Sounds to me like it might be, and now I really have no idea what the shape of that trade is.I wonder if the Sean Murphy deal is the next piece.
If we’re talking 2007 prospects, no one can compete with Craig Hansen.Don't forget Ryan Kalish.
I’d guess Abreu.Sounds to me like it might be, and now I really have no idea what the shape of that trade is.
Good! Almost all of those deals turned out just swell for us.Feels like a Dombrowski deal
You were furious with Sox not getting guys the last few days and now you're furious when they do, but pay more than you wanted.Okay, now I am absolutely furious. This is a terrible, horrible, no good, very bad deal.
Quoted wrong poster.? I love the trade. I want them to keep going.
They used up most of their trade pieces in this deal.I wonder if the Sean Murphy deal is the next piece.
Had this same thought.Feels like a Dombrowski deal
That’s the hard part too. How many years of control do we get? 1?I'm ok with this if they extend him. I hate it if they don't.
To be fair he doesn't have a single professional AB and Anthony is a far superior prospect to say the least.Yikes! Montgomery is hardly a throw in.
Just a step below the Big 4 and only because he hasn’t played played MiLB yet.
They’re going to have to extend Crochet.That's a ton. I don't absolutely hate this deal, but I don't like it either. I get this ownership group just won't spend money so you gotta trade prospects to get good players, but that is a lot. Teel alone is a lot, but then adding Monty?
They just offered someone $700,000,000That's a ton. I don't absolutely hate this deal, but I don't like it either. I get this ownership group just won't spend money so you gotta trade prospects to get good players, but that is a lot. Teel alone is a lot, but then adding Monty?
Bingo.That's a ton. I don't absolutely hate this deal, but I don't like it either. I get this ownership group just won't spend money so you gotta trade prospects to get good players, but that is a lot. Teel alone is a lot, but then adding Monty?
2. And given his history he's likely open to an extension.That’s the hard part too. How many years of control do we get? 1?
Yes, Breslow painted into a corner by ownership.If they aren't spending money, bodies are the only alternative currency.
But we don't know their names yet and we haven't seen their highlights on YouTube!Good news is that there will be another draft this year and the Sox will have a way to acquire more prospects.
If that actually happens I will feel a little bit better, but again that requires them to spendThey’re going to have to extend Crochet.
I wasn't even a little bit furious about Soto, and was more stunned about Fried than furious (and mad that it ended up being the Yankees). I'm honestly more upset about them not getting a real catcher than not signing either of those guys.You were furious with Sox not getting guys the last few days and now you're furious when they do, but pay more than you wanted.
This world (MLB) doesn't work like that.
Trading Abreu and still keeping him would be a genius move. (I can say that because I’ve never made a mistake in a posting here.)My dream is that we flip Abreu+prospects for Murphy and roll with an OF of Anthony-Rafaela-Abreu.
It has some shades of the Sale deal, not just because it's the White Sox again.Feels like a Dombrowski deal
Apparently the 2025 draft has a lot of college catcher depth.Good news is that there will be another draft this year and the Sox will have a way to acquire more prospects.
This is true. If it's a trade-and-extend I'll get over it.I'm ok with this if they extend him. I hate it if they don't.
Now I'm going to be kinda pissed if they don't drop serious money in FA. We still have serious holes to fill and arguably still need another pitcher.Bingo.
Id rather pay straight money for a guy than prospects.
They also have to extend Crochet. It will be VERY interesting to see what that contract looks like
I don't know where the "this team is more than 2 years out" talk comes from, but, yes, they certainly need to extend him...which is why they would have been better off just going all in for Burnes.Listen, this is a fair deal, and it's really kind of what they needed to do. Give up some of your top prospects and get a young top-of-the-rotation starter. I was actually expecting worse. But this team is more than 2 years out and they need to extend him.
They just got a cost-controlled starter who is known to be able to succeed at a top level for 4 guys who have not yet shown that. In the past couple of days, the Sox have been reported to have offered $700 million for Soto and $190 million for Fried. And today, they traded for arguably the best pitcher that will be acquired this offseason. Getting good players is good for winning and fun to watch. The Sox are making an effort, and the 2025 Red Sox just got a hell of a lot more exciting.Well there's your big piece everyone. 87 wins or bust. And not just for this year, since a fine combination of not being willing to spend market rate for players and now taking a big chunk out of the potential future cost-controlled starters basically helps put another brick in the wall of long fucking term mediocrity. Cheap bastards.
And the Bruins fan Stockholm Syndrome set will be like "yay they did something" and bang out the park again.
Weren‘t we all complaining about his inability to close? This is closing.I'm the first guy that says that there's no such things a prospect and you can always draft another one in a year and that they're all chips, but this seems like a lot for Crochet.
It feels like a frustration trade where Breslow had to get his guy and wasn't going to let anything stop him.