Jacksonity......or the Knick thread

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
70,745
Obviously a lot can change between now and the summer, but JR Smith said he expects to exercise his $2.5M player option for next year and stay with NY, that would be HUGE.

http://www.denverstiffs.com/2012/2/24/2820327/tomasson-j-r-smith-never-received-a-call-from-the-nuggets
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
13,622
Obviously a lot can change between now and the summer, but JR Smith said he expects to exercise his $2.5M player option for next year and stay with NY, that would be HUGE.

http://www.denversti...rom-the-nuggets
Unless the author of that article has more inside info, he may have been jumping the gun with that assessment.

Smith is quoted as saying "Thats my plan. If everything keeps going well, God willing I will be with the Knicks". It's not clear what question he was responding to, but not sure that means he will definitely be picking up his 2.5M player option.

I would be shocked if he didn't get a better offer than that from someone. If he stays with the Knicks, I have a feeling they will have to sign him to a much better deal than 1 year 2.5M
 

amlothi

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 5, 2007
803
Gone Too Far

No mention of fortune cookies is allowed at all when Jeremy Lin is involved. Fortune cookies are racist! Admittedly, I'm still mystified the fortune cookie sign was racist but now calling fortune cookies as an ingredient seems like the backlash has gone too far.
Lin grew up in California. Fortune cookies were invented in California. I don't see how that is racist.
 

A Bartlett Giamatti

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2003
2,049
A possible cause of Amare's lack of athleticism--which no one that I've read has brought up--is his weight gain. Over the summer, he put on what was reported to be 25 pounds. To be fair, it was reported as new muscle, and presumably Amare did that so his body could hold up banging with 5's all year. By all reports, he was still going to be playing center most of the year as the Knicks preserved cap space to get Chris Paul. How was he to know that Glen Grunwald would blow the roster to hell after the new CBA, picking up Tyson Chandler to play center?

Now what you see is a player who has played most of his career at about 240, with iffy knees, trying to carry around 260-265 after a long lockout, offseason back surgery and maintain the same explosiveness. I think its fairly likely that if Amare were to get back down to his usual weight of 240 (probably can't happen till next year) he'd be a vastly superior player at the 4, similar to what we saw last year. Anyway, that's my hope.
 

Brickowski

Banned
Feb 15, 2011
3,755
If Jeremy Lin had played for the Celtics in the 60's or 70's, I wonder what nickname Johnny Most would have assigned to him.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
70,745
A possible cause of Amare's lack of athleticism--which no one that I've read has brought up--is his weight gain. Over the summer, he put on what was reported to be 25 pounds. To be fair, it was reported as new muscle, and presumably Amare did that so his body could hold up banging with 5's all year. By all reports, he was still going to be playing center most of the year as the Knicks preserved cap space to get Chris Paul. How was he to know that Glen Grunwald would blow the roster to hell after the new CBA, picking up Tyson Chandler to play center?

Now what you see is a player who has played most of his career at about 240, with iffy knees, trying to carry around 260-265 after a long lockout, offseason back surgery and maintain the same explosiveness. I think its fairly likely that if Amare were to get back down to his usual weight of 240 (probably can't happen till next year) he'd be a vastly superior player at the 4, similar to what we saw last year. Anyway, that's my hope.
He supposedly didn't play 5 on 5 all summer because of his recovering back, then he went the first 25 games or so of this season with no PG. I think he's going to be better going forward for the rest of the season than he has been so far, the question is how much (there is a lot of room there certainly).
 

A Bartlett Giamatti

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2003
2,049
Couple of points on the weight from Alan Hahn (the best follow by far for Knicks news, by the way) today:

[twitter]alanhahn How Does Amare look? Any better yet?” put in extra work postpractice. Seems to be looking to shed weight[/twitter]
[twitter]KillaBuddah: @alanhahn Amare trying to lose weight is HUGE news. I think the muscle he put on his slowing him down.” agree[/twitter]

I think its a number of factors holding down Amare this year--certainly the lack of practice time and lack of a point guard are issues, but the decline in sheer athleticism is harder to explain. That's why I look optimistically at his weight gain and hope its just not a structural issue with the back/knees.
 

A Bartlett Giamatti

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2003
2,049

There can be disagreement over whether Landry should be in the rotation...but this should end any dispute over his singing ability.

Alas, Shump should stick to his day job.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
70,745
NY outscores CLE 71-42 in the second half to come from way down and win by 20, NY's highest scoring total of the year (120). Lin and Baron had 21 assists and 1 turnover combined, the bench was incredible in the second half.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
70,745
I liked the way D'Antoni adapted in his first game with the deep bench, leaving Baron in for extended minutes when he was going well, and playing Shumpert down the stretch instead of Fields with the other four starters. The sooner he figures out that Fields is the 11th man in this rotation and should only be playing if for some reason he wants to go 11 deep, and certainly not starting, the better. He was clearly the worst of the 10 guys who played last night (Harrellson was a late scratch, I guess).
 

Grin&MartyBarret

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 2, 2007
4,932
East Village, NYC
Personally, I find the D'Antoni hatred to be a bit misguided.

I certainly think there are coaches potentially available who would present an upgrade--the Rick Carlisle rumors are interesting--but otherwise I'm not sure I've heard a rational argument yet as to why this team's issues should be pinned on D'Antoni. I was at the game last night, and the number of fans calling for D'Antoni's job during the first half surprised me, particularly since the major difference between the teams up to that point in the game was as simple as Cleveland making open looks and New York missing theirs. The shots were there; they just weren't falling.

Ultimately, there are some serious flaws in the construction of this team, chief among them that Amare and Carmelo simply haven't shown they can coexist. D'Antoni gets a ton of unwarranted blame for not emphasizing defense, but the Knicks are an above average defensive team despite playing the worst defensive player in the league (Amare) and Carmelo. I'm not exactly opposed to a coaching change, if the right guy is available I think it's something you have to consider this off season, but I think there are certainly some risks involved and I pretty vehemently disagree with the notion that this is a well constructed team that's being held back by Mike D'Antoni. Personally, I think this team is rounding into a pretty solid team, and that D'Antoni deserves some semblance of roster continuity, something he's never had in New York. This Knicks team isn't even comfortable playing with each other yet; the idea that they should be a well-oiled machine, or even the idea that the rotations should be clear yet feels premature to me.

And lastly, for those who feel a coaching change is needed, let me ask you this: Is Jeremy Lin Jeremy Lin playing for anybody else in the league?
 

Grin&MartyBarret

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 2, 2007
4,932
East Village, NYC
Just looking at some stats that I think warrant mention (unrelated to the above D'Antoni post):

Outside of Mike Bibby, who is legally dead, Amare Stoudemire has far and away the worst floor time stats on the team. His raw +/- is an awful -53, and per 48 minutes the Knicks are 3.2 points worse when he's on the floor.

I think that +/- is a pretty flawed metric and obviously subject to a ton of variables, but in Amare's case it's consistent with what I see when I watch him play.
 

A Bartlett Giamatti

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2003
2,049
Just looking at some stats that I think warrant mention (unrelated to the above D'Antoni post):

Outside of Mike Bibby, who is legally dead, Amare Stoudemire has far and away the worst floor time stats on the team. His raw +/- is an awful -53, and per 48 minutes the Knicks are 3.2 points worse when he's on the floor.

I think that +/- is a pretty flawed metric and obviously subject to a ton of variables, but in Amare's case it's consistent with what I see when I watch him play.
I could not agree more. I've always figured that Amare is a great athlete who simply doesn't WANT to play defense. But when I watch him more closely, I see a guy who simply doesn't recognize what defensive play is occurring. It makes me wonder if he simply doesn't have the cognitive ability to understand what he has to do to get in position to help. Now that he's lost, for whatever reason, a great deal of athleticism that problem is exacerbated. And he does not make up on the offensive end what he takes off the table on defense.

As for coaching, my main problem with D'Antoni is not his in-game moves, but more his team management. He seems unable to motivate, relying on external factors (so called big games, team leaders like Chandler) to do the job for him. What that leaves are huge periods of time where the team sleep walks and doesn't execute. I couple that with his stubborn adherence to a system regardless of what his personnel says, and what you're left with is an excellent college coach who doesn't fit the NBA. To answer your question as to who could have gotten more out of Lin, its probably no one. But to answer the question as to who could have gotten more out of this team as a whole, the answer is probably everyone. D'Antoni's coaching created a problem that only D'Antoni's coaching could solve--if it happened to get lucky. Which is in no way a recipe for success.

Sadly, this team IS a championship contender with the right coach, but they won't get there with D'Antoni. And moving forward, a lot of the pieces (at minimum, Novak, Davis and Smith) will be gone. A total shame.
 

NatetheGreat

New Member
Aug 27, 2007
619
Lin had a really nice bounceback game. The Knicks are a deep team, and honestly Amar'e might be the worst player getting any real play time on that roster.
 

Grin&MartyBarret

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 2, 2007
4,932
East Village, NYC
I could not agree more. I've always figured that Amare is a great athlete who simply doesn't WANT to play defense. But when I watch him more closely, I see a guy who simply doesn't recognize what defensive play is occurring. It makes me wonder if he simply doesn't have the cognitive ability to understand what he has to do to get in position to help. Now that he's lost, for whatever reason, a great deal of athleticism that problem is exacerbated. And he does not make up on the offensive end what he takes off the table on defense.
Agree completely. He has a low basketball IQ, on both ends of the floor. It's pretty quickly becoming the worst contract in the league, which unfortunately, isn't really a surprise. The only real surprise is how fast it's happening.

As for coaching, my main problem with D'Antoni is not his in-game moves, but more his team management. He seems unable to motivate, relying on external factors (so called big games, team leaders like Chandler) to do the job for him. What that leaves are huge periods of time where the team sleep walks and doesn't execute. I couple that with his stubborn adherence to a system regardless of what his personnel says, and what you're left with is an excellent college coach who doesn't fit the NBA. To answer your question as to who could have gotten more out of Lin, its probably no one. But to answer the question as to who could have gotten more out of this team as a whole, the answer is probably everyone. D'Antoni's coaching created a problem that only D'Antoni's coaching could solve--if it happened to get lucky. Which is in no way a recipe for success.


Sadly, this team IS a championship contender with the right coach, but they won't get there with D'Antoni. And moving forward, a lot of the pieces (at minimum, Novak, Davis and Smith) will be gone. A total shame.
We'll just have to agree to disagree here. I don't see this team as a championship contender, and I don't really buy the argument that the poor execution is a symptom of D'Antoni's inability to motivate the team. In my mind, it has a lot more to do with roster turnover, lack of a true training camp, and a condensed schedule leading to fewer practices. This has been a truly ugly season of basketball throughout the league. Team offensive efficiency is way down across the league (for instance, the Thunder, a team with the same roster as last year, have the league's 2nd most efficient offense this year, but their current production would have ranked 10th last year) and defensive efficiency is way "up" (the Knicks are 8th in the league, but have a better defensive efficiency this year than any team in the league last year), so I think singling D'Antoni out because the Knicks aren't executing well is a bit unfair. Poor offensive execution has been a league wide issue this year, and it's clear that the Knicks offense is at least trending in the right direction.
 

Gravistar

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2005
303
London, England
Personally, I find the D'Antoni hatred to be a bit misguided.

I certainly think there are coaches potentially available who would present an upgrade--the Rick Carlisle rumors are interesting--but otherwise I'm not sure I've heard a rational argument yet as to why this team's issues should be pinned on D'Antoni. I was at the game last night, and the number of fans calling for D'Antoni's job during the first half surprised me, particularly since the major difference between the teams up to that point in the game was as simple as Cleveland making open looks and New York missing theirs. The shots were there; they just weren't falling.

Ultimately, there are some serious flaws in the construction of this team, chief among them that Amare and Carmelo simply haven't shown they can coexist. D'Antoni gets a ton of unwarranted blame for not emphasizing defense, but the Knicks are an above average defensive team despite playing the worst defensive player in the league (Amare) and Carmelo. I'm not exactly opposed to a coaching change, if the right guy is available I think it's something you have to consider this off season, but I think there are certainly some risks involved and I pretty vehemently disagree with the notion that this is a well constructed team that's being held back by Mike D'Antoni. Personally, I think this team is rounding into a pretty solid team, and that D'Antoni deserves some semblance of roster continuity, something he's never had in New York. This Knicks team isn't even comfortable playing with each other yet; the idea that they should be a well-oiled machine, or even the idea that the rotations should be clear yet feels premature to me.

And lastly, for those who feel a coaching change is needed, let me ask you this: Is Jeremy Lin Jeremy Lin playing for anybody else in the league?
I didn't see last night's game, but part of what has been annoying me in the past five games or so is that the current system doesn't seem to get the most out of the overall talent level. It seems like this team would benefit greatly from having more set plays that they could use in a half-court offense (this would be especially helpful come playoff time). Correct me if I'm wrong, but do the Knicks run any set plays other than the pick and roll (which they got away from after Melo and Amare came back)? There are so many me-first players on the team (adding JR Smith doesn't help) that having a set offense might limit the number of one-on-ones in each game. It's not like the Knicks have a really dynamic fast break offense like the Heat, so why not do something like what Doc did with the C's?
 

Grin&MartyBarret

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 2, 2007
4,932
East Village, NYC
I can't shake the feeling this morning that yesterday afternoon's game was a must win for the Knicks. They're now sitting at 18-19, and of their next 11 games 9 are against playoff caliber teams in Dallas, San Antonio, Philadelphia (3), Chicago, and Indiana (2). They'd be very fortunate to get out of that stretch with 4 wins.

Also, at what point do we see Baron Davis getting some minutes with the first unit to see if they function better than they do with Lin running the point? Against Cleveland, and again yesterday, the first unit created significant holes that the second unit brought them back from. That's not a habit you want to get into, especially against good defensive teams, and Indiana, Portland, Dallas, Chicago, and Philadelphia are all top 10 defensive teams.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
70,745
Fields has been the worst player in NY's rotation for two games in a row now (the only two games since NY had their full complement of guards), Shumpert should certainly be starting over him with Smith as the 6th man and Fields knocked down to the rarely used 11th man.

D'Antoni must be pretty close to doing this, Fields sat the final 26 minutes yesterday after singlehandedly giving back the lead at the start of the second half. One more dud half and I bet he doesn't start the second half against Dallas tomorrow night...
 

Grin&MartyBarret

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 2, 2007
4,932
East Village, NYC
Well, the Celtics have a tough stretch coming up as well. Or are you worried about one of the Cle/Mil/Tor group rising into the playoff race? The Knicks are good enough when they're playing well to have a nice stretch even against that schedule.
More than that, I'm worried about the Knicks being unable to get out of a 7th or 8th seed, and having to face Miami or Chicago in the first round.
 

Grin&MartyBarret

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 2, 2007
4,932
East Village, NYC
Fields has been the worst player in NY's rotation for two games in a row now (the only two games since NY had their fulll complement of guards), Shumpert should certainly be starting over him with Smith as the 6th man and Fields knocked down to the rarely used 11th man.

D'Antoni must be pretty close to doing this, Fields sat the final 26 minutes yesterday after singlehandedly giving back the lead at the start of the second half. One more dud half and I bet he doesn't start the second half against Dallas tomorrow night...
Agree with this. I actually think Fields compliments the second unit better anyhow, as that unit struggles to rebound the ball. I'd like to see Smith/Shumpert get more time with the first unit depending on need. When a shooter is needed, and that first unit often needs a shooter, Smith is the guy, and when a defender is needed it should be Shump. Fields minutes should definitely be cut, no question about it.
 

A Bartlett Giamatti

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2003
2,049
I've been a big proponent of keeping Fields' minutes, mostly along the line of thinking that removing Fields from the starting lineup is a dicey proposition. I am fine with the allotment of minutes from yesterday (Fields 15, Smith 20, Shump 31) most nights, but I think you risk a little bit of chemistry with Lin. Maybe that's not such a big deal, and worth shaking up what's been a pretty stagnant start to most games.

Really, Fields is more of a 3 anyway. A second unit of Davis (for the time being), Smith, Fields, Jeffries, Novak makes sense.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
70,745
I think the Lin/Fields chemistry thing people keep citing (not just you) is largely imaginary and based on their off the court friendship. The Shumpert/Lin duo together has been much more effective in the past few games than Fields/Lin.

As for your proposed second unit, Harrellson deserves minutes IMO way more than Fields, who I continue to think just doesn't fit on this team if everyone is healthy. Jorts is the best post defender on the team after Chandler, and can shoot 3s at least as well as Fields has been the past month or so (very low bar).

I do think that Fields is a good fit for the third unit, though, him, Jerome Jordan, Toney Douglas, and Mike Bibby. :D
 

A Bartlett Giamatti

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2003
2,049
I think the Lin/Fields chemistry thing people keep citing (not just you) is largely imaginary and based on their off the court friendship. The Shumpert/Lin duo together has been much more effective in the past few games than Fields/Lin.

As for your proposed second unit, Harrellson deserves minutes IMO way more than Fields, who I continue to think just doesn't fit on this team if everyone is healthy. Jorts is the best post defender on the team after Chandler, and can shoot 3s at least as well as Fields has been the past month or so (very low bar).

I do think that Fields is a good fit for the third unit, though, him, Jerome Jordan, Toney Douglas, and Mike Bibby. :D
Harrelson/Novak/Jeffries as a front line takes away from the effectiveness of what that unit has been doing. I'm not sure you want to go from Shumpert at the 3 and all the athleticism and ball handling he brings to Harrelson. Fields is a better fit.
 

A Bartlett Giamatti

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2003
2,049
These guys just don't show up. Its time for D'Antoni to go. Hopefully if they lose to Milwaukee he'll stay out in the midwest and hand the reins over to Woodson.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
70,745
It's a real mess, and Chandler doesn't seem like he'll be healthy for the rest of the year. He rules, but if he can't hold onto the ball, he rules a lot less.
 

Grin&MartyBarret

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 2, 2007
4,932
East Village, NYC
They're just not a well constructed team, and a seven game stretch of Lin leading a league average offense against a stretch of mostly bad teams blew expectations way out of proportion.
 

Stu Nahan

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2003
5,737
They're just not a well constructed team, and a seven game stretch of Lin leading a league average offense against a stretch of mostly bad teams blew expectations way out of proportion.
I couldn't agree more. I keep hearing about how unbelievably talented the Knicks are but it's not translating to the court. The pieces just don't seem to fit together. I'm sure D'Antoni is going to pay with his job because he doesn't seem to have a clue as to how to make this team work. With that said, I'm not sure this team is a major threat no matter who coaches it. When you throw in Chandler's health and the fact that Amare looks like he has fossilized this year, the Knicks are another also ran with some big names on the roster.
 

A Bartlett Giamatti

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2003
2,049
I couldn't agree more. I keep hearing about how unbelievably talented the Knicks are but it's not translating to the court. The pieces just don't seem to fit together. I'm sure D'Antoni is going to pay with his job because he doesn't seem to have a clue as to how to make this team work. With that said, I'm not sure this team is a major threat no matter who coaches it. When you throw in Chandler's health and the fact that Amare looks like he has fossilized this year, the Knicks are another also ran with some big names on the roster.
Plenty of coaches are getting by with disparate rosters*. Setting aside system issues, this team just doesn't come to play--and that's on the coach. Really, the thing that doesn't make sense about the Knicks is having Amare and Carmelo together--two shoot first guys who arent' willing passers and defenders. Lots of teams have a redundancy issue, but lots of teams dont' have other talented parts around them. The Knicks should be at least around a 6 seed with what they have right now and a decent coach.

*Off the top of my head, rosters that don't make sense on paper that are better/on the Knicks Level:

Miami (we know about this)
Atlanta (lots of random parts)
Orlando (horrible contracts surrounding D12, no wing scorer)
Golden State (Ellis/Curry issues)
Memphis (Two huge, plodding post players, redundancy at the wing--ok, this one might be a stretch)
 

A Bartlett Giamatti

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2003
2,049
You know what, let me ask this question another way. Would Miami be a legitimate championship contender with Mike D'Antoni coaching their current roster? Or would Norris Cole and Mario Chalmers be ineffectively trying to run "his system" off pick and rolls with Bosh screening while Wade and Lebron tried to figure out what to do?

I think it's more the latter than former.
 

Grin&MartyBarret

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 2, 2007
4,932
East Village, NYC
You know what, let me ask this question another way. Would Miami be a legitimate championship contender with Mike D'Antoni coaching their current roster? Or would Norris Cole and Mario Chalmers be ineffectively trying to run "his system" off pick and rolls with Bosh screening while Wade and Lebron tried to figure out what to do?

I think it's more the latter than former.
I disagree.

D'Antoni's system doesn't require a point guard. It requires effective pick and roll players, and Miami has several of them.

Look, this off-season if the right guy is available, sure, make a coaching change. But the idea that this year's issues fall on D'Antoni, or that the roster as constructed isn't being optimized just doesn't hold water in my mind. They shouldn't make a change just to make a change, and making a change under your logic (that anybody could get more out of this team than D'Antoni) is really misguided.

A lot of teams lost back to backs against Dallas and San Antonio on the road. Overreacting and firing your coach in the middle of a practice-free, shortened season is going to make things far, far worse.
 

dolomite133

everything I write, think and feel is stupid
SoSH Member
Mar 6, 2002
5,920
Littleton, NH
Fire D'Antoni. Bring in a coach who stresses defense (or at least mentions it once in a while). That is all.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
70,745
His (NY) teams are all so undisciplined in so many ways, he seems to get outcoached virtually every game. Among other things tonight, why did he not call a TO two possessions in a row down 112-111 with Baron clearly gassed after sparking the big comeback? Scott Skiles is another of the numerous coaches I'd rather have.
 

A Bartlett Giamatti

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2003
2,049
Let's play Mike D'Antoni choose your own adventure.

Scenario 1:
Carmelo Anthony comes down 1 on 4 and shoots an ill-advised jumper. Do you:

1-look frustrated
2-smirk
3-yell at Landry Fields
4-wait for a timeout, then demonstrate leadership by chasing down the refs to avoid confrontation and leave accountability to Woodson and Chandler.
5-yank Shumpert


Scenario 2:
Amare Stoudemire doesn't turn around, to help at all and Evan Turner dunks on him. Do you:

1-look frustrated
2-smirk
3-yell at Landry Fields
4-wait for a timeout, then demonstrate leadership by chasing down the refs to avoid confrontation and leave accountability to Woodson and Chandler.
5-yank Shumpert
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
70,745
He needs to be fired after NY gets blown out again tomorrow in Chicago. The ship be sinking.
 

A Bartlett Giamatti

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2003
2,049
This opportunity for a fun, deep, competitive team is on life support, and Dantonis ineptness is murdering it. He has to go; of course, I have no idea who even pulls the trigger. Dolan? Grunwald?
 

Grin&MartyBarret

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 2, 2007
4,932
East Village, NYC
The tide seems to have shifted in favor of firing D'Antoni, and it looks like it's going to happen.

But I can't help but think it's going to be a disaster. Pinning the team's lack of fire on D'Antoni is easy, I guess, but he's the only guy I see showing emotion.

Regardless, you guys are probably right that he's on his way out. But the idea that it's just a question of effort and that the Knicks could be a contender is misguided; this just isn't a good team. They're gonna have to find a hell of a coach to change that.
 

Grin&MartyBarret

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 2, 2007
4,932
East Village, NYC
Before firing D'Antoni, they should be frantically looking for a patsy GM to take Amare off their hands at the deadline. It's probably impossible, but in my mind Amare is far more culpable for the Knicks issues than D'Antoni is. He's atrocious on the defensive end--to the point that even when he does make an effort, he truly has no idea what to do--and he does nothing on the offensive end but get in Carmelo's way. There isn't a worse contract in basketball right now.
 

A Bartlett Giamatti

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2003
2,049
The tide seems to have shifted in favor of firing D'Antoni, and it looks like it's going to happen.

But I can't help but think it's going to be a disaster. Pinning the team's lack of fire on D'Antoni is easy, I guess, but he's the only guy I see showing emotion.

Regardless, you guys are probably right that he's on his way out. But the idea that it's just a question of effort and that the Knicks could be a contender is misguided; this just isn't a good team. They're gonna have to find a hell of a coach to change that.
What were seeing now isn't a disaster? How can you honestly sit here and say you'd rather this course continue, under this captain, rather than installing a guy with previous NBA head coaching experience who preaches defense?

Woodson will by no means be a savior; you just have to hope he will emphasize defense and hold his "stars" accountable. I'm seeing nothing from Dantoni that tells me he's up to this (or really, any sort of) coaching challenge.
 

A Bartlett Giamatti

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2003
2,049
Before firing D'Antoni, they should be frantically looking for a patsy GM to take Amare off their hands at the deadline. It's probably impossible, but in my mind Amare is far more culpable for the Knicks issues than D'Antoni is. He's atrocious on the defensive end--to the point that even when he does make an effort, he truly has no idea what to do--and he does nothing on the offensive end but get in Carmelo's way. There isn't a worse contract in basketball right now.
This I 100% agree with. Maybe Billy King crumbles, money trumps sense and you send Amare and Lin to Jersey for D-will (if they are convinced they can't/won't get D12 and need to sell seats next year, this makes sense from a business perspective)

I was thinking about Amare and from where his defensive woes stem. Here's a guy who never even had a decent prolonged high school experience, no less college. He went to the pros and immediately got stuck playing for the worst defensive coach in the NBA. Now here he is again. Has anyone ever even taught him the basics?
 

dolomite133

everything I write, think and feel is stupid
SoSH Member
Mar 6, 2002
5,920
Littleton, NH
Knicks dream scenario: You bring in Phil Jackson, who shows up on the first day wearing all of his rings, looks the team in the eye, and says "you either do it my way or you're gone." It would really be that simple.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
70,745
Pinning the team's lack of fire on D'Antoni is easy, I guess, but he's the only guy I see showing emotion.
D'Antoni shows emotion? I see him smiling courtside and in press conferences more than any other NBA coach I can think of, Baron Davis seemed like he spent more time coaching the team during games for the first 25 or so games this year than D'Antoni did.

And yeah, Chandler/Melo for Howard and then Amare/Lin for D-Will had better be on the table.
 

Grin&MartyBarret

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 2, 2007
4,932
East Village, NYC
D'Antoni shows emotion? I see him smiling courtside and in press conferences more than any other NBA coach I can think of, Baron Davis seemed like he spent more time coaching the team during games for the first 25 or so games this year than D'Antoni did.

And yeah, Chandler/Melo for Howard and then Amare/Lin for D-Will had better be on the table.
I mean, I see plenty of shots of him looking disgusted and getting on refs during telecasts, and on several occasions this season I've been to games where I can hear him yelling at players, Amare included, from my seats. I see far more emotion out of D'Antoni than I do out of any player outside of Chandler.
 

Grin&MartyBarret

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 2, 2007
4,932
East Village, NYC
What were seeing now isn't a disaster? How can you honestly sit here and say you'd rather this course continue, under this captain, rather than installing a guy with previous NBA head coaching experience who preaches defense?

Woodson will by no means be a savior; you just have to hope he will emphasize defense and hold his "stars" accountable. I'm seeing nothing from Dantoni that tells me he's up to this (or really, any sort of) coaching challenge.
I don't really think defense is the issue. When Chandler and Jeffries are healthy, this is an above average defensive team--really, a top 10 defensive team. The "D'Antoni doesn't emphasize defense" thing just feels like people are falling back on on critiques of D'Antoni teams, and don't seem to apply to this one.

The thing is, honestly, it's not like I'm a huge D'Antoni fan. I'd like to see them make a change--just not in the middle of this season with fewer practices. This offseason there are definitely guys I'd like them to target, but right now I don't see how Woodson is going to present a huge upgrade or really bring anything new to the table considering that he's, you know, sitting at the table already. As poorly as they're playing now, and as flawed as I think the construction of the team is, I'd still like to give this team some semblance of continuity and see what develops. This team has barely played together. They've had to adjust to a major trade that involved an entire roster overhaul (Carmelo), several new pieces (Lin, Davis, Novak, Harrelson, Shumpert, Smith, Chandler), and a shortened season with fewer practices all within a calendar year. It just feels to me like there's a better chance that this team will benefit from continuity than there is that Mike Woodson holds the key to their success--and will be able to make it work over the next month leading up to the playoffs.
 

TomRicardo

rusty cohlebone
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 6, 2006
20,613
Row 14
And yeah, Chandler/Melo for Howard and then Amare/Lin for D-Will had better be on the table.
The Nets would be retarded to take that. No one will take Amare. He is the worst contract in the league. I can't even think how you could gift wrap him so someone will take his bloated corpse.

Anyone else starting to get the Isiah Thomas feel for the Knicks again? They have one draft pick in the next 3 years. They have two bloated max contracts.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
70,745
Yep, the ship be sinkin'. Fuck James Dolan, if I had less on my plate, I swear I'd lead an organized fan boycott in a (likely ill-fated) attempt to force Dolan out.

And the saddest thing is I'm now kind of hoping they lose enough games so they have a shot at keeping their pick this year, which is top 5 protected. Of course, they'll likely fall short there also.
 

Grin&MartyBarret

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 2, 2007
4,932
East Village, NYC
Yep, the ship be sinkin'. Fuck James Dolan, if I had less on my plate, I swear I'd lead an organized fan boycott in a (likely ill-fated) attempt to force Dolan out.

And the saddest thing is I'm now kind of hoping they lose enough games so they have a shot at keeping their pick this year, which is top 5 protected. Of course, they'll likely fall short there also.
Was it ever floating? I think the Gallo, Amare, Wilson Chandler, Ray Felton playing way above his head for a half a season Knicks were in line for a 7 seed. And that marks the high water mark in, what, 10 years?