I’m with you. No idea what the rule is but the whistle had no bearing on anybody stopping what they were doing. It being a 4-1 game probably goes into my feelings too.(whispers)
I'm okay with the 2nd goal being a goal
(/whispers)
I’m with you. No idea what the rule is but the whistle had no bearing on anybody stopping what they were doing. It being a 4-1 game probably goes into my feelings too.(whispers)
I'm okay with the 2nd goal being a goal
(/whispers)
I don't think they were too crazy.I'd love to see all the lines the Bruins threw out there tonight. Seemed like a creative one for the coaches.
I don't think they were too crazy.
Coyle to 1C.
Reunited the Bertuzzi-Zacha-Pasta second line
Hall-Frederic-Foligno on the third line
Lauko-Nosek-Hathaway on the 4th line
I think it's probably about the best way to line those players up. About the only quibble might be with Foligno on the third line.
If he signed a team friendly deal, and either Carlo or Grzelcyk got traded, they could pull it off.For those who are tuned into the salary cap, is there any way that they'll be able to retain Orlov, or is he just a rental?
Thanks -- I hope they figure out a way to keep him.If he signed a team friendly deal, and either Carlo or Grzelcyk got traded, they could pull it off.
(whispers)
I'm okay with the 2nd goal being a goal
(/whispers)
I'll give the counter.I’m with you. No idea what the rule is but the whistle had no bearing on anybody stopping what they were doing. It being a 4-1 game probably goes into my feelings too.
Perhaps the refs will stop blowing the whistle so early every time the puck is anywhere close to a goalie in this series..I'll give the counter.
Now, whenever the puck is even a little visible, it's open season. After all, the whistle doesn't mean anything. So poke away.
In game 1, DeBrusk's goal was on a puck just sitting on the pads of Lyon that the refs thankfully did not blow the whistle on.Perhaps the refs will stop blowing the whistle so early every time the puck is anywhere close to a goalie in this series.
I think being down their top 2 centres, including the best two-way guys to lace them up, may also have contributed.I still don’t think they look like the regular season Bs, but I’m willing to accept that may be some combination of opponent and the playoff level up.
This is a good point. It's not just the talent, it's how it affects the lines and chemistry. Find a way to grind through this series and that may also relieve a tiny bit of pressure too. Losing to the 8 seed would be entirely different than losing to the Leafs or Bolts.I think being down their top 2 centres, including the best two-way guys to lace them up, may also have contributed.
They wanted to get Linus a chance at a goalI’m still more mad about the shorty. Up 4-0 with what 6 minutes left? Goal there is to just kill 2 minutes. Just completely unacceptable to give up a goal. If that doesn’t happen the stupid second goal probably doesn’t happen anyway.
I still don’t think they look like the regular season Bs, but I’m willing to accept that may be some combination of opponent and the playoff level up.
Overall fantastic first ~54 minutes and last 2-3.
Florida is also a good team that dealt with a bunch of injuries this year. They’re not the Penguins, who if they made it in and we lost to, I’d be completely embarrassed about. As we saw last night, even without their top 2 Cs, when the Bruins bring their game for most of the night, they can win comfortably, but they can’t let off the gas. You can’t really do that against anyone in the playoffs.This is a good point. It's not just the talent, it's how it affects the lines and chemistry. Find a way to grind through this series and that may also relieve a tiny bit of pressure too. Losing to the 8 seed would be entirely different than losing to the Leafs or Bolts.
1000% this. The refs and the league cannot fuck around with this and gray-zone it. If they do, someone is going to get legitimately hurt and the Bruins should tell this group of refs that at puck drop in game 4. The story of that play is Florida should feel like they got legitimately screwed by a clearly too early whistle. And if I was a Florida fan I'd want to be pissed by the screw job, but to clearly, obviously blow the whistle and then let it stand as a goal sets a bad standard for play. Crazy.I'll give the counter.
Now, whenever the puck is even a little visible, it's open season. After all, the whistle doesn't mean anything. So poke away.
Hard to have a big game from the bench too though. Grz seemed to get stuck riding the pine. It was like the coaches where anxious about actually using him.I think being down their top 2 centres, including the best two-way guys to lace them up, may also have contributed.
On another front, Grzelcyk had a quiet game, but that may be good. As I recall, he didn’t have any turnovers that put them in trouble, and he clearly held his own against some tough forwards.
I think Florida's route to winning this series was probably going to be the ongoing success of this move against the boards which really, really gave the Bruins trouble through the first 7 periods of the series. It is a good thing that the Bruins seemed to figure out a way to break it down.The D distributed well and started going up the middle with pace instead of the boards when FLA cut off the boards on their forecheck.
I love hockey. I don't know how people do this though. Hockey is just not made for radio.Listened to the entire game while driving.
No choice, of course, last night.I love hockey. I don't know how people do this though. Hockey is just not made for radio.
Agreed. Grz has wilted under playoff forecheck pressure in the past, but he looked fine last night. In fact I'd say his presence was a significant factor in their ability to break out last night as opposed to their Game 2 efforts.I think being down their top 2 centres, including the best two-way guys to lace them up, may also have contributed.
On another front, Grzelcyk had a quiet game, but that may be good. As I recall, he didn’t have any turnovers that put them in trouble, and he clearly held his own against some tough forwards.
This was the key difference IMO. Lindholm was hot garbage in Game 2, but he was back to his usual self last night. The simple truth is that the Bruins' defense is beyond elite as long as they're not coughing up the puck.Listened to the entire game while driving. At some point Beers mentioned that Monty pulled McAvoy, Lindholm and Orlov aside after practice and pretty much told them they had to be better and how. Sounded like they got the message.
I love hockey. I don't know how people do this though. Hockey is just not made for radio.
When I was in college, my alma mater was playing in the NCAA D1 semifinals (RPI vs Minn-Duluth, Adam Oates vs Brett Hull). While the final game was televised live, the semis were not (they would be on tape delay the following morning). This was the 1980's when TV coverage for hockey at any level was in the relative dark ages. So only way to listen at all was on WRPI (local college station). Game went into 3 OT's. Listened to every minute on the radio.No choice, of course, last night.
Could be a separate thread, but it *really* depends on announcer quality and analyst skill at dropping in quickly without stepping on the action.
Beers is really good at the latter.
Hockey radio pbp seems really fucking hard. Sirotte is a good pbp guy. I think he gets too excited in the regular season too often, but that's not now.
Goucher was great.
Neumeier was awful.
Also, I got used to it long long ago, listening to Marv Albert doing the rangers on the radio late 60s and early 70s.
Usually it's the opposite—goals are called back because the ref "intended to blow the whistle." And I can't remember one where the whistle actually went and they decided to ignore that fact.Havent we seen multiple examples of whistle being blown being reviewed and goals standing throughout the season? I'm not sure why everyone is so up in arms about this specific one.
This is super. I was one of the voices for WRPI from ‘94-2000. I mostly did color for hockey and pbp for football. We had an awesome time watching hockey from the Houston field house and around the country.When I was in college, my alma mater was playing in the NCAA D1 semifinals (RPI vs Minn-Duluth, Adam Oates vs Brett Hull). While the final game was televised live, the semis were not (they would be on tape delay the following morning). This was the 1980's when TV coverage for hockey at any level was in the relative dark ages. So only way to listen at all was on WRPI (local college station). Game went into 3 OT's. Listened to every minute on the radio.
Fortunately, the college student play-by-play announcer for WRPI was actually really good. Like, he could actually describe the play and knew the sport. Not as good as say, Goucher or the late Bob Wilson or Fred Cusick (who did radio for some time before becoming full time TV). But definitely better than some of the lesser pbp announcers I've heard at the NHL level.
Got a day of classes cancelled (which literally never happened for any reason) when RPI won the title.
Yes, that shouldn't ever happen. It is asking for someone to get killed because they stopped playing at a whistle and another player didn't and drilled them.Usually it's the opposite—goals are called back because the ref "intended to blow the whistle." And I can't remember one where the whistle actually went and they decided to ignore that fact.
A really good one like Beers or Goucher and I can close my eyes and see in my head what is happening on the ice.No choice, of course, last night.
Could be a separate thread, but it *really* depends on announcer quality and analyst skill at dropping in quickly without stepping on the action.
Beers is really good at the latter.
Hockey radio pbp seems really fucking hard. Sirotte is a good pbp guy. I think he gets too excited in the regular season too often, but that's not now.
Goucher was great.
Neumeier was awful.
Also, I got used to it long long ago, listening to Marv Albert doing the rangers on the radio late 60s and early 70s.
I think it could be an age thing.. as an almost 50 year old I grew up listening to Johnny Most do almost every Celtics game.. listened to the Red Sox and occasionally listened to the Bruins.. (I still listen to any game I can get when I’m in the car) You can remember people bringing radios to live events just to hear about what they were seeing live. A good announcer can guide your imagination to make you feel like you’re there. I can specifically remember times listening to the crowd and the announcer describe the first Red Sox games of spring.A really good one like Beers or Goucher and I can close my eyes and see in my head what is happening on the ice.
I am not that old, lol. Watching the games for years on TV gave me images to use as templates. So when they describe the action decently we'll, I can use those as mental references to create the image.I think it could be an age thing.. as an almost 50 year old I grew up listening to Johnny Most do almost every Celtics game.. listened to the Red Sox and occasionally listened to the Bruins.. (I still listen to any game I can get when I’m in the car) You can remember people bringing radios to live events just to hear about what they were seeing live. A good announcer can guide your imagination to make you feel like you’re there. I can specifically remember times listening to the crowd and the announcer describe the first Red Sox games of spring.
We didn’t have 1000 television channels growing up (from memory.. we had 2,4,5,7,25,38,44,56,68).. so radio was a necessity. We didn’t even have a remote! I remember flicking through the channels, clicking to 25, 38, 56 to try and catch games.
I wonder if that is sort of lost on younger generations that can see just about any game they want.
Wasn't intending to stereotype too muchI am not that old, lol. Watching the games for years on TV gave me images to use as templates. So when they describe the action decently we'll, I can use those as mental references to create the image.