SaberSeminar: It's a Wrap

AlNipper49

Huge Member
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 3, 2001
44,917
Mtigawi
Hi Guys,
 
We here at SoSH are:
 
  • Extremely grateful for the team behind Saber Seminar.  The event was beyond a success and everyone had a great time.
  • Very proud for having participated in an event which raised money for such a good cause
  • Appreciative of the folks that we've surrounded ourselves with.  It's great to be able to share a passion with folks that we, well, like.
 
SoSH's Jimmy Wulf was out there to cover the event.  I encourage everyone to give it a read, exposure for this means exposure for the cause behind it.  
 
Thanks again Fris!
 
CLICK HERE TO READ JIMMY'S REVIEW
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043

 
Great photoshop work by the SoSH Baseball team - it really looks like Schilling showed up in camo and combat boots.
 

Darnell's Son

He's a machine.
Moderator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,608
Providence, RI
That's no photoshop. Those are some kick ass camo pants. When you're invited to be a guest speaker at a seminar that is raising money for cancer research, why would you try to look presentable? Just go ready for battle.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,239
AlNipper49 said:
 

Nice recap, thanks.
 
Quick question--in the Schilling part it mentions the "Nasty Boys Phillies clubhouse." I thought that was the Reds--with Dibble, Charlton, Myers, etc. Was that something Schilling said--that they also referred to themselves in that way?
 

JimBoSox9

will you be my friend?
SoSH Member
Nov 1, 2005
16,677
Mid-surburbia
shepard50 said:
Thanks for the recap Jimmy. I really appreciated the insight and the downloads. That's an unbelievably good lineup of speakers.
 
 
DrewDawg said:
 
Nice recap, thanks.
 
Quick question--in the Schilling part it mentions the "Nasty Boys Phillies clubhouse." I thought that was the Reds--with Dibble, Charlton, Myers, etc. Was that something Schilling said--that they also referred to themselves in that way?
 
Thanks - it's still Jimbo to ya'll, though.  
 
Dawg is entirely correct, and I am officially fined five internet points for misattribution of historical nicknames.  In my defense, I was watching SummerSlam while typing it up.
 

DaveRoberts'Shoes

Aaron Burr
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 1, 2005
4,271
OR 12
Darnell's Son said:
That's no photoshop. Those are some kick ass camo pants. When you're invited to be a guest speaker at a seminar that is raising money for cancer research, why would you try to look presentable? Just go ready for battle.
Whatever, I wore shorts.

Gotta show off the cankles, you know.
 

Darnell's Son

He's a machine.
Moderator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,608
Providence, RI
The .com has part 2 of Jimbo's SaberSeminar recap and because he couldn't pack all the goodness into just two articles, you're all in luck because there will be a part 3 coming out tomorrow. Read part 2 here
 
 
 
Between new technology, uncertain data, and rapidly changing methodologies, both panels repeatedly underscored that, far from being over, baseball’s analytics revolution is in its infancy. On-base percentage, WAR, range factors and pitch framing were the first rounds of a debate that show no signs of ending. To make meaningful use of all the information now becoming available to us, the amount of work undone dwarfs the work completed.
 

AB in DC

OG Football Writing
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2002
13,878
Springfield, VA
Not to pick on Jimbo specifically, but am I the only one who's getting tired of seeing the term "analytics revolution"?  Because, at this point, isn't basically every industry in American using analytics to one degree or another?  The question isn't whether to use "analytics", it's how.  And I think the Michael Lewis Moneyball rhetoric has gotten to the point where it's obscuring the situation, not elucidating it.  
 

Reverend

for king and country
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2007
64,625
AB in DC said:
Not to pick on Jimbo specifically, but am I the only one who's getting tired of seeing the term "analytics revolution"?  Because, at this point, isn't basically every industry in American using analytics to one degree or another?  The question isn't whether to use "analytics", it's how.  And I think the Michael Lewis Moneyball rhetoric has gotten to the point where it's obscuring the situation, not elucidating it.  
 
Are you familiar with a certain baseball team in Philadelphia?
 

Darnell's Son

He's a machine.
Moderator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,608
Providence, RI
Today Jimbo drops part 3 of his SaberSeminar Recap focusing on members of the media, packed with goodness such as:
 
 
One challenge to providing unique information may be an upcoming loss of locker room access (already reduced in the last CBA). Speier, McCaffrey and McCullough all seemed significantly concerned with the impact of this, stressing that being able to learn the dynamics and beats of a clubhouse are essential to being able to develop a rapport with people on and around the team.
 

Darnell's Son

He's a machine.
Moderator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,608
Providence, RI
Jimbo has the fourth and final installment of his SaberSeminar recap:
 
 
It shouldn’t be surprising that the operator of the best public PITCHf/x site on the planet can reinvent how you look at PITCHf/x in fifteen minutes. Saberseminar co-organizer and brooksbaseball.net owner Dan Brooks was also the leadoff hitter for the event, showing the crowd interesting ways a simple pitch movement graph can be manipulated to understand the relationship between pitchers’ release points and the movement on their different pitches.
 

Jnai

is not worried about sex with goats
SoSH Member
Sep 15, 2007
16,147
<null>
Someone should add that the peanut idea was Matt Lentzner's. :)

Thanks for the nice writeups of the event.
 

JimBoSox9

will you be my friend?
SoSH Member
Nov 1, 2005
16,677
Mid-surburbia
Thanks Jnai, and thanks for the talk - I knew I missed some important notes in the first minute or two  :blink: .  I realize there was a late scratch and shuffling the lineup right before first pitch is always tough, but the managerial decision to lead off with PITCHf/x graphs at 9:15 in the dang morning was rightly ripped to shreds on talk radio the next day.  Boy oh boy it was tough to get out of the starting blocks.
 

johnnywayback

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 8, 2004
1,422
JimBoSox9 said:
Thanks Jnai, and thanks for the talk - I knew I missed some important notes in the first minute or two  :blink: .  I realize there was a late scratch and shuffling the lineup right before first pitch is always tough, but the managerial decision to lead off with PITCHf/x graphs at 9:15 in the dang morning was rightly ripped to shreds on talk radio the next day.  Boy oh boy it was tough to get out of the starting blocks.
 
That's funny -- I really liked starting with a cold splash of graph-water.  A bold decision, and a really fun and meaty way to kick things off.
 

iayork

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 6, 2006
639
JimBoSox9 said:
Thanks Jnai, and thanks for the talk - I knew I missed some important notes in the first minute or two  :blink: .  I realize there was a late scratch and shuffling the lineup right before first pitch is always tough, but the managerial decision to lead off with PITCHf/x graphs at 9:15 in the dang morning was rightly ripped to shreds on talk radio the next day.  Boy oh boy it was tough to get out of the starting blocks.
 
Doesn't everyone start their day with a good hearty graphing?
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
iayork said:
 
Doesn't everyone start their day with a good hearty graphing?
 
It is impossible to not read this post in the voice of your avatar.
 

iayork

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 6, 2006
639
soxfan121 said:
 
It is impossible to not read this post in the voice of your avatar.
 
Think how much it would mess you up if I said "Good news, everyone!"