NFL Draft Rd.1: Discussion, Rumors, Rumblings, Spoilers Gamethread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dogman

Yukon Cornelius
Moderator
SoSH Member
Mar 19, 2004
15,360
Missoula, MT
Use this thread for discussion between picks, tweets, rumors, rumblings, etc.

Spoilers allowed in this thread.

Enjoy round 1.
 

bsj

Renegade Crazed Genius
SoSH Member
Dec 6, 2003
22,906
Central NJ SoSH Chapter
I dont get no spoilers threads when we've spent literally months trying to get advance word of who will be drafting who.

I likely will be camped here :)
 

Phil Plantier

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 7, 2002
3,441
I'm going with spoilers this year, so I'll be here.

What/how is everyone watching? I have an affection for The Draft Network, but I'm not sure where they're broadcasting. Absent that, I'll probably go with Bleacher Report. Any other suggestions?

I think of the draft as a quiz: can I pick the players that the Pats would like?

Why did the Pats leak that they liked Fields? I don't get why they wouldn't like him...
 

bsj

Renegade Crazed Genius
SoSH Member
Dec 6, 2003
22,906
Central NJ SoSH Chapter
I'm going with spoilers this year, so I'll be here.

What/how is everyone watching? I have an affection for The Draft Network, but I'm not sure where they're broadcasting. Absent that, I'll probably go with Bleacher Report. Any other suggestions?

I think of the draft as a quiz: can I pick the players that the Pats would like?

Why did the Pats leak that they liked Fields? I don't get why they wouldn't like him...
Re the leak I'm hoping its bc they like Lance. Although no idea is the SF smoke there is real
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
19,241
This will be my home this evening. The more spoiled I am the better.

Current consensus top 6 that lots of people feel strongly about is Lawrence/Wilson/Jones/Pitts/Chase/Waddle.

Lfg.
 

Phil Plantier

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 7, 2002
3,441
This will be my home this evening. The more spoiled I am the better.

Current consensus top 6 that lots of people feel strongly about is Lawrence/Wilson/Jones/Pitts/Chase/Waddle.

Lfg.
If that's the consensus, Detroit is going to realize quite a haul for #7 from someone, probably the Bears.

I have a crazy theory about SF. Every draft the NFL and their broadcast partners want to increase uncertainty. I wonder if, after the draft, NFL headquarters asked Shanahan/Lynch to set out a smokescreen for the good of the league. It doesn't harm them (or anyone) and might help ratings.
 

Dogman

Yukon Cornelius
Moderator
SoSH Member
Mar 19, 2004
15,360
Missoula, MT
I dont get no spoilers threads when we've spent literally months trying to get advance word of who will be drafting who.

I likely will be camped here :)
I'm sure there are those that prefer picks in real time. Two threads cover everybody and allow people to camp in their own spot.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
55,539
I have an indoor soccer game at 8 tonight---I'm hoping when I get off the field 45 minutes later my phone has blown up because the Pats traded up.
 

Phil Plantier

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 7, 2002
3,441
I'm sure there are those that prefer picks in real time. Two threads cover everybody and allow people to camp in their own spot.
Of course, there are also the undecideds who will gravitate to the more active thread.

To make this not solely a post to get the reply count up, PFF is also doing a broadcast on pff.com and YouTube. I'm not sure why I'll need a broadcast tonight/this weekend, but I think I'll have to have sound in the background while I furiously refresh here/twitter/reddit
 

Ferm Sheller

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2007
22,623
I appreciate both threads. I'm a non-spoiler guy and will probably be by my lonesome in the other thread.
I don't like to be spoiled, either.

But correct me if I'm wrong in thinking that there's always a joker or two who has a need to "break news" and over vociferous objections of other posters, repeatedly spoils picks in the "no spoiler" thread, anyway.
 

OnWisc

Microcosmic
SoSH Member
Apr 16, 2006
8,350
Chicago, IL
I appreciate both threads. I'm a non-spoiler guy and will probably be by my lonesome in the other thread.
I'll be there as well. Mind you, my contribution will be limited to sarcastic attempts at humor that will often fall flat and will contain no insightful commentary or analysis whatsoever, but hey, game thread.
 

bsj

Renegade Crazed Genius
SoSH Member
Dec 6, 2003
22,906
Central NJ SoSH Chapter
I don't like to be spoiled, either.

But correct me if I'm wrong in thinking that there's always a joker or two who has a need to "break news" and over vociferous objections of other posters, repeatedly spoils picks in the "no spoiler" thread, anyway.
Promise it won't be me. Seriously though, i think in 2021 the default is spoiler-friendly, so if a thread isnt labeled I would give someone a pass. But in this case, to specifically spoil in a thread that says NO SPOILERS is a dick move

I just feel too invested in finding out the answer before the draft to stop now...spoil away
 

cournoyer

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 11, 2012
532
Enfield, Connecticut
When I'm watching at home I usually prefer no spoilers, I like the drama that comes with the draft and it's really underwhelming seeing something on Twitter and then watching Roger's dumb face announce it right after. However, since I'm not sitting at home tonight I will definitely be following this thread for the quick and dirty info/reaction.
 
Apr 24, 2019
1,278
I'm going with spoilers this year, so I'll be here.

What/how is everyone watching? I have an affection for The Draft Network, but I'm not sure where they're broadcasting. Absent that, I'll probably go with Bleacher Report. Any other suggestions?

I think of the draft as a quiz: can I pick the players that the Pats would like?

Why did the Pats leak that they liked Fields? I don't get why they wouldn't like him...
I will be watching the livestream of Patriots Unfiltered (Patriots.com) because, more than any media source in the area, they are smart, objective and actually critical, and also pretty funny. After the first 40 minutes - they kick off at 7:50 pm, I believe - I will keep listening but likely have NFLN on in the background.

EDIT: The geniuses at the league office only allow team websites to stream on-camera for the first part of the draft.
 

Ferm Sheller

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2007
22,623
Promise it won't be me. Seriously though, i think in 2021 the default is spoiler-friendly, so if a thread isnt labeled I would give someone a pass. But in this case, to specifically spoil in a thread that says NO SPOILERS is a dick move

I just feel too invested in finding out the answer before the draft to stop now...spoil away

I think oftentimes it's a spoil like, "Buffalo has traded it's pick to Dallas", or "Wow! I can't believe they reached for him in the first round!", or "Wow, I thought the Steelers would have gone OL or DB with that pick."

Those are still bona fide spoilers to me, but I think the poster feels like they're aren't because he didn't actually name the player.
 

EvilEmpire

paying for his sins
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 9, 2007
18,081
Washington
I don't like to be spoiled, either.

But correct me if I'm wrong in thinking that there's always a joker or two who has a need to "break news" and over vociferous objections of other posters, repeatedly spoils picks in the "no spoiler" thread, anyway.
Yup.

Not my lane, but I think anyone who does that in a way that clearly isn't an accident should get banned from both threads.
 

Saints Rest

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
If that's the consensus, Detroit is going to realize quite a haul for #7 from someone, probably the Bears.

I have a crazy theory about SF. Every draft the NFL and their broadcast partners want to increase uncertainty. I wonder if, after the draft, NFL headquarters asked Shanahan/Lynch to set out a smokescreen for the good of the league. It doesn't harm them (or anyone) and might help ratings.
I entertained such a theory for a bit, but I don't see what's in it for SF, other than "the good of the league/broadcast partners" which I don't think holds much water for coaches or even GMs. My theory was just that the Niners would take Pitts at 3 because he is the best player. Talk about a two-headed TE monster with him and Kittles!!
 

Saints Rest

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
This will be my home this evening. The more spoiled I am the better.

Current consensus top 6 that lots of people feel strongly about is Lawrence/Wilson/Jones/Pitts/Chase/Waddle.

Lfg.
Agreed. But there is still a decent amount of uncertainty seemingly at 3-6:
  • Does SF really take Jones??
  • Does ATL trade out?
  • Does Cin make Burrows happy, reuniting him with Chase, or keep him safe by taking Sewell?
  • MIA is almost certain to go pass-catcher, but is that Pitts (if still on the board), Chase or Waddle?
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
55,539
McShay's final mock:

SF takes Trey Lance.
Den gets Fields at 9.
NE gets Jones at 15.

Kiper's final mock:

Pats trade up to 7 and take Lance (cost is 2022 1st).
Den gets Fields at 9.
 

RoDaddy

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jun 19, 2002
3,405
Albany area, NY
if the Pats pick a round 1 QB, it wouldn't surprise me if they also go after Jimmy G (3rd rounder plus Cam?)
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
37,964
if the Pats pick a round 1 QB, it wouldn't surprise me if they also go after Jimmy G (3rd rounder plus Cam?)
Why are the Patriots giving up the two best assets in that trade?

If the Patriots trade for Jimmy G it should be a 7th... maybe a 6th if they're feeling frisky. He's a not particularly good player on a salary 3 times what he'd get if he were on the market.
 

bsj

Renegade Crazed Genius
SoSH Member
Dec 6, 2003
22,906
Central NJ SoSH Chapter
McShay's final mock:

SF takes Trey Lance.
Den gets Fields at 9.
NE gets Jones at 15.

Kiper's final mock:

Pats trade up to 7 and take Lance (cost is 2022 1st).
Den gets Fields at 9.
I'm with Kiper. Lance at 7 is my prediction (which is driven by hope)
 

bsj

Renegade Crazed Genius
SoSH Member
Dec 6, 2003
22,906
Central NJ SoSH Chapter
Why are the Patriots giving up the two best assets in that trade?

If the Patriots trade for Jimmy G it should be a 7th... maybe a 6th if they're feeling frisky. He's a not particularly good player on a salary 3 times what he'd get if he were on the market.
I agree with all the caution on Jimmy. That said, if he made 1/2 of his current salary I think I'd be much more willing to look past the negatives.
 

ElcaballitoMVP

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 19, 2008
4,089
I've been all juiced up to trade up and get a QB, and now...not so much. As of now, I'm going with a trade back.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
55,539

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
19,241
Agreed. But there is still a decent amount of uncertainty seemingly at 3-6:
  • Does SF really take Jones??
  • Does ATL trade out?
  • Does Cin make Burrows happy, reuniting him with Chase, or keep him safe by taking Sewell?
  • MIA is almost certain to go pass-catcher, but is that Pitts (if still on the board), Chase or Waddle?
Yeah, that's based on strong rumblings. Always possible someone is smoke-screening or someone will step up with a godfather offer.
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
53,049
I want Fields but as a BB devotee I can't help but feel a small part of me rooting for all the QBs and skill players to go as early as possible, leaving some potential studs at less glamorous positions on the board at 15.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
95,389
Oregon
Does Mrs. MuppetAsteriskTalk's uber ride fall under spoilers or no spoilers?
 

Mystic Merlin

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 21, 2007
49,596
Hartford, CT
I kinda doubt Bill is telling Lombardi his thinking, it isn’t unknown to him that Lombardi has a podcast where he trades on his knowledge of the old Raiders and Pats.
 

Ferm Sheller

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2007
22,623
Okay, maybe I'm wrong about Rodgers.

If the Pats had the #3 pick and GB offered Rodgers straight up for it, who here would be happy to make that deal? (And the rumor has SF offering much more than just the #3.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.