they allowed 193 yards rushing at 4.7 per rush. If the Dolphins had any semblance of a competent QB or special teams, they would have won by 20. Gonzalez played well. The rest of the D was pretty badMayo
Brissett
The defense was pretty good
I won’t disagree but this defense played without Barmore, Bentley, Dugger, and Peppers. That is a lot of attrition.they allowed 193 yards rushing at 4.7 per rush. If the Dolphins had any semblance of a competent QB or special teams, they would have won by 20. Gonzalez played well. The rest of the D was pretty bad
Today they actually could run it, but they went away from that at every opportunity.The line sucks so bad that there's nothing the offense can do even average. Any gains we're immediately eliminated by penalties. Shrug and know it.
They gave up 15 points, it's the NFL that should win you every game.they allowed 193 yards rushing at 4.7 per rush. If the Dolphins had any semblance of a competent QB or special teams, they would have won by 20. Gonzalez played well. The rest of the D was pretty bad
When your offense has scored 13 PPG, it wontThey gave up 15 points, it's the NFL that should win you every game.
How many runs were recalled by holds/procedure penalties? I will go through this later, but I'm guessing 5. That likely means lots of those decent runs were just uncalled holds. A decent line doesn't have to hold this much. I get it, they're street guys and rookies and injured and Vedarian Lowe, but this is the root of all evil, much as it was last year.Today they actually could run it, but they went away from that at every opportunity.
I do agree that it wasn’t a great throw but still think Polk should have got the second foot down.Great throw by Jacoby with Polk as wide open in the middle of the end zone as you'll ever see in that scenario. Make him jump 10 feet to catch it.
I bet there are like 31 fanbases that make that expensive deal every time.The bill came due for 20 years of excellence and it is extremely expensive.
i always thought that 20 years was credit due me for what I saw in my youth and middle age. Because right now, the Patriots I'm seeing remind me of the Patriots I saw then. For those of you whom are too young to know, this is what most Patriot teams were like for a long time.The bill came due for 20 years of excellence and it is extremely expensive.
This is quality sarcasm. Love it.When your offense has scored 13 PPG, it wont
allowing 15 to a team which has averaged 11 PPG isn’t exactly a great effort
This is it but you can clearly see that some folks didn't think it would ever have to be paid. But its really the most objective take.The bill came due for 20 years of excellence and it is extremely expensive.
They already paid in 2020-2023 though. This is rebuild attempt #2. What really set them back was the 2021 offseason - the failed spending spree, and the Jones pick. So 2024 is rebuild attempt #2. Rebuild attempt #3 likely in spring 2026-2027, sadly.The bill came due for 20 years of excellence and it is extremely expensive.
On the plus side, the new dark ages have thus far avoided cocaine related arrests, guys whipping out their junk at woman reporters, toilets overflowing en masse, bankruptcy and relocation talk and discussions of Donald Trump buying the team only to be denied by the commissioner because of Trump’s casino and gambling influencei always thought that 20 years was credit due me for what I saw in my youth and middle age. Because right now, the Patriots I'm seeing remind me of the Patriots I saw then. For those of you whom are too young to know, this is what most Patriot teams were like for a long time.
Oh man--was I having flashbacks today! I'm still happy to give Mayo some time--but they are a grimly unwatchable team on offense.i always thought that 20 years was credit due me for what I saw in my youth and middle age. Because right now, the Patriots I'm seeing remind me of the Patriots I saw then. For those of you whom are too young to know, this is what most Patriot teams were like for a long time.
That spending spree wasn’t really that bad. Judon and Henry worked out. Agoholor was about as expected, got paid low end 2 money and produced #3 results but on short years not really an issue. Jonnu Smith was a disaster of course but hardly a roster busting problemThey already paid in 2020-2023 though. This is rebuild attempt #2. What really set them back was the 2021 offseason - the failed spending spree, and the Jones pick. So 2024 is rebuild attempt #2. Rebuild attempt #3 likely in spring 2026-2027, sadly.
This is the NFL. There is no excuse to be bad for more than 3-4 years in a row before turning it around and making the playoffs.
the rule that your foot has to be inbounds? The rule that has been in place for 100 years?The rule that causes Polk’s catch to be ruled an incompletion is the dumbest fucking rule in the sport.
I get this but there's no real reason why it had to be the case. Where they are now is the result of bad management. The middling years from 2020-2022 I can see as a cycle. Now it's just a shitshow that they've brought on themselves and are inflicting on the fanbase.The bill came due for 20 years of excellence and it is extremely expensive.
Eh...maybe? Plenty of GMs have been dealt a hand of middling sophomore QB and succeeded, by drafting OL and WR help that work with said QB. Instead, no OT, overdraft OG, bad WRs. BB made his bed, and we're still lying in it.No GM could have drafted well enough to make up for the loss and degradation of talent the Pats had after the 2018 Super Bowl.
This is what I was trying to articulate. There's no reason to be bad more than 3-4 years in a row in the NFL. Look at the Texans.I get this but there's no real reason why it had to be the case. Where they are now is the result of bad management. The middling years from 2020-2022 I can see as a cycle. Now it's just a shitshow that they've brought on themselves and are inflicting on the fanbase.
It is ludicrous that a receiver can drag his tie along the ground in bounds, or tap his toe on the ground in bounds, and those both count as a foot down in bounds. But if the receiver taps his toe on the ground in bounds but then plants the back half of his foot out, it does not count at a foot down. Completely stupid. A receiver should either need to get the whole foot down or not.the rule that your foot has to be inbounds? The rule that has been in place for 100 years?
if that’s the dumbest rule in the sport, im surprised it isn’t talked about all the time. Seems like most people are fine with the idea that you need to get your feet inbounds for the catch to count.
Jets, Giants, Indy, Jacksonville, Raiders, Chargers, Miami, Denver, Commanders, Arizona, New Orleans, and Atlanta have all been piss poor for a while. Well over 3-4 years. And that's off the top of my head.They already paid in 2020-2023 though. This is rebuild attempt #2. What really set them back was the 2021 offseason - the failed spending spree, and the Jones pick. So 2024 is rebuild attempt #2. Rebuild attempt #3 likely in spring 2026-2027, sadly.
This is the NFL. There is no excuse to be bad for more than 3-4 years in a row before turning it around and making the playoffs.
Yeah, this. They have one of the worst rosters in football and don’t seem to be able to improve it either via the draft or FA.This is what I was trying to articulate. There's no reason to be bad more than 3-4 years in a row in the NFL. Look at the Texans.
seriously. It's first point of contact by the foot, everywhere EXCEPT the end zone? What kind of coked-up lawyer thought THAT one up?!The rule that causes Polk’s catch to be ruled an incompletion is the dumbest fucking rule in the sport.
I agree with Eddie on this one. He got 2 feet in before the heel hit so why isn't it a catch. If 2 toes count dragging them ob, why the hell doesn't it count if you get 2 toes in before the heel hits. It seems ridiculous to me.the rule that your foot has to be inbounds? The rule that has been in place for 100 years?
if that’s the dumbest rule in the sport, im surprised it isn’t talked about all the time. Seems like most people are fine with the idea that you need to get your feet inbounds for the catch to count.
They lost Chung, McCourty, Edelman, Brady (of course), Hightower, Gilmore, Gronk to age related decline, retirement or going elsewhereEh...maybe? Plenty of GMs have been dealt a hand of middling sophomore QB and succeeded, by drafting OL and WR help that work with said QB. Instead, no OT, overdraft OG, bad WRs. BB made his bed, and we're still lying in it.
Well yeah when you keep fucking up you keep ending up in 3-4 year cycles. Which the Pats are in now.Jets, Giants, Indy, Jacksonville, Raiders, Chargers, Miami, Denver, Commanders, Arizona, New Orleans, and Atlanta have all been piss poor for a while. Well over 3-4 years. And that's off the top of my head.
that’s not the ruleseriously. It's first point of contact by the foot, everywhere EXCEPT the end zone? What kind of coked-up lawyer thought THAT one up?!
You said there's no excuse to be bad for more than 3-4 years. There are plenty of excuses and examples.Well yeah when you keep fucking up you keep ending up in 3-4 year cycles. Which the Pats are in now.
I agree. Man, I am Person Number 1 when it comes to excoriating the refs but this one is so easy to understand. A toe tap is a toe TAP.that’s not the rule
If the entire bottom of the foot hits the ground during the catching process, the entire foot has to be in bounds.
it’s been that way for 100 years just about. Why are people so confused about this? The entire foot has to be in bounds, it’s NFL rules 101
Yeah the point is that if you rebuild the correct way you can get good again in 3-4 years max. If you don’t do it correctly you start over.You said there's no excuse to be bad for more than 3-4 years. There are plenty of excuses and examples.
He didn’t get two feet in. He got one and a half. The second foot was clearly half in and half out. If the heel didn’t hit the ground as part of the catch, it would have been a TD.I agree with Eddie on this one. He got 2 feet in before the heel hit so why isn't it a catch. If 2 toes count dragging them ob, why the hell doesn't it count if you get 2 toes in before the heel hits. It seems ridiculous to me.
Yes that's the rule and obviously the refs got it right but it is a stupid rule. See Insta's explanation aboveI agree. Man, I am Person Number 1 when it comes to excoriating the refs but this one is so easy to understand. A toe tap is a toe TAP.
A foot coming down is a foot coming down. If the foot comes down, and it is NOT a toe tap, the whole foot has to be in. Pretty simple.