How do you know that a player's status doesn't result in greater demands? Or maybe better said - that it "isn't a thing" that established players are more likely to make demands about playing time than less established players? Have you been in a major league clubhouse? It seems quite natural that with more status comes more agency/confidence to ask for things - damn it's a universal work place phenomenon (as an aside: NBA star players can get their coach fired - the 12th man on the bench cannot). Rookies or fringe players likely feel less agency or "space" to "gripe" than a star player. Do you really believe that Chavis is going into Cora's office bitching - or that Devers (or his agent) wouldn't start bitching if he were suddenly a part time player?? We know JD has some issue with not playing the field more and I'm sure he communicates as much. Do you think Danny Santana complains about anything? He knows he'd be cut from the team in an instant if he did.First name I thought of as well. Of course there are undoubtedly countless players who have also done it over the years less publicly. Having some perceived "status" to make griping about playing time okay really isn't a thing. Professional athletes all have huge egos and don't like to lose playing time. Cora will probably go with a rotation that is best for the team, both on the field, and in the clubhouse.
Imagine how many there would be if this wasn't the main boardNo worries. It's hard to keep up with the bad puns in this punfest
Yeah, good point -- I lost sight of that. No more from me.Imagine how many there would be if this wasn't the main board
We never shoulda signed that guy.And Jay Payton did? Chances are it won't be an issue, but it's something to keep in mind.
We’re Notorious for that sort of thing.Imagine how many there would be if this wasn't the main board
Since you asked, yes, I actually have been in quite a few major league clubhouses, although that's irrelevant to the discussion.How do you know that a player's status doesn't result in greater demands? Or maybe better said - that it "isn't a thing" that established players are more likely to make demands about playing time than less established players? Have you been in a major league clubhouse? It seems quite natural that with more status comes more agency/confidence to ask for things - damn it's a universal work place phenomenon (as an aside: NBA star players can get their coach fired - the 12th man on the bench cannot). Rookies or fringe players likely feel less agency or "space" to "gripe" than a star player. Do you really believe that Chavis is going into Cora's office bitching - or that Devers (or his agent) wouldn't start bitching if he were suddenly a part time player?? We know JD has some issue with not playing the field more and I'm sure he communicates as much. Do you think Danny Santana complains about anything? He knows he'd be cut from the team in an instant if he did.
Now you are almost certainly right that all kinds of behind the scenes stuff happens that we don't know of; and certainly all players want to be at the center - their livelihoods are effected by playing time and a chance to excel. Though not all players are assholes like Jay Payton. I think many players understand a bit of personal sacrifice is necessary in a championship stretch run, and if the team is winning they are on board - would prefer to share playing time and win a championship than get all the playing time and not win one. Some players do see the big picture. And finding high character guys IS part of the equation for wise general managers ...*
The reason that a guy like Payton stands out is the huge gulf between his self-perception (and subsequent demands) and what he was actually capable of contributing: he was bitching but it was all ego, he didn't have the goods to back it up. Meanwhile, the 2004 team had gorgeous depth - with Millar, Mientkiewicz, Kaplar, Nixon, Reese, Roberts mixing in and out in the stretch run - I bet you they were all on board.
No - I think it's entirely relevant! I'm certainly operating on conjecture and observations of human nature, and not the observed workings of major league clubhouses. I am more than happy to here your actual observations of this stuff (sincerely)! ...Since you asked, yes, I actually have been in quite a few major league clubhouses, although that's irrelevant to the discussion.
He never should have signed with the Sox if he was gonna be unhappy with a part-time role. He had to know what he was getting into.We never shoulda signed that guy.
It’s a 16 year old joke. He wasn’t signed we traded Roberts for him.He never should have signed with the Sox if he was gonna be unhappy with a part-time role. He had to know what he was getting into.
...I know. I was lurking on the board at the time. I was leaning into the joke. Sorry for reviving such an old joke.It’s a 16 year old joke. He wasn’t signed we traded Roberts for him.
Well if you have to explain it, of course it's not going to be funny.It’s a 16 year old joke. He wasn’t signed we traded Roberts for him.
Someone has to defend Jay Payton (a little). The Red Sox did not SIGN Payton, they TRADED for him in a deal that sent Dave Roberts to San Diego. Payton was a starting player, with 1,100+ plate appearances over the previous two seasons. On paper, he was an excellent acquisition. He could serve as a RH platoon partner for Nixon, as well as CF insurance for Damon, who was entering his walk year. Payton was signed through 2006. The Red Sox didn't play him very much, and he reacted petulantly, basically forcing his way out of town. And, of course, Nixon wound up getting hurt not long after his departure.We never shoulda signed that guy.
ummSomeone has to defend Jay Payton (a little). The Red Sox did not SIGN Payton, they TRADED for him in a deal that sent Dave Roberts to San Diego. Payton was a starting player, with 1,100+ plate appearances over the previous two seasons. On paper, he was an excellent acquisition. He could serve as a RH platoon partner for Nixon, as well as CF insurance for Damon, who was entering his walk year. Payton was signed through 2006. The Red Sox didn't play him very much, and he reacted petulantly, basically forcing his way out of town. And, of course, Nixon wound up getting hurt not long after his departure.
huh? How is it remotely extreme? Am I missing something?Are any of our stathounds able to answer the following: how many established major leaguers have as extreme a reverse split as Duran?
Yelich/Harper have been the best the past few seasons, but it's really not a thing.Are any of our stathounds able to answer the following: how many established major leaguers have as extreme a reverse split as Duran?
Great ... now we're going to have dozens of posts explaining this one
Does that mean we get to repost it again in a few posts?Great ... now we're going to have dozens of posts explaining this one
We’re Notorious for that sort of thing.Does that mean we get to repost it again in a few posts?
Thread really should be closed and a legit one about Duran startedThis topic has come undone.
Is there anyone out there to start a new thread? Someone else not me, please.This topic has come undone.
How hungry?I’m really Hungry to see Duran in action in the major leagues. FU Yankees for the delay. You’re no friends of mine.
Montgomery is starting for the Yankees. Duran's gonna sit against LHP for the time being, it would appear.Duran not in the starting line up tonight according to the Globe ... anyone know why? Seems very odd to me to bring him up then immediately have him ride the pine ...
At one point, they did it on purpose. Call them up, have them sit day 1.Duran not in the starting line up tonight according to the Globe ... anyone know why? Seems very odd to me to bring him up then immediately have him ride the pine ...
Unless it causes said players to gripe about playing time.