You never have to apologize. I never played football so don't watch it with the view of someone who has, but I learn so much from you and all of your breakdowns.
He had a very good game, but they didn't exactly ask him to do a lot.With the caveats that: we’re comparing a performance coming off the bench cold vs a good passing defense with GB and getting a week of installs in and going up against a bottom third passing defense and quite possible the overall worst defense in the league I think you saw two things in this game that are very encouraging. 1) pocket presence went from being pretty dreadful to poised over night. 2) he wasn’t hesitating with his reads and quick releases. You saw him getting the ball out on time. Being hesitant and being off timing and rhythm makes sense coming in cold. Pocket shakiness is more concerning because you want a backup even coming in cold to have good pocket presence. I was worried about Zappe after last week. I probably overreacted. I’m sorry.
Not yet, but I saw him climb the pocket and step into more throws today better than Mac has this year. That it was the Lions’ awful defense is reason for a hard pause, but a lot to be encouraged and intrigued by from the kid.QB controversy!!!!
I agree. And I'm never going to invest too much in one game. BUT...He had a very good game, but they didn't exactly ask him to do a lot.
I'll just reiterate no apologies necessary at all! The analysis you were giving was accurate and appreciated and I look forward to hearing your thoughts on Baily going forward. The Zappe fever was as much optimism around exploring his unknown potential than it was a statement on Bailey's play last week. I think the expectation for most of us given the situation, 3rd string rookie being THROWN into the fire AT LAMBEAU, was total calamity. The fact that it wasn't total calamity was enough for excitement. It was nice to have someone actually analyzing Zappe's play for what it was.With the caveats that: we’re comparing a performance coming off the bench cold vs a good passing defense with GB and getting a week of installs in and going up against a bottom third passing defense and quite possible the overall worst defense in the league I think you saw two things in this game that are very encouraging. 1) pocket presence went from being pretty dreadful to poised over night. 2) he wasn’t hesitating with his reads and quick releases. You saw him getting the ball out on time. Being hesitant and being off timing and rhythm makes sense coming in cold. Pocket shakiness is more concerning because you want a backup even coming in cold to have good pocket presence. I was worried about Zappe after last week. I probably overreacted. I’m sorry.
I think this is a real possibility. I don't necessarily equate the problem to Mac throwing downfield too much, but I've been wondering if they just kind of handed Mac the keys this year and said "go run the offense," whereas they planned specifically to simplify things for Zappe (and for Mac last year). That's probably an overstatment but I do wonder if they could do more for Mac than they have.I agree. And I'm never going to invest too much in one game. BUT...
He threw the ball down field and outside the numbers with much more confidence than we've seen from Mac. I'm sure that helps if there's 8 in the box against a shit defense, but I was way more impressed than I expected to be.
Someone said it last week, but this was the offense where Mac succeeded last year and, while I want him to expand his role further, they may want to strike more of a balance. He doesn't need to be throwing 18 checkdowns a game, but he also doesn't need to lead the league in air yards per throw.
I also think the overall play calling has improved. Much more mixing in of play action, which is leading to Zappe having some open guys to throw to. Credit to Zappe for hitting them. But whether it was all Mac in the beginning or the new play callers finding out what works, the play calling against Detroit and Cleveland has seemed much better (and so has the execution).Super impressed, again this week, with his pocket awareness, read progression, and his ability to take care of the ball. The offense looks much better with him in there.
Obviously I'm not the biggest Mac fan and I thought Zappe would suck, but it's impressive how he's not just defaulting to the easy throw like Mac has been prone to do.
View: https://twitter.com/NFLResearch/status/1581743014409404416
I think this performance was better or at least on par with Mac's best games last year. Won't compare it to 2022 because they were asking way more of Mac.Super impressed, again this week, with his pocket awareness, read progression, and his ability to take care of the ball. The offense looks much better with him in there.
Obviously I'm not the biggest Mac fan and I thought Zappe would suck, but it's impressive how he's not just defaulting to the easy throw like Mac has been prone to do.
Maybe it’s me but I hate the Wally Pipp comments as it’s not funny at all. First we’ve all seen the clip and it’s not an inside joke or clever and it’s way over used here. Also with Mac Jones he clearly wants to get onto the field. It’s not the same context at all as it was with Welker.After today's performance, Mac just might find himselfPippedZapped
Lighten up FrancisMaybe it’s me but I hate the Wally Pipp comments as it’s not funny at all. First we’ve all seen the clip and it’s not an inside joke or clever and it’s way over used here. Also with Mac Jones he clearly wants to get onto the field. It’s not the same context at all as it was with Welker.
A Bledsoe or Mo Lewis joke is way closer to the situation.
Im actually 50/50 on Mac /Zappe so I have no bias here outside of the Pipp joke being overused and stale after only a few weeks. It’s like it’s coming out of the Edelman Comedy Club. I’d prefer Zappe starts next week for the record.Lighten up Francis
Wally Pipp as a verb is a thing much bigger than one Patriots soundbite. Wally Piip, you know the guy that it is named after, wanted to play too, and played 372 games after the Yankees replaced him. Also the wordplay words ending in pp, works much better than being Beldosed.
You want MAc to keep his job, fine, but the jokes are not out of line.
The only reason Bledsoe is brought up is also BB. Otherwise we'd say Mac has been Romoed.Im actually 50/50 on Mac /Zappe so I have no bias here outside of the Pipp joke being overused and stale after only a few weeks. It’s like it’s coming out of the Edelman Comedy Club. I’d prefer Zappe starts next week for the record.
The only reason it’s brought up here is the BB comment to Welker.
Also.. I don't know if the play calling has just changed, but for the first time all year the TEs were used significantly all game. Not sure what's been happening this year but it's felt like Mac hasn't found the TEs all year.I’m catching up on some highlights from the parts of the game I missed….. getting a little excited fellas, he seems to have some real zip, makes quick reads, can move pretty well in the pocket, and he’s winning.
The only reason it's brought up is because it's a historical reference that everyone on this board knows since it's mainly a baseball board. It has nothing at all to do with BB and Welker.Im actually 50/50 on Mac /Zappe so I have no bias here outside of the Pipp joke being overused and stale after only a few weeks. It’s like it’s coming out of the Edelman Comedy Club. I’d prefer Zappe starts next week for the record.
The only reason it’s brought up here is the BB comment to Welker.
Yeah, gotta say, it's odd to think that there are folks who hear "Wally Pipp" and think "Welker!" rather than "Lou Gehrig!"The only reason it's brought up is because it's a historical reference that everyone on this board knows since it's mainly a baseball board. It has nothing at all to do with BB and Welker.
It’s interesting since only 17 of Zappe’s 475 completions were to his TE’s.Also.. I don't know if the play calling has just changed, but for the first time all year the TEs were used significantly all game. Not sure what's been happening this year but it's felt like Mac hasn't found the TEs all year.
Didn't they run an Air Raid offense with 4 WR and 1 RB most of the time at WSU? That would explain it.It’s interesting since only 17 of Zappe’s 475 completions were to his TE’s.
Yes, very strange.Yeah, gotta say, it's odd to think that there are folks who hear "Wally Pipp" and think "Welker!" rather than "Lou Gehrig!"
Exactly. Also, to complete the thought, it should be noted that Welker caught 449 passes for 5119 yards in 61 regular season games after that clip from A Football Life. Good enough for 2 All-Pro and 3 Pro Bowl nominations, fwiw.Yes, very strange.
No one that brings it up is primarily referring to Welker/BB. It’s one random NFL Films clip some Pats fans might have seen, no one cares.
It’s a pretty widely known sports example of a backup taking over, out performing the starter, and never giving the job back. That’s it.
That was kinda my point. It wasn’t as if this was a “Zappe change” in philosophyDidn't they run an Air Raid offense with 4 WR and 1 RB most of the time at WSU? That would explain it.
My understanding of that clip is that is that Welker/Belichick were specifically talking about the "job" of punt returner, not the general idea of playing football. Welker tore his ACL late in 2009 (week 17, I think?) and Edelman did ultimately take over the return duties. The clip is from the 2009 pre-season (right?) and they were trying Edelman out in the return game, as a rookie.Exactly. Also, to complete the thought, it should be noted that Welker caught 449 passes for 5119 yards in 61 regular season games after that clip from A Football Life. Good enough for 2 All-Pro and 3 Pro Bowl nominations, fwiw.
WKU.Didn't they run an Air Raid offense with 4 WR and 1 RB most of the time at WSU? That would explain it.
So Zappe’s nickname should be Cowbell.
Just want to say how good Lazar's breakdowns are. Good to hear he's got the fever.
There’s your mistake.A week ago on the Felger / Holley show Ben Volin opined that Zappe would never be an NFL starting quarterback. I usually respect Volin, but in that case I had to say "Say what?"