Now it's Sale's turn: Sale has COVID, will not start Sunday (9/10 update)

Status
Not open for further replies.

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
why sit idle?

maybe he could have been in the bullpen for Boston doing long relief instead of some of this flotsam we've been throwing out there

OR

2-3 innings max at AAA

heck rosters had been expanded, why waste his arm at AAA?

BUT when you have so many positives over the last 10 days, the chance of the rest of the roster getting COVID increases, right? So managing AAA pitchers innings seems obvious. Seabold is done for 4-5 days now
I don't disagree with anything
This outbreak allegedly originated with Brock Holt. There may have been a shared dinner during the weekend (so they interacted away from the park). He tested positive on Sunday. Five days later, Kike and Arroyo test positive and the dominoes fell from there. Other than that, I've heard of nothing suggesting that the virus is transmitting between opposing players. So the only danger here is to the Red Sox themselves, which is likely why MLB isn't stepping in. As long as the Sox field a full roster each game, and so far they haven't been caught short-handed with more IL players than available taxi squad guys, there's nothing more to do.
I was just curious if given the situation with the Sox if MLB has issued some sort of no co-mingling edict as some sort of preventative/proactive measure.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,543
I'm not sure we're cracking any atoms around here wanting Seabold pitching innings in Boston instead of Worcester.

What do you think the strategy is by pitching him at AAA and not in Boston?
It wasn't just about "pitching innings" I was responding to the idea that if the Sox werent so totally stupid, they'd not have pitched Seabold in worcester and thus he'd have been there to start today.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,305
Santa Monica
It wasn't just about "pitching innings" I was responding to the idea that if the Sox werent so totally stupid, they'd not have pitched Seabold in worcester and thus he'd have been there to start today.
Yea it's more like, the Sox need pitching, rosters expanded and you leave your best pitcher at AAA to toss 6 innings.

Bring him up and use him every 2-3 days for 4-6 batters like they did with Whitlock this year

It's not like they expected him to be a starter down the stretch for the big club with numerous days off
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
More hindsight on my part, but in his post game Crawford said that he was scratched a few days ago in anticipation of something like this happening. Why not push that train of thought down the line? When Friday rolls around, name Crawford your starter in WOOster for Saturday and then push back Seabold for a couple of days.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,872
Maine
Yea it's more like, the Sox need pitching, rosters expanded and you leave your best pitcher at AAA to toss 6 innings.

Bring him up and use him every 2-3 days for 4-6 batters like they did with Whitlock this year

It's not like they expected him to be a starter down the stretch for the big club with numerous days off
Seabold missed a bunch of time this season and has only thrown 48 innings after no competitive innings last year. Perhaps they're more concerned with getting him as many regularly scheduled innings as they can to build toward next season and beyond. Perhaps if he hadn't missed that time, it would be a different story right now.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,305
Santa Monica
Seabold missed a bunch of time this season and has only thrown 48 innings after no competitive innings last year. Perhaps they're more concerned with getting him as many regularly scheduled innings as they can to build toward next season and beyond. Perhaps if he hadn't missed that time, it would be a different story right now.
If they don't end up calling him up this year I'll BUY that
 

scottyno

late Bloomer
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2008
11,339
Yea it's more like, the Sox need pitching, rosters expanded and you leave your best pitcher at AAA to toss 6 innings.

Bring him up and use him every 2-3 days for 4-6 batters like they did with Whitlock this year

It's not like they expected him to be a starter down the stretch for the big club with numerous days off
They didn't do that with Whitlock because they thought he'd be this good, they did it because he had to be on the roster all year or they had to offer him back
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,305
Santa Monica
They didn't do that with Whitlock because they thought he'd be this good, they did it because he had to be on the roster all year or they had to offer him back
I feel the Sox should (and will eventually) use Seabold in a structured relief role every 2-3 days for 4-6 batters this season. Which was similar to how the Sox used Whitlock this season (who also was coming off TJ surgery). Yes, some relief pitching can be scheduled, it's not ALL random

Nobody thought GW would be this good and has absolutely nothing to do with this discussion. It was strictly about use of young pitching coming back from TJ


Seabold missed a bunch of time this season and has only thrown 48 innings after no competitive innings last year. Perhaps they're more concerned with getting him as many regularly scheduled innings as they can to build toward next season and beyond. Perhaps if he hadn't missed that time, it would be a different story right now.

Red feels they are potentially building Seabold for next season and beyond by having him pitch scheduled starts at AAA
 

scottyno

late Bloomer
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2008
11,339
I feel the Sox should (and will eventually) use Seabold in a structured relief role every 2-3 days for 4-6 batters this season. Which was similar to how the Sox used Whitlock this season (who also was coming off TJ surgery). Yes, some relief pitching can be scheduled, it's not ALL random

Nobody thought GW would be this good and has absolutely nothing to do with this discussion. It was strictly about use of young pitching coming back from TJ
It does because the reason he's being used in this role is because he's been so good. You think if he had a 5 era that they'd be using him for 4-6 batters twice a week just to give him a structured role?
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,872
Maine
Red feels they are potentially building Seabold for next season and beyond by having him pitch scheduled starts at AAA
Thanks for misrepresenting what I said.

Everyone had a reduced work load last year, and they've made no secret that they're easing guys into building back up to more normal 162-game season workloads. Why should a guy who threw zero competitive innings and has yet to pitch at all in the major leagues be any different? If they feel the best course of action for Seabold to be best prepared for 2022 is getting to 75-80 innings pitched in Worcester rather than 60-65 total innings by relieving in Boston, so what?

Perhaps the bottom line is that they don't think Seabold is ready for the majors. This is Duran all over again. People wants him up yesterday because, dammit, he could be contributing to the big league team and the front office are a bunch of idiots for holding him off. Duran has had little impact since his call-up. Maybe they think Seabold would be of similar help?
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,305
Santa Monica
It does because the reason he's being used in this role is because he's been so good. You think if he had a 5 era that they'd be using him for 4-6 batters twice a week just to give him a structured role?
Whitlock has been used in this role since day 1 of this season, actually since the pre-season. Not once have they used him in back-to-back games this season. His use has been monitored. They did that to ease him back into pitching after being out last season with TJ.

If GW had a 5+ ERA he would have been cut or put on the DL with an injury, like they've done with Rule 5 guys before him.

https://www.audacy.com/weei/sports/red-sox/is-connor-seabold-the-red-sox-latest-secret-weapon

Thanks for misrepresenting what I said.

Everyone had a reduced work load last year, and they've made no secret that they're easing guys into building back up to more normal 162-game season workloads. Why should a guy who threw zero competitive innings and has yet to pitch at all in the major leagues be any different? If they feel the best course of action for Seabold to be best prepared for 2022 is getting to 75-80 innings pitched in Worcester rather than 60-65 total innings by relieving in Boston, so what?

Perhaps the bottom line is that they don't think Seabold is ready for the majors. This is Duran all over again. People wants him up yesterday because, dammit, he could be contributing to the big league team and the front office are a bunch of idiots for holding him off. Duran has had little impact since his call-up. Maybe they think Seabold would be of similar help?
How the heck did I misrepresent you? I quoted your post, then reiterated word for word with what you said? :rolleyes:

Now you feel "PERHAPS" it could be Duran all over again? Agreed there could be plenty of reasons Seabold is not up. That's fine, you can have that stance. BUT I certainly didn't take what you said out of context.
 

pk1627

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
May 24, 2003
2,532
Boston
I hate this thread. Every time I see a new post, it’s oh crap. (And I realize this post inspired the same feeling in several others).

Maybe find a way to update the title with the latest to hit the COVID IL? I hope to see Santana for a while.
 

Humphrey

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2010
3,194
It's 10 days since the positive test (and a negative test or two) to be come eligible, right?

For example, Bogie definitely had his test on the 31st, the day he got pulled from the game. So, he should be able to play on the 10th.

When was Kike's test?
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
It's 10 days since the positive test (and a negative test or two) to be come eligible, right?

For example, Bogie definitely had his test on the 31st, the day he got pulled from the game. So, he should be able to play on the 10th.

When was Kike's test?
There is an additional test that they must clear before activation. MLB has called for players to be tested for Myocarditis before they're given the go ahead to return. I'm not 100%, but that may be the hold up with Kike's return.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,445
deep inside Guido territory
There is an additional test that they must clear before activation. MLB has called for players to be tested for Myocarditis before they're given the go ahead to return. I'm not 100%, but that may be the hold up with Kike's return.
They also have to meet certain workout milestones before they can return. Kike is currently working out on the field, so they may be waiting to see how that goes before they can do anything. My sense is that Hernandez may have been able to play today if it was a night game.
 

vadertime

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
1,601
Rhode Island
Do players have to be immediately activated after they clear protocol? Can they be sent on a rehab assignment, to get a handful of AB/IP in before they're brought back?
 

Humphrey

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2010
3,194
Do players have to be immediately activated after they clear protocol? Can they be sent on a rehab assignment, to get a handful of AB/IP in before they're brought back?
Competent center fielder needed pronto. Don't care if he bats zero for 2-3 games.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,872
Maine
Delino DeShields? Does he fill the bill? Is he still around?
He's with the Reds.

The cake is baked at this point. There's no finding players to upgrade this team. They're sinking or swimming with the defense they have at this point.
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,412
Miami (oh, Miami!)
I'm just gonna update this as we go. Moves are now by transaction date, actual games played the player missed noted in parens on return. (This may capture a normal off day or two.)

Gone and Back.

Christian Arroyo: Aug 27 (+ test) (more severe symptoms than others per Cora on 9/7)​
Enrique Hernandez: Aug. 27 (+ test)​
return: Sept. 7 (missed 11 games)​
Martin Perez: Aug. 30 (+ test)​
Matt Barnes: Aug. 30 (+ test)​
Josh Taylor: Aug. 31 (? test - 7 day minimum for a close contact.)​
return: Sept 6. (missed 7 games)​
Hirokazu Sawamura: Aug. 31 (+ test)​
Xander Boegarts: Sept 1. (+ test)​
Yario Munoz: Sept 1. (+ test)​
Jarod Durran: Sept. 3 (+ test - symptoms before test)​
Nick Pivetta: Sept 5. (+ test)​
Danny "Power and Speed" Santanner: Sept 5. (Negative test, but fielding poorly)​
return: Sept. 7 (missed 2 games)​

Total 10 Covid-impacted players. And maybe Santana.​

Active Callups and Returns from Covid:
J. Arauz: Aug. 27​
Yario Munoz: Aug. 27​
(Covid on 9/1)​
Phillips Valdez: Aug. 30​
Raynel Espinal: Aug. 30​
(down 8/31)​
Stephen Gonsalves: Aug. 31​
Brad Peacock: Aug. 31​
(Renfroe returns from bereavement leave: 8/31)​
Roster Expansion 9/1 to 28 players
John Schreiber: Sept. 1​
(down on 9/6)​
Jack Lopez: Sept. 1​
(down on 9/6)​
Danny "Power and Speed" Santanner: Sept. 1​
(Covid ? on 9/5)​
returned on 9/7​
Ryan Brasier: Sept. 1​
Connor Wong: Sept. 3​
(down on 9/4)​
Taylor Motter: Sept 4 (claimed off waivers from Rockies 9/2)​
(DFA 9/7)​
Kutter Crawford: Sept. 5​
(down on 9/6)​
Franchy Cordero: Sept. 5​
(down on 9/7)​
Josh Taylor: Sept. 6 (return from Covid close contact)​
Michael Feliz: Sept. 6 (free agent - released by Reds 8/25)​
Jose Iglesias: Sept. 6 (free agent - released by Angels 9/3)​
Enrique Hernandez: Sept. 7 (return from Covid, + test)​
 
Last edited:

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
6,421
From Red Sox MLB site:

SS Xander Bogaerts
Expected return:
Upcoming road trip
By the sounds of things, Bogaerts has been nearly symptom-free since his positive test for COVID-19 on Aug. 31. He is expected to meet the Red Sox in Chicago for the opening of the series against the White Sox on Friday. It remains to be seen how quickly he will be cleared to play.
“Xander, probably he doesn't need much [of a ramp-up period],” said Red Sox manager Alex Cora. “He's been doing a lot of sit-ups and pushups, and he should be physically OK. We'll talk about it and go from there. It's not that easy a decision, because we want these guys to be right, that's the most important thing. When we see them, we'll sit down with the coaching staff, obviously the medical staff, and decide what we're going to do.” (Last updated: Sept. 8)

RHP Nick Pivetta
Expected return:
TBD
Pivetta is vaccinated, so there is a small chance he will be cleared to make his start on Saturday in Chicago against the White Sox. It seems more likely he’ll return either in Seattle or during the homestand that starts on Sept. 17. After a couple of days of inconclusive test results, the Red Sox finally announced on Sept. 7 that Pivetta tested positive. Look for righty Connor Seabold, the team’s No. 13 prospect as rated by MLB Pipeline, to get the start on Saturday if Pivetta is a no-go. (Last updated: Sept. 8)
INF Christian Arroyo
Expected return:
TBD
Arroyo has been hit the hardest of the nine Red Sox players who tested positive in recent weeks. Though he’s back in Boston after being quarantined in Cleveland for close to two weeks, there’s no word yet on when he will be able to play or if he will accompany the team to Chicago.
“Christian has a few doctor's appointments,” said manager Alex Cora. “He got hit pretty hard. It was kind of like Kiké [Hernández], but with a few extra days. We'll see where we go with that.” (Last updated: Sept. 8)
 

grimshaw

Member
SoSH Member
May 16, 2007
4,229
Portland
They've been traveling with a 3-4 man taxi squad all season. Other than Seabold possibly taking the start on Saturday (wouldn't rule out another Peacock/bullpen game though), none of these guys are likely to be activated unless someone else ends up on the COVID IL.
Ya, I'm aware of the taxi squad and how it works which is why I said potentially.
They could certainly DFA Peacock at any time if they think Ort could help them. I think he's just there in case of a blowout.
The other two are break glass in case of emergency.
 

Harry Hooper

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
34,605
I wonder where Renfroe heard that. He's certainly not talking to "MLB." It's possible, because Manfred, but I think he mis-heard or only heard part of something.
I heard a bit of that radio segment. He said MLB stopped testing on vaccinated players which blew up when a breakthrough case with such a player (Hernandez) arose.
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,412
Miami (oh, Miami!)
I heard a bit of that radio segment. He said MLB stopped testing on vaccinated players which blew up when a breakthrough case with such a player (Hernandez) arose.
I am aware that gamethreading on the main board is discouraged.

But I feel the only substantive response to this can be WTF?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.