I think it’s really going about as good as you could hope for. Only thing better would be if he was paired with some hot shit offensive coach but your OC seems fine. Nothing exciting but not bad.
If we had a choice between a guy they thought could develop Maye and a guy that could call a great game, I'd go with the first option.I think it’s really going about as good as you could hope for. Only thing better would be if he was paired with some hot shit offensive coach but your OC seems fine. Nothing exciting but not bad.
I mean, ideally the QB coach would do the former and the offensive coordinator the latter. It shouldn't be an either/or.If we had a choice between a guy they thought could develop Maye and a guy that could call a great game, I'd go with the first option.
I think AVP does both fine. I think people want sexy offense on tape that our personnel can't execute. When you try to do things without taking into account your personnel you get CHI this year, or MIA when Tua is out.I mean, ideally the QB coach would do the former and the offensive coordinator the latter. It shouldn't be an either/or.
Yeah I have no major complaints with AVP. We obviously grade Maye on a curve in part because of how awful his supporting cast is, and AVP should get the same grace (unless we think there is lots of unrealized potential here...I do not). Additionally, SOMEONE in the coaching staff gets at least partial credit for how Drake Maye has played. He was the 3rd QB taken, super young and thought to be the least pro-ready QB among the top picks, yet here he is looking really good. He's not Manning, Luck or Lawrence (lol) who came into the league ready to be a star from day 1, if the coaching staff is doing just one thing right, at least it's this. Might as well credit AVP.I think AVP does both fine. I think people want sexy offense on tape that our personnel can't execute. When you try to do things without taking into account your personnel you get CHI this year, or MIA when Tua is out.
I don't expect a sexy offense with the players we have, but there's thing he does tactically which drive me up the wall. Drake brings the team down the field to 1st and goal on LAR 5 and we run 3 times in a row resulting in a field goal from LAR 7. Quite simply, Fuck that.I think AVP does both fine. I think people want sexy offense on tape that our personnel can't execute. When you try to do things without taking into account your personnel you get CHI this year, or MIA when Tua is out.
He does sometimes get conservative I agree, though some of that is he has a conservative HC, that should be a 4 play cycle, that it is 3 tells me there is a dictate to be conservative. I don't think AVP is amazing, he;s just a solidly okay OC. You could win a superbowl with him, certainly you can win playoff games, and to me that's a lot more than I think is true of the rest of the staff so far.I don't expect a sexy offense with the players we have, but there's thing he does tactically which drive me up the wall. Drake brings the team down the field to 1st and goal on LAR 5 and we run 3 times in a row resulting in a field goal from LAR 7. Quite simply, Fuck that.
We're not going to hear anything on this unless and until someone signs, but WRs know this guy will get them the ball. It's a selling point.He’s the guy full stop. Eliot, do your job and get him some help.
I'm pretty sure that will be the case, in part because I think there is no chance Kraft is willing to admit that the biggest problem in the coaching staff is his favorite son.Will be interesting to see if Daboll or someone shakes loose this year if the Krafts' eyes start wandering for a more high profile OC. I actually think AVP has been pretty good since Maye got the reins. But is he the guy you want to build with 5+ years?
Maye has the tools to be the second-best QB in Pats history. Bledsoe had the cannon arm, and the size, but obviously not the mobility, and he really didn't have the touch on the shorter passes, either. He never finished higher than 6th in QB rating, which he did only once.I think I’m more excited about Maye than I was about Bledsoe at the end of ‘93.
If Maye blossoms this season and next, AVP will get sone sniffs to be a HC, because he's gonna get credit for developing Maye.Will be interesting to see if Daboll or someone shakes loose this year if the Krafts' eyes start wandering for a more high profile OC. I actually think AVP has been pretty good since Maye got the reins. But is he the guy you want to build with 5+ years?
And maybe, in fact, he has developed Maye. None of us know how this process is going. Maybe AVP does deserve a ton of credit for Maye.If Maye blossoms this season and next, AVP will get sone sniffs to be a HC, because he's gonna get credit for developing Maye.
According to NextGen Stats, Maye ranks tenth out of 31 qualified quarterbacks in completion percentage over expectation (CPOE) on throws within 20 yards of the line of scrimmage (+2.9%). The Pats rookie is also 11th among qualified quarterbacks in expected points added on short throws (0-9 yards), with an impressive +0.27 output. On Sunday, Maye produced career-highs in passing yards (282) and EPA per drop-back (+0.27) with an average target depth of 5.7 yards vs. the Rams, efficiently picking apart LA's underneath coverages.
Maybe this was your point but I would argue that these two things are highly related. The pass pro stats look better because Maye is playing at a very high level in terms of getting the ball out quickly and moving in the pocket to avoid hits.
I wasn't making any point, just posting some interesting info.Maybe this was your point but I would argue that these two things are highly related. The pass pro stats look better because Maye is playing at a very high level in terms of getting the ball out quickly and moving in the pocket to avoid hits.
You can get by with either an average OL/stud WRs or stud OL/average WRs, but you can't have both be average or below.I'm starting to get to the point with Maye that I think having a stud WR is better for the offense than a stud OT. I think they can get by with an average OL (gotta get THERE first, of course). The Pats currently have an average rushing game, even with this poor OL. Maye has shown that he can really move the ball, on the ground and in the air. I'm picturing a true stud WR1 along with their current receiving corps, and I think the offense would have a chance to be dynamic, even with an average OL.
So with average RBs, a tick above average TEs, a below average WR group, and a really bad OL, while playing a string of pretty good defenses, Drake Maye has done a pretty darned good job.You can get by with either an average OL/stud WRs or stud OL/average WRs, but you can't have both be average or below.
Truth.So with average RBs, a tick above average TEs, a below average WR group, and a really bad OL, while playing a string of pretty good defenses, Drake Maye has done a pretty darned good job.
To be fair, this also coincided with some OL changes/stability, most notably Michael Jordan. I think it can be attributed to both with Maye getting 80%+ of the credit.Maye's five games as a starter (where he played the whole game):
vs Hou: 20-33, 243 yds, 3 td, 2 int, 5 rushes, 38 yds, 1 fum
at Jax: 26-37, 276 yds, 2 td, 0 int, 3 rushes, 18 yds
at Ten: 29-41, 206 yds, 1 td, 2 int, 8 rushes, 95 yds
at Chi: 15-25, 184 yds, 1 td, 1 int, 4 rushes, 24 yds
vs LAR: 30-40, 282 yds, 2 td, 1 int, 3 rushes, 27 yds, 1 fum
TOT: 120-176 (68.2%), 1,191 yds, 6.8 y/a, 9 td, 6 int, 23 rushes, 202 yds, 8.8 y/a, 2 fum
Pats averaging 19.0 points and 318.2 yards a game. Those would rank #23 (points) and #24 (yards), where right now they're ranked, in total, #30 (points) and #31 (yards).
In the games where Brissett either started or came in to play most of the game (vs NYJ), the Pats averaged 14.5 points and 250.3 yards. Those would rank #32 (points) and #32 (yards).
So replacing Brissett with Maye has improved the offense thusly:
+5.5 points
+67.9 yards
He's improved their rankings thusly:
+9 spots points
+8 spots yards
Essentially ONE change produced this effect on the offense. Now the defense has given up more points, in part because of Maye's turnovers. His turnovers in the Houston game basically handed like 21 points to Houston alone. So that has to be factored in as well. But from just a purely offensive standpoint, the difference between having Brissett at QB and having Maye at QB is...substantial.
It is questionable whether the line is in any way significantly improved.To be fair, this also coincided with some OL changes/stability, most notably Michael Jordan. I think it can be attributed to both with Maye getting 80%+ of the credit.
I remember looking at these charts for the previous #10. and there were no greens to one side of the field (I think the left). So in that vein, the distribution is really encouraging.
I'm torn on this. Maye clearly gets the ball out more quickly and cleanly than Brissett did (or Mac did), and that helps the line. The early returns on him also suggest that he'll be one of those QBs that you don't want to blitz too often because he will find the open guy. Still, Maye's best success has been in the short game in part because he doesn't have the time for slower-developing plays to develop. Allowing him to spend more time in the pocket and improving the running game are both things that would help the WRs we do have.I'm starting to get to the point with Maye that I think having a stud WR is better for the offense than a stud OT. I think they can get by with an average OL (gotta get THERE first, of course). The Pats currently have an average rushing game, even with this poor OL. Maye has shown that he can really move the ball, on the ground and in the air. I'm picturing a true stud WR1 along with their current receiving corps, and I think the offense would have a chance to be dynamic, even with an average OL.
You can argue the hardest thing to do in sports is develop a QB. Given Maye's success I would have to think they aren't going to bring in another OC (which is an excellent way to screw up a QB).And maybe, in fact, he has developed Maye. None of us know how this process is going. Maybe AVP does deserve a ton of credit for Maye.
I was very impressed with the creativity of some of the plays they ran on Sunday. He is definitely playing to Maye's strengths.I can't imagine AVP is going anywhere. Nor should he. Even if there's better options available, the consistency is so important.
Yeah--if you watch any of the breakdown vids online, you hear a lot about how the play design looks really good in places. Love to see what happens with more talent around AVP as well.I was very impressed with the creativity of some of the plays they ran on Sunday. He is definitely playing to Maye's strengths.
Can't speak to the depth of the draft but the top end of the draft doesn't seem great for either position.Is there a real world way to trade down from very high first round pick, gain an excess high 2nd round pick, then trade two 2nds to get back into the first round? Or is this just a concoction of the mock draft fantasy world?
Secondly what do we know about the upcoming strength of the OT and WR classes? I read that the tackle class was only 2 players deep, but what about the WR class?
Long winded way of saying I think we need to be investing in both. And of course there are defensive needs too (DL and CB). The talent on the team is notably thin and badly in need of a really good draft haul - or two.
Agreed. If there's a knock on AVP it's his use of the running game on early downs and in red zone situations, but that's defensible for a myriad of reasons. Nobodies perfect, and he's had a few head scratchers, but overall he's been perfectly fine in his role.I was very impressed with the creativity of some of the plays they ran on Sunday. He is definitely playing to Maye's strengths.
WR class is well behind last years class. One likely top 10 pick in Tet McMillan, a Drake London type big body X. Another top 10 pick in Travis Hunter but he is likely to play CB where he is elite though could probably play some WR as well in certain packages. After those two there are some upside players but they all have question marks, will likely be end of 1st rd picks.Is there a real world way to trade down from very high first round pick, gain an excess high 2nd round pick, then trade two 2nds to get back into the first round? Or is this just a concoction of the mock draft fantasy world?
Secondly what do we know about the upcoming strength of the OT and WR classes? I read that the tackle class was only 2 players deep, but what about the WR class?
Long winded way of saying I think we need to be investing in both. And of course there are defensive needs too (DL and CB). The talent on the team is notably thin and badly in need of a really good draft haul - or two.
The ont tic that I see from AVP that I'd like changed is that when it's 2nd and short, he always tries a run or other low reward play just to pick up the first. 2nd and short situations are opportunities to go long or get a chunk play; going forward I hope AVP can break out of the "just get the 1st down" mentality a bit more.Agreed. If there's a knock on AVP it's his use of the running game on early downs and in red zone situations, but that's defensible for a myriad of reasons. Nobodies perfect, and he's had a few head scratchers, but overall he's been perfectly fine in his role.
Agree. I said somewhere else that the real problem on this team is the defensive coaching. I think OC and downward are probably doing what they can with subpar talent at most positions, and coupled with Maye looking impressive, it’s kept them in a lot of games. I have no problem bringing back AVP, even if he may not be the guy to unlock Maye’s top potential long-term. Keep him here 3-4 years, get a good foundation under Maye, and then find the guy that can take him to that next level if AVP isn’t it (which I don’t think he is, but I’m open to it).Agreed. If there's a knock on AVP it's his use of the running game on early downs and in red zone situations, but that's defensible for a myriad of reasons. Nobodies perfect, and he's had a few head scratchers, but overall he's been perfectly fine in his role.
We really need fewer variations on Maye, Mayo and Mays. My brain is beginning to hurt.The Athletic had a "silver linings for bad teams" segment today. It's Robert Mays with SI's Conor Orr. As expected the Patriots was easy.... Drake Maye.
But also both big fans of AVP's job this year, and think that the pairing of QB/playcaller going forward is a big advantage.
Mays did note that despite all the missing guys, he thinks the defense has been a disappointment.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MqwbiSfrg0
11.5 + plays, 5.5 - plays. Even Greg is getting with the program at this point.even Bedard had Maye as his #1 UP.
Wholeheartedly agree, and I was a critic of the hiring. Maye is coming along as well as we could have projected and he's doing a fine job with an offense that's completely bereft of talent. The in game decisions by the HC and the defensive coaching/play calling are the main issues with the team, AVP has performed.I can't imagine AVP is going anywhere. Nor should he. Even if there's better options available, the consistency is so important.