Level out over a full season, sure. I think ookami7m's point is that we're barely at the quarter mark of the season. The outliers might have outsized impact at this stage.
May: Red Sox discussion, observations and trend tracking...AKA It's not all about the Benjamins
- Thread starter YTF
- Start date
From a top level view, this is absolutely right. We've given up the fewest earned runs in the Majors. They are the best. There's no more reasonable improvement to be mined out of this staff. We are 12 runs better than the #2 team - NYY.
When you add in unearned runs? Well, it's bad. But we only fall to #3 in all baseball: ATL, NYY, BOS, BAL, LAD - in that order. The top 5 are basically all within 10 runs of each other. If the defense improves that'd be great, but it's not exactly killing us.
Batting - actual runs crossing the plate, or OPS+? We're basically average at this point. But that's probably going to trend down if our recent performance stays the same.
I think the problem is likely that. Looking at just the AL teams we're very much middle of the road (or better) for most things, including making productive outs and so forth. But our HR numbers are low - very low for the home park splits. Also we have the second highest number of Ks.
So the hitting isn't bad - but without RBIs from HRs, we tend to get men on, move them over when we hit, but not bring them home. Because we're constantly striking out.
https://www.baseball-reference.com/leagues/AL/2024-situational-batting.shtml
PS - resort the link you used in your post for strikeouts with runners in scoring position and tell me what you see?
Even better - https://www.mlb.com/stats/boston-red-sox/strikeouts?split=risp&playerPool=ALL
Last edited:
RHF got my answer out before I did (stupid work keeping me away from SoSH during the day). Over 162, sure. But not yet.
….Sox are in a funk. Figuring out every possible way to lose a game and exploring those ideas in real life it seems.
Since I made this comment 2 days ago Duran has 1 home run and 3 doubles.
You are welcome.
If someone told you before the season the Sox would be at .500 after 44 games you wouldn't be shocked.
If someone told you they'd be at .500 after 44 games with a 2.79 ERA, you'd have some very colorful replies.
Well my comment led him to change his leg kick - which in turn is why he is hitting better.
Now that you mention it I am not wild about Rafaela's path to the ball. I'll see what I can do.
The team really looks undisciplined in my limited watching time. The pitching looks very good but to me, Cora is still not leading well. Makes poor decisions late in the games, still doesn’t emphasize situational hitting.
I do wonder if you trim the pythag to limit the effect of 10+ blowouts whether it gets more predictive.
I went to the first two games of the series and watched all of last night - and to me the lineup is just not very good. It has 3 kids who are playing everyday (and who should), one guy who got off to a hot start and has cooled (O'Neill) and a guy who is hitting pretty high up in the lineup but who cannot be expected to be a major contributor offensively (Wong).
I went to the first two games of the series and watched all of last night - and to me the lineup is just not very good. It has 3 kids who are playing everyday (and who should), one guy who got off to a hot start and has cooled (O'Neill) and a guy who is hitting pretty high up in the lineup but who cannot be expected to be a major contributor offensively (Wong).
I disagree that Cora is the issue. Our offense has been depleted by injury and we just have too many guys that can't even muster a .600 OPS., in some cases not .500, in some not .400...
I thought Cora mismanaged the pitching last night. His go-to template is Martin in the 8th and Jansen in the 9th. Slaten pitched the 7th and struck out the side with 16 pitches. Why not keep him in for the 8th? But Cora stuck to his template and Jansen lost the game.
The template has worked in a lot of games though. Jansen has become iffy, of course.
This team just ends up in too many close games that are decided at the end. Almost every game is a struggle.
As for Slaten, he's one of those guys you have to be careful not to burn out with too many innings, I think. He could be an asset for years to come.
Cora's very paint-by-numbers when it comes to the pen. When he has a good pen (like this year) it isn't so much an issue. We don't have any true B-squad "white flag" pitchers that Cora will automatically go to, even if down by one run in the 6th. Which he would. And so (IMO) one of his biggest weaknesses has been mitigated.
Cora's PH and situational hitting results aren't all that bad this year. (He used to drive me bananas with this.) Like the bullpen usage, it's at worst average managing. For example, look at % of platoon advantage and https://www.baseball-reference.com/leagues/AL/2024-situational-batting.shtml
I don't want to sound like a broken drum, but the hitting coaches need to be fired. They need a new voice in there for about half the squad. The K numbers with RISP are absurd. And while that's driven by a few awful players, it also seems to be a top-down directive - a hitting philosophy. Smack the ball and it will all even out eventually. Except it's not doing that.
https://www.mlb.com/stats/boston-red-sox/strikeouts?split=risp&playerPool=ALL
Compare for a moment Devers/O'Neill and Duran/Abreu. The first group is very all-or-nothing. Few hits but for power - but that means their RBIs are clustered to fewer ABs (and so, games). And they K about half the time. The second has more hits and less power - which spreads the RBIs over more ABs, and so, more games. Valdez (for example) was trying to be like Devers. He should have tried to be like Abreu.
I fully agree. Cora's teams have all been sloppy teams, with mistake prone and unintelligent play (lack of situational hitting, bad base running, etc), with the juggernaut 2018 team being the exception. Despite that, for whatever reason, I like him as a personality, though not sure he's all that great a manager.
EDIT: Yes, Cora's hitting philosophy has been to be aggressive early. But it's a reductive: there are times to be aggressive and times to be patient. Just lacks any nuance or situational understanding.
I found it a bit curious that the Red Sox hired Dillon Lawson as a hitting coordinator after he was fired by the Yankees mid-season. Lawson's stated hitting philosophy is "Hit Strikes Hard".
I don't see how you can assess Cora's managerial record without mentioning the near-miracle of 2021.
This is my beef, the pitching for the most part has been sublime. I believe in the pitching program but I will be amazed if this current excellence continues. The Sox were awful defensively early and that cost them games, now they are pathetic offensively. Cooper and Smith are off the scrap heap and look the part, they have not gotten any offense out of second base, and man, this team has been striking out like you read about.
I'll lead with the caveat that I'm sure the hitting coaches in-system have benefitted some of the players on the roster. I don't think we have enough information to begin to parse how effective which coaches are with which players. But on the whole, this isn't working.
Who has come here and gotten better? Who has taken a clear step forward this year? - as opposed to who has started cold or mildly-regressed or keeps under-performing?
I think Wong is clearly on the plus side of the ledger. You can make arguments for Duran/Abreu being in the "good plateau" category. (Perhaps Refsnyder also - who has cooled a bit.)
But that's it. Devers and O'Neill are having glittery but empty seasons, and so are in the under-performing category.
Most damning though is their getting basically nothing out of what should be average to sub-average-but-playable guys. Valdez, Dalbec, Smith, Cooper, Reyes. Even Rafaela and Hamilton. It seems like they just convert everyone's batting talent level to one or two notches below what they've been able to do before. (Or should be able to do at the MLB level.) Instead, these are all negative fWAR guys with the bats (except Hamilton). Not just below average hitters - below replacement level hitters. (Which is defined as a starter for a team with a .295 WP.)
Those guys are 1/3rd of the roster. They (plus Grissom) account for 554 ABs. Which is just under a third of the at-bats.
Think about that for a moment. The hitting coaches have: Cooper, Rafaela, Hamilton, Reyes, Dalbec, Smith, Grissom (and Short, I suppose.) These are all guys (with the exception of Hamilton) who have hit MLB pitching in the recent past. And they can't get them above replacement level?
I don't expect universal success of course, but that's an awful lot of craptastic at-bats. And we have not one single "we brought him in and fixed him to the point of playability" guy.
How are Devers and O’Neill underperforming? They are well above career norms. I don’t know what the team should be expected to get out of guys like Cooper, Smith, Hamilton, Grissom etc but these guys have very few at bats and or / are generally seen as replacement level types.
It seems like you are just throwing out guys doing well for some reason, mentioning guys not doing great, and then saying it’s because of the hitting coaches. Ok, I guess.
This team entered the season with very little depth, once the inevitable injuries struck, they were stuck giving lots of at bats to crappy players.
It seems like you are just throwing out guys doing well for some reason, mentioning guys not doing great, and then saying it’s because of the hitting coaches. Ok, I guess.
This team entered the season with very little depth, once the inevitable injuries struck, they were stuck giving lots of at bats to crappy players.
Conversely, I have no idea why people want to blindly defend the hitting coaches the same way they defended Dave Bush.
If you want to know about Devers and O'Neill, you can read this thread (and others) and respond to the points people have already raised.
The Sox hitters are second in MLB in strikeout rate at 26.1% and 19th in bb rate at 8.3%. This pretty much lines up with the eye test that the hitters are extremely undisciplined. I realize that any team missing its 3-4-5 hitters isn't going to be trotting about a robust lineup. But the failure lies in not maximizing the assets they do have.
In the last homestand they played two teams with hitting styles that are a complete contrast to the Sox. With the exception of Diaz and Paredes, the Nats and Rays have piss-poor lineups. But they made the most of their offenses - they put runners in motion, they went to the opposite field, they put together pesky at bats. Last night, Lowe, who is a #3 hitter with no stolen bases, tried for a bunt hit against a shift. It didn't work because he fouled it off, but the idea of "I'll take what the defense gives me" at least was there. On the other side, the Sox continue to string together non-competitive at bats by swinging from their heels time and again, no matter the hitter or the situation.
I'm not a "small ball" advocate, but again it's about maximizing your assets. If you're forced to play Duran, Rafeala, and Hamilton, then they should be bunting once a game, minimum. Forget hard contact, just make contact in the first place and put pressure on opposing defenses. Take what they'll give you.
The really terrifying piece of the puzzle is that they're fourth in BABIP at .309, so the bats may actually have been on the lucky side of things so far. If that normalizes, things could get ugly very quickly.
In the last homestand they played two teams with hitting styles that are a complete contrast to the Sox. With the exception of Diaz and Paredes, the Nats and Rays have piss-poor lineups. But they made the most of their offenses - they put runners in motion, they went to the opposite field, they put together pesky at bats. Last night, Lowe, who is a #3 hitter with no stolen bases, tried for a bunt hit against a shift. It didn't work because he fouled it off, but the idea of "I'll take what the defense gives me" at least was there. On the other side, the Sox continue to string together non-competitive at bats by swinging from their heels time and again, no matter the hitter or the situation.
I'm not a "small ball" advocate, but again it's about maximizing your assets. If you're forced to play Duran, Rafeala, and Hamilton, then they should be bunting once a game, minimum. Forget hard contact, just make contact in the first place and put pressure on opposing defenses. Take what they'll give you.
The really terrifying piece of the puzzle is that they're fourth in BABIP at .309, so the bats may actually have been on the lucky side of things so far. If that normalizes, things could get ugly very quickly.
I appreciate that there is a lot going on, and yes, I have seen the highlight reel plays but Rafaela has made a lot of errors for a guy who was supposed to be our defensive savior.
K rates this season vs career:
Duran is down 4.4% (expected to get worse by Steamer)
Devers is up 3.9% (expected to get much better)
Abreu is about the same as last season
O'Neil is up 2.7%
Wong is down 10.4% (expected to go up by Steamer)
McGuire is up 4.1%
Casas was up 3.4%
Refsnyder is down 1.3%
Yoshida was down 1.4%
Rafaela is improved from last season and slightly above where Steamer projects for the ROS.
The rest of the garbage getting significant at bats early were really bad.. Reyes and Valdez were close to 30%. Obviously Dalbec. Hamilton is 27.8%
Smith and Cooper have been ok, Grissom has been good.
I think some of it is the quality of the pitching faced so far, some is Devers being able to be pitched around more. Wong is basically the only outlier but it's tough to maintain that type of improvement.
Unfortunately this is the normal pace.
Down on the farm, Meyer and Yorke are better than average and average respectively. Teel and Anthony are over 30% this season.
Duran is down 4.4% (expected to get worse by Steamer)
Devers is up 3.9% (expected to get much better)
Abreu is about the same as last season
O'Neil is up 2.7%
Wong is down 10.4% (expected to go up by Steamer)
McGuire is up 4.1%
Casas was up 3.4%
Refsnyder is down 1.3%
Yoshida was down 1.4%
Rafaela is improved from last season and slightly above where Steamer projects for the ROS.
The rest of the garbage getting significant at bats early were really bad.. Reyes and Valdez were close to 30%. Obviously Dalbec. Hamilton is 27.8%
Smith and Cooper have been ok, Grissom has been good.
I think some of it is the quality of the pitching faced so far, some is Devers being able to be pitched around more. Wong is basically the only outlier but it's tough to maintain that type of improvement.
Unfortunately this is the normal pace.
Down on the farm, Meyer and Yorke are better than average and average respectively. Teel and Anthony are over 30% this season.
Last edited:
I was skeptical about your "quality of pitching" statement, but you may be on to something. Min, Sea, Bal, Atl, Cle, Was, SFG are all in the top 11 teams in xFIP. The only team they've faced in the bottom nine is LAAAAA.
The offense also doesn't blow teams out (only a 7 run win vs Minnesota since the Cubs blowout, so they are facing good relievers instead of middle guys a lot. Their last 6 games have been decided by 1 or 2 runs.
I completely disagree that Cora is the problem. I actually think he's been more involved and more pro active this year than some of the previous years. Go back to the extra inning game in April in Oakland. Cora knew the rule about the Manfred Man exception (the runner is able to be replaced in certain situations). Replacing the runner in that case led directly to the Red Sox winning. The same strategy worked the other night when Romo got the walk off hit. Sometimes the manager can put the players in a position to succeed but due to their ability, they just don't make it. Sort of like the old saying you can lead the horse to water but you can't force it to drink.
Some of the fielding errors are due to the players lack of ability: eg..Hamilton has no business playing except for pinch running situations.
What players would you say have underachieved under Cora this year? I think Wong and Duran have continued to improve under Cora and Aberu has come on.
Finally, Cora has no control over injuries. It's not like he's Scott Proctoring or Tom Thibodaux ing the roster.
As many guys as he walks, I'm always worried when Jansen enters the game. And yeah, I was hoping they'd ride a hot Slaten for another inning...but it doesn't make any difference as long as Jansen owns the 9th.
Wong has improved his whiff rate by 7%, and he's about league average in that respect rather than being one of the worst in baseball. I don't see any reason to think it's only a temporary improvement. Whiff rates and K percentages are one of the fastest stabilizing statistics in baseball. I think the toe tap he used to have really was messing with his timing.
I don't get the Jansen hate. In his 8 outings previous to last night (dating back to 4/20), 7 have been scoreless. The one outlier was last Friday when he got into a game the Sox were losing mostly because he hadn't worked for a week. Even with that, his line for those 8 outings: 8 innings, 5 hits, 1 walk, 2 runs, 10 Ks, 111 total pitches (just under 14 pitches an inning...fairly efficient). What reason did Cora have to try to avoid him in that spot?
The good news is that Fatse helped with that over the off-season: https://www.mlb.com/news/connor-wong-red-sox-spring-camp-2024
The bad news is Fatse sat on his hands for 400 PAs in 2023, and so Wong, despite his native talent, garnered an 80 OPS+. While striking out 134 times.
Perhaps a spreadsheet wasn't ready or something?
I'm just saying that a 10% improvement from your career average is very difficult to maintain. If he cuts it down even 5% I think that's great.
On a pucker scale of Koji to Kimbrel, Kenley is getting far too close to the latter.
Hate? No, not really. The guy just makes me nervous every time he goes out there. Maybe that's because he's walked 10 guys in 15.2 innings this year, and he has trouble holding guys on. He reminds me of Jonathan Papelbon in his last two years with the Sox. Every save seemed to be an adventure.
Eight of those walks came in his first 6 outings (5.2 IP). Which means over his last 10 innings, he's walked two. As for holding guys on, of the 23 base runners he's allowed, they are 2 for 4 in steals against him. That doesn't strike me as trouble, particularly since both steals came in the same (bad) inning against the Nats last Friday. Basically, he's been good far far more often than he's been bad.