Protecting the Shields -- The Nick Cafardo Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

MyDaughterLovesTomGordon

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2006
14,297
40 plate appearances. 40. Nick just used that as some kind of evidence and a Globe editor was like, "yep, gonna let that fly."
 
40. 
 
Plate appearances. 
 
Nick is dumber than a box of hammers. 
 

dynomite

Member
SoSH Member
It's two posts up, I think ("He had a .928 OPS in his first 40 plate appearances.")

These appearances were also during the September roster expansion, so some of the pitchers he was facing were AAA guys (one of his HR came off of Tampa Bay RP Steve Geltz... Who?)
 

Don Buddin's GS

Member
SoSH Member
Nicky gets called out for BS reporting by Heyman, according to MLB Trade Rumors:

•Earlier today, Nick Cafardo of the Boston Globe reported that the Yankees had come closer than any other team to acquiring Phillies star Cole Hamels. If that’s true, CBS Sports’ Jon Heyman writes, that might mean the Phillies haven’t come close to dealing Hamels to any team, because the two sides have not had discussions recently and never were near a deal.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,609
Nick v Heyman.  I'm rooting for the asteroid.
 
(Actually, I've had email exchanges with both. Nick is the one that's never been an asshole, so I hope he has his sources in order).
 

LeoCarrillo

Do his bits at your peril
SoSH Member
Oct 13, 2008
10,432
Twitter may end up being a wonderful thing after all, if the rabid sportswriters turn on each other.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,609

John Marzano Olympic Hero

has fancy plans, and pants to match
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2001
24,628
God. What a terrible lede. 
 
I mean if an actual breathing editor was in place the third sentence should be rewritten to, "Is the latter good or bad?" because right now that third sentence insinuates that it could be good or bad that Miley is new, which is just dumb. I think what Cafardo is trying to convey is that it may be good or bad that Miley is the only lefty in the Boston rotation. 
 
A question that does have some merit, but not that much to frame an entire story around it. 
 
That last sentence is a pile of crap. I understand that not every story is going to be "War and Peace" but please give the illusion of trying. 
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,609
John Marzano Olympic Hero said:
God. What a terrible lede. 
 
I mean if an actual breathing editor was in place the third sentence should be rewritten to, "Is the latter good or bad?" because right now that third sentence insinuates that it could be good or bad that Miley is new, which is just dumb. I think what Cafardo is trying to convey is that it may be good or bad that Miley is the only lefty in the Boston rotation. 
 
A question that does have some merit, but not that much to frame an entire story around it. 
 
That last sentence is a pile of crap. I understand that not every story is going to be "War and Peace" but please give the illusion of trying. 
 
Not surprisingly, the story itself follows the lede's lead into crapville.
 

glennhoffmania

meat puppet
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
8,411,679
NY
I thought he was asking if Miley getting attention is good, bad or neither.  Who the fuck knows.
 

OzSox

New Member
Dec 8, 2005
157
glennhoffmania said:
I thought he was asking if Miley getting attention is good, bad or neither.  Who the fuck knows.
 
This is how I read it too. It's still terrible, but I thought that part was fairly clear.
 

John Marzano Olympic Hero

has fancy plans, and pants to match
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2001
24,628
Yeah, I can see that. But most of the story is about how Miley has to face a lot of good righty hitters in the American League (he lists about a dozen). Some good lefties (including Jacoby Ellsbury!) and some good switch hitters too. Most batters in the National League gripped the bat with their teeth, different game in the American League. I hope Miley is ready! 
 
Jesus, he's a fucking terrible hack of a writer. 
 

glennhoffmania

meat puppet
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
8,411,679
NY
But don't forget about how much attention he may or may not get, and how much that will impact his ability to get out guys like Ellsbury and the good righties.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,609
glennhoffmania said:
I thought he was asking if Miley getting attention is good, bad or neither.  Who the fuck knows.
 
Ha. I never thought of the "he's getting attention" angle.  The talk of all the hitters he has to face ("there are good hitters that bat lefty AND righty," sayeth Nick) put me in the "is being the only lefty a problem?" camp. 
 
Read it any way you want. Nichschach
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
27,104
Newton
Nick back today with a full-on "Get off of my lawn" column on all the things that are wrong with the game today – all under the auspices of "Why the game isn't as popular as it used to be." Some of Nick's reasons:

Batters are too selective
The game has fewer characters
Pitchers don't pitch inside
Pitch counts suck
Defensive shifts (again!)
The DH
Players get hurt more
Players only play baseball now and don't have to do things like deliver ice for a living (yes, this is really in the column)

Amazing stuff from an amazing man.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,609
Van Everyman said:
Nick back today with a full-on "Get off of my lawn" column on all the things that are wrong with the game today – all under the auspices of "Why the game isn't as popular as it used to be." Some of Nick's reasons:

Batters are too selective
The game has fewer characters
Pitchers don't pitch inside
Pitch counts suck
Defensive shifts (again!)
The DH
Players get hurt more
Players only play baseball now and don't have to do things like deliver ice for a living (yes, this is really in the column)

Amazing stuff from an amazing man.
 
Moron just wrote 500 words on why baseball sucks, and he wonders why fewer people watch it.  Maybe its because those who are tabbed as "experts,"  like GravyStains Cafardo, keep shitting on the game and rarely write good things when it isnt in the service of the 3 agents that return his calls.
 
also bugging Nick
 
Not enough "human interest stories; other stories too technical." (STATS!!!!!)
 
Too much science, but we need to study biomechanics more.  (wow. I wonder if anyone has thought of that.  I wonder if Nick is angling for a front office job)
 

Yelling At Clouds

Post-darwinian
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
3,441
Van Everyman said:
Nick back today with a full-on "Get off of my lawn" column on all the things that are wrong with the game today – all under the auspices of "Why the game isn't as popular as it used to be." Some of Nick's reasons:

Batters are too selective
The game has fewer characters
Pitchers don't pitch inside
Pitch counts suck
Defensive shifts (again!)
The DH
Players get hurt more
Players only play baseball now and don't have to do things like deliver ice for a living (yes, this is really in the column)

Amazing stuff from an amazing man.
 
Could be because any time someone shows a shred of personality, a writer rips him for failing to "respect the game." 
EDIT: Upon actually reading the column, I see that Nick mentions this. 
 
The thing about oblique injuries is weird, though. 
 

John Marzano Olympic Hero

has fancy plans, and pants to match
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2001
24,628
That column this morning was garbage. Like most of his pieces, it started off with an interesting premises: why is baseball failing to capture the youth of today? But then it devolves into a "What Are the Things That I, Nick Cafardo, Don't Like About Baseball" column. Aside from the first paragraph, does Cafardo reference the Globe poll? Did Nick bother to talk to anyone in the 25 and under bracket (probably not)? You know who may have been a good person to talk to about the Globe poll, the person who owns the Globe and the person who owns the Boston Red Sox. I wonder if Cafardo would be able to get either man on the phone?
 
It was bullshit. 
 
And one of the worst parts was his logic that stats ruin the game argument. But in the next line he says, "The stats I used to follow were better!" I want to grab Cafardo by the jewels and say, "VORP and RBIs are both FUCKING statistics! You just like one better than the other." And Cafardo is usually one of the lead torch bearers when a baseball player attempts to color outside the line. "He's not respecting the unwritten rules! HOW DARE HE!" So his assertion that there aren't any colorful characters left in the game is bogus too. 
 
And fuck him for bringing Barry Bonds' name into it. "Durrrr, whatever happened to cocky guys like Barry Bonds? That's what the kids liked!" Fuck and you. If I had the time or the inclination, I could go back and find the thousands of words that Cafardo and his brethren wrote about Bonds saying that he was the anti-Christ. If, in 1999, Cafardo happened to see a kid act like Barry Bonds, he would have lost his shit. There is no doubt in my mind, he's such a god damn hypocrite. 
 
The shifts. Man, I was wondering how he'd shoehorn his anti-shift crusade. "Ted Williams? Bah, don't give me any of that crap. David Ortiz has to hit into a shift 500 times a year."
 
FIVE HUNDRED TIMES A YEAR! He does not, so fuck you, you over-exaggerating prick. And you know how you beat a god damn shift, hit it the other way. Do it a half-dozen times and I guarantee there won't be any more shifts. 
 
Man. I don't know who wrote a worse column in the last 48 hours: Nick Cafardo or Bill "All of My Friends are WICKED FAMOUS, You Guys!" Simmons. 
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,562
Oregon
John Marzano Olympic Hero said:
Man. I don't know who wrote a worse column in the last 48 hours: Nick Cafardo or Bill "All of My Friends are WICKED FAMOUS, You Guys!" Simmons. 
 
At least you have Monday to anticipate with joy!
 

Humphrey

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2010
3,202
John Marzano Olympic Hero said:
Man. I don't know who wrote a worse column in the last 48 hours: Nick Cafardo or Bill "All of My Friends are WICKED FAMOUS, You Guys!" Simmons. 
You haven't even given Peter King a chance to match Simmons's and Nick's suckitude.   
 

Granite Sox

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 6, 2003
5,064
The Granite State
No characters?

How about Papi, Pedey, Panda, Koji, and Joseph Kelley Jr. for starters just on this team. Pedro as wandering ambassador.

Even kids like X, Mookie, and someone new like Moncada have a certain type of charisma that is incredibly appealing to young kids.

He's just completely nonsensical with everything today.

Jaysus what an idiot.
 

Reverend

for king and country
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2007
64,494
Dick Pole Upside said:
No characters?

How about Papi, Pedey, Panda, Koji, and Joseph Kelley Jr. for starters just on this team. Pedro as wandering ambassador.

Even kids like X, Mookie, and someone new like Moncada have a certain type of charisma that is incredibly appealing to young kids.

He's just completely nonsensical with everything today.

Jaysus what an idiot.
Two years from one of the more likable squads anyone can remember no less.

Some of these guys fail to realize that they aren't really talking about the team or the game--it is they who have changed.
 

Hyde Park Factor

token lebanese
SoSH Member
Jun 14, 2008
2,817
Manchvegas
I didn't have a chance to read the Sunday notes yesterday, so I started my Monday morning with that crap fest. The only highlight was coming here immediately upon finishing it. You know, misery / company....
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,609
CLEARWATER, Fla. — Well, after watching Justin Masterson and Wade Miley Sunday could you draw the conclusion that the Red Sox need Cole Hamels?
 
March 10...FORT MYERS, Fla -- Well, after Justin Masterson and Wade Miley pitched back-to-back 3 perfect innings against the always-tough Rays and Cardinals, keeping their spring ERAs at 0.00, could you draw the conclusion that each will go 32-0 and cruise to a Cy Young Award tie.
 
One scout described the outing as “awful.”
 
 
THAT's why Nick gets the big bucks.  He has scouts on call to give in-depth analysis that "analytics" can't always provide. Without such scouting acumen, the mathematicians ruining baseball might have thought that Masterson's 3.1IP/7H/6R/2BB/2HR0K was actually pretty good.
 

John Marzano Olympic Hero

has fancy plans, and pants to match
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2001
24,628
Why does baseball "need" Pete Rose?
 
I may go ask him that on the old Twitter box. 
 
Edit: Wait a second. I'm blocked from following him, which is strange because I've never ripped on him or was ever disrespectful or even engage with him on Twitter. Ever. I wonder why I'm blocked?
 
This is the first time anyone has ever blocked me on Twitter. I don't know how I feel.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,609
Rose played the game on the field the right way. He had that energy about him for most of his career. Nobody played the game harder. Ask Ray Fosse about the home plate collision that derailed his career. Rose would go through a brick wall to help his team win.
That’s the good part.
 

 
 
Yeah. "The right way." Screwing up a rookie's career in an exhibition (all star) game.  Quite a guy.
 
And I'm sure Ol' Pete didn't begin to gamble until he reached the manager's office.  Never occurred to him.
 
And I guess it never occurred to Nick that people HAVE asked Ray Fosse:
http://www.foxsports.com/mlb/story/Cincinnati-Reds-Pete-Rose-Cleveland-Indians-Ray-Fosse-collision-home-plate-1970-All-Star-Game-070412
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
35,879
Deep inside Muppet Labs
And that "nobody played the game harder." That's such mealy-mouthed bullshit. Maybe I'd accept "nobody publicly showed how hard he played the game more obviously than Pete Rose," but that's about it. It assumes that 1) the way to be great in baseball is to play harder than everyone else, which simply isn't true (no one's ever hit a curveball off of more effort), and 2) that because Rose was such a gloryhound showboat about the way he played therefore his efforts were true and pure.
 
Only a dimwit like Nick would take anything Rose said or showed in his career at face value. It's not enough to say that Rose was a great player, because obviously he was. No, Nick has to add strength of character into the mix, which is silly and in Rose's case utterly fraudulent to his cause, since, ya know, he did bet on baseball.
 

MyDaughterLovesTomGordon

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2006
14,297
Nick really needs to read Pos' Big Red Machine for some insight into Rose's "character." Yeah, he wanted to win real bad, but he was not a good dude at any point in his career. 
 

John Marzano Olympic Hero

has fancy plans, and pants to match
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2001
24,628
Ask Ray Fosse about the home plate collision that derailed his career.
 
 
Why is this a positive, Rose destroyed a guy's career in an exhibition? Why don't you ask Daryl Stingily how fun it was to play against Jack Tatum? Maybe Rudy T. can explain how wacky it is to be in a brawl with Kermit Washington. Dig up Tony C. and ask him what it was like to face a Jack Hamilton fast ball? While you're at it, dig up Ray Chapman and ask him the same question about facing Carl Mays?
 
I get it, Pete Rose hustled. A lot. And that's pretty great, I guess. But the guy also bet on baseball. A lot. And that's not so great. 
 
Baseball has done pretty well for itself in the 25 years since Pete Rose was booted from the game. It doesn't NEED Pete Rose. In fact, it needs less people like Rose. 
 
EDIT:
 
Nick really needs to read Pos' Big Red Machine for some insight into Rose's "character." Yeah, he wanted to win real bad, but he was not a good dude at any point in his career. 
 
 
Actually, that was the part of the book that I liked the least. Pos was in Rose's corner for everything, he really loves himself some Pete Rose. Cafardo should read Michale Sokolove's "Hustle" if he wants a good description of this creep.
 

Reverend

for king and country
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2007
64,494
Cafardo is coming off as a guy whose favorite book is still Catcher In the Rye.
 

MyDaughterLovesTomGordon

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2006
14,297
John Marzano Olympic Hero said:
 
 
Actually, that was the part of the book that I liked the least. Pos was in Rose's corner for everything, he really loves himself some Pete Rose. Cafardo should read Michale Sokolove's "Hustle" if he wants a good description of this creep.
 
Ha. I agree that Pos was rather enamored, but I just found myself thinking, "God, what a dick that guy is."
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,609
MyDaughterLovesTomGordon said:
 
Ha. I agree that Pos was rather enamored, but I just found myself thinking, "God, what a dick that guy is."
 
That's a point in Pos's favor.  It takes a pretty good writer to sketch the scene fully such that he shows that *he* likes Rose, but the reader doesn't.   I haven't read it, but it sounds similar to Feinstein's effort with Bobby Knight in "Season on the Brink."
 

ifmanis5

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2007
63,960
Rotten Apple
I'm really glad SoSH has not started a Rose thread- worst sports talk radio topic ever. Can't even come up with a close second other than maybe PEDs/steroids.
 
Attention Nick et al, no one is losing sleep over this. He broke the golden rule and got punished. All perfectly understandable. We're not missing out on anything. Moving on then.
 

SydneySox

A dash of cool to add the heat
SoSH Member
Sep 19, 2005
15,605
The Eastern Suburbs
There is no Rev said:
Cafardo is coming off as a guy whose favorite book is still Catcher In the Rye.
 
No? Catcher in the Rye is amazing and the message doesn't seem to pertain here.
 
Don't see the connection ... unless you are insinuating he's coming off as someone who read it in 8th grade and identified Holden Caulfield as a protagonist and not a deeply flawed lesson.
 
Or maybe you're saying that Catcher in the Rye is his favourite because he read it a long time ago and pines for the days of yesteryear? If that's the case I wish you'd picked a book that has less direct conflict with your theory, professor.
 
hashtagilovesalingerfuckyou
 

Reverend

for king and country
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2007
64,494
SydneySox said:
 
No? Catcher in the Rye is amazing and the message doesn't seem to pertain here.
 
Don't see the connection ... unless you are insinuating he's coming off as someone who read it in 8th grade and identified Holden Caulfield as a protagonist and not a deeply flawed lesson.
 
Or maybe you're saying that Catcher in the Rye is his favourite because he read it a long time ago and pines for the days of yesteryear? If that's the case I wish you'd picked a book that has less direct conflict with your theory, professor.
 
hashtagilovesalingerfuckyou
 
The bolded, yes.
 
Like, he thinks everyone and everything about the game today is somehow inauthentic. He sounds like someone who might start complaining about all the phonies in the league or something.
 
There might be an interesting novel to be written about a man whose love of baseball turns into loathing, but he's locked into writing about it for a living.
 

SydneySox

A dash of cool to add the heat
SoSH Member
Sep 19, 2005
15,605
The Eastern Suburbs
It is very valid to suggest he's the sort of person unaware of the what that book is about.
 
It would be interesting to see if he would see himself as he appears to be; the phoney.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,609
I just can't  . . . .
 
 
 
NICK CAFARDO | ON BASEBALL

Red Sox taking a risk by waiting on Cole Hamels
 
Status
Not open for further replies.