Red Sox in season discussion

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,675
What kind of deal do people expect Schwarber to sign? Will he get more than good bat/bad glove Ozuna did (4/$65M)? Sox could come out ahead, financially at least, if they could get Schwarbs for that, then deal JD, say, to the offensively (and otherwise) challenged Mess for a QO-signed Syndegaard. Just spitballing here...
This article guesses 3/$45 million, and this one says 5/$80. In my mind it’s been something like 4/$64 — so yeah, essentially the Ozuna deal. I don’t think they go five, but I see him as essentially the same asset as JDM when we signed him so I wouldn’t hate it either.
 

Minneapolis Millers

Wants you to please think of the Twins fans!
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
4,753
Twin Cities
"Final list of players tendered the qualifying offer, per sources. Freddie Freeman, Eduardo Rodriguez, Nick Castellanos, Trevor Story, Carlos Correa, Justin Verlander, Raised Iglesias, Corey Seager, Chris Taylor, Michael Conforto, Noah Syndergaard, Brandon Belt, Robbie, Ray Marcus Semien " - Passan

View: https://mobile.twitter.com/JeffPassan/status/1457469173651722264?s=20
I realize that only about 1 in 10 guys historically takes the QO, but there are 4-5 on that list who should seriously consider it this offseason, imo, including E-Rod.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,434
deep inside Guido territory
Some contract predictions for the top FA's from Jim Bowden today. The list below are players that he sees as potential fits for the Red Sox(among other teams). On this list, I would explore Rodon, Rizzo, Schwarber, Iglesias, and Belt.

--Corey Seager: 10 years, $320 million
--Carlos Correa: 10 years, $300 million
--Freddie Freeman: 6 years, $187 million
--Marcus Semien: 5 years, $148 million
--Trevor Story: 7 years, $204 million
--Carlos Rodon: 1 year, $12 million plus incentives
--Anthony Rizzo: 4 years, $80 million(Bowden only lists the Yankees and Red Sox as best fits for Rizzo)
--Raisel Iglesias: 3 years, $51 million
--Kyle Schwarber: 3 years, $54 million
--Brandon Belt: 4 years, $79 million

https://theathletic.com/2940507/2021/11/08/top-25-mlb-free-agents-of-2021-22-jim-bowdens-rankings-contract-predictions-and-best-team-fits-for-a-stacked-class/?source=user_shared_article

Compare those numbers above to the contract predictions by FanGraphs. Ben Clemens makes predictions and also has the rest of the FG staff give their takes as well.
Seager
Ben Clemens: 8/240
Median Crowdsource: 7/196
Avg Crowdsource: 7/196

Correa
Ben Clemens: 9/297
Median: 8/240
Avg: 8/243

Freeman
Clemens: 5/135
Median: 5/125
Avg: 5/139

Semien
Clemens: 4/120
Median: 4/92
Avg: 4/113.5

Story
Clemens: 5/115
Median: 6/150
Avg: 5/131.5

Belt
Clemens: 1/18
Median: 2/33.2
Avg: 2.2/36.2

Rodon
Clemens: 3/45
Median: 4/76
Avg: 3/76.6

Rizzo
Clemens: 2/26
Median: 3/48
Avg: 3/56.7

R. Iglesias
Clemens: 3/45
Median: 3/30
Avg: 2.8/29.8

Schwarber
Clemens: 4/60
Median: 4/60
Avg: 3.7/55.2
 
Last edited:

grimshaw

Member
SoSH Member
May 16, 2007
4,227
Portland
I love Belt, but I can't see 4 years at his age (34). In other words, Jim Bowden wrote the article.

Here is the fangraphs crowdsourcing projections for the top 50. I don't give much weight to any of this stuff, but it's my favorite of the projection systems and there won't be much activity for a while.
https://blogs.fangraphs.com/2022-top-50-free-agents/
 
Last edited:

John Marzano Olympic Hero

has fancy plans, and pants to match
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2001
24,624
In other words, Jim Bowden wrote the article.
I'm kinda shocked that the Athletic allows Bowden to continue to write. He is, pound-for-pound, the worst national columnist writing today. His advice to the Yankees on improving their team--sign every good free agent, trade all of your bad players to other teams for their good ones--was so insane that I thought that it was a satire.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,125
What kind of deal do people expect Schwarber to sign? Will he get more than good bat/bad glove Ozuna did (4/$65M)? Sox could come out ahead, financially at least, if they could get Schwarbs for that, then deal JD, say, to the offensively (and otherwise) challenged Mess for a QO-signed Syndegaard. Just spitballing here...

(Edit: Just remembered that players signing a QO can't be traded until June, so dealing for Thor this offseason would be out.)
Also the Mets have a pricy Cano coming back, who will presumably DH.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,208
My wish is that the Sox opportunistically sit back and wait. With such a deep class, someone is going to have to settle for much less than they want. The roster is such that they can shuffle people around and find room for someone at any position except DH, so they can just wait and see who loses musical chairs and pounce.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,870
Maine
I'm kinda shocked that the Athletic allows Bowden to continue to write. He is, pound-for-pound, the worst national columnist writing today. His advice to the Yankees on improving their team--sign every good free agent, trade all of your bad players to other teams for their good ones--was so insane that I thought that it was a satire.
Really makes you wonder why he's no longer a GM, doesn't it?
 

HangingW/ScottCooper

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
2,500
Scituate, MA
I'm kinda shocked that the Athletic allows Bowden to continue to write. He is, pound-for-pound, the worst national columnist writing today. His advice to the Yankees on improving their team--sign every good free agent, trade all of your bad players to other teams for their good ones--was so insane that I thought that it was a satire.
I couldn't agree more. Other than actual knowledge inside a front office, I would trust the opinion of most of the members of this board over him. He comes off like a stereotypical talk radio caller.

As for the Sox offseason, I'm in the camp of let the market come to you but with a couple of exceptions. I'd like to see a veteran starter added. If that's E.Rod great, if not I'd like to see Chaim be proactive here for the #2-3 starter range. I'd also like to see Schwarber brought back. Despite the inexperience at 1B, I'd rather have him than Rizzo.
 

mfried

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 23, 2005
1,680
I'm mildly surprised about JD picking up his option... I suspect the possible lockout is to blame. He has to be aware that his skills could be deteriorating and that it's more likely than not it'll continue into '22. But most players I suspect see their age related decline as just a small bump that will be overcome anytime now.
Totally not sure what the plan is with Schwarber now. Bloom obviously likes him but it'd be pretty tricky to try and have both JD and Schwarber on the same team again, and it's far, far far too soon to give up on Dalbec. I suspect the FO will put a hard ceiling on Schwarber's worth and try to bring him in at that... if he accepts it, great. They'll try and deal JD (and offer to pick up some $ subsidy). If he doesn't and looks elsewhere, we'll be looking at basically the same offense as '21. Fine. Despite the inconsistencies and hot/cold runs, they were still in the top 5 offenses in the league. I imagine that if they do get Schwarber, a partially subsidized JD would bring back at least a very good prospect or a good reliever.
I said before that if I was betting on just single years... I'm probably split on which of Schwarber or JD will be better in '22. Over the next 5 years? Definitely Schwarber.
No surprise that JD opted in: but we can kiss Schwarber goodbye unless Martinez, accompanied by some cash, is traded - a prospect I would welcome.
 

mfried

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 23, 2005
1,680
Many decisions should be predicated on improving defense: that means neither Martinez nor Schwarber should be more than a DH.
 

ehaz

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2007
4,953
If Schwarber isn't a fit due to JD opting in I'd like to see the Sox kick the tires on Semien. You'd replace most of Schwarber's offensive production while solidifying the infield defense and adding future Xander insurance.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,675
If Schwarber isn't a fit due to JD opting in I'd like to see the Sox kick the tires on Semien. You'd replace most of Schwarber's offensive production while solidifying the infield defense and adding future Xander insurance.
Semien makes a lot of sense, and his crowdsourced Fangraphs contract estimates (between 4/$92 and 4/$120) are pretty doable, I think.

If you buy that Semien can handle shortstop defensively, which is a question, four years is a solid bridge to Mayer. Or maybe it’s three years, with Bogaerts shifting to left after Verdugo walks and Semien moving to 2B in 2025.
 

Max Power

thai good. you like shirt?
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
7,990
Boston, MA
Semien seems like a trap. He's going to be 31 next year and has exactly 2 seasons with an OPS+ over 100. Maybe he figured something out offensively in the last 3 years, but $30 million is a lot to pay for a guy who could turn back into a pumpkin again.
 

LogansDad

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
29,707
Alamogordo
I realize that only about 1 in 10 guys historically takes the QO, but there are 4-5 on that list who should seriously consider it this offseason, imo, including E-Rod.
I think E-Rod is in a really interesting spot. One hand, the QO is A LOT of money in an offseason where we don't really know what is about to happen.

On the other hand, from every report I've read and seen, and from the eye test, he pitched way better than his numbers showed, and a team that sees that and thinks they have a defense that can play behind him and get him to a sub-4 ERA might back up the Brinks truck.

With Bogaerts and Devers manning the left side, and who knows playing the right side, this might be the peak of his value, heading into his age 29 season. I could absolutely see a team giving him a 6 year deal at "set your family up for the next five generations" kind of money.
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,669
Rogers Park
Semien makes a lot of sense, and his crowdsourced Fangraphs contract estimates (between 4/$92 and 4/$120) are pretty doable, I think.

If you buy that Semien can handle shortstop defensively, which is a question, four years is a solid bridge to Mayer. Or maybe it’s three years, with Bogaerts shifting to left after Verdugo walks and Semien moving to 2B in 2025.
Maybe someone who watched more A's games than I did should chime in, but my view is that Semien was a pretty good defensive shortstop from 2016-19. He had a lot of trouble with throwing errors early in his career — 35 in 2015 — but he got his footwork straightened out and cut those numbers in half. His range has generally looked good to me, but OOA places it a few outs below par.

He had a terrible season on both sides of the ball in 2020, and then Toronto put him at 2B, where he was great. So... a mixed defensive record.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,675
Maybe someone who watched more A's games than I did should chime in, but my view is that Semien was a pretty good defensive shortstop from 2016-19. He had a lot of trouble with throwing errors early in his career — 35 in 2015 — but he got his footwork straightened out and cut those numbers in half. His range has generally looked good to me, but OOA places it a few outs below par.

He had a terrible season on both sides of the ball in 2020, and then Toronto put him at 2B, where he was great. So... a mixed defensive record.
Good call, I remember those stories about his improvement at short too. I read somewhere in the last week or so that the industry views him more as a second baseman now, but of course I’ve forgotten where. I’ll try to dig it up, but I should have qualified that a bit more.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
Some contract predictions for the top FA's from Jim Bowden today. The list below are players that he sees as potential fits for the Red Sox(among other teams). On this list, I would explore Rodon, Rizzo, Schwarber, Iglesias, and Belt.

--Anthony Rizzo: 4 years, $80 million(Bowden only lists the Yankees and Red Sox as best fits for Rizzo)
I know Rizzo is a superior defender to Dalbec, but Dalbec is already Rizzo's (rough) equivalent offensively (better OPS, lesser oWAR) and Rizzo's defensive skills, while better than Dalbec's, are declining. And then there's Casas. And the money. Anyway, what was said above about Bowden. He's a lazy doofus.
 

Daniel_Son

Member
SoSH Member
May 25, 2021
1,729
San Diego
Reds willing to discuss Luis Castillo.

View: https://twitter.com/jonmorosi/status/1457747478078373890


I hope we'd jump all over this if talks become serious. Castillo is a favorite target of mine.
As great as Castillo is for us, he's also great for 29 other teams. Anything we offer could be easily topped - and I'm not sure I'd want to part with the players necessary to get him. Houck/Verdugo would probably be the baseline.
 

Minneapolis Millers

Wants you to please think of the Twins fans!
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
4,753
Twin Cities
If Rodriguez can be had for 3/$50, I hope we're all over that.
Agreed. But if I'm E-Rod, and my agent tells me this is the kind of deal that's reasonable to expect in this offseason, then I'm taking the QO and letting the dust settle. If he pitches next year like he did this year, and the BABIP gods and Lady Luck smile upon him, he's looking at something closer to a Corbin-like deal.
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
6,416
Agreed. But if I'm E-Rod, and my agent tells me this is the kind of deal that's reasonable to expect in this offseason, then I'm taking the QO and letting the dust settle. If he pitches next year like he did this year, and the BABIP gods and Lady Luck smile upon him, he's looking at something closer to a Corbin-like deal.
That makes sense. Would be a perfect scenario for the Sox IMO and would provide them with basically the same rotation that ended the season- Sale, Eovaldi, ERod, Pivetta and Houck. Likely one of them goes down and Whitlock can step in. Seabold plays the Whitlock role ‘22.
 
Aug 31, 2006
133
South Acton, Mass.
Reds willing to discuss Luis Castillo.

View: https://twitter.com/jonmorosi/status/1457747478078373890


I hope we'd jump all over this if talks become serious. Castillo is a favorite target of mine.
The Reds have been open about needing to trim payroll; I would entertain letting Cincinnati staple Mike Moustakas to Castillo rather than giving up good prospects. He's got a $16 million luxury tax hit the next two seasons and was awful in 2021, but the Red Sox could actually use a guy who can play 1B and 2B hitting from the left side.
 

Sprowl

mikey lowell of the sandbox
Dope
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
34,600
Haiku
That makes sense. Would be a perfect scenario for the Sox IMO and would provide them with basically the same rotation that ended the season- Sale, Eovaldi, ERod, Pivetta and Houck. Likely one of them goes down and Whitlock can step in. Seabold plays the Whitlock role ‘22.
Does Seabold have the stuff for relief ace? I didn't see much promise of that in his brief major league appearances. Velocity unimpressive, fastball topping out in the low 90s, and limited movement on the slider.
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
6,416
Does Seabold have the stuff for relief ace? I didn't see much promise of that in his brief major league appearances. Velocity unimpressive, fastball topping out in the low 90s, and limited movement on the slider.
I’m meaning it more in the old style “long relief” type that can spot start or just eat innings. I should probably remove the Whitlock connection
 

LogansDad

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
29,707
Alamogordo
Agreed. But if I'm E-Rod, and my agent tells me this is the kind of deal that's reasonable to expect in this offseason, then I'm taking the QO and letting the dust settle. If he pitches next year like he did this year, and the BABIP gods and Lady Luck smile upon him, he's looking at something closer to a Corbin-like deal.
Andrew Heaney just let up a home run basically every 4 innings he pitched and got a deal for $8 mil+. Eduardo may take the QO (it's a lot of money to say no to), but I really think if he goes to free agency he is going to get PAID.
 

Eddie Bressoud

New Member
Aug 3, 2014
57
I think E-Rod will decline the QO. He now knows the Sox are willing to pay at least 18.6 for one year. Time to see what everyone else is offering.
 

vadertime

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
1,601
Rhode Island
I don't have the numbers off the top of my head, and I'm not savy enough to put together a list, but since the advent of the QO don't players offered the QO that reject it end up signing really late in the off-season? I vaguely remember one recently that didn't sign until after spring training. With so much uncertainity with the labor situation you're almost a fool to pass it up.
 

pdub

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 2, 2007
517
I really liked Schwarber but I would rather gamble on Rizzo if the price is right. With JDM back I think we will need a more defensive-minded 1B, rather than two DH's. I also think Rizzo's bat will be fine.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,870
Maine
I really liked Schwarber but I would rather gamble on Rizzo if the price is right. With JDM back I think we will need a more defensive-minded 1B, rather than two DH's. I also think Rizzo's bat will be fine.
I can't imagine the Sox being in on Rizzo this winter. Signing a 32 year old 1B to a multi-year deal makes no sense with Dalbec in house and Casas knocking on the door.

Schwarber may not be great shakes defensively but as someone three years younger than Rizzo and who has some defensive flexibility (as in he can play the OF on occasion), he seems like a better fit IF the Sox go for a high profile free agent LHH 1B type at all. I could see them going more in the direction of a LHH utility guy who can cover 1B on occasion (e.g. a better version of Marwin Gonzalez) rather than a true 1B like Rizzo.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,270
The only free agent backup 1b types who hit LH are Shaw and Moreland, no thanks. Joc Pederson looks like a potential fit, he’s played a bit of 1b and his 2018/19 seasons look like Schwarber. He’s only 29.
 

BringBackMo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
1,329
Does Seabold have the stuff for relief ace? I didn't see much promise of that in his brief major league appearances. Velocity unimpressive, fastball topping out in the low 90s, and limited movement on the slider.
FWIW, the Sox Prospects guys felt that Seabold’s stuff had diminished considerably by the time he made that appearance for the Sox in September. He missed a large part of the season because of an injury, had a couple of very-good-to-excellent starts when he came back, and wound up with OK stats overall in 54 IP across 11 minor league appearances for Worcester:
8.7 K/9
3.2 BB/9
1.15 WHIP
3.5 ERA

The general idea, though, was that his stuff wasn’t holding up as the season progressed, culminating in that disappointing appearance for the Sox. I think there are probably reasons for concern, and we definitely shouldn’t be counting on him to fill the Whitlock role in ‘22. But he’s still just 25, his late-season dip seems reasonable given the fact that he was working his way back from a lengthy injury, and SP continues to give him a ceiling of a 3-4 starter. So definitely still some room for optimism there.
 

Yo La Tengo

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 21, 2005
921
The general idea, though, was that his stuff wasn’t holding up as the season progressed, culminating in that disappointing appearance for the Sox. I think there are probably reasons for concern, and we definitely shouldn’t be counting on him to fill the Whitlock role in ‘22. But he’s still just 25, his late-season dip seems reasonable given the fact that he was working his way back from a lengthy injury, and SP continues to give him a ceiling of a 3-4 starter. So definitely still some room for optimism there.
This is helpful background, since he looked extremely average in his appearance with the Sox. It probably isn't fair to anticipate another breakout like Whitlock, but I'm hoping one or two of this list will contribute meaningful innings next year: Brayan Bello, Josh Winckowski, Kutter Crawford, Eduard Bazardo, Durbin Feltman, Kaleb Ort, Frank German.
 

Jack Rabbit Slim

Member
SoSH Member
May 19, 2010
1,305
Good call on Miller; he looks like a perfect fit for the Marwin role next year, with hopefully better results.
If the Sox are mostly going the stand pat route with the roster, I think Eduardo Escobar would be a perfect fit. Switch hitter that plays 2B, 3B, and even covered 1B for 18 games last year. He has played SS in the past as well so might be a short term solution in the event X just needs a couple days off.
 

Bowhemian

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2015
5,764
Bow, NH
Verlander representing the Red Sox at off-season player workouts while also attempting his own comeback. Nobody works harder than this guy.
That's how I read it the first 5 times as well. It took me a while to figure out what that tweet was actually trying to say.
 

Daniel_Son

Member
SoSH Member
May 25, 2021
1,729
San Diego
Any idea what kind of contract it'd take to land Chris Taylor? I think Zobrist's 4 years/56 mil contract is a good reference point. Obviously, it's not a perfect analogy; Zobrist was 34 when he signed it, a bit better with the bat but not as versatile in the field. But if Taylor can be had for $14 mil a year, I think the Sox should be all over that - and quite frankly, given his on-base/defensive skills, I think the Sox should be all over it for more than that. 4/60? 4/65?
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,870
Maine
Any idea what kind of contract it'd take to land Chris Taylor? I think Zobrist's 4 years/56 mil contract is a good reference point. Obviously, it's not a perfect analogy; Zobrist was 34 when he signed it, a bit better with the bat but not as versatile in the field. But if Taylor can be had for $14 mil a year, I think the Sox should be all over that - and quite frankly, given his on-base/defensive skills, I think the Sox should be all over it for more than that. 4/60? 4/65?
Fangraphs has a pretty good article about the top 50 free agents and what their folks are expecting contract-wise. Their consensus is 4/60 for Taylor.
 

Daniel_Son

Member
SoSH Member
May 25, 2021
1,729
San Diego
Fangraphs has a pretty good article about the top 50 free agents and what their folks are expecting contract-wise. Their consensus is 4/60 for Taylor.
I was also scanning the thread and realized 4/60 was the general consensus when it was discussed earlier, or else let LA have him if the bidding goes higher. I disagree; this guy fills a lot of holes in our roster, and I think he's got the track record to justify a bigger contract. I'd go 4/65 or 4/70 for him easily.