Red Sox ‘22 offense: offensively offensive

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,448
Who would have thought that going into the season it would be the Red Sox offense that has been terrible (and not the rotation or BP
How bad you ask:
Some stats after todays game
View: https://twitter.com/bostonsportsinf/status/1518322564308873219

Red Sox offense

Thru the first 16 games, have scored ≤ 4 runs a whopping 12 times

The most by a Red Sox team in 30 years

the offense has been putrid
The Red Sox have been held to four runs or fewer in each of their last seven games. They’ve gone 2-5 while scoring 2.3 runs per game in that stretch.

Overall in 2022, they rank 30th while seeing just 3.7 P/PA. They also rank 30th while chasing 32% of pitches outside the zone.
The Red Sox are averaging 3.5 runs per game, their second-lowest scoring average through 16 games this century. League context is that offense is down everywhere for multiple reasons, but … their offense is absent for huge swaths of most games. View: https://twitter.com/alexspeier/status/1518316219677519874
View: https://twitter.com/alexspeier/status/1518317255469289472
Red Sox’ first 5 PAs of the game: 4-for-5
Red Sox’ next 29 PAs: 2-for-28, BB

They lost to the Rays, 5-2.
View: https://twitter.com/alexspeier/status/1518316219677519874
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,655
Runs scored, by game:

5, 2, 4, 1, 5, 9, 4, 4, 8, 3, 2, 1, 2, 4, 2, 2

To put them in a distribution:

1 run: 2 times
2 runs: 5 times
3 runs: 1 time
4 runs: 4 times
5 runs: 2 times
> 5 runs: 2 times

7 out of 16 games (44%) they've scored 1 or 2 runs. It really has been pathetic so far. I don't think the bats will forever stay silent but so far it's been very quiet.
 

Mueller's Twin Grannies

critical thinker
SoSH Member
Dec 19, 2009
9,386
Kiké has had a cold start, as did X, though both have been better lately. Devers and Verdugo have been good, JBJ has surprised, and JDM has done alright when in the lineup. It's literally everybody else that's been the issue. Story got a bit of a pass because of COVID, but has been showing signs of breaking out. Vásquez has lived up to being a sub-.250 hitter with little power. Dalbec has completely regressed to pre-2021 levels of futility at the plate. Shaw is useless and would be even if he'd been awarded that HR the other night. And the rest of the bench has been meh.

Even still, that kind of success rate should be enough to score at least 5 runs a game, especially against back end of the rotation arms. The issue seems mostly to be lack of any consistency during a game. How many games have more than one player had more than one hit? How many have had hits in non-scoring situations vs. with RISP? How many have been been screwed by BABIP?

This team is probably a little better than their record to this point, but probably not much. If Bloom is serious about trying to contend this year, we should see some call-ups. If he's not, which is my suspicion, I think he's going to keep his blue chip prospects in the minors as long as possible until the rules change presents the incentive to have them make the big club next year.

I hate to say it, but I think this is a punt year for the Sox, by design. Whether assuming the lockout would last longer or just surveying the landscape and making a conservative estimate about the quality of the team put together, I think Bloom is honest about their chances this year and is also waiting to see what happens with X and Devers w/r/t extensions before deciding how much to commit to 2023 or beyond.

The question I have is how soon the team becomes true sellers and who will be available. Because they should be and it should be a lot of guys.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,272
Well, the depth guys (those who generally don’t start) are 7 for 62 with 1 xbh (Refsnyder’s double today). With JD out, one of those guys is in the lineup and an already not that deep lineup (with Enrique scuffling) is made shorter. The team doesn’t walk and doesn’t steal bases, so they are going to need homers to score, and they aren’t hitting many of those.
 

Ganthem

a ray of sunshine
SoSH Member
Apr 7, 2022
914
So a question for those that are more knowledgeable then I. As I have stated in other threads, it seems as if the offense last year would swing between two extremes. It was either ice cold or scorching hot and never anything in between. What has my spidey sense tingling is that it seems this offense might be heading on the same trajectory. It would not shock me a bit if they go to Toronto and score a bunch of runs and then go to the O's and score no runs. Do the stats from last year bear this narrative out? What would one even look at to figure out if what I suspect is true? If true what is the cause of this? It is not like we have a bunch of bad hitters. JDM, Bogey, Devers, Kike, etc. should lead to a pretty consistent offense, and yet it does not.
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
16 games into the season, 7-9 and 3.5 out of first. No reason to push the panic button, but there are things that can not be ignored here. Offensively, 1B, the outfield and bench depth are all issues and all intermingled. IMO Dalbec needs motivation and Shaw needs to be released. The solution to both of those issues is likely in WOOstah. Ideally The Sox would probably like for his debut not to come against the Jays in Toronto, but how much longer are they willing to live with the Dalbec/Shaw tandem? OF...AFAIK, Justin Upton is still available. If they are not willing to trade for a better option at this point, perhaps he's worth a look. Not the best glove solution, but he's been playing the position his whole career while you have a utility IFer trying to learn the job on the fly and if the defense is a huge concern, that's what JBJ is here for. If Upton is an option they should move on him sooner rather than later as he's going to need sometime to get into game shape.

Pitching...If Houck is on the mound and not struggling with his pitch count let him go a little longer. You can't protect him, Whitlock and worry about piggybacking Hill. I think Braiser's gone at the end of the month, but that's only accommodating the MLB roster drops. Perhaps he gets demoted before then and someone else gets a shot to see if they can contribute in the coming week.

Fundamentals... We have guys in transition when it comes to position players, some of this is going to take time. That said, SMART base running, plate discipline and infield defensive positioning/footwork are all areas that need concentration. Story's limited time during a limited spring training is unfortunate as there is going to be a learning curve for a guy who has played 0 games at 2B in his 6 year career. That said, who's working with him? I can think of a guy who was a damn fine second baseman here for a few years and I reckon the team knows how to get a hold of him. If he's not available, I'm sure there are a number of fine defensive former MLB second basemen who might welcome a chance to tutor Story.

There's work to be done for sure and I do have faith in Bloom, but I also have concerns over how long you wait on some of these issues.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,871
Maine
So a question for those that are more knowledgeable then I. As I have stated in other threads, it seems as if the offense last year would swing between two extremes. It was either ice cold or scorching hot and never anything in between. What has my spidey sense tingling is that it seems this offense might be heading on the same trajectory. It would not shock me a bit if they go to Toronto and score a bunch of runs and then go to the O's and score no runs. Do the stats from last year bear this narrative out? What would one even look at to figure out if what I suspect is true? If true what is the cause of this? It is not like we have a bunch of bad hitters. JDM, Bogey, Devers, Kike, etc. should lead to a pretty consistent offense, and yet it does not.
Depends how granular you want to be with their "swings".

2021 month to month runs/game: 4.8, 5.4, 5.0, 4.7, 5.3, 5.5 Other than a blip in July that looks entirely reasonable for a team playing a bunch of cold(ish) weather games in the first month of the season.

16 games into the season is way way WAY too early to assess anything with this team. The offense is sputtering, but so is half the league. Entering today, the league average runs per game was 3.99 and the Sox were at 3.73 (Toronto, they of the vaunted offense, are at 3.93 for comparison).

Tropicana Field is always a house of horrors for the Red Sox. There's no reason to panic because of what happened this weekend.
 

Max Power

thai good. you like shirt?
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
7,994
Boston, MA

Looch

New Member
Jul 15, 2021
725
On the spectrum of scoring/action in the major team sports, with basketball at the high end and soccer at the low end, baseball is steadily drifting toward soccer. Football to me has found the sweet spot while evolving toward basketball, while hockey has moved in that positive direction as well from what I understand without direct knowledge. Baseball hasn’t begun to solve its problems, and this year already seems to be even worse than last year.
 

geoduck no quahog

not particularly consistent
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 8, 2002
13,024
Seattle, WA
So they say Pitchers are typically ahead of hitters coming out of Spring.

The strike made that even worse, I’m guessing. Hitters may have lost around 100 AB’s (as did HP Umpires).

Normal amount of at bats during Spring Training (from what I can tell) is about 155. The Red Sox starters had around 55. Devers led with 68.

(Also, I’m curious if Pitchcomm has had any impact. Still early, but are there any meaningful stats comparing the use of the machine?)
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
So they say Pitchers are typically ahead of hitters coming out of Spring.

The strike made that even worse, I’m guessing. Hitters may have lost around 100 AB’s (as did HP Umpires).

Normal amount of at bats during Spring Training (from what I can tell) is about 155. The Red Sox starters had around 55. Devers led with 68.

(Also, I’m curious if Pitchcomm has had any impact. Still early, but are there any meaningful stats comparing the use of the machine?)
Good question. I think it's going to be difficult to get an accurate answer if were using a different ball this season.
 

DeadlySplitter

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 20, 2015
33,531
The Sox are last in pitches per PA and 25th in OBP, can't blame much of that on any dead ball antics.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,125
The Sox are last in pitches per PA and 25th in OBP, can't blame much of that on any dead ball antics.
I mean, changing the ball changes literally everything, the players are well aware the balls are different so the pitches are different and the AB approaches are necessarily different. I want to say everyone is using the same balls except I read a piece today that there were two decidedly different types of balls for all of 2021, so I can't even say that. I'm not sure how you make personnel decisions under these conditions, once again I am so glad that is not my actual job and I can just sit at home and first- and second-guess.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,125
Also from some of the big scoring outbursts this weekend, I would not be surprised if MLB had already started to switch back to livelier balls at least at some parks.
 

OCD SS

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Offense is down across MLB but the ball is traveling especially poorly at Fenway so far.

View: https://twitter.com/bbl_astrophyscs/status/1518309695584231425?s=21&t=ZCbNkWaK0rNLnJJVJK30KQ
There were three balls I saw from my seats opening weekend that I was sure were gone and they barely made the warning track. I chalked it up to the weather, but there's clearly more going on.
It can be hard to parse separate causes in a small sample size. Put a deadened ball into Boston's April weather and I don't think it's hard to see Fenway's park factors skewing to a bigger negative drop...
 

scottyno

late Bloomer
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2008
11,337
Before today the Sox had an 80 ops+, so hard to blame it on the ball, unless there really are multiple types and the Sox happen to be getting all the bad ones.

2 starters are hitting like pitchers and before today the entire bench was 8/72
 

Harry Hooper

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
34,605
Before today the Sox had an 80 ops+, so hard to blame it on the ball, unless there really are multiple types and the Sox happen to be getting all the bad ones.

2 starters are hitting like pitchers and before today the entire bench was 8/72
Based on knowledge available, Fenway is one of only a handful of parks that puts the baseballs in a humidor to deaden them.
 

scottyno

late Bloomer
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2008
11,337
Based on knowledge available, Fenway is one of only a handful of parks that puts the baseballs in a humidor to deaden them.
That wasn't added this year though, fenway was hitter friendly even after they added the humidor before 2020
 

sean1562

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 17, 2011
3,650
Trevor Story has not had a great start to the season but most of the other big time FAs are also having rough starts.

Story: .234/.294/.298/.592
Correa: .192/.288/.288/.577
Seager: .241/.286/.310/.596
Semien: .183/.250/.250/.500
Bryant: .278/.328/.352/.680
Marte: .254/.319/.381/.700
Baez: .261/.292/.435/.727
Schwarber: .169/.246/.407/.653

Freeman and Castellanos are crushing the ball but the players above are not going to end the season with those stat lines. Hernandez and Story will get better, Vazquez is bad but not .470 OPS bad.

A slightly bigger problem is that our team ERA is 19th in MLB and our FIP is 24th. Pivetta will pitch better but I am not sure how much better we can expect Wacha, Houck, Whitlock, and Eovaldi to get.
 

Daniel_Son

Member
SoSH Member
May 25, 2021
1,729
San Diego
Sox are seeing just 3.7 pitches per at-bat and chase bad pitches outside the zone 32% of the time - dead last in the majors in both categories.

Source
 

streeter88

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 2, 2006
1,807
Melbourne, Australia
Can somebody help me with how to pronounce the hitting coach's name? Trying to "develop deep regard", in the words of an early mentor... but it's tough thus far. If the Red Sox hitting philosophy is that bad that it only took 6 batters for the Jays to work out how to successfully neuter it, gonna be a long season.
 

grimshaw

Member
SoSH Member
May 16, 2007
4,227
Portland
Looking under the hood and keeping in mind that we have reached the point where barrel% begins to stabilize at 40-50 balls in play.

-Devers leads the team with the most barrels, and his hard hit% is at a career high so far. You be you, Raffy.

-Bogaerts is hitting the ball as hard as ever, but with a .471 BABIP. That's not going to hold up, but it is always high (.335 career) since he's tough to defend.

-JDM isn't making quality contact. His hard hit % is the lowest on the team and far below his worst season and his BABIP is .343. All that said, he is still at a wRC+ of 129, so is among the least to blame for run production. The underlying numbers are a bit troubling though.

-JBJ has barreled one ball. JBJ is JBJ. He's tough to put in the lineup with an already struggling offense, but the Sox seem to have punted RF for the time being, and the rest of the offense hasn't picked up the slack. His "platoon" mate Arroyo doesn't have anything concerning across the board, nor does he really have enough PA's to glean much. The hits just haven't fallen in. I'd chalk it up to infrequent play and learning a new position.

-Story just needs the at bats IMO. Missing some games while already having a shortened spring training hasn't helped.

-Enrique is heating up after a miserable start. He has one fewer barrel than Devers. Keeping in mind though, that his current level of wRC+ (74) is closer to 2019-2020 (wRC+ 85) than last season, his improvement may not be dramatically better.

Really though, I believe the biggest factor is the quality of pitching they have faced. Aside from the Tigers, every other team they have played is over .500. They need them some O's quickly.
 

Heating up in the bullpen

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,095
Pittsboro NC
On Sunday 4/17 the Red Sox beat the Twins 8-1 on the strength of 5 scoreless innings from Wacha and a 2-run 6th and 6-run 8th. Their record was 5-4.
Since then they've gone 2-7. In those games they've scored in three different innings once (all single runs in an 8-3 loss on P-Day), in two different innings three times, and in only one inning five times. They've have seven 1-run innings, six 2-run innings, and one more than 2-run inning (the 4-run 8th last night). They haven't scored in back to back innings in any of those games. They've scored 5 runs in a game once (last night's loss), 4 runs once (a 4-3 win), 3 runs once (the 8-3 Patriot's Day loss), 2 runs five times (four losses, one 2-1 win), and 1 run once. A total of 23 runs in 9 games, or 2.56 per game.
I don't know if there's a meaning to these distributions beyond this team is scuffling offensively as a group and individually (for the most part), having a hard time putting rallies together, having a hard time getting a big hit when runners are on, and not hitting many homers to create instant offense.
The no back-to-back scoring innings for a 9-game stretch seems significant. They're not getting starters on the ropes and then taking advantage of the softer parts of bullpens. I guess the previous paragraph explains that.
They will (knock on wood) hit better. I hope sooner than later.
 

Mueller's Twin Grannies

critical thinker
SoSH Member
Dec 19, 2009
9,386
I've seen a few calls to sign Justin Upton. They could, sure, but so could 28 other clubs who haven't. Maybe he's just done and the word got around. There are plenty of 4th and 5th OF types out there if they just need a warm body. I'd rather they acquire someone who can help out once a week or so.
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
I've seen a few calls to sign Justin Upton. They could, sure, but so could 28 other clubs who haven't. Maybe he's just done and the word got around. There are plenty of 4th and 5th OF types out there if they just need a warm body. I'd rather they acquire someone who can help out once a week or so.
Anybody currently out there could have been signed by 28 other clubs who haven't. Unfortunately it's a "You don't know until you know sort of thing.."
 

Dustin the Wind

4416
SoSH Member
Apr 27, 2007
723
Rockport,Mass
Upton has barely been a .200 hitter the last couple of seasons. I think he just can't hit ML pitching anymore.
It seems also that he is best used as a DH at this point in his career, rating negatively on most metrics. And moving Verdugo to Right Field and having Upton in left field changes our outfield defense significantly

https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/justin-upton-457708?stats=statcast-r-fielding-mlb

https://www.fangraphs.com/players/justin-upton/5222/stats#fielding
 
Last edited:

RoDaddy

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jun 19, 2002
3,258
Albany area, NY
-JBJ has barreled one ball. JBJ is JBJ. He's tough to put in the lineup with an already struggling offense
I would think they're close to giving Duran another shot, especially with his hot start for the Woosox this season. Maybe another month there to see if he can keep it up
 

AB in DC

OG Football Writing
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2002
13,788
Springfield, VA
I would think they're close to giving Duran another shot, especially with his hot start for the Woosox this season. Maybe another month there to see if he can keep it up
Frankly the JBJ trade never made any sense to me, unless they just wanted to keep the seat warm until Duran was ready. JBJ's defense is wasted in RF anywhere except Fenway, and he still can't hit (though he's no worse than anyone else on the team so far).
 

Daniel_Son

Member
SoSH Member
May 25, 2021
1,729
San Diego
Frankly the JBJ trade never made any sense to me, unless they just wanted to keep the seat warm until Duran was ready. JBJ's defense is wasted in RF anywhere except Fenway, and he still can't hit (though he's no worse than anyone else on the team so far).

David Hamilton - .321/.413/.547/.960 through ~50 AA at-bats
Alex Binelas - .288/.424/.673/1.097 through ~50 A+ at-bats

vs.

Hunter Renfroe - .228/.274/.404/.678 so far in 2022

Bloom made the right call. JBJ wasn't the target of that trade.
 
Last edited:

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,272
Ok, but if JBJ wasn’t the target of the trade, why didn’t the team get someone to at least platoon with him? Or just dump him and sign someone else to play RF? There’s no evidence that they didn’t value JBJ and only did the deal for prospects.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,655
Ok, but if JBJ wasn’t the target of the trade, why didn’t the team get someone to at least platoon with him? Or just dump him and sign someone else to play RF? There’s no evidence that they didn’t value JBJ and only did the deal for prospects.
That's a different (but good) question. The deal was for the prospects. I'm sure they figured JBJ would provide quality defense (true) and that he'd at least hit better than he did last year.
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
6,417
Ok, but if JBJ wasn’t the target of the trade, why didn’t the team get someone to at least platoon with him? Or just dump him and sign someone else to play RF? There’s no evidence that they didn’t value JBJ and only did the deal for prospects.
I think the Sox made a serious attempt to get Suzuki as their RF but were, like a lot of us, pretty floored when the Cubs dumped a sizable sum there to win his services. JBJ I think was intended to be the late innings defensive replacement.