I would caution against getting too worked up about a GM after 1 year. Beyond that most of their rookies you don't really know about yet... a lot of GMs have a rough 1st year, even some of the best,...
Howie Roseman... his 1st draft he hit on his 1st, his 2nd was a decent player (they let him walk after his rookie deal), his 3rd rounder got cut year 1, he whiffed on 4 picks in the 4th, nothing much after.
Gutenkust... his 1st rounder was good, his 2nd was off the team after 3 years, his 3rd rounder didn't really get off ST, 4th busted out completely
Ballard (considered a great drafter)... A decent safety in the 1st, whiffed on the 2nd, whiffed on the 3rd (waived in his 2nd year), 4th got waived before his 1st season, other 4th was a backup RB.
Guys need a little time to get their feet wet, being a GM is a multi-year timeline. Nailing your early 1st is a good start.
it seems like the results you list aren’t really outside the norm for what you’d consider pretty normal or one deviation from normal (i.e. variance). It’s not like good GM’s don’t whiff in the draft all the time (Roseman taking Reagor right ahead of Justin Jefferson, both he and Ozzie Newsome had plenty of big misses)
but I think there’s a difference between being a new GM from outside the building, where your first draft is often based on your predecessor’s work/scouts/etc. Just like BB’s 2000 draft was largely using Grier and his scouts’ work.
Groh and Wolf have been in New England for a few years obviously. There should really be no transition or excuses for why he’d need a year to settle in.
as it is, one awful draft - redeemed anyway since Maye looks good - isn’t a good reason to be down on a GM
the fact that he did absolutely nothing else to improve the roster is. Over 21M spent on Okorafor, Osborn, Leverett, Watts, Hawkins, Takitaki, Gibson, Hooper and Slye with almost no help from those guys. Gibson has been good albeit underutilized. Slye and Hooper have played their roles fine. But 3 of those guys are gone and one is a healthy scratch. Brissett was a good move for a one year deal so he deserves credit for that. QB was handled very well (including shipping out Jones and Zappe). He totally botched WR, OL and the entire defense though.
then look at his strategy with re-signings. Are we thinking the Peppers, Dugger, Bourne, Stevenson and Godchaux re-signing/extensions are all money well spent or indicative of good player evaluation? Keeping Barmore is great. Onwenu, fine although weird to seemingly not have a dedicated postion in mind for him. Henry, good deal I’d say.
they spent a good chunk of money externally and internally and a huge portion of that money as well as most of those roster spots seem very questionable.
it’s hard to inherit a 4 win team and fail so miserably to improve the roster at least around the edges, but I think that you could argue that outside of QB, the rest of the roster is (in aggregate) worse off now than it was last year. He got lucky Maye dropped into his lap. He failed the other 50 or so roster spots.