It’s a change of possession, they can decline the penalty on Buffalo and have only their penalty enforcedEr don’t the penalties offset? What is this business about KC ‘electing’ to replay the down?
He completely lost control of the ball.Ridiculous rule on the no catch. The little bobble was small adjustment while in control.
They are the team in last possession after a change of possession. Basically the rule exists so that this doesn’t happen:Why does KC get to make that choice? They had the "worse" penalty (the personal foul). Why can't Buffalo be the team to make the choice? CFB?
There was nothing cute about it. It was only ugly.Man too cute there. So dumb.
Ok that rule at least makes sense.They are the team in last possession after a change of possession. Basically the rule exists so that this doesn’t happen:
Team A illegal formation. Throws a pick. Block in the back during return. Offsetting fouls would be extremely unfair to team B, so they have the option to decline the penalty on team A and keep the ball after enforcement of their penalty.
“Shoot out” is solid.I'd call a lot of scoring back and forth a shoot out.
I'd call a 9-6 game a rock fight.
But that's just me.
I think unsportsmanlike conducts never get offset by anything other than another unsportsmanlike though, right? Seems like pretty misplaced priorities.It's crazy that a silly little penalty like "guy ran out of bounds" is equal to "personal foul, tried to blow up someone's knee" when talking about offsets.
Buffalo would go for 2. So either 27 or 29.This is setting up for a last minute 29-28 KC win.
Not to hijack the thread or take away from an abundantly entertaining weekend of football, but it is just ridiculous that the NFL espouses Black Lives Matter and End Racism but seems perfectly fine with the Chiefs' fans doing that chant. Washington changes its name but not KC?!?Nationally televised racism every few minutes.
It's Kansas City, Jake.Why hasn't that war chant receive more criticism? Didn't the Braves stop doing it 20 years ago?
Reid comes from the Carroll School of Head Coaching?Why would you run an option play with your TE and not your awesome, fast QB?
Thanks for hijacking the thread and taking away from an abundantly weekend of football.Not to hijack the thread or take away from an abundantly entertaining weekend of football, but it is just ridiculous that the NFL espouses Black Lives Matter and End Racism but seems perfectly fine with the Chiefs' fans doing that chant. Washington changes its name but not KC?!?
Chiefs isn’t as derogatory as the former WFT nameNot to hijack the thread or take away from an abundantly entertaining weekend of football, but it is just ridiculous that the NFL espouses Black Lives Matter and End Racism but seems perfectly fine with the Chiefs' fans doing that chant. Washington changes its name but not KC?!?
As in, they don’t have anything better to fight with. I see that.Kid.
Edit to add, I think there's a kind of futility suggested in "rock fight" that you don't get with "slugfest."
I guess you didn’t watch the World Series.Why hasn't that war chant receive more criticism? Didn't the Braves stop doing it 20 years ago?
Really? I actually think Romo is great (even as a niners fan and having him call last weeks game).Both Nantz and Romo are good; I said it.
What is the NFL supposed to do about it though? Suspend the KC fan base? Make KC play without fans? You can kick individual people out of the game for using the N word, but you can't empty an entire stadium, can you? I'm trying to be realistic and practical, not assume some moral stance here.Not to hijack the thread or take away from an abundantly entertaining weekend of football, but it is just ridiculous that the NFL espouses Black Lives Matter and End Racism but seems perfectly fine with the Chiefs' fans doing that chant. Washington changes its name but not KC?!?