Can you summarize? Curious to hear the gist of what he’s been saying.Fwiw, Haralabob has been saying some negative things about Luka on Twitter for awhile, and he was obviously quite close to the situation.
Can you summarize? Curious to hear the gist of what he’s been saying.Fwiw, Haralabob has been saying some negative things about Luka on Twitter for awhile, and he was obviously quite close to the situation.
No there isn'tThere is a real chance Luka is not playing Game 4.
Can't find it now, wondering whether he deletedCan you summarize? Curious to hear the gist of what he’s been saying.
WTF are you all talking about? The correct move is for them to try and win game 4The correct move from Dallas' POV is to bench him because of the "injury he has been playing through, which has clearly affected his performance on defense" or some other bullshit in a lame attempt to make more excuses for the losses.
If JT's stock going down means the celts can save a few millon off of the max contract, awesome.Still can’t make this shit up. People on the media are losing their fucking minds when talking about this team.
View: https://twitter.com/marktitusshow/status/1801099280804991002?s=46&t=IVL2VrlFgLlpc3mjGGto8Q
Windy has been saying this stuff from the jump. One of the only national NBA media guys who has this right.Fuck these front running NBA writers. Every one of them knew this shit about Luka’s defense and what his team thinks about his antics before this series started. But it’s not until the Mavs and Luka get curb stomped that they’re willing to say it.
LOL.. it's funny how you're always the first one bringing up the contrarian take .. though you're probably right on this one.No there isn't
Ok. I didn’t know that. I stand corrected.Windy has been saying this stuff from the jump. One of the only national NBA media guys who has this right.
Before the series he said the Celtics might be one of the best teams of the last 20 years, and great teams win titles, not great players.
Lowe and the Hoop Collective are great. McMahon who is clearly a Luka guy has been nothing but awesome with his coverage.Windy has been saying this stuff from the jump. One of the only national NBA media guys who has this right.
Before the series he said the Celtics might be one of the best teams of the last 20 years, and great teams win titles, not great players.
Awful Coaching on Youtube.Also going to put this out there.. the Celts have grown over the past few years.. and there are zero media members that have grown with them.. past champs had writers and reporters that were worthy of them.. not sure if there are any out there that have the same gravitas/voice of those from champions of old. are there any writers that are worthy of this possible championship?
lol.. I did add local media after the fact.. but it is sort of funny that awful coaching has been praising their defense almost more than anyone else.Awful Coaching on Youtube.
Writing is almost completely irrelevant now, so I'm not sure it's a fair comparison.Also going to put this out there.. the Celts have grown over the past few years.. and there are zero media members that have grown with them.. past champs had writers and reporters that were worthy of them.. not sure if there are any out there that have the same gravitas/voice of those from champions of old. are there any writers that are worthy of this possible championship?
edit: and by that I mean local guys.
Timpf has been excellent. The Garden Report guys are the best local guys. Bontemps will end up writing the story on this season for the World Leader. All that said the real parade will be Simmons on the Sunday with Russillo. I wonder how bad Bill will grind into him.Writing is almost completely irrelevant now, so I'm not sure it's a fair comparison.
Out of podcasters, I'd say Timpf has grown along with this particular team the most and had the most insightful things to say about them as the season and playoffs have gone on.
Yeah..I guess Reiss was the last good Boston writer.. at least in the papers? Weird that nobody has taken up the calling in the blogosphere.Writing is almost completely irrelevant now, so I'm not sure it's a fair comparison.
Out of podcasters, I'd say Timpf has grown along with this particular team the most and had the most insightful things to say about them as the season and playoffs have gone on.
Hey I was just being cautious. It is the coach in me. It appears your prediction is coming true.Would be great if you could point out where I discussed that! As we've seen with LeBron James, one title (or two, or three, or four) buys you months of grace in this media/fan environment.
There were a lot of reasons for the gold-rush towards Dallas heading into the series, most of them dumb. But the one I'll be filing away for future reference is this weird bias towards overrating "closers" and "crunch-time execution." This also shaded the Denver vs. Boston analysis. People seem to assume these games will be close, as if NBA games start with flipping a coin and giving one team the ball with a 2 point lead and six minutes left. It's similar to the bias where people over-weight close wins and discount blowout wins, whereas statistical analysis shows that the real hallmark of dominant teams is winning blowouts.
Yup, hopefully these playoffs put to bed the bizarre idea that the first 43 minutes barely matter.It's funny how much the Finals games have indeed resembled the two regular season games between these teams (lower-scoring versions but with similar dynamics) despite very media person telling us before the Finals that those two regular season matchups DID NOT MATTER because Dallas DID NOT HAVE THEIR GUYS YET (never mind that the second matchup happened weeks after the trade deadline).
Meanwhile, Boston allegedly had no chance against Denver on the basis of two close regular season losses. Oh, ok.
There were a lot of reasons for the gold-rush towards Dallas heading into the series, most of them dumb. But the one I'll be filing away for future reference is this weird bias towards overrating "closers" and "crunch-time execution." This also shaded the Denver vs. Boston analysis. People seem to assume these games will be close, as if NBA games start with flipping a coin and giving one team the ball with a 2 point lead and six minutes left. It's similar to the bias where people over-weight close wins and discount blowout wins, whereas statistical analysis shows that the real hallmark of dominant teams is winning blowouts.
Spit my coffee out
You mean the Jason Timpf who said that BOS didn't think JT was good enough so they got Jrue and KP?Writing is almost completely irrelevant now, so I'm not sure it's a fair comparison.
Out of podcasters, I'd say Timpf has grown along with this particular team the most and had the most insightful things to say about them as the season and playoffs have gone on.
Boston even benefitted from the absence of an opposing star player, as it has throughout its postseason romp, when Luka Doncic fouled out in crunch time.
Treating Luka fouling out as a wild thing that happened which had nothing to do with the Celtics, as opposed to it being the inevitable result of Jaylen Brown hunting him mercilessly in the 4th quarter.Most controversially, the Celtics benefited in the clutch in Game 3 from the absence of Doncic, who fouled out—on a close whistle, while foolishly trying to take a charge with five fouls, after committing foolish foulsearlier in the game—with 4:12 remaining. Here lies another manifestation of the Celtics’ entire playoff journey: While Doncic left the game because of fouls, not injury, Boston was able to close yet another playoff contest without facing its opponent’s best creator, after avoiding Jimmy Butler, Donovan Mitchell, and Tyrese Haliburton for all or parts of the first three rounds.
While we've all watched the videos of the blow-bys and Luka's disinterest 8 defense, Herring is the first writer I've seen (granted I'm not on Xitter and don't read that many pieces) that has mentioned that Luka killed DAL in transition too. And it wasn't just arguing with the refs. Most times Lula got in deep, if the shot was missed, BOS had numbers going the other way because Luka couldn't sprint back on D. (I would lo e if someone put clips of these plays together).Herring: Incredible in some ways. Some of his baskets were a thing of beauty. But the nature of some of the looks he created, for himself and his teammates, still weren't good enough for chunks of the game. (This doesn't even speak to the times he failed to get back defensively after a call didn't go his way; especially during the two plays to end the first quarter, which helped Boston pick up five quick points.) The third period, in particular, was a massive contrast in style: The Mavs took 21 shots in the quarter, with 15 of them coming off the dribble, while the Celtics took 20 attempts with just seven of those being off-the-dribble. The quality of the looks have consistently been the difference in this series as Doncic and Irving are having to work too hard to simply keep it close.
Yeah, that caught my attention as well. It's just a writer trying to jam everything into the procrustean bed of "Celtics have avoided the other team's best player" narratives. I think at some point the article begrudgingly gave credit to the Celtics for attacking Donka and putting him in position to foul out, but the author clearly wanted to overfit the data to align with "Butler, Mitchell, Haliburton... now Doncic," which is super lame.One of the arguments of this horrible Ringer article is especially nutty to me, as basically summed up in this sentence and a later paragraph
Treating Luka fouling out as a wild thing that happened which had nothing to do with the Celtics, as opposed to it being the inevitable result of Jaylen Brown hunting him mercilessly in the 4th quarter.
Give Brian Robb a try. He’s the best Celtics reporter in NE.Also going to put this out there.. the Celts have grown over the past few years.. and there are zero media members that have grown with them.. past champs had writers and reporters that were worthy of them.. not sure if there are any out there that have the same gravitas/voice of those from champions of old. are there any writers that are worthy of this possible championship?
edit: and by that I mean local guys.
Who wrote this? I don't want to click through given how bad the article seems to be. Txs.One of the arguments of this horrible Ringer article is especially nutty to me, as basically summed up in this sentence and a later paragraph
Treating Luka fouling out as a wild thing that happened which had nothing to do with the Celtics, as opposed to it being the inevitable result of Jaylen Brown hunting him mercilessly in the 4th quarter.
Zach KramWho wrote this? I don't want to click through given how bad the article seems to be. Txs.
Title of Kram's article after game 2.Zach Kram
Pretty sure Kram was a kid that was hired as a baseball analytics guy but Simmons has no interest in baseball so he writes about football/basketball but doesn't know much about those sports.Luka Doncic Is the Finals’ Best Player, but That’s Not Enough to Beat the Boston Celtics
Lowe managed to lead his reaction pod with the greatest hits. Luka was wronged, Luka doesn’t play defense because he’s hurt (lol), C’s haven’t played anyone this postseason, and the 4Q was who this team really is. It gets a bit better deeper in the show, but he can’t help himself.I just love how take committed everyone is. People just can't bring themselves to say "yeah, I was wrong and the gap between these teams is larger than I had anticipated".
I can’t ever remember a narrative that a 50 win 5 seed was a consensus pick against a 64 win team that had just went 12-2. It’s just bonkers.I just love how take committed everyone is. People just can't bring themselves to say "yeah, I was wrong and the gap between these teams is larger than I had anticipated".
Pina has been much better on the Cs.Title of Kram's article after game 2.
Pretty sure Kram was a kid that was hired as a baseball analytics guy but Simmons has no interest in baseball so he writes about football/basketball but doesn't know much about those sports.
+1 for B RobbGive Brian Robb a try. He’s the best Celtics reporter in NE.
I was thinking about this yet again this morning (heaven knows why)...I can’t ever remember a narrative that a 50 win 5 seed was a consensus pick against a 64 win team that had just went 12-2. It’s just bonkers.