Marlins just DFA'd Salty

nattysez

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2010
8,486
According to a few sources on Twitter and MLB Trade Rumors.
 
They are paying him $7mm this year and $8mm next year.  That's quite a bit of money to eat.
 
He .OPS'd .681 last year and was abysmal through 9 games this year, but it's not like the Marlins to give away money like this.
 
On the plus side, he just had a kid, so he might be happy to stay at home with his kid for awhile.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,463
@joecapMARLINS: #Marlins Jarrod Saltalamacchia reinstated from paternity list and designated for assignment.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,135
He's supposed to be one of the worst catchers at pitch framing also, that's not helping his case.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,872
Maine
Smiling Joe Hesketh said:
2 for 29 on the year so far.
 
He was down last year from his 2013 Boston numbers, but he's only 30. Hard to think he's just completely lost it already.
 
BABIP of .063 in those 29 ABs.  Ouch.
 
Someone will no doubt take a flyer on him, especially since he'll come cheap (once he clears waivers).  Kinda surprised by the Marlins quick trigger on this.
 
And already, the "nice fit" drums are sounding amongst the Boston beat writers (okay, it's only Ian Browne).
 

Ian Browne @IanMBrowne
Salty would have to clear waivers and all that, but he could be a nice fit on this Red Sox team.
 

mauidano

Mai Tais for everyone!
SoSH Member
Aug 21, 2006
35,920
Maui
$15 million? Yeah, I think he's probably cool with hanging out at home.  However, he is a MLB caliber catcher, SOMEONE will take a flyer on him.
 

Greg29fan

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
20,502
NC
jon abbey said:
He's supposed to be one of the worst catchers at pitch framing also, that's not helping his case.
 
https://twitter.com/Ken_Rosenthal/status/592773428907737088
 

mauidano

Mai Tais for everyone!
SoSH Member
Aug 21, 2006
35,920
Maui
Red(s)HawksFan said:
 
BABIP of .063 in those 29 ABs.  Ouch.
 
Someone will no doubt take a flyer on him, especially since he'll come cheap (once he clears waivers).  Kinda surprised by the Marlins quick trigger on this.
 
 
mauidano said:
$15 million? Yeah, I think he's probably cool with hanging out at home.  However, he is a MLB caliber catcher, SOMEONE will take a flyer on him.
Great minds think alike.
 
M

MentalDisabldLst

Guest
Greg29fan said:
 
https://twitter.com/Ken_Rosenthal/status/592773428907737088
 
Worcester's Own Tanyon Sturtze?  Talk about chugging the haterade.
 

Tyrone Biggums

nfl meets tri-annually at a secret country mansion
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2006
6,424
Vegas would put odds on the Cubs claiming him as 7/2. He's a former Red Sox they can't resist.
 

Sox and Rocks

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 16, 2013
5,863
Northern Colorado
A lot of SOSHers were upset the Sox didn't re-sign him, and now he can be had for next to nothing (though I realize the Sox catching situation has changed since then).
 
That was a bad contract from day one. 
 

MakMan44

stole corsi's dream
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2009
19,363
I'd actually rather the Sox just stuck with Hanigan at this point. I doubt I'm alone in feeling that way either. 
 

nattysez

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2010
8,486
Tyrone Biggums said:
Vegas would put odds on the Cubs claiming him as 7/2. He's a former Red Sox they can't resist.
 
The Cubs currently have a three-catcher rotation.  Of all the teams in the majors, the #1 team that absolutely will not be trading for Salty will be the Cubs.
 

GRPhilipp

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 30, 2007
87
soxhop411 said:
@joecapMARLINS: #Marlins Jarrod Saltalamacchia reinstated from paternity list and designated for assignment.
The Marlins used virtually the same wording in their tweet. This could be read as a signal that they fired him in retaliation for taking paternity leave. That organization just epitomizes class.
 

MakMan44

stole corsi's dream
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2009
19,363
GRPhilipp said:
The Marlins used virtually the same wording in their tweet. This could be read as a signal that they fired him in retaliation for taking paternity leave. That organization just epitomizes class.
I....uhhh....what?
 

SydneySox

A dash of cool to add the heat
SoSH Member
Sep 19, 2005
15,605
The Eastern Suburbs
GRPhilipp said:
The Marlins used virtually the same wording in their tweet. This could be read as a signal that they fired him in retaliation for taking paternity leave. That organization just epitomizes class.
 
It could. That is true.
 
Apr 7, 2015
332
GRPhilipp said:
The Marlins used virtually the same wording in their tweet. This could be read as a signal that they fired him in retaliation for taking paternity leave. That organization just epitomizes class.
MLB doesn't have an exemption from FMLA, only Sherman/Clayton/antitrust, correct?
 

Average Reds

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 24, 2007
35,413
Southwestern CT
GraysonGrandeGonads said:
MLB doesn't have an exemption from FMLA, only Sherman/Clayton/antitrust, correct?
 
Given that they are still responsible for his salary, the Marlins aren't in violation of the FMLA.
 
They are a shitty organization, but Salty is (now) a bad ballplayer and that's why he got cut.
 

GRPhilipp

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 30, 2007
87
Lose Remerswaal said:
 
Wow.  Amazing read of the situation.
I'm not saying I think this is why they cut him. I'm saying the optics are bad (would your employer do it this way?) and they made things worse by posting the two bits of news in literally the same sentence.
 

The Talented Allen Ripley

holden
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 2, 2003
12,739
MetroWest, MA
I was dating a girl for a few years and was on the verge of dumping her until her dad was diagnosed terminal cancer. I not only had to stick with her until he passed, but then I had to wait out a nebulous mourning period before pulling the trigger (3 months, in my estimation). That sucked.
 
I feel the Marlins' pain.
 

Rasputin

Will outlive SeanBerry
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 4, 2001
29,494
Not here
GRPhilipp said:
I'm not saying I think this is why they cut him. I'm saying the optics are bad (would your employer do it this way?) and they made things worse by posting the two bits of news in literally the same sentence.
 
You're reaching. When two player transactions come at the same time, they are often put in the same sentence. "Player X was reinstated from the disabled list and assigned to AAA Pawtucket" and so forth. There is precisely nothing weird about their statement.
 

Drek717

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 23, 2003
2,542
MakMan44 said:
I'd actually rather the Sox just stuck with Hanigan at this point. I doubt I'm alone in feeling that way either. 
But would you also rather stick with Sandy Leon?  I think that gets into "debatable" territory.  Also, they could try to get Leon through waivers and on the AAA roster as an upgrade over Matt Spring and potentially improve their organizational catcher depth.
 
Buchholz had a damn good 2013 going with Salty catching until he got hurt, doubt he hates throwing to him, so there's at least one game a week you could give him to see if he gets the bat back on track with a return to the AL East/Fenway.
 
Just saying, the Sox are one injury away from a Sandy Leon/Matt Spring tandem or rushing Swihart up, I can't see anyone taking on his contract in any way, and I'd bet he would prefer Boston over the alternatives.  If he clears he would probably be an easy vet minimum signing.  If it's a trade it wouldn't cost anyone of any consequence at all and still cost basically nothing.  Definitely worth kicking the tires.
 
(as a disclaimer I was 100% opposed to re-signing him following 2013, but he's a better bet to not suck if thrust into a majority starter role than Leon or Spring and available for basically nothing.)
 

MakMan44

stole corsi's dream
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2009
19,363
Drek717 said:
But would you also rather stick with Sandy Leon?  I think that gets into "debatable" territory.  Also, they could try to get Leon through waivers and on the AAA roster as an upgrade over Matt Spring and potentially improve their organizational catcher depth.
 
Buchholz had a damn good 2013 going with Salty catching until he got hurt, doubt he hates throwing to him, so there's at least one game a week you could give him to see if he gets the bat back on track with a return to the AL East/Fenway.
 
Just saying, the Sox are one injury away from a Sandy Leon/Matt Spring tandem or rushing Swihart up, I can't see anyone taking on his contract in any way, and I'd bet he would prefer Boston over the alternatives.  If he clears he would probably be an easy vet minimum signing.  If it's a trade it wouldn't cost anyone of any consequence at all and still cost basically nothing.  Definitely worth kicking the tires.
I disagree. 
 
Salty is not a good back up catcher, because his defense is iffy at best and that's what he'd be right now.
 
I suppose if he doesn't get traded, passes through waivers and would report to AAA, sure, why not? 
 

GRPhilipp

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 30, 2007
87
Rasputin said:
 
You're reaching. When two player transactions come at the same time, they are often put in the same sentence. "Player X was reinstated from the disabled list and assigned to AAA Pawtucket" and so forth. There is precisely nothing weird about their statement.
I freely admit to reaching.  I'm also not alone; the guys on the CBS fantasy baseball podcast today said "that's cold!" when they read this news item.  I disagree with your assessment of how weird or un-weird their statement is and I suspect you can find none others like it since MLB implemented paternity leave.
 
I would rather live in a world with more people like The Allented Mr Ripley and fewer people like Jeffrey Loria and his henchmen.  I hope I'm not alone in that sentiment.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,484
Oregon
I would rather live in a world with fewer people who adhere to the CBS fantasy baseball podcast
 

The Talented Allen Ripley

holden
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 2, 2003
12,739
MetroWest, MA
GRPhilipp said:
I freely admit to reaching.  I'm also not alone; the guys on the CBS fantasy baseball podcast today said "that's cold!" when they read this news item.  I disagree with your assessment of how weird or un-weird their statement is and I suspect you can find none others like it since MLB implemented paternity leave.
 
I would rather live in a world with more people like The Allented Mr Ripley and fewer people like Jeffrey Loria and his henchmen.  I hope I'm not alone in that sentiment.
 
I like this guy.
 
This just sounds like a terrible world.
 
Hush, you.
 

Drek717

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 23, 2003
2,542
MakMan44 said:
I disagree. 
 
Salty is not a good back up catcher, because his defense is iffy at best and that's what he'd be right now.
 
I suppose if he doesn't get traded, passes through waivers and would report to AAA, sure, why not? 
No matter how you term his defense I have a hard time buying that the delta between he and Sandy Leon defensively wins over even the potential offensive delta should Salty revert to 2011-2013 Salty with the bat upon returning to Boston.  For the roughly 60 games they need to spell Hanigan you're talking less than a win of defense.
 
For a quick back of the napkin test Salty, by DRS, has been -31 runs over his career for 5310 innings, so -0.0525 per game.  Hanigan is +14 over 4331 innings, so +0.0291.  This assumes Leon is every bit the defender Hanigan is.  So over the course of 60 or so games in relief of Hanigan Salty would be -3.15 runs to Hanigan's +1.74 runs, for a delta of 4.89 runs.  The usual runs to wins ratio is 10:1, so we're talking a shade under half a win.  Now if we use Sany Leon's nicest projection (Steamer, -4.1 offensive runs over 102 ABs for a -0.040 per AB rate) versus Salty's worst (also Steamer, -4.4 over 294 ABs for a -0.0149 per AB rate), figure 4.5 ABs per game and do that over 60 games we have -10.85 runs for Sandy's offense and -4.023 runs from Salty.  So just over half a win.
 
The most optimistic projection for Sandy and assuming his defense is equal to Hanigan's career up to this point still gives a slight edge to Salty if he posts a .216/.297/.369 slash, the worst of any projection and basically comparable to his last season with the Marlins.
 
This also ignores that Salty was .706 OPS (98 wRC+) last year against RHP (as a LHB) and .600 OPS (67 wRC+) against LHP (as a RHB).  A slightly weaker split than his career average.  So he could be used more selectively against RHP to get an extra LHB in the lineup, further increasing his offensive value.
 
Again, I'm not even a Salty fan, but Sandy Leon isn't worth hording.  Salty is almost definitely a better overall player who would likely look forward to coming here and since a decent chunk of the 2013 club is still around likely fit just fine in the clubhouse.  If he finds his bat on the trip back north it could turn into a big net positive for this club with him as an extra LH bat off the bench.
 

MakMan44

stole corsi's dream
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2009
19,363
Good argument. It doesn't sound like the Sox are interested in a reunion, but I can admit that was an interesting read. 
 
M

MentalDisabldLst

Guest
Andrew said:
Yeah but who knows when he'll have another kid again and just leave the team. You can't trust a guy like that.
 
Well played.
 
Now we just need a Mike Rowe type to show up and hate on Salty for being a taker, expecting the Marlins to pay him while he sits around on his duff doing nothing.
 

Kevin Jewkilis

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 5, 2006
1,241
Lafayette Sq., Cambridge
The flip side to Salty's offense is his shockingly bad defense.  Last year, his poor pitch framing cost the Marlins about 20 runs.  That's before you introduce other elements of catcher defense, where Salty has also been below average.  Salty was born a generation too late for his skill set. As teams learn more about catcher defense and pitch framing, the potential for flashy offensive stats is no longer enough.
 

Plympton91

bubble burster
SoSH Member
Oct 19, 2008
12,408
Kevin Jewkilis said:
The flip side to Salty's offense is his shockingly bad defense.  Last year, his poor pitch framing cost the Marlins about 20 runs.  That's before you introduce other elements of catcher defense, where Salty has also been below average.  Salty was born a generation too late for his skill set. As teams learn more about catcher defense and pitch framing, the potential for flashy offensive stats is no longer enough.
I think the new market inefficiency for teams to exploit is statistical hubris.

The catcher framing fetish is an example of the lamppost fallacy. We've found something we can measure at a position filled with intangibles, and all of a sudden it's getting hugely disproportionate weight.

Buccholz had the best season of his career throwing to Salty, and the Red Sox won a Division title and AL Championship with him as a starting catcher less than 18 months ago. His bat clearly out weighted any defensive shortcomings. Now, that offense was driven by a high BABIP, but If were still living in the era of diminished offense, then his 2014, was perfectly fine for an offensive catcher.

I hardly think he's washed up offensively based on 50 plate appearances this April. He's got to be a bigger asset than Leon, regardless of a stat that says Jose Molina is close to the most valuable catcher in baseball
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,412
Miami (oh, Miami!)
What are the odds he transitions into a 1B/DH/3rd catcher in the hopes his bat would come around without the regular catching duties dragging it down?  He's always had decent power.  Sort of a Hatteberg/Napoli lite.  
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,543
Plympton91 said:
I think the new market inefficiency for teams to exploit is statistical hubris.

The catcher framing fetish is an example of the lamppost fallacy. We've found something we can measure at a position filled with intangibles, and all of a sudden it's getting hugely disproportionate weight.

Buccholz had the best season of his career throwing to Salty, and the Red Sox won a Division title and AL Championship with him as a starting catcher less than 18 months ago. His bat clearly out weighted any defensive shortcomings. Now, that offense was driven by a high BABIP, but If were still living in the era of diminished offense, then his 2014, was perfectly fine for an offensive catcher.

I hardly think he's washed up offensively based on 50 plate appearances this April. He's got to be a bigger asset than Leon, regardless of a stat that says Jose Molina is close to the most valuable catcher in baseball
 
His 118 OPS+ in 2013 is beginning to look like the outlier.  Now that he's returned to being a below average hitter, he really offers very little. That said,  "better asset than Leon" is a pretty low bar that he might clear.
 
And while you're right about Buchholz and Salt's starting status, he did get moved aside for Ross in October. Maybe he was cooked from a no-backup summer, or maybe they just couldnt live with the defense in the playoffs.  Regardless, it was pretty clear the Sox opinion of him wasn't very high by November 2013.
 

kenneycb

Hates Goose Island Beer; Loves Backdoor Play
SoSH Member
Dec 2, 2006
16,149
Tuukka's refugee camp
He got benched because he wasn't hitting. In 35 PAs he had a .188 average with a 19/3 K/BB. He also struck out in 12 of his final 24 PAs with only 3 hits and 2 BBs. He was a mess at that point.
 

mauf

Anderson Cooper × Mr. Rogers
Moderator
SoSH Member
Plympton91 said:
I think the new market inefficiency for teams to exploit is statistical hubris.
 
 
I checked last season and was shocked to discover that team defense, as measured by advanced metrics, was a better predictor of team success than either OPS or ERA.
 
That doesn't mean that defense is more important than hitting or pitching. It might not even mean that advanced metrics do a good job at measuring defense. It does, however, strongly suggest that teams that rely heavily on advanced metrics continue to enjoy a competitive advantage, more than a decade after Moneyball. So I'm glad to see the Red Sox leaning in on cutting-edge stats like catcher framing.
 

BroodsSexton

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 4, 2006
12,647
guam
Plympton91 said:
I think the new market inefficiency for teams to exploit is statistical hubris.

The catcher framing fetish is an example of the lamppost fallacy. We've found something we can measure at a position filled with intangibles, and all of a sudden it's getting hugely disproportionate weight.

Buccholz had the best season of his career throwing to Salty, and the Red Sox won a Division title and AL Championship with him as a starting catcher less than 18 months ago. His bat clearly out weighted any defensive shortcomings. Now, that offense was driven by a high BABIP, but If were still living in the era of diminished offense, then his 2014, was perfectly fine for an offensive catcher.

I hardly think he's washed up offensively based on 50 plate appearances this April. He's got to be a bigger asset than Leon, regardless of a stat that says Jose Molina is close to the most valuable catcher in baseball
 
I don't even know what this means.  Could you explain your thesis of how one would "exploit statistical hubris"?  Is the idea that you look for guys who have inferior statistics, and pay them more than the statistical analysis would suggest they are worth?
 

Plympton91

bubble burster
SoSH Member
Oct 19, 2008
12,408
BroodsSexton said:
 
I don't even know what this means.  Could you explain your thesis of how one would "exploit statistical hubris"?  Is the idea that you look for guys who have inferior statistics, and pay them more than the statistical analysis would suggest they are worth?
 
I gave one example in the post - the lamppost fallacy -- elevating the worth of things you can measure solely because you can measure them.   Understanding the second moments of the distributions you're measuring would be another good place to start.  I always get a kick out of the idea that UZR is of paramount importance, but it doesn't stabilize until you have 3 years of data, across which a player might have played in 3 separate defensive schemes and played through 2 leg injuries for weeks at a time.  Not placing a whole lot of weight on a statistic that says Jose Molina was the most valuable player in baseball in 2013, would be a third.
 

BroodsSexton

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 4, 2006
12,647
guam
Plympton91 said:
 
I gave one example in the post - the lamppost fallacy -- elevating the worth of things you can measure solely because you can measure them.   Understanding the second moments of the distributions you're measuring would be another good place to start.  I always get a kick out of the idea that UZR is of paramount importance, but it doesn't stabilize until you have 3 years of data, across which a player might have played in 3 separate defensive schemes and played through 2 leg injuries for weeks at a time.  Not placing a whole lot of weight on a statistic that says Jose Molina was the most valuable player in baseball in 2013, would be a third.
 
My apologies, maybe I was just reading too much into your initial post, but I thought you were proposing a coherent way of making the team better, by means of employing a particular method in evaluating and acquiring talent, (i.e., "exploiting statistical hubris"). If what you're saying is that there are limits to the use of advanced metrics, and that all of the information has to be taken into account when arriving at a valuation, that seems less interesting (but also less controversial...and not really "exploiting statistical hubris").