I don’t agree with the last half of his idea (trading a World Series for Mookie years) but I wholeheartedly agree with him about the first 45 seconds. 1000000%.
I was there last night. Bill sucked as a moderator. By the end Larry was pretty dismissive of him "yeah we covered all this in the show, let's take some questions."Apparently Simmons hosted " A Conversation with Larry David" at the MGM Theatre at Fenway tonight. My friend who is a curmudgeon thought Simmons did a bad job. Good for Simmons to develop a relationship with David -- that could be a useful connection in the future.
Tough spot for a host in that the guest could be bored but who the hell knows if the audience heard the podcast.They did a podcast together a couple of months ago on the Ringer that really had a good flow and there was a solid chemistry between them. It was pretty clear they were both very familiar and big fans with each other's work. (I was surprised the LD was that into Simmons, and it sounded like LD was up for doing a Rewatchable). Perhaps the MGM gig was too soon after and for them it was covering old ground.
He's not a great interviewer of celebrities in particular, and is a mixed bag with athletes. He leans waaaaay too much into his own view of that person's work, which is a very pop-culture view typically, and pretty often the people he's talking to are not going to be interested in that stuff. I've interviewed athletes over the years, and in my experience the key is to somehow get into *their* experience of what they do, rather than your uninformed perception of it, if you want to have an interesting conversation. Even if you can't really understand what they do, it's fine, they understand that and will probably engage meaningfully anyway. He has a big audience so the people he's talking to usually try to be nice about it, but it often gets cringy.Apparently Simmons hosted " A Conversation with Larry David" at the MGM Theatre at Fenway tonight. My friend who is a curmudgeon thought Simmons did a bad job. Good for Simmons to develop a relationship with David -- that could be a useful connection in the future.
Can you go into more detail on this? Really interested in hearing moreI was there last night. Bill sucked as a moderator. By the end Larry was pretty dismissive of him "yeah we covered all this in the show, let's take some questions."
He started off bartending in Allston while writing about Tennis players nipples (living off his family dime, though). He was a sportsaholic who loved and respected journalism. He has met/interviewed/counts as his friends literally all his heroes in the sports, journalism and Hollywood world. And still does what he loves and does whatever the fuck he wants to and is worth 100s (?) of millions of dollars. It is hard to imagine a bigger "regular" person fulfilling their dreams as much as Simmons. It really is an incredible stroy.He was on the forefront of internet writing, forefront of podcasting, and ran and sold a company, all in the span of 25 years. Plus he’s basically running the podcasting strategy at a multi-billion dollar company now. I have no idea how you can make that claim.
Dave Portnoy? Who I guess is kind of the Bizarro version of Bill Simmons.He started off bartending in Allston while writing about Tennis players nipples (living off his family dime, though). He was a sportsaholic who loved and respected journalism. He has met/interviewed/counts as his friends literally all his heroes in the sports, journalism and Hollywood world. And still does what he loves and does whatever the fuck he wants to and is worth 100s (?) of millions of dollars. It is hard to imagine a bigger "regular" person fulfilling their dreams as much as Simmons. It really is an incredible stroy.
Portnoy is a better example of jacklamabe's "always a sixth grade teacher" analogy - Portnoy hasn't grown at all past being a shithead. To torture the analogy a bit, Simmons now I think is more in the mold of someone who has been successful teaching a bunch of different grades but is comfortable coasting along teaching whatever he likes at the tail end of his career because he's already proven how successful he can be.Dave Portnoy? Who I guess is kind of the Bizarro version of Bill Simmons.
This is spot on, IMHO.Here's the thing about the great Bill Simmons: I think he's the top podder in the whole game when it comes to sports radio or panel show hosting. He's elevated this shit to levels unseen before his time. His stuff with Sal, Russillo, Rewatchables, any kind of "hosting", the guy creates an unmatched vibe and is super entertaining. Whatever that skill or talent is, my guy's got it. Now for the bad stuff, his straight-up interviewing? It's shit, no other way to say it. He get's good fucking guests too because they probably love his show but the celeb interviews are not the "show". He isn't close to Maron or even Rogan, never mind great interviewers like Terry Gross or Tyler Cowen.
edit: For example, he can have a guy like Barkley on and shoot the shit and there will be some interview type elements and it will be really good, but any straight up "I don't really know this guy, let me talk to him about" thing? I swear I would be way better because that is how bad Bill is. It's kind of strange how it seems like it should be the same kind of thing but it's apparently a discrete thing.
It bears noting that the only reason Simmons was able to start while bartending is that his dad was paying his rent for him. This isn't necessarily a knock on Simmons, just an example that he had privilege that a lot of other people didn't.He started off bartending in Allston while writing about Tennis players nipples (living off his family dime, though). He was a sportsaholic who loved and respected journalism. He has met/interviewed/counts as his friends literally all his heroes in the sports, journalism and Hollywood world. And still does what he loves and does whatever the fuck he wants to and is worth 100s (?) of millions of dollars. It is hard to imagine a bigger "regular" person fulfilling their dreams as much as Simmons. It really is an incredible stroy.
Pretty much every famous writer came from some money, went to prep school, etc. Not unique to Simmons at all.It bears noting that the only reason Simmons was able to start while bartending is that his dad was paying his rent for him. This isn't necessarily a knock on Simmons, just an example that he had privilege that a lot of other people didn't.
His shtik wore very thin for me long ago so I don't much care for him, but I would not deny his success has been incredible.
Haha, yes thought I implied that? What bar was it, Harrys?It bears noting that the only reason Simmons was able to start while bartending is that his dad was paying his rent for him. This isn't necessarily a knock on Simmons, just an example that he had privilege that a lot of other people didn't.
His shtik wore very thin for me long ago so I don't much care for him, but I would not deny his success has been incredible.
LOL sorry, I didn't catch that.Haha, yes thought I implied that? What bar was it, Harrys?
I agree with the general assessment, but can we stop using Only Child Theory as a key to understanding Simmons? It's beneath the collective intelligence of this board. There is no evidence of an "only child" personality type— it's junk science.This is spot on, IMHO.
Bill is an immensely talented guy, and I agree that he's the best sports podcast host going. I've searched for years to find a baseball pod that is as entertaining and engrossing as his NBA work, and I've yet to find one that even comes close.
The thing about his lack of interview skill is that for all his talents, Bill doesn't strike me as particularly curious. He's fantastic at generating his own takes, and creating interesting frameworks for discussing topics. But he's terrible at being interested in anyone else's perspective. I mean, how many times does he say something to this effect to Rusillo: "What's your thoughts on X? Here's what I think..." He's an only child who is great at building his own world, not so much learning about others.
And that's fine. No one is great at everything.
Just like an only child to make it all about yourself.I agree with the general assessment, but can we stop using Only Child Theory as a key to understanding Simmons? It's beneath the collective intelligence of this board. There is no evidence of an "only child" personality type— it's junk science.
And, yes, I'm an only child and that's why it slightly annoys me.
Well doneJust like an only child to make it all about yourself.