Sure I guess? I don't think anybody on the committee really puts much weight on number of SBs, or moving teams. I think you are underselling the TV deal... that was the deal that changed the future of the NFL (and amusingly of on-air TV), sure Kraft was a public figure in the labor negotiations, and that's part of his case. He has a good one. I will say that the labor deal was nowhere near the importance of the TV realignment. FOX obliterated previous numbers, and CBS got shut out, that meant the next bidding CBS came in huge, the TV deal doubled and shut out NBC, who then came back in the next one with huge money which caused another almost 50% increase. There is a good case that TV deal is what made the NFL what it is today (for better or worse)... it also changed the TV landscape from a big 3 to a big 4.So Jones and Bowlen's claims to fame were that they helped usher in big TV deals. And, yeah, their teams won some Super Bowls, and Jones built a stadium.
Kraft purchased a financially failing team that was ready to move out of a potentially lucrative sports media market, won 6 Super Bowls, and was a very visible owner during some difficult labor negotiations. And Kraft built a new stadium in the process.
Sorry, not really seeing any difference here other than that Jones and Bowlen were simply good at the same self promotion that the ESPN article criticizes Kraft for doing. Nor am I ready to believe that Jones and Bowlen are some paragons of virtue when compared to Kraft and other owners.
Which comes back to the Occam's razor explanation:
This is where I'm at as well - Kraft is an okay pick, but not some egregious oversight. Jones completely changed the business of the NFL. Not just the TV deal, but also allowing teams to have marketing deals separate from the NFL as a whole, starting the explosion of teams marketing themselves. Heck, the Collective Bargaining Agreement has a specific Dallas Cowboys carve-out because of Jones (it says that "Revenues derived from wholesale merchandising opportunities (i.e., the manufacture and distribution of merchandise to third-party retailers) conducted by Dallas Cowboys Merchandising (“DCM”) other than any related royalty payments to any League entity, Club or Club Affiliate" do not count towards revenue calculations for salary cap purposes).Sure I guess? I don't think anybody on the committee really puts much weight on number of SBs, or moving teams. I think you are underselling the TV deal... that was the deal that changed the future of the NFL (and amusingly of on-air TV), sure Kraft was a public figure in the labor negotiations, and that's part of his case. He has a good one. I will say that the labor deal was nowhere near the importance of the TV realignment. FOX obliterated previous numbers, and CBS got shut out, that meant the next bidding CBS came in huge, the TV deal doubled and shut out NBC, who then came back in the next one with huge money which caused another almost 50% increase. There is a good case that TV deal is what made the NFL what it is today (for better or worse)... it also changed the TV landscape from a big 3 to a big 4.
Sure, Kraft has been a significant contributor in some ways, but at the same time most of his impact on the league overall is just winning and it's pretty clear that winning isn't that high on how they rate "contributors". So a lot of his case comes down to how much you attribute labor deals to him... and how important you think they are.
Kraft is a guy who if he got in.... good pick, if he doesn't get in... sure, he's just an owner, not like he was a founder of the league, and he didn't become a major player in leaguewide things until after the period where the NFL developed. It's not some indefensible snub to not put him in... he's more Phil Simms than Joe Montana or Johnny Unitas. A guy who should be on the shortlist, but isn't a shoe in pick for a limited space.
That was all a giant misunderstanding, the Falcons HOF voters were asked to fill in the blanks.Kind of surprised he hasn't pulled an Arthur Blank and put himself in the team's HOF
Better just wait for him to die and then put him in. Ralph Hay was so HoF worthy it only took him a 100 years to get in. I’m more of a Small Hall person but the NFL HoF is so fucked up.While we are on the subject, you can throw Eddie DeBartolo and Pat Bowlen into that group, too.
That said, I agree with a prior post - I won’t be losing a wink of slip over this. Kraft likely played way too hard in campaigning for the HOF for a decade plus.
BingoSo Jones and Bowlen's claims to fame were that they helped usher in big TV deals. And, yeah, their teams won some Super Bowls, and Jones built a stadium.
Kraft purchased a financially failing team that was ready to move out of a potentially lucrative sports media market, won 6 Super Bowls, and was a very visible owner during some difficult labor negotiations. And Kraft built a new stadium in the process.
Sorry, not really seeing any difference here other than that Jones and Bowlen were simply good at the same self promotion that the ESPN article criticizes Kraft for doing. Nor am I ready to believe that Jones and Bowlen are some paragons of virtue when compared to Kraft and other owners.
Which comes back to the Occam's razor explanation:
Ken Anderson has an MVP, led the league in passer rating four times (in a cold-weather city with 2/3 others in the division) and the most AV of anyone not in the HOF who's eligible besides Jim Marshall. How does he not even make the finalist round?Five individuals have reached the Finalist stage across three categories for possible election to the Pro Football Hall of Fame's Class of 2025 presented by Visual Edge IT.
Moving within one step of inclusion in the next class of enshrinees are Ralph Hay (Contributor), Mike Holmgren (Coach), and Maxie Baughan, Sterling Sharpe and Jim Tyrer (Seniors). The remaining bar to clear: approval from at least 80% of the members of the full Selection Committee at their annual meeting next year in advance of the class unveiling during Super Bowl LIX week in New Orleans, La.
https://www.nfl.com/news/contributor-coach-senior-finalists-revealed-for-pro-football-hall-of-fame-class-of-2025
Maybe because he overlapped with so many HOF QBs (Montana, Marino, Elway, Fouts, Kelly and Young), although Young didn’t start for the 49ers until 1991. Anderson didn’t have the notoriety the others did. Playing for Cincinnati probably didn’t hep his cause either.Ken Anderson has an MVP, led the league in passer rating four times (in a cold-weather city with 2/3 others in the division) and the most AV of anyone not in the HOF who's eligible besides Jim Marshall. How does he not even make the finalist round?
The only one in that list who was largely his contemporary is Fouts, who put up bigger raw numbers in a much easier environment (both weather-wise and not having to play the Steel Curtain twice a year - not to mention Anderson greatly outplayed him in their most famous meeting). His best season was also a strike year. Anderson is obviously hurt by not playing for a marquee franchise or winning a Super Bowl, but he absolutely deserves to be in.Maybe because he overlapped with so many HOF QBs (Montana, Marino, Elway, Fouts, Kelly and Young), although Young didn’t start for the 49ers until 1991. Anderson didn’t have the notoriety the others did. Playing for Cincinnati probably didn’t hep his cause either.
By the time Anderson became eligible (1992) that “golden age of quarterbacks” was mostly established and Anderson probably paled in the eyes of the HOF voters compared with them. I don’t know, there are always guys that don’t make sense getting in or not. It could still be made right, but I guess it’s not happening.The only one in that list who was largely his contemporary is Fouts, who put up bigger raw numbers in a much easier environment (both weather-wise and not having to play the Steel Curtain twice a year - not to mention Anderson greatly outplayed him in their most famous meeting). His best season was also a strike year. Anderson is obviously hurt by not playing for a marquee franchise or winning a Super Bowl, but he absolutely deserves to be in.
Im really surprised to see Fred Taylor make it to the finalists list as well. I loved him back in my Fantasy Football college years, but he never even finished Top 5 in rushing yards once and only even made 1 Pro Bowl.Eli really is a joke candidate. All of the finalists would have been considered one of the 2-3 best players at their position for multiple years. Then you have Eli.
That one is shocking. In no way should he ever be a finalist at any point. Never thought highly of him.Im really surprised to see Fred Taylor make it to the finalists list as well. I loved him back in my Fantasy Football college years, but he never even finished Top 5 in rushing yards once and only even made 1 Pro Bowl.
Really good story--also Polian sucks so much. Just a fucking worm.https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/43359812/a-worms-hof-voters-candidacy-chiefs-great
In case folks hadn't seen this story. I wasn't aware of it.
Of course, that doesn't mean voters will have to explain themselves if they choose not to select Tyrer. Nor does it mean there hasn't been behind-the-scenes lobbying in the lead-up to the vote. Several voters were contacted by Bill Polian, a former NFL executive-turned-analyst who has had a vote for several years. Polian, one voter said, urged him and others not to select Tyrer because of the murder-suicide.
Lobbying for a particular candidate is nothing new, but the voter told ESPN that until Polian's plea, "I'd never gotten a call telling me not to vote for somebody."
Polian told ESPN he made calls to a few people and "talked, in general, about the class and things of that nature, not specifically about [Tyrer's] candidacy. ... I talk to a few people that I respect, every year. And I talk to quite a few people who are not selectors every year, but they're people who I respect, whose opinions I solicit."
Asked how he would vote, Polian said, "I won't reveal who I vote for under any circumstances. ... It's nobody's business but mine."
Not to mention Ray Lewis...Not that they are at all comparable, but if they let OJ stay in the HoF, then they shouldn’t deny Tyrer, assuming his skills were worthy of admission.