate the run game."Bill, if the team was # 1 in rushing defense last year, everything else must have *really* sucked to go 4-13, no?"
Well, I don't want to start a whole debate about the Belichick era, and no one defended him more or longer than I did... still, I feel like I have to point out that two week stretch last year where the Patriots were outscored 72-3. And the 2000 Pats gave up 130+ rushing yards 8 times (in other words, in half their games).2. Even with all the injuries aside... the BB defenses always looked like they knew what the offense wanted to do, were prepared to handle it, and individuals always knew what their job was and executed the best they could at that job..... this team doesn't.
Would also be interested to hear about this.What is weird to me is how complex their zone coverage is and when they use it. Sometimes I wonder what the thought process is on calls. It’s like they don’t have the safeties to play C1/C3 but their corners are better in man than zone. Their front gets no pressure regardless so it doesn’t matter what they call on the back end of everyone has all day to throw.
I am not a defensive coach and I’m a lot better at knowing what fronts are effective vs what run looks and not what coverage is effective vs certain looks. Anyone with an informed take on what’s up with all these complex zone looks and specifically if they are calling them at times that make sense or not?
Not sure how your post answers the one you quoted, neither Klassen (nor I) was saying that Bill's teams never had bad defensive games, or even mediocre seasons (though honestly this year's team will have to get a LOT better on D not to be significantly worse than any defense in the BB era). The point was that even if they got beat, it looked like they all knew what the plan was, there was a coherent gameplan, the players had clear roles and knew them. Klassen was pointing out that there doesn't seem to be a plan watching this defense and the players aren't just performing poorly in terms of execution (getting beat by speed, missing tackles, losing on strength) though there is plenty of that, they also often look like they aren't sure what they are supposed to be doing.Well, I don't want to start a whole debate about the Belichick era, and no one defended him more or longer than I did... still, I feel like I have to point out that two week stretch last year where the Patriots were outscored 72-3. And the 2000 Pats gave up 130+ rushing yards 8 times (in other words, in half their games).
Of course I think (hope?) we all know Belichick is the greatest coach of all time, so any comparison to him -- much like quarterback play post-Brady -- will be inherently unfair and unkind.
Still, I think it's a little early to judge what Mayo's defenses (as Head Coach) look like compared to Belichick's, particularly as noted given all the injuries. And of course, who knows what things would look like if Mayo had Hall of Famers & Hall of Very Goods on this defense in their prime (Vrabel, Wilfork, Seymour, Law, Milloy, Harrison, Hightower, Mayo himself, McCourty, Revis, etc.)
Would also be interested to hear about this.
Coach Intangibles.Is there any actual reason to think Mayo-coached Pats teams will be especially noteworthy defensively?
He’s not buying the groceries, he’s not (AFAIK) calling the plays. Is he installing gameplans? He doesn’t have a track record of doing any of that.
What’s his big success story as position coach? Developing Tavai from 2nd round flop castoff to useful player? Doesn’t seem to be working his magic now on these LB’s who look lost without Bentley.
He was a good LB as a player but that’s hardly evidence that he can be a good coach or that we should expect top tier defenses from him and his staff moving forward.
Wasn’t the story that the last couple seasons he was the brains behind the D’s design and gameplan, while Steve called the plays on game day? Obviously that might have been nonsense, but I’m pretty sure that was the story.Is there any actual reason to think Mayo-coached Pats teams will be especially noteworthy defensively?
He’s not buying the groceries, he’s not (AFAIK) calling the plays. Is he installing gameplans? He doesn’t have a track record of doing any of that.
What’s his big success story as position coach? Developing Tavai from 2nd round flop castoff to useful player? Doesn’t seem to be working his magic now on these LB’s who look lost without Bentley.
He was a good LB as a player but that’s hardly evidence that he can be a good coach or that we should expect top tier defenses from him and his staff moving forward.
And if he can’t then he should be one and done. They don’t have time to waste a rookie QB salary on a joke coach.Listening to Andrew Callahan on 98.5 right now. He mentioned a post-London-game conversation with a player (I missed which one) who agreed with Mayo that the team is playing soft and is selfish.
Callahan's POV is that there are "a lot of independent contractors" on the Pats right now, and they're not "rowing in the same direction".
This makes sense to me. No one thought the Pats were going to be a good team this season. Stands to reason that players are out there for themselves -- auditioning for other teams if they're pending FAs or likely to be released after the season.
Needless to say, it's Mayo's job to prevent this.
This is what happens on bad teams, but you'd also think players would realize GMs review all the tape and talk to each other, so putting hero ball on tape or being a locker room issue is not going to help them. Yes, the coach should control this, but these are also grown men and professionals (or so they tell us).Listening to Andrew Callahan on 98.5 right now. He mentioned a post-London-game conversation with a player (I missed which one) who agreed with Mayo that the team is playing soft and is selfish.
Callahan's POV is that there are "a lot of independent contractors" on the Pats right now, and they're not "rowing in the same direction".
This makes sense to me. No one thought the Pats were going to be a good team this season. Stands to reason that players are out there for themselves -- auditioning for other teams if they're pending FAs or likely to be released after the season.
Needless to say, it's Mayo's job to prevent this.
I guess that's all I meant -- I don't feel qualified to say whether defensive players "knew what the plan was" and "there was a coherent gameplan." I haven't watched the All-22, and even if I did I'm not sure I would know what I'm seeing. Still, Mayo was by all accounts very involved with the defense the last few seasons, right? And I have a hard time believing Belichick would have entrusted him with that role if he didn't believe in Mayo's ability to put together a "coherent gameplan."Not sure how your post answers the one you quoted, neither Klassen (nor I) was saying that Bill's teams never had bad defensive games, or even mediocre seasons (though honestly this year's team will have to get a LOT better on D not to be significantly worse than any defense in the BB era). The point was that even if they got beat, it looked like they all knew what the plan was, there was a coherent gameplan, the players had clear roles and knew them. Klassen was pointing out that there doesn't seem to be a plan watching this defense and the players aren't just performing poorly in terms of execution (getting beat by speed, missing tackles, losing on strength) though there is plenty of that, they also often look like they aren't sure what they are supposed to be doing.
I also really think people underestimate the talent now and/or overestimate the talent in the past. Gonzo was a much better regarded (arguably) better player than McCourty... Bill recognized his limitations and made him a great safety... Vrable played 4 full NFL seasons without a single start before he came to NE. And the bulk of many of those defenses were JAGs... the street FA DBs that became longterm starters, Castoffs like Ninkovich. BB was the absolute master at finding what a guy could and couldn't do, and building around the combined strengths/weaknesses of his team, his opponent, and being willing to completely change things when those things changed.
Is it unfair to compare Mayo to Bill... maybe, but at the same time.... compare him to anyone you want, this defense looks wildly disorganized
Which is why Mayo's comments about being fine with players "using the media to send messages" and that "if you believe you're the best player in the league, then say it" were awful to me. Why would you not only not try to get the team in line and focused on the collective, but actually encourage guys to get their own agendas out there? I think the dude is completley out of his depth.Listening to Andrew Callahan on 98.5 right now. He mentioned a post-London-game conversation with a player (I missed which one) who agreed with Mayo that the team is playing soft and is selfish.
Callahan's POV is that there are "a lot of independent contractors" on the Pats right now, and they're not "rowing in the same direction".
This makes sense to me. No one thought the Pats were going to be a good team this season. Stands to reason that players are out there for themselves -- auditioning for other teams if they're pending FAs or likely to be released after the season.
Needless to say, it's Mayo's job to prevent this.
This is as close as we'll get to BB taking a victory lap - and I'm here for it. The team sucks, I'm fine with the architect of the greatest run in NFL history twisting the knife after having (and continuing to have) all the blame piled on his doorstep.A must watch clip, though glossing over 3 key losses here:
View: https://twitter.com/PatsBuzz/status/1848417359624798506
Bill Belichick on
@PatMcAfeeShow
responds to Jerod Mayo calling the Patriots “soft”: “I feel bad for the defensive players because they're all tough players.”
But that's kind of the crux of the issue. A coach needs to do SOMETHING well. I don't care what it is. Mayo's had enough time to at least show us a glimmer of something somewhere. What is it? What's the one thing he even does slightly above average?1) I'm not sure if we would be saying that if we were writing about Belichick after, say, Week 7 in 2000 or 1991 (although recognizing he had won 2 Super Bowls as a defensive coordinator by that time and had been coaching in the league for 3 decades unlike Mayo), and
2) I think it helped Belichick that in addition to diamonds in the rough like Vrabel and Ninko he also had blue chippers like Seymour, Wilfork, Law, Milloy, Bruschi, etc. -- I don't think Mayo has many of those guys right now, in part because of injury, in part because Wolf seems to have been terrible at assembling talent, and perhaps in part because he's not putting guys in a position to succeed as Belichick would have.
Ultimately, I agree with you: Mayo has been bad at literally everything so far other than drafting Drake Maye, from speaking to the media to putting a team on the field that can compete. I guess I just still feel like when everything is this bad it's hard for me to identify who's responsible for what.
Totally, I'm with you. This has been as bad as it could have been, no disagreement there. Judging by these games and his comments to the press, Mayo looks totally overmatched and unprepared for this role. It would be easy to pile on -- and frankly, maybe correct to do so as well.But that's kind of the crux of the issue. A coach needs to do SOMETHING well. I don't care what it is. Mayo's had enough time to at least show us a glimmer of something somewhere. What is it? What's the one thing he even does slightly above average?
I guess despite being incredibly down on this team I'm still hoping that Mayo can give us something -- anything -- to give us hope for the future.Some teammates called Mayo "Mini Bill" because they believed he saw the game through a coach's lens. Mayo lived minutes away from the team facility because he spent so much time there -- like Belichick. When players wanted to sway Belichick on things like changing the team's itinerary, they would ask Mayo to speak to him. ....
In the fourth quarter of the Week 1 game against the Bengals, as New England attempted to run out the clock, starting quarterback Jacoby Brissett told his teammates to "take them to the hill!" It was a reference to how Mayo ran long, tough training camp practices that finished with players running up a nearby hill multiple times, which had been a Belichick staple. It has become the team motto.
"I was so excited hearing that from the players. It meant a lot," Mayo said. "We always talk about taking the hard route. That just means all the extra things we do, it pays off."
Yeah, and now it's week 7 and Bourne is talking about the team's conditioning being an issue, so currently Mayo doesn't even have that "take them to the hill" nugget to fall back on. It's grim right now.Totally, I'm with you. This has been as bad as it could have been, no disagreement there. Judging by these games and his comments to the press, Mayo looks totally overmatched and unprepared for this role. It would be easy to pile on -- and frankly, maybe correct to do so as well.
Still...
There has to be a reason Belichick trusted him to work with the defense the last few years and he was so highly regarded that Kraft was afraid to lose him, right? Even from this much maligned ESPN article, there are nuggets in here beyond just Kraft liking what he saw from across a lounge at Ben Gurion airport:
I guess despite being incredibly down on this team I'm still hoping that Mayo can give us something -- anything -- to give us hope for the future.
Right, that's particularly upsetting if true. To your point, conditioning feels like the lowest-hanging of all the fruits.Yeah, and now it's week 7 and Bourne is talking about the team's conditioning being an issue, so currently Mayo doesn't even have that "take them to the hill" nugget to fall back on. It's grim right now.
Especially when the HC's brother is elevated to strength and conditioning coach replacing a guy who was part of three Super Bowl Championships for a team whose conditioning was a strong suit even when they sucked in these past few years. But I digress.Right, that's particularly upsetting if true. To your point, conditioning feels like the lowest-hanging of all the fruits.
The more I seer and hear, the more I'm convinced that Mayo and Wolf orchestrated a small scale coup to get Kraft to can BB so they could have the place to themselves, without any forethought about what they'd do once they got rid of the Big Bad Man.Especially when the HC's brother is elevated to strength and conditioning coach replacing a guy who was part of three Super Bowl Championships for a team whose conditioning was a strong suit even when they sucked in these past few years. But I digress.
7-9, 10-7, 8-9, 4-13. That's largely why Bill is gone.The more I seer and hear, the more I'm convinced that Mayo and Wolf orchestrated a small scale coup to get Kraft to can BB so they could have the place to themselves, without any forethought about what they'd do once they got rid of the Big Bad Man.
I am not a crank.
.500 and then a bad year after 6 Championships in 20 years doesn't seem like a great reason. I'm thrilled with the move. I don't need to see his game plans against my rookie quarterbacks anymore, I don't need to see that ever again in my life.7-9, 10-7, 8-9, 4-13. That's largely why Bill is gone.
Bill is hard to work with and when the team isn't winning people don't want to deal with that. I'm not judging it, just saying that's what happens frequently.
I don't think anyone needed to stage a coup. Kraft's been upset since Bill convinced him it was good to let Brady walk.
He put together the worst roster in football and the offense was horrific. It was time to move on, that they decided on Mayo and Wolff is the issue..500 and then a bad year after 6 Championships in 20 years doesn't seem like a great reason. I'm thrilled with the move. I don't need to see his game plans against my rookie quarterbacks anymore, I don't need to see that ever again in my life.
It was time to move on
Yeah this. The roster was, and still is, one of the worst if not the worst in the league. Also, he's 72, there's really no track record for a coach that age continuing to have success in what is one of the most demanding jobs in sports.He put together the worst roster in football and the offense was horrific. It was time to move on, that they decided on Mayo and Wolff is the issue.
I don't know how happy you'd be if they had Adam Peters and Ben Johnson instead of Wolff and Mayo, for instance. Not saying those were easy hires, but to me there were a lot of avenues they could have explored in order to set this team up for the future and they decided that Bill's guys without Bill was the way to go. Didn't like it from the start.Then we are both happy; a rare but nice win-win situation.
Personally, I would have given Bill another season..500 and then a bad year after 6 Championships in 20 years doesn't seem like a great reason. I'm thrilled with the move. I don't need to see his game plans against my rookie quarterbacks anymore, I don't need to see that ever again in my life.
The Cam season was a weird one with all the COVID opt-outs, I'm not too sure much can be gleaned from it, really. But look at those two seasons in the middle.7-9, 10-7, 8-9, 4-13. That's largely why Bill is gone.
Bill is hard to work with and when the team isn't winning people don't want to deal with that. I'm not judging it, just saying that's what happens frequently.
I don't think anyone needed to stage a coup. Kraft's been upset since Bill convinced him it was good to let Brady walk.
BB is above .500 with this roster and Maye, and probably would have had a better draft as well.The Cam season was a weird one with all the COVID opt-outs, I'm not too sure much can be gleaned from it, really. But look at those two seasons in the middle.
Made the playoffs with MAC FUCKING JONES, which by itself is likely the greatest coaching achievement the league has ever seen. That alone would get any coach an immediate induction into Canton.
The next year they weren't as good as Mac was bad again but they were in a win-and-you're-in situation at 8-8 going into the last game of the year. Mac sucked and they lost.
Following this, BB apparently went to Kraft wanting to trade Mac and sign Baker Mayfield, if reports are to be believed. Kraft said no.
The following year Mac plays like the worst QB in the history of the league while the defense is largely excellent.
If Kraft had listened to BB the organization would be in a far better place today. But reports also had Kraft telling Mayo he was heir apparent five years ago....just before the Cam year.
Look I'm not totally serious that there was a palace coup. But honestly I wouldn't be surprised if there was.
No way. Like, not even the slightest chance, especially not with the injuries they've had.BB is above .500 with this roster and Maye, and probably would have had a better draft as well.
For all the complaints about his drafting (valid or not), his highest draft pick in the last decade was 15. Maybe he would have been better if he was picking at the top of each round not in the middle or back.
I certainly understand that the team was not in GREAT shape last year, but I remember the defense playing hard down the stretch, certainly nothing like the defense that gave up Sunday against Jacksonville.BB is above .500 with this roster and Maye, and probably would have had a better draft as well.
For all the complaints about his drafting (valid or not), his highest draft pick in the last decade was 15. Maybe he would have been better if he was picking at the top of each round not in the middle or back.
It's also not wrong to point out the context of all of these supposedly terrible drafts. The tab was always going to come due for 20 years of dominance, and the subsequent bottom of the round draft picks they produced. You can only maneuver, and out run that for so long. I think he had more than earned the right to try and rebuild this team with actual, prime, draft capital. Which he never really had before. That said, for a variety of reasons, some of them petty and ego driven, Kraft wanted him gone. So be it. His shop, his rules. But he deserves every ounce of scorn that can he heaped upon him for not even conducting an outside search for a new coach, just handing it to a guy who's pretty clearly not ready for the job, and then retro-fitting the GM in after that. A half-assed, ill-conceived process all the way around.Personally, I would have given Bill another season.
But it's not wrong to note that the roster he built was, and still is, a disaster. Unfortunately it seems that the relationship between Bill and Kraft was irrevocably damaged over the past few years. It seemed this was destined to end on bad terms when Brady left and immediately won a SB while we went 7-9. I really think that sparked Kraft to look for the chance to dump Bill. 4-13 was it.
I hadn't heard that Josh had been promised to be the heir. I would imagine he would not have taken the Raiders job had he been told that.When McDaniels left the Colts at the altar to come back, wasn't there also reporting that in addition to a higher salary, more front office involvment/mentoring from BB, McDaniels got assurance that he was the heir? Not sure it was ever contractually written in the way Mayo's was but Josh ended up leaving for Vegas anyway.
I don't think Mayo was Bob's only heir. It seems like he got afraid of the brain drain and just kinda used it as leverage to keep guys he liked or thought had promise. I'd like to keep you, would you like to be the heir?
I very well could be wrong but I thought that was part of the story back then. The Colts thing was 2019 and Josh left for Vegas in 2022. I thought he just got tired of waiting around and saw no signs Bill was remotely close to hanging them up.I hadn't heard that Josh had been promised to be the heir. I would imagine he would not have taken the Raiders job had he been told that.
Of course Josh has been making pretty terrible non-Patriots decisions for his entire career, so what do I know.
I dunno. I feel like the target will be there starting next year no matter what. He has been involved for multiple years, he is a nepo hire of sorts that didn't really earn his current role with the Patriots based on a strong track record elsewhere and didn't face the competition of a national search, and by next summer he will have overseen two drafts and two off-seasons as formal GM. He'll basically own the roster at that point and I think its probably in his interest to maximize the chances that the team performs and looks headed in the right direction.Wolf probably has the "I didn't hire him" card to play, but when to use it? As soon as he does that and hires his own guy, the target gets painted on his back. It's probably in Wolf's best interest to hold on to that card for a little while at least.
He is apparently a world class brown nosing ass kisser.But that's kind of the crux of the issue. A coach needs to do SOMETHING well. I don't care what it is. Mayo's had enough time to at least show us a glimmer of something somewhere. What is it? What's the one thing he even does slightly above average?
Thanks for putting yourself through rewatching that game.I watched a bunch of the first and into the second half last night. I am a little surprised how much cover 2 they ran. ILBs are so out of their depth when trying to cover anyone. Tavai and others don't play with the requisite awareness in zone. Then you have bullshit where they can't figure out how to distribute coverage vs a bunch on the TD or 2 pt conversion. Whichever one it was that was on the bunch. Marcus Jones is supposed to take Brian Thomas. You can see Dugger even signal to him, mid-play, hey that's your man.
They have no eye-discipline. Jags played on that all day. They also don't have answers to the RPO slants and screens that keeps them gap-sound vs the run. Even if they had the players to actually fight back on some of these run plays they are being held back by their scheme. It's just a complete mess. They are not well-coached. I know injuries play a part here and these players largely suck but this is week 7. Having Marcus Jones bust coverage vs a bunch on goal to go is just brutal.
Offense wise these guys are just out of sync as blockers. It's to be expected of course given that you need continuity to get things done but they get no push. I saw Michael Jordan getting thrown down as a run blocker against a pitiful Jags front. They dry and run duo as their counter to OZ and they can't actually move folks with double teams.
Spacing wise it's fucked too. I am seeing awful spacing probably 30-40% of the time. Guys running into each other still too.
Sure talent is a part of this but coaching seems pretty damn bad too.
I feel like the drop-off in defensive scheme is beyond what anyone would think was possible. It is that bad.
The team is getting worse as the season grinds on, and that is absolutely an indictment on coaches being able to adjust or if they are losing the locker room. One of the biggest indicators to me is the penalties. Over their first 4 games, they had 19 total penalties (4.75 per game), which would put them as the second least penalized team in the league. The last 3 games? 9.3 penalties per game, dead last in the NFL. And it's not like the shitty offensive line is just trying to hold on for dear life. They have 8 holding calls so far this season, while teams like the Ravens, Chiefs, 49ers, Packers, and Steelers all have more.To me it is pretty simple and honestly kinda boring. This was always going to be a multi-year process because of the state of the roster and on top of that they had some tough injuries to the better unit (defense) this year. Mayo can also learn on the job. But, you have to improve over the year. And as it turns out they don't have a very tough schedule.
If they continue to look uncompetitive and win only 2 or 3 games, I would can Wolf and Mayo and do a real search, telegraphing before the end of the year that this was going to happen as much as possible so you could hopefully get good candidates signed and on board quickly. You are handing over the team to a GM with a top 3 or maybe 1 pick, basically a blank slate roster, and with a very young and promising QB. I think that would be attractive for candidates.
If they show life by the end of the year, then maybe he's getting the hang of things and guys are beginning to buy in to the program.