Patriots Training Camp 2024

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
20,572
Jayden Daniels has been named the starter. Caleb is obviously starting. I think we can see where this is headed for Maye. There needs to be a pretty compelling reason NOT to start him soon. His own development, OL, Jacoby playing unexpectedly well, etc.
I would hope Mayo is not making decisions based on what other teams are doing with their newly drafted QBs.
 
Apr 7, 2006
2,657
Jayden Daniels has been named the starter. Caleb is obviously starting. I think we can see where this is headed for Maye. There needs to be a pretty compelling reason NOT to start him soon. His own development, OL, Jacoby playing unexpectedly well, etc.
Except those are three different players, situations, coaching staff and team-building philosophies. So...maybe. But maybe not.

edit typos because always
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
49,847
Except those are three different players, situations, coaching staff and team-building philosophies. So...maybe. But maybe not.

edit typos because always
Not making a direct comparison to the situations, just saying that the Patriots may follow suit if Maye shows he’s ready (or Brissett is just awful). Basically, there has to be a good reason not to start him if he’s delivering in practice.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
33,339
Good is probably a stretch but I think he's closer to average than awful.

His best trait is he doesn't turn the ball over much (and, yes, I saw the horrendous red zone pick last week). He's never had a year as a starter with double digit picks, and his INT rate is 2nd lowest to Rodgers over his career. One of those years was behind a disaster of a line (2017 Indy when Luck missed the year). On the flip side, he doesn't throw a lot of touchdowns either. He's not going to get you to 30 points on a weekly basis but until the Pats turn it over to Maye the formula is going to be tp play good defense, avoid the crippling turnovers, and get to 20.

If he played here last year I think they would've won 7/8 games just by the crippling turnover avoidance (the Indy fiasco, the Giants game, the Raiders game, etc.).
That's all fair. I was painting with a very broad brush.
 

JokersWildJIMED

Blinded by Borges
SoSH Member
Oct 7, 2004
3,043
Good is probably a stretch but I think he's closer to average than awful.

His best trait is he doesn't turn the ball over much (and, yes, I saw the horrendous red zone pick last week). He's never had a year as a starter with double digit picks, and his INT rate is 2nd lowest to Rodgers over his career. One of those years was behind a disaster of a line (2017 Indy when Luck missed the year). On the flip side, he doesn't throw a lot of touchdowns either. He's not going to get you to 30 points on a weekly basis but until the Pats turn it over to Maye the formula is going to be tp play good defense, avoid the crippling turnovers, and get to 20.

If he played here last year I think they would've won 7/8 games just by the crippling turnover avoidance (the Indy fiasco, the Giants game, the Raiders game, etc.).
Brisset is not an average quarterback. 18-30 is not a SSS…his ceiling, as another poster just said, is slightly above not awful. He is what he is…a good guy to have around but not someone who should be taking meaningful snaps from anyone with a future.
 

Garshaparra

New Member
Feb 27, 2008
744
McCarver's Mushy Mouth
Brisset is not an average quarterback. 18-30 is not a SSS…his ceiling, as another poster just said, is slightly above not awful. He is what he is…a good guy to have around but not someone who should be taking meaningful snaps from anyone with a future.
100% agreed. Brissett has a leg up on your undrafted college QBs, and on many a clipboard carrier in the league, but he's a top 40 QB, not top 20. They're going to be a little more careful with Maye because Jacoby is around, and because they know there are lots of other glaring weaknesses on the offense. CHI and WAS both jettisoned their prior starters, who are now backups elsewhere.
 

jercra

No longer respects DeChambeau
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
3,433
Arvada, Co
The interaction between the OL and QB is not one dimensional either. Brissett makes the OL worse because he does not have the same athleticism as Maye to extend plays with his legs. At the same time, the need for that dimension in QB puts Maye at a higher risk of injury since he'll be frequently trying to escape broken protections. If you're trying win more games and Maye is not a disaster, he seems like the obvious choice. If you're trying to protect your most valuable asset, you keep him on the sidelines while you wait for the OL to improve. Based on what little we've seen, Maye seems to be far from a disaster, so it's really just about picking between injury risk to me.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
14,150
São Paulo - Brazil
Joe Burrow got his rookie season cut short by an ACL tear and he turned out more than fine. These guys aren't brittle and this isn't 1972, Maye's career won't be derailed by an injury (even if you concede this OL would significantly heighten the odds of an injury occurring, which I don't believe to be a given). It's all about his mental readiness, nothing more. If his grasp of the offense is at a level that allows him to be out there, he should be out there.
 
Jan 26, 2014
36
Taunton, MA
Joe Burrow got his rookie season cut short by an ACL tear and he turned out more than fine. These guys aren't brittle and this isn't 1972, Maye's career won't be derailed by an injury (even if you concede this OL would significantly heighten the odds of an injury occurring, which I don't believe to be a given). It's all about his mental readiness, nothing more. If his grasp of the offense is at a level that allows him to be out there, he should be out there.
This is all true if the goal is to compete this year, but what if they view the year as a development year and no matter what they do they won't be contender. Maybe the team will be much better served in that case by having a top 5 pick and taking it slow. Why risk an injury if they aren't competing anyway? To sell tickets?

I said it before and I'll say it again, tanking (when done correctly) is a valid strategy that could lead to sustained success
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
49,847
This is all true if the goal is to compete this year, but what if they view the year as a development year and no matter what they do they won't be contender. Maybe the team will be much better served in that case by having a top 5 pick and taking it slow. Why risk an injury if they aren't competing anyway? To sell tickets?

I said it before and I'll say it again, tanking (when done correctly) is a valid strategy that could lead to sustained success
It’s not really tanking when you’re going to be bad regardless of who is at QB. There are clear examples of guys who’ve redshirted and been fine but I’d rather he get live reps this year, if he’s demonstrated himself to at least be somewhat ready.

The top 5 pick will be ours no matter what so the real calculus is what is best for Maye’s longterm development.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
28,987
Unreal America
Joe Burrow got his rookie season cut short by an ACL tear and he turned out more than fine. These guys aren't brittle and this isn't 1972, Maye's career won't be derailed by an injury (even if you concede this OL would significantly heighten the odds of an injury occurring, which I don't believe to be a given). It's all about his mental readiness, nothing more. If his grasp of the offense is at a level that allows him to be out there, he should be out there.
At the same time, it’s entirely possible that playing behind a lousy OL and getting his brains beat in on a weekly basis would introduce some bad tendencies into his developmental process.

Ultimately I agree that if he’s ready then get him on the field. But I don’t fault the org if they’re cautious about doing that from week 1.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
14,150
São Paulo - Brazil
This is all true if the goal is to compete this year, but what if they view the year as a development year and no matter what they do they won't be contender. Maybe the team will be much better served in that case by having a top 5 pick and taking it slow. Why risk an injury if they aren't competing anyway? To sell tickets?

I said it before and I'll say it again, tanking (when done correctly) is a valid strategy that could lead to sustained success
Yeah, I really need any shred of actual, non anecdotal evidence that not taking live reps for a full year would be good for his development.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
39,015
Yeah, I really need any shred of actual, non anecdotal evidence that not taking live reps for a full year would be good for his development.
I mean, I'm in favor of playing him, but what does non-anecdotal evidence of something like that mean? Some QBs play as rookies and turn out fine, some fail, some sit most or all of the year and turn out really well too.... but it's all completely impossible to empirically assess because each player and situation is unique. All you can do as a GM and coach is assess the player and situation and do what you think is best.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
48,384
Melrose, MA
Jayden Daniels has been named the starter. Caleb is obviously starting. I think we can see where this is headed for Maye. There needs to be a pretty compelling reason NOT to start him soon. His own development, OL, Jacoby playing unexpectedly well, etc.
I would hope Mayo is not making decisions based on what other teams are doing with their newly drafted QBs.
The only compelling reason, to start him or not, is his own development.
 

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
3,625
It’s not really tanking when you’re going to be bad regardless of who is at QB. There are clear examples of guys who’ve redshirted and been fine but I’d rather he get live reps this year, if he’s demonstrated himself to at least be somewhat ready.

The top 5 pick will be ours no matter what so the real calculus is what is best for Maye’s longterm development.
This is it. The team is bad regardless of who's at QB. Everyone knows Maye is the future so you do everything you can to get him on track. Sitting a few games won't hurt. Let the team, coaching staff etc. work out a few kinks early and then get him in there in October (or earlier if Brissett goes down).
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
33,339
Yeah, I really need any shred of actual, non anecdotal evidence that not taking live reps for a full year would be good for his development.
While I'm not sure what sort of non-anecdotal evidence can support the point, it worked out OK for Favre, Rodgers, Mahomes and Brady. (or do you mean literally zero game snaps?)
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
9,409
Philly
How was Maye’s OL at North Carolina?
I read that it was lousy, which made it difficult to properly evaluate him.
2022 it was decent! 2023 not so much. It wasn't as bad as people make it out to be though most games minus NC State and Clemson in particular. His pressure numbers were in the normal range for a college QB. He also made his own issues drifting around. Sometimes the drift helped. Sometimes he drifted right into a sack. Looks better in a limited sample this preseason.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
14,150
São Paulo - Brazil
I get his argument, but there's also another side to this: by the age Brady was when he signed up to be on his high school football team, guys today have already had years of private tutoring, attended multiple passing camps and have overall a much higher degree of refinement and understanding of the position before they even reach college. I'll agree the NCAA/NFL mental requirements for the position have been watered down, but that's a function of recognizing guys can win at QB in different ways as well, so instead of trying to mold them to a preconception of what the position should be, they prioritize maximizing what they are. And in time, even the players who go playing time due to their athleticism get good, or at the very least functional at the mental aspect of the game. Tom just has a very clear notion of what a quarterback should play like and anything that deviates from that is inherently negative to him.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
49,847
I get his argument, but there's also another side to this: by the age Brady was when he signed up to be on his high school football team, guys today have already had years of private tutoring, attended multiple passing camps and have overall a much higher degree of refinement and understanding of the position before they even reach college. I'll agree the NCAA/NFL mental requirements for the position have been watered down, but that's a function of recognizing guys can win at QB in different ways as well, so instead of trying to mold them to a preconception of what the position should be, they prioritize maximizing what they are. And in time, even the players who go playing time due to their athleticism get good, or at the very least functional at the mental aspect of the game. Tom just has a very clear notion of what a quarterback should play like and anything that deviates from that is inherently negative to him.
Yup. This is why it’s impossible to have a one-size-fits-all approach here. I’m sure the Texans are quite pleased with their approach with Stroud but the Panthers may feel differently about Bryce Young.
 

Ferm Sheller

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2007
22,933
2022 it was decent! 2023 not so much. It wasn't as bad as people make it out to be though most games minus NC State and Clemson in particular. His pressure numbers were in the normal range for a college QB. He also made his own issues drifting around. Sometimes the drift helped. Sometimes he drifted right into a sack. Looks better in a limited sample this preseason.
Thank you. (That's what I had heard -- last year he was behind a lousy OL. Wasn't sure about 2022.)
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
38,470
306, row 14
First Round QB's since 2015:

Jameis Winston - Started immediatley.
Marcus Mariota - Started immediately
Jared Goff - Took over week 10
Carson Wentz - Sarted Immediately
Mitch Trubisky - Took over week 5
Patrick Mahomes- Sat a year
DeShaun Watson- Started Immediatley; injured week 7
Baker Mayfield - Started Immediately
Sam Darnold - Started Immediately
Josh Allen - Didn't start week 1 (Nathan Peterman lol), but started week 2 onward. Missed a few weeks in the middle of the year with an injury.
Lamar Jackson - Didn't start; took over week 10 for an injured Flacco
Kyler Murray - Started immediately
Daniel Jones - Took over week 4
Joe Burrow - Started immediately
Tua Tagovailoa -Took over as the starter week 8
Justin Herbert - Was supposed to sit to start but the Chargers Charger'd and the doctor injected Tyrod Taylor in the wrong spot and Herbert emergency started week 2 and never looked back.
Trevor Lawrence- Started Immediately
Zach Wilson - Started Immediately
Trey Lance - Sat a year
Justin Fields - Started Immediately
Mac Jones - Started Immedaitely
Bryce Young - Started Immediately
CJ Stroud - Started Immediately

Main takeaway is that the bulk of the first round QB's start immediately, 13 of 23. Two others (Allen, Herbert) took over week 2 so it's closer to 15/23. Burrow and Allen got hurt but it didn't really hurt their development. The guys who sat and learned are a mixed bag. Mahomes is obviously one of the 3 best QB's of all time. Lamar is an MVP candidate. Mitch Trubisky and Dan Jones sucked.

I kinda think the QB either has it or they don't. Of the guys who started right away, I'm not sure if any outcomes are different if the QB sat. Maybe Bryce Young last year? The other two glaring disasters are Darnold and Wilson.
 

ShaneTrot

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2002
6,872
Overland Park, KS
There is no way of knowing if Zach Wilson was drafted by Andy Reid where he would be in his career or if CJ Stroud was on last year's Pats or Jets teams where he would be in his development. I have to believe that if a guy is good enough he will succeed but I think the situation is very important. Maye is a great prospect and I can't wait to see him play but this Pats offense is ass. I don't want his development to be derailed because he gets injured, sped up, is running for his life, or Baker drops every pass that hits him in the hands. I am perfectly happy to watch Brisset try to be competent with this team for however long it takes. Maye will be 22 on August 30th, he has a lot to learn and we shouldn't be in a rush. The offensive situation will never be perfect but this Pats situation is bottom 3 in the league right now.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
39,015
One development issue with QBs is that the CBA has limited practice time a good amount, so few teams can afford to give them the kind of practice reps that they used to. Remember the whole Brady/Manning thing about Manning wanting all the practice reps and other teams like NE splitting them.... basically doesn't happen in-season anymore, unless you have a really old QB you want to rest, the limited practice opportunities in-season almost all go to the starter.
 

Commander Shears

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 24, 2005
1,090
First Round QB's since 2015:

Jameis Winston - Started immediatley.
Marcus Mariota - Started immediately
Jared Goff - Took over week 10
Carson Wentz - Sarted Immediately
Mitch Trubisky - Took over week 5
Patrick Mahomes- Sat a year
DeShaun Watson- Started Immediatley; injured week 7
Baker Mayfield - Started Immediately
Sam Darnold - Started Immediately
Josh Allen - Didn't start week 1 (Nathan Peterman lol), but started week 2 onward. Missed a few weeks in the middle of the year with an injury.
Lamar Jackson - Didn't start; took over week 10 for an injured Flacco
Kyler Murray - Started immediately
Daniel Jones - Took over week 4
Joe Burrow - Started immediately
Tua Tagovailoa -Took over as the starter week 8
Justin Herbert - Was supposed to sit to start but the Chargers Charger'd and the doctor injected Tyrod Taylor in the wrong spot and Herbert emergency started week 2 and never looked back.
Trevor Lawrence- Started Immediately
Zach Wilson - Started Immediately
Trey Lance - Sat a year
Justin Fields - Started Immediately
Mac Jones - Started Immedaitely
Bryce Young - Started Immediately
CJ Stroud - Started Immediately

Main takeaway is that the bulk of the first round QB's start immediately, 13 of 23. Two others (Allen, Herbert) took over week 2 so it's closer to 15/23. Burrow and Allen got hurt but it didn't really hurt their development. The guys who sat and learned are a mixed bag. Mahomes is obviously one of the 3 best QB's of all time. Lamar is an MVP candidate. Mitch Trubisky and Dan Jones sucked.

I kinda think the QB either has it or they don't. Of the guys who started right away, I'm not sure if any outcomes are different if the QB sat. Maybe Bryce Young last year? The other two glaring disasters are Darnold and Wilson.
You're missing a few, including the patron saint of 'sit raw quarterbacks'.

Paxton Lynch
Josh Rosen
Dwayne Haskins
Jordan Love
Kenny Pickett
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
38,470
306, row 14
There is no way of knowing if Zach Wilson was drafted by Andy Reid where he would be in his career or if CJ Stroud was on last year's Pats or Jets teams where he would be in his development. I have to believe that if a guy is good enough he will succeed but I think the situation is very important. Maye is a great prospect and I can't wait to see him play but this Pats offense is ass. I don't want his development to be derailed because he gets injured, sped up, is running for his life, or Baker drops every pass that hits him in the hands. I am perfectly happy to watch Brisset try to be competent with this team for however long it takes. Maye will be 22 on August 30th, he has a lot to learn and we shouldn't be in a rush. The offensive situation will never be perfect but this Pats situation is bottom 3 in the league right now.
On the CJ Stroud part...I think that's a bit revisionist history.

Houston was 3-13-1 in 2022, selected Stroud. I'm not sure anyone at this time last year was thinking Houston had the infrastructure in place around Stroud. They have 2 good veterans on the OL, Tunsil and Mason. But the other 3 don't seem like they're all pro's, and as it turned out they dealt with a ton of OL injuries on the year. The WR room was Robert Woods, Nico Collins, Tank Dell, Noah Brown, John Metchie. Woods a serviceable vet, Collins a 3rd year pro who had yet to put up 500 yards in a season, Tank Dell a rookie 3rd round draft pick, Brown a career depth WR, and Metchie a former 2nd round pick who missed his rookie season battling leukemia. Devin Singletary was the lead RB and Dalton Schultz the TE. I think the view on that group this time last year was closer to how people view NE's offensive supporting cast entering this year.

I don't think anyone was looking at that group around Stroud at this time last year thinking Stroud was set up for success. It's a credit to how good his is that he got there and now people are looking back going, well yeah, of course Nico Collins and Tank Dell are a 1300 yard receivers.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
56,095
Per various twitter accounts: Patriots are treating this week not like training camp, but like a normal week of practice leading to a Sunday game (at least in terms of scheduling)--off today, practice Wed-Fri, travel Saturday. Mayo said if a player is healthy he's gonna play on Sunday.
 

BusRaker

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 11, 2006
3,243
I read Mayo's comments as:
1. Brissett can be a starter and he's done what he needs to do to justify starting.
2. Maye is on a development plan and they will follow it.
3. The plan doesn't preclude starting Maye week 1 if he meets certain criteria and appears the better QB than Brissett.
4. Mayo wants to see what the OL line can do but he would never tell this to the media and throw his OL under the bus
 

NortheasternPJ

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 16, 2004
20,876
One development issue with QBs is that the CBA has limited practice time a good amount, so few teams can afford to give them the kind of practice reps that they used to. Remember the whole Brady/Manning thing about Manning wanting all the practice reps and other teams like NE splitting them.... basically doesn't happen in-season anymore, unless you have a really old QB you want to rest, the limited practice opportunities in-season almost all go to the starter.
And two of the eight people named in the lawsuit in 2010/2011 CBA were Brady and Manning that started to limit two a days, training camp and padded practices.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
38,470
306, row 14
You're missing a few, including the patron saint of 'sit raw quarterbacks'.

Paxton Lynch
Josh Rosen
Dwayne Haskins
Jordan Love
Kenny Pickett
Yeah, I suck at multi tasking and missed a bunch.

I think the overall point is I'm not sure there's a benefit either way. I don't really see many QB's who started immediately that were ruined because of it. Maybe Bryce Young last year or the two Jets QB's. Conversely, sitting a top drafted QB for some period of time doesn't seem to yield better results.

I think the coaching staff matters much more than the on field supporting cast.
 

Saints Rest

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Yeah, I suck at multi tasking and missed a bunch.

I think the overall point is I'm not sure there's a benefit either way. I don't really see many QB's who started immediately that were ruined because of it. Maybe Bryce Young last year or the two Jets QB's. Conversely, sitting a top drafted QB for some period of time doesn't seem to yield better results.

I think the coaching staff matters much more than the on field supporting cast.
I think the overall point is that there are so many factors in a very SSS that it is impossible to glean any probative value from it. IOW, the coaching staff (and we fans) have to take Maye as sui generis
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
13,172
around the way
I think the overall point is that there are so many factors in a very SSS that it is impossible to glean any probative value from it. IOW, the coaching staff (and we fans) have to take Maye as sui generis
Exactly. Tons of factors. What division are you in? How good of an overall organization is that team? For example, any conversation that includes Carolina has to factor in what a rudderless clown show they have been the last few years. It's almost impossible to deduce whether a QB picked by them was an actual good pick or not.
 

ShaneTrot

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2002
6,872
Overland Park, KS
On the CJ Stroud part...I think that's a bit revisionist history.

Houston was 3-13-1 in 2022, selected Stroud. I'm not sure anyone at this time last year was thinking Houston had the infrastructure in place around Stroud. They have 2 good veterans on the OL, Tunsil and Mason. But the other 3 don't seem like they're all pro's, and as it turned out they dealt with a ton of OL injuries on the year. The WR room was Robert Woods, Nico Collins, Tank Dell, Noah Brown, John Metchie. Woods a serviceable vet, Collins a 3rd year pro who had yet to put up 500 yards in a season, Tank Dell a rookie 3rd round draft pick, Brown a career depth WR, and Metchie a former 2nd round pick who missed his rookie season battling leukemia. Devin Singletary was the lead RB and Dalton Schultz the TE. I think the view on that group this time last year was closer to how people view NE's offensive supporting cast entering this year.

I don't think anyone was looking at that group around Stroud at this time last year thinking Stroud was set up for success. It's a credit to how good his is that he got there and now people are looking back going, well yeah, of course Nico Collins and Tank Dell are a 1300 yard receivers.
If Tunsil was on the 2024 Pats we would be doing backflips. He is a 4x Pro Bowler at LT. I will admit Stroud is fantastic and they dealt with OL injuries but it wasn't all CJ, these young players stepped up in a QB friendly system.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
39,015
I will say in Lowe's defense... I kind of agree with Lazar... he's been much better than last year.... it's just he's still not "starting at LT in the NFL" level yet.
 

Jinhocho

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2001
10,477
Durham, NC
I will say in Lowe's defense... I kind of agree with Lazar... he's been much better than last year.... it's just he's still not "starting at LT in the NFL" level yet.
Fair enough but against regulars in the real season he is going to be get burnt...a lot. I wish they had kept McDermott.
 

Saints Rest

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
From Bedard:

New offensive line debuts
: Vederian Lowe, who went out of Wednesday's session with a left torso injury, eventually emerged to watch practice but the Patriots seemed to be moving on with a new offensive line that may make some people happy (me):

LT Chuks Okorafor
LG Sidy Sow
C David Andrews
RG Layden Robinson
RT Mike Onwenu

This has been my preferred offensive line for some time. But due to some issues (mostly Okorafor not being the biggest fan of left tackle) that hasn't happened until today. Lowe's injury my have made them get around to the inevitable. But Robinson's big push the past couple of weeks also made it a reality. This could very well be their best offensive line.