Red Sox hook Crochet for Kyle Teel, Braden Montgomery, Chase Meidroth and Wikelman Gonzalez

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
28,967
Unreal America
People get too attached to prospects. Especially diehard fans. In this case, attached to a guy who's never suited up for the organization.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
12,814
As I said like minutes before this trade happened, acquiring a guy like Crochet was going to be painful.

That’s a steep package. I hate the idea that we traded this much value for a guy when we just could have signed Fried or Burnes.

However, Crochet is 25 and has great stuff.

Overall, I don’t like this trade but I am happy that they aggressively went after a need
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
56,081
Okay, now I am absolutely furious. This is a terrible, horrible, no good, very bad deal.
You were furious with Sox not getting guys the last few days and now you're furious when they do, but pay more than you wanted.

This world (MLB) doesn't work like that.
 

manny

New Member
Jul 24, 2005
295
JFC, I understand qualms with the price but to call this a "bad" deal is off the mark. We just got a pitcher with arguably top 5 stuff in all of baseball, that has a realistic path to being a top 10 starter (or better) in all of MLB. For 2 years, plus he has indicated openness to an extension. I wish we could have done it without Teel or Montgomery but that was the price it took. They got it done. It's exciting. Having a guy like Crochet is cool. Be excited we get to watch him.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
96,402
Oregon
Teel was my favorite of the Big 4, so this is painful. I hope they follow-up by addressing the catching situation.
 

katnado

New Member
Aug 14, 2016
2,314
Alaska
That's a ton. I don't absolutely hate this deal, but I don't like it either. I get this ownership group just won't spend money so you gotta trade prospects to get good players, but that is a lot. Teel alone is a lot, but then adding Monty?
 

brownsox

New Member
Mar 11, 2007
61
Feels like a Dombrowski deal
Had this same thought.

I’m not overly distraught about losing any of them individually, but all four together is a steep price - two top-five prospects and three of the top ten. Meidroth was kind of a binky, so that one stings. He should at least get a chance to play regularly in MLB this year.
 

bloodysox

New Member
Sep 25, 2011
3,193
Louisville, Colorado
Yikes! Montgomery is hardly a throw in.

Just a step below the Big 4 and only because he hasn’t played played MiLB yet.
To be fair he doesn't have a single professional AB and Anthony is a far superior prospect to say the least.

My dream is that we flip Abreu+prospects for Murphy and roll with an OF of Anthony-Rafaela-Abreu.
 

Salem's Lot

Andy Moog! Andy God Damn Moog!
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
16,665
Gallows Hill
That's a ton. I don't absolutely hate this deal, but I don't like it either. I get this ownership group just won't spend money so you gotta trade prospects to get good players, but that is a lot. Teel alone is a lot, but then adding Monty?
They’re going to have to extend Crochet.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
56,081
That's a ton. I don't absolutely hate this deal, but I don't like it either. I get this ownership group just won't spend money so you gotta trade prospects to get good players, but that is a lot. Teel alone is a lot, but then adding Monty?
They just offered someone $700,000,000
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
12,814
That's a ton. I don't absolutely hate this deal, but I don't like it either. I get this ownership group just won't spend money so you gotta trade prospects to get good players, but that is a lot. Teel alone is a lot, but then adding Monty?
Bingo.

Id rather pay straight money for a guy than prospects.

They also have to extend Crochet. It will be VERY interesting to see what that contract looks like
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
38,135
Deep inside Muppet Labs
Prospects can have many different uses and people get too fixated on what they MIGHT become instead of what value they have now.

They're like Samwise's potatoes: Trade them, develop them, stick them in a deal.
 

Harry Hooper

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
35,788
If they aren't spending money, bodies are the only alternative currency.
Yes, Breslow painted into a corner by ownership.

I hate trading Teel since he represented the rarest non-pitcher commodity (all-around C) among the top prospects. Having said that, if Breslow and baseball folks had reached a legit projection on him that he wasn't going to become a top MLB catcher, they dealt him at close to peak value. We'll see.
 

John Marzano Olympic Hero

has fancy plans, and pants to match
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2001
25,828
I'm the first guy that says that there's no such things a prospect and you can always draft another one in a year and that they're all chips, but this seems like a lot for Crochet.

It feels like a frustration trade where Breslow had to get his guy and wasn't going to let anything stop him.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
49,599
Here
Listen, this is a fair deal, and it's really kind of what they needed to do. Give up some of your top prospects and get a young top-of-the-rotation starter. I was actually expecting worse. But this team is more than 2 years out and they need to extend him.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
13,144
around the way
Well there's your big piece everyone. 87 wins or bust. And not just for this year, since a fine combination of not being willing to spend market rate for players and now taking a big chunk out of the potential future cost-controlled starters basically helps put another brick in the wall of long fucking term mediocrity. Cheap bastards.

And the Bruins fan Stockholm Syndrome set will be like "yay they did something" and bang out the park again.
 

Dewey'sCannon

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
957
Maryland
I am ok with this. We knew the price for pitching would be steep. Frankly, I would have preferred sending them Abreu rather than Montgomery (which I know many will disagree with, but I think Montgomery has a much higher ceiling).

i don't know that they "need" another SP with Houck, Bello, Crawford and Giolito, but maybe Buehler, or Cease if they can get him for a reasonable price.
 

LogansDad

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
33,175
Alamogordo
You were furious with Sox not getting guys the last few days and now you're furious when they do, but pay more than you wanted.

This world (MLB) doesn't work like that.
I wasn't even a little bit furious about Soto, and was more stunned about Fried than furious (and mad that it ended up being the Yankees). I'm honestly more upset about them not getting a real catcher than not signing either of those guys.

They better extend Crochet ASAP, otherwise this is a massive overpay to me.

If I am wrong, then great. I will be over it and stop shitposting in 15 minutes, probably, and enjoy watching Crochet pitch for the Red Sox.

I admit it is a great move for 2025/2026.
 

curly2

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 8, 2003
5,204
My dream is that we flip Abreu+prospects for Murphy and roll with an OF of Anthony-Rafaela-Abreu.
Trading Abreu and still keeping him would be a genius move. (I can say that because I’ve never made a mistake in a posting here.)
 

DeadlySplitter

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 20, 2015
36,631
Feels like a Dombrowski deal
It has some shades of the Sale deal, not just because it's the White Sox again.

If it works out like the Sale deal where neither Teel or Montgomery are impact pieces, it will be a stroke of genius.
 

LogansDad

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
33,175
Alamogordo
Yeah, I'm over it. Gonna sit back and enjoy 2025, because that team just got a lot better.

Please just get a real fucking catcher.
 

bloodysox

New Member
Sep 25, 2011
3,193
Louisville, Colorado
Bingo.

Id rather pay straight money for a guy than prospects.

They also have to extend Crochet. It will be VERY interesting to see what that contract looks like
Now I'm going to be kinda pissed if they don't drop serious money in FA. We still have serious holes to fill and arguably still need another pitcher.

I know I'm probably dreaming but I want Burnes even more now because the thought of being able to roll out:

Burnes
Crochet
Houck

in a playoff series is too good to pass up. Then we could flip Kutter or Bello in a package for a catcher like Murphy.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
8,427
I would have been fine with just paying Fried and Burnes, but look at it this way: we got the rarest thing in baseball, an elite left-handed pitcher who's just 25 years old. Fried and Burnes are both 30, and could fall off a cliff in terms of performance any year now.

Crochet is like any other pitcher, he could get injured, but if he's healthy he's likely to continue being a valuable contributor for a long time. The Sox don't do this unless they think they can extend him, IMO.
 

Seabass

has an efficient neck
SoSH Member
Oct 30, 2004
5,405
Brooklyn
If this was the Sons of Greg Walker we'd be nervous about Montgomery playing zero pro ball after coming off an ankle injury and Teel being a catcher that could stall out. I think it's a fairly square deal all around. Odds are decent Teel and Montgomery are closer to Andy Marte than Jeff Bagwell.

Crochet is filthy and young, that's who you move these dudes for.
 

Benj4ever

New Member
Nov 21, 2022
509
Listen, this is a fair deal, and it's really kind of what they needed to do. Give up some of your top prospects and get a young top-of-the-rotation starter. I was actually expecting worse. But this team is more than 2 years out and they need to extend him.
I don't know where the "this team is more than 2 years out" talk comes from, but, yes, they certainly need to extend him...which is why they would have been better off just going all in for Burnes.
 

manny

New Member
Jul 24, 2005
295
Well there's your big piece everyone. 87 wins or bust. And not just for this year, since a fine combination of not being willing to spend market rate for players and now taking a big chunk out of the potential future cost-controlled starters basically helps put another brick in the wall of long fucking term mediocrity. Cheap bastards.

And the Bruins fan Stockholm Syndrome set will be like "yay they did something" and bang out the park again.
They just got a cost-controlled starter who is known to be able to succeed at a top level for 4 guys who have not yet shown that. In the past couple of days, the Sox have been reported to have offered $700 million for Soto and $190 million for Fried. And today, they traded for arguably the best pitcher that will be acquired this offseason. Getting good players is good for winning and fun to watch. The Sox are making an effort, and the 2025 Red Sox just got a hell of a lot more exciting.
 

SouthernBoSox

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2005
12,661
I'm the first guy that says that there's no such things a prospect and you can always draft another one in a year and that they're all chips, but this seems like a lot for Crochet.

It feels like a frustration trade where Breslow had to get his guy and wasn't going to let anything stop him.
Weren‘t we all complaining about his inability to close? This is closing.

Teel hurts, but his best attribute is he plays catcher and he still has significant work to do in that area according to scouts. Montgomery is a wild card but really redundant with Roman.

Meidroth and Wickleman are more org guys.

Edit: Streamer has Crochet as the 4th best SP in ALL OF BASEBALL in 2025