Stop hoarding TP(E) - the what should the Celtics do with the TPE thread

What should the Celtics do with their TPE

  • Use it before the current season starts

    Votes: 6 4.6%
  • See what is available around the NBA trade deadline and level up for the playoffs

    Votes: 55 42.3%
  • Save it for next summer's free agent bonanza

    Votes: 69 53.1%

  • Total voters
    130

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,680
House has been shooting poorly this year, but was around 38% on high volume while playing decent D for a playoff team. He wouldn’t be a major piece, but a guy who could be a competent vet 3&D wing and he’d fit under the Kanter exception.
Houston has completely imploded this year (we'd better be getting Cade out of this), and he no longer has Harden to create open looks for him. But in Boston with the JayCrew and Kemba he can go back to doing what he does best, hitting wide open treys and supplying decent D off the bench.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,001

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,096
I’d be interested in House for cheap.
The Rockets are about ready to foreclose on him he’s shooting so bad for them.

A spot-up shooter needs a functional system which the Rockets don’t have without Harden. He’d be an interesting piece
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,467
Comes down to price, but I'm coming around on the Vucevic trade idea. I don't think I'd realized how good of a passer he's become... his AST rates despite playing on a garbage roster are better than either Jay, honestly he's close to Kemba.

The cap implications and acquisition cost is the obvious issue, but a scenario where the Celtics trade for Vucevic then backfill the wing with a TT or Theis trade is pretty appealing from a roster perspective. Vucevic is a better and more consistent player than I had realized on both ends, a big who can defend credibly, rebound, shoot and pass is impressive. He basically takes the best parts of Theis and Thompson's game, combines them and does them better.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,303
Comes down to price, but I'm coming around on the Vucevic trade idea. I don't think I'd realized how good of a passer he's become... his AST rates despite playing on a garbage roster are better than either Jay, honestly he's close to Kemba.

The cap implications and acquisition cost is the obvious issue, but a scenario where the Celtics trade for Vucevic then backfill the wing with a TT or Theis trade is pretty appealing from a roster perspective. Vucevic is a better and more consistent player than I had realized on both ends, a big who can defend credibly, rebound, shoot and pass is impressive. He basically takes the best parts of Theis and Thompson's game, combines them and does them better.
Isn’t Thompson a markedly better defender than Vucevic? Particularly in the pick and roll?

The issue with getting Vucevic and paying him that much is that you’d be spending a ton of money on him and Kemba per year and youre basically going to get slaughtered on the defensive end of the floor if you play them together.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,215
Comes down to price, but I'm coming around on the Vucevic trade idea. I don't think I'd realized how good of a passer he's become... his AST rates despite playing on a garbage roster are better than either Jay, honestly he's close to Kemba.

The cap implications and acquisition cost is the obvious issue, but a scenario where the Celtics trade for Vucevic then backfill the wing with a TT or Theis trade is pretty appealing from a roster perspective. Vucevic is a better and more consistent player than I had realized on both ends, a big who can defend credibly, rebound, shoot and pass is impressive. He basically takes the best parts of Theis and Thompson's game, combines them and does them better.
Welcome to the club. This is exactly where I am at. At the risk of overselling him, you have to factor in that Orlando's roster limitations during his time there have depressed his potential production - he may well prefer to be his team's alpha in which case this is known to potential acquirers and they can adjust their price for him accordingly or simply pass. That said, his production efficiency may have a fair bit of upside if you surround him with other weapons - Terrance Ross is an ok player but obviously isn't the same as Tatum coming off PnRs (or in any way shape or form otherwise). Ditto the rest of his supporting cast.

Also, I don't know this author but its an interesting, well supported article. I buy what they are selling.

As I alluded to when discussing dribble handoffs, I want the Celtics to acquire a big man who can dribble, pass, and shoot. I outlined the value of this archetype, which I call Stretch Participator Big, in a previous article.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,094
Comes down to price, but I'm coming around on the Vucevic trade idea. I don't think I'd realized how good of a passer he's become... his AST rates despite playing on a garbage roster are better than either Jay, honestly he's close to Kemba.

The cap implications and acquisition cost is the obvious issue, but a scenario where the Celtics trade for Vucevic then backfill the wing with a TT or Theis trade is pretty appealing from a roster perspective. Vucevic is a better and more consistent player than I had realized on both ends, a big who can defend credibly, rebound, shoot and pass is impressive. He basically takes the best parts of Theis and Thompson's game, combines them and does them better.
Where do you draw the line on price?
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,467
Isn’t Thompson a markedly better defender than Vucevic? Particularly in the pick and roll?

The issue with getting Vucevic and paying him that much is that you’d be spending a ton of money on him and Kemba per year and youre basically going to get slaughtered on the defensive end of the floor if you play them together.
Every metric I've seen grades Vucevic out as the better overall defender, and he's a true C.
Defending the roll man, TT has been better this year, Vucevic was better last year and the year before.

The money is a concern, but there is no indication in Vucevic's history that he'll get you slaughtered on the defensive end, he consistently grades out as a plus defender on some pretty weak ORL teams.

Where do you draw the line on price?
Two 1sts and a couple of the young guys (PP, TL, Nesmith, Langford, Grant) probably won't get it done, but that's what I offer, maybe a swap too.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,215
Every metric I've seen grades Vucevic out as the better overall defender, and he's a true C.
Defending the roll man, TT has been better this year, Vucevic was better last year and the year before.

The money is a concern, but there is no indication in Vucevic's history that he'll get you slaughtered on the defensive end, he consistently grades out as a plus defender on some pretty weak ORL teams.


Two 1sts and a couple of the young guys (PP, TL, Nesmith, Langford, Grant) probably won't get it done, but that's what I offer, maybe a swap too.
The cost will almost certainly involve Time Lord. Frankly, his recent play, as well as that of the others, really helps the Celtics here at the deadline.

Again, from a macro perspective, there really is no player or pick that should be untouchable if the C's think they have the right next piece. Vucevic may well not be that player but teams that are going for it "now" don't worry about costs. The biggest risk here is that the C's aren't going to or cannot spend what it takes to get a shot at the dance. They are now at a point where they have to make some decisions that carry pretty big risks (upside as well as downside).
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,094
The cost will almost certainly involve Time Lord. Frankly, his recent play, as well as that of the others, really helps the Celtics here at the deadline.

Again, from a macro perspective, there really is no player or pick that should be untouchable if the C's think they have the right next piece. Vucevic may well not be that player but teams that are going for it "now" don't worry about costs. The biggest risk here is that the C's aren't going to or cannot spend what it takes to get a shot at the dance. They are now at a point where they have to make some decisions that carry pretty big risks (upside as well as downside).
You'd have to think that an offer of TL, Nesmith/Langford (their choice), and 2 unprotected #1's would be pretty competitive with whatever anyone else could/would offer. I would do Cellar's offer without blinking. Kevin O'Connor said in the Ringer that the Heat, Spurs, and Hornets are also very interested.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,467
You'd have to think that an offer of TL, Nesmith/Langford (their choice), and 2 unprotected #1's would be pretty competitive with whatever anyone else could/would offer. I would do Cellar's offer without blinking. Kevin O'Connor said in the Ringer that the Heat, Spurs, and Hornets are also very interested.
Yeah, I think that would be basically my offer, might throw in Grant if it got the deal done, or a swap.

The thing is, ORL has some incentive to be tough given they can just roll into next year and see what happens given Vucevic's contract and that he hasn't said he wants out.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,215
If Charlotte or San Antonio are serious players for Vucevic, they can probably beat any Boston offer given that they have more NBA ready players with which to trade and the value or their picks might be viewed as marginally more attractive too. Any Vucevic trade is going to hurt the acquiring team - there are no bargains to be had here.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,094
If Charlotte or San Antonio are serious players for Vucevic, they can probably beat any Boston offer given that they have more NBA ready players with which to trade and the value or their picks might be viewed as marginally more attractive too. Any Vucevic trade is going to hurt the acquiring team - there are no bargains to be had here.
Potentially although we'd have to see who they offered up. For instance, would the Spurs put Vassell or Keldon on the table? Figure they would have to start any offer with one of them and then probably add Lonnie Walker and the same picks. Is Keldon/Walker/picks any better than TL/Nesmith/picks? Probably comes down to preference.

Charlotte could offer up some combination of Washington, Graham, Monk, Bridges and picks. It's pretty clear to me that TL's recent play is absolutely needed to get the Celtics into these conversations. Nesmith and Langford just haven't done enough but TL is a guy any team can dream on.
 

the moops

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 19, 2016
4,703
Saint Paul, MN
Two 1sts and a couple of the young guys (PP, TL, Nesmith, Langford, Grant) probably won't get it done, but that's what I offer, maybe a swap too.
Man, that is steep. I can't imagine it costing that much for a good, but not great player like Vuc.

What is a good comp trade we can look at?
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,094
Yeah, I think that would be basically my offer, might throw in Grant if it got the deal done, or a swap.

The thing is, ORL has some incentive to be tough given they can just roll into next year and see what happens given Vucevic's contract and that he hasn't said he wants out.
Yeah, can't see Orlando trading him without a really good return. These types of offers are probably there for them in the offseason, as you'd still get 2 full years of Vucevic.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,467
Man, that is steep. I can't imagine it costing that much for a good, but not great player like Vuc.

What is a good comp trade we can look at?
There really isn't one. He's not as good as Harden (though there is a case his salary and control close some of the gap), but he's way better than any non-All NBA guy traded recently (not S&T)

Looking back at something like the Tobias Harris deal though (not as good or as valuable), makes me think I'm under-selling him, probably takes 3 1sts and 3 of the young guys, minimum
 

the moops

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 19, 2016
4,703
Saint Paul, MN
There really isn't one. He's not as good as Harden (though there is a case his salary and control close some of the gap), but he's way better than any non-All NBA guy traded recently (not S&T)

Looking back at something like the Tobias Harris deal though (not as good or as valuable), makes me think I'm under-selling him, probably takes 3 1sts and 3 of the young guys, minimum
Harris cost one young player (Shamet), a top 14 protected 1st, and the MIA unprotected 1st.

3 firsts and 3 young guys is what it cost to get AD
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,336
Welcome to the club. This is exactly where I am at. At the risk of overselling him, you have to factor in that Orlando's roster limitations during his time there have depressed his potential production - he may well prefer to be his team's alpha in which case this is known to potential acquirers and they can adjust their price for him accordingly or simply pass. That said, his production efficiency may have a fair bit of upside if you surround him with other weapons - Terrance Ross is an ok player but obviously isn't the same as Tatum coming off PnRs (or in any way shape or form otherwise). Ditto the rest of his supporting cast.

Also, I don't know this author but its an interesting, well supported article. I buy what they are selling.
Yeah I tend to think the best version of recent Celtics offenses has been the one that heavily featured Al as the big facilitator—the option tree is just so much bigger with a guy like that as opposed to even someone like Theis who is a credible shooter. Gordon sort of took that role on to a degree but fate was uninterested.

I doubt Vuc is quite the passer/decisionmaker that Horford was here, but he is Rich Man's Horford in a number of other ways that would compensate.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,467
Harris cost one young player (Shamet), a top 14 protected 1st, and the MIA unprotected 1st.

3 firsts and 3 young guys is what it cost to get AD
AD cost a guaranteed top 4 pick and two guys MUCH MUCH better than any young guy the Celtics can offer.
Harris was 2 1sts and a young guy of similar maybe higher quality than we can offer. Vucevic is both much better than Harris and has a much better contract. He probably takes at least 3 late 1sts and 2-3 young guys.

Our young guys don't have that much value... There isn't a Lonzo in there, nevermind a future max guy like Ingram, and our picks aren't that valuable except the furthest out of 3
 

NomarsFool

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 21, 2001
8,161
The Jrue Holiday trade is a bit complicated. But, the Pelicans got two firsts (from Milwaukee) and two pick swaps (also from Milwaukee - basically useless) along with Steve Adams and Eric Bledsoe. So, say what you will about them - but they are legit NBA players. The Pelicans sent out some other young players and some second round picks.

AD is a tough comp because they could pretty much only trade with LA.

Orlando doesn't have to trade Vuc at all, and they certainly don't have to trade him now. If I were them, I would need some young player that I could sell to my fans as an exciting, high ceiling prospect. I don't think Nesmith or Langford fit that description right now. Maybe by this summer they will, but the only one that fits that description, in my opinion, is Rob Williams (whom I really like). But, trading for Vuc would be a win now move, and you do have to give up something to get something. I'm not at all saying that is the move they should make - whether John Collins or Aaron Gordon would be a better fit and/or a lower cost is a perfectly valid question. An OPJ buyout pick-up could be enough of a half-measure to hang on to RWIII and see how far this group goes.
 

the moops

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 19, 2016
4,703
Saint Paul, MN
Vucevic is both much better than Harris and has a much better contract.
When Harris was traded he was 4 years younger than Vuc is now, and was putting up 21/8 while shooting 43% from three. Harris plays a more important position and had some upside still associated with him. Vuc is what he is and is 30 years old. The contract situation certainly tips in favor of Vuc though.

I do think the package for Vuc will be closer to what LA got for Harris rather than three picks and three young players
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,215
Harris is a good player but Vucevic has been more valuable over their respective careers - I peeked at RAPTOR and the Vuc is scored as a better player there as well. Frankly, looking at past transactions to determine a cost is probably not very informative. It strikes me that the biggest driver of cost is what others are willing to pay and we aren't likely to get any color on that, especially not in real time.




39377
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,467
When Harris was traded he was 4 years younger than Vuc is now, and was putting up 21/8 while shooting 43% from three. Harris plays a more important position and had some upside still associated with him. Vuc is what he is and is 30 years old. The contract situation certainly tips in favor of Vuc though.

I do think the package for Vuc will be closer to what LA got for Harris rather than three picks and three young players
Yes he was younger, and maybe someone thought he had upsid, but Vuc is a better player.

Also I don't think the position thing is true. Elite wings are more important than elite bigs, and within a tier maybe you lean wing over big, but.... top big men are clearly highly valued based on the contracts we see, and they should be, since there is a lot of depth at C, but a thin top tier.

Looking at those 2, here are the half seasons before they might be traded:
Player TS% 3pt% TRB% AST% TOV% USG OBPM DBPM 3PA
Harris .605 .414 9.6 14.3 10.3 23.5 2.6 -0.2 5.3
Vucecic .571 .412 17.8 21.1 7.2 29.4 5.9 0.1 6.5


That's a big gap.

 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,467
You guys might be right that 3 picks plus young players is the price for Vuc, but we'll never know if that's true because no GM would pay that.
maybe, on the other hand, Jrue Holiday got 2 picks, 2 swaps and 2 pretty good veteran players and that was on a shorter deal.

Orlando shouldn't trade Vuc for 2 late firsts and not good young guys is the thing. They need to hold out for either 2 picks 1 of which is good and young guys, 2 picks and at least 1 GOOD young player, or 3 picks.

The point is less that the asking price is 3 firsts and young players, it's that the price for the Celtics is likely that because we don't have good picks or particularly good young players. We don't have any former high lotto picks to offer, we don't really have any good contributors now, except TL, but he loses value due to lack of rookie deal years left.

What is the best piece we have to offer? That's the issue, you can't just say.. X number of picks and X number of young guys, there are variants on each, and the Celtics don't have any of the good ones, so they need to try to win with quantity.
 

NoXInNixon

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 24, 2008
5,299
If the Celtics are going to trade multiple first round picks, I'd rather they do what good teams do and wait for an All-NBA player to demand a trade and offer pennies on the dollar. I'm thinking of Beal or Towns.
 

DannyDarwinism

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 7, 2007
4,883
maybe, on the other hand, Jrue Holiday got 2 picks, 2 swaps and 2 pretty good veteran players and that was on a shorter deal.

Orlando shouldn't trade Vuc for 2 late firsts and not good young guys is the thing. They need to hold out for either 2 picks 1 of which is good and young guys, 2 picks and at least 1 GOOD young player, or 3 picks.

The point is less that the asking price is 3 firsts and young players, it's that the price for the Celtics is likely that because we don't have good picks or particularly good young players. We don't have any former high lotto picks to offer, we don't really have any good contributors now, except TL, but he loses value due to lack of rookie deal years left.

What is the best piece we have to offer? That's the issue, you can't just say.. X number of picks and X number of young guys, there are variants on each, and the Celtics don't have any of the good ones, so they need to try to win with quantity.
I’m with you. Three likely late picks isn’t a huge ask when you’re not giving over first tier young guys. Maybe they love Rob (though he’s going to need to get paid soon enough and part of the reason for moving Vucevic is to free Bamba) but I can’t imagine the rest of our young guys are all that attractive to them. PP has been good, but he’s older than Fultz and Anthony. They could use a young wing, so I guess there’s a shot they’re interested in Romeo or Nesmith, but I’d think they could find something they like better.
 

the moops

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 19, 2016
4,703
Saint Paul, MN
The Jrue deal is such its own animal that I am unsure it should be used as a comp. That deal was so much about keeping Giannis that NO could pretty much name their price
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,215
If the Celtics are going to trade multiple first round picks, I'd rather they do what good teams do and wait for an All-NBA player to demand a trade and offer pennies on the dollar. I'm thinking of Beal or Towns.
Good teams these days are all paying up for talent and/or making levered signings where one player effectively fetches several other stars. In fact, this is how the the three current top favorites for the title have been built.

Look at the top teams on this list, aside from the Warriors who obviously don't have Thompson and are paying for the past decade, all the adult teams are absolutely not paying pennies on the dollar in terms of talent acquisition or salaries. To me, there is a glaring absence here (I get that the Hayward departure is a factor) and we really cannot ignore it given the core talent in Boston.

There is no single way to building a contender - but absent signing a Kyrie who fetches you a Durant and Harden or a LeBron or Kawhi who bring in their superstar friends, the Celtics have to pursue other means for team construction. Waiting around to see if any All NBA players come on the market and want to play in Boston seems like hope - not a strategy.

Finally, it feels as if teams have a pretty good handle on who is and who is not available as well as attainable. Its telling that aside from the Tatum/Beal relationship, there has been little chatter outside of this board/Twitter about him to Boston. Meanwhile, the TWolves have shown no interest in dealing KAT to date - anything is possible but it seems like that may be a dead end as well.

The Cs aren't babies anymore and the window is opening. They should be doing everything they can to open it as wide as possible.


39379
 
Last edited:

chilidawg

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 22, 2015
5,934
Cultural hub of the universe
Good teams these days are all paying up for talent and/or making levered signings where one player effectively fetches several other stars. In fact, this is how the the three current top favorites for the title have been built.

Look at the top teams on this list, aside from the Warriors who obviously don't have Thompson and are paying for the past decade, all the adult teams are absolutely not paying pennies on the dollar in terms of talent acquisition or salaries. To me, there is a glaring absence here (I get that the Hayward departure is a factor) and we really cannot ignore it given the core talent in Boston.


View attachment 39379
What's the ranking criteria?
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,096
If the Celtics are going to trade multiple first round picks, I'd rather they do what good teams do and wait for an All-NBA player to demand a trade and offer pennies on the dollar. I'm thinking of Beal or Towns.
The problem here is that both Beal and Towns are in their prime and early prime with a ton of demand. Nobody is acquiring either for pennies on the dollar.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,409
around the way
The Jrue deal is such its own animal that I am unsure it should be used as a comp. That deal was so much about keeping Giannis that NO could pretty much name their price
Yeah the Jrue and AD deals are completely different animals, because they were both meant to appease an alpha (nevermind that AD is a top 10 player).

Probably not an easy comp out there because Vuc is a very good player on a good contract who hasn't demanded a trade, unless there's some other team out there desperately wants a Robin for their Batman.

I think that CD is right that the price will be high. And sure, we should start consolidating assets here. But 3 firsts plus young guys for Vuc seems like a shitty idea to me. It will be pretty fucking surprising if that happens.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,467
Yeah the Jrue and AD deals are completely different animals, because they were both meant to appease an alpha (nevermind that AD is a top 10 player).

Probably not an easy comp out there because Vuc is a very good player on a good contract who hasn't demanded a trade, unless there's some other team out there desperately wants a Robin for their Batman.

I think that CD is right that the price will be high. And sure, we should start consolidating assets here. But 3 firsts plus young guys for Vuc seems like a shitty idea to me. It will be pretty fucking surprising if that happens.
I don't think it happens, for two reasons... 1, I think ORL would rather either keep him or take an offer with a better centerpiece, 2. Ainge has been very reluctant to make a deal he thinks is an overpay.

I also think it's a fair price. We don't have the pieces to trade for a better player than Vuc, unless we got very lucky on a S&T (and even then we'd have to trade a bunch of guys to make it happen because of the hard cap).

It's an interesting question because, sometimes the best thing than can happen is "losing" a trade, because in the NBA a single player is more key than a bunch of decent ones. Odds are if we traded say.... Grant, TL, Nesmith and 3 late 1sts for Vuc.... none of those 6 players will be better than him, and even if all of them turn out to be above expected value.... you'd still probably rather have an All-Star caliber player than a bunch of good rotation players.

To me the thing is... if you can make the tax work, Trading three 1sts for Vuc makes it a lot more likely you win a title in the next 3-5 years than any of those assets. The odds are none of those pieces become a top 3 player on a Championship team. Vuc could easily be the 3rd man on your title team.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,409
around the way
To me the thing is... if you can make the tax work, Trading three 1sts for Vuc makes it a lot more likely you win a title in the next 3-5 years than any of those assets. The odds are none of those pieces become a top 3 player on a Championship team. Vuc could easily be the 3rd man on your title team.
I agree with pretty much all of this. Hard part is basically giving away the chance that one of those guys turns into something special. And if you struck out on all of the guys, then at least you had the picks (which are probably closer to the lottery than not, if you struck out on everyone).

Vuc is damn good, and he's a bird in hand for sure. Maybe you're talking me into it. Danny seems to be able to find random guys to fill out rosters just fine. Just feels like a big bet, and it feels like bets this big should be made on guys better than Vuc.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,001
I agree with pretty much all of this. Hard part is basically giving away the chance that one of those guys turns into something special. And if you struck out on all of the guys, then at least you had the picks (which are probably closer to the lottery than not, if you struck out on everyone).

Vuc is damn good, and he's a bird in hand for sure. Maybe you're talking me into it. Danny seems to be able to find random guys to fill out rosters just fine. Just feels like a big bet, and it feels like bets this big should be made on guys better than Vuc.
If you think that Tatum and Brown are good bets to improve a decent bit further (the Celtics only real path to a title anyway), then it makes some sense to go bird-in-the-hand for this phase.

There's also the factor that you need Tatum and Brown to be really happy and winning for the next 4 years, because you need Brown to re-sign, and if they're both here and winning, they are likely able to convince a buddy like Donovan Mitchell to jump ship when his deal is up.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,096
I agree with pretty much all of this. Hard part is basically giving away the chance that one of those guys turns into something special. And if you struck out on all of the guys, then at least you had the picks (which are probably closer to the lottery than not, if you struck out on everyone).

Vuc is damn good, and he's a bird in hand for sure. Maybe you're talking me into it. Danny seems to be able to find random guys to fill out rosters just fine. Just feels like a big bet, and it feels like bets this big should be made on guys better than Vuc.
Aside from KG, who was a generational talent, has Ainge ever made a significant investment on a 5? You can make a case for Horford but he had Amir and then Baynes starting with him while he played a bunch of 4.

* Signed Mark Blount to MLE when only 5’s on roster were Ernest Brown and Raef coming off knee surgery.

* Got all he could out of Perk while he was cheap then moved him as damaged goods.

* Used Humphries/Sully/Bass/Olymk at the 5 then a couple years of Zeller/Olynyk (before letting Kelly get paid elsewhere)

* The Theis Era



I dunno.....wake me when Ainge moved multiple 1sts for an expensive Euro center on the other side of 30 who doesn’t appear to be a good fit with JT and JB. I don’t see it.
 

NoXInNixon

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 24, 2008
5,299
The problem here is that both Beal and Towns are in their prime and early prime with a ton of demand. Nobody is acquiring either for pennies on the dollar.
So was AD. And Paul George. And James Harden. All three were traded for a few good but not great young players and all the first round picks and swaps for the rest of the decade. Because the players colluded to narrow the field down to one and only one team.

That's what the Celtics have to hope happens.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,001
So was AD. And Paul George. And James Harden. All three were traded for a few good but not great young players and all the first round picks and swaps for the rest of the decade. Because the players colluded to narrow the field down to one and only one team.

That's what the Celtics have to hope happens.
The first problem here is that in all of those deals, a lot of the picks and swaps come when key players on the star-acquiring team will be in serious decline or retired. In the Celtics case, teams are pricing in Tatum+Brown being there for as far out as you can do picks/swaps (7 years), while being in their primes the whole time. Barring total disaster, it's hard to project the Celtics ever conveying anything juicy.

The second problem is that Ingram/Ball and SGA, while imperfect at the time of those deals, are better than anything the Celtics have to offer (unless some team is really in love with TL). It's true that Brooklyn only gave up LaVert and Allen, but they also sent basically all the picks, at a time when KD and Harden are likely to be significantly worse.

If you can't see the difference in these situations, this ride might be too tall for you.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,506
It's an interesting question because, sometimes the best thing than can happen is "losing" a trade, because in the NBA a single player is more key than a bunch of decent ones. Odds are if we traded say.... Grant, TL, Nesmith and 3 late 1sts for Vuc.... none of those 6 players will be better than him, and even if all of them turn out to be above expected value.... you'd still probably rather have an All-Star caliber player than a bunch of good rotation players.

To me the thing is... if you can make the tax work, Trading three 1sts for Vuc makes it a lot more likely you win a title in the next 3-5 years than any of those assets. The odds are none of those pieces become a top 3 player on a Championship team. Vuc could easily be the 3rd man on your title team.
I'm willing to accept the Vuc gives the Cs a better chance to win the title in the next couple of years but really, how big is that chance? The issue is if whoever the Cs empty their assets to get better be the Right Guy because there are no more assets.

Vuc might be an upgrade but I doubt he's upgrade enough and if the Cs are giving up Romeo and AN they are selling low on both. I mean it's not so hard to squint and see that next year maybe RL, AN, and TL have all increased their trade value.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,467
[
I'm willing to accept the Vuc gives the Cs a better chance to win the title in the next couple of years but really, how big is that chance? The issue is if whoever the Cs empty their assets to get better be the Right Guy because there are no more assets.

Vuc might be an upgrade but I doubt he's upgrade enough and if the Cs are giving up Romeo and AN they are selling low on both. I mean it's not so hard to squint and see that next year maybe RL, AN, and TL have all increased their trade value.
I assume you only give up 2 of those 3.

On the other hand, one of the reasons we have no assets is because we waited for "the right guy" and our valuable draft picks became mediocre to bad bench players. The odds are against the Celtics having much better assets any time soon, because right now, one asset they have is the ability to not match salary, that is going away in a few months, after which you not only don't have good assets, you need to salary match as well.

To me, Vucevic may not be the guy, but... the TPE is probably the Celtics' last chance to add to this team until 2024, and being mediocre until 2024 is a very dangerous game as far as keeping the Jays in town is concerned. Whether is Vucevic at this deadline or someone in the summer.... this is the breaking point for this team.
 

DannyDarwinism

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 7, 2007
4,883
I'm willing to accept the Vuc gives the Cs a better chance to win the title in the next couple of years but really, how big is that chance? The issue is if whoever the Cs empty their assets to get better be the Right Guy because there are no more assets.

Vuc might be an upgrade but I doubt he's upgrade enough and if the Cs are giving up Romeo and AN they are selling low on both. I mean it's not so hard to squint and see that next year maybe RL, AN, and TL have all increased their trade value.
Well, we don’t know if they’re selling low on both. If I’m a skeptical Magic fan, I see an injured shooting guard who can’t shoot and a mid-round pick who hasn’t shown much beyond energy. I think those two in particular plus a couple of (likely late round) picks is a pretty bad return for an All Star with 2.5 years left on a good contract. If I’m John Hammond, I’m looking hard elsewhere, and I think OKC, for one, could pretty easily put together a more attractive offer.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,094
I'm willing to accept the Vuc gives the Cs a better chance to win the title in the next couple of years but really, how big is that chance? The issue is if whoever the Cs empty their assets to get better be the Right Guy because there are no more assets.

Vuc might be an upgrade but I doubt he's upgrade enough and if the Cs are giving up Romeo and AN they are selling low on both. I mean it's not so hard to squint and see that next year maybe RL, AN, and TL have all increased their trade value.
At some point you have to play a hand though. While you’re right that RL, AN, and TL all are likely to improve, what are the odds than any of them ever come close to the value of Vuc over the next 2+ years? Pretty small, IMO.

Then, the next question becomes what are the odds a player better than Vuc becomes available and is obtainable using a package that consists of some of those guys and a couple picks? Probably pretty low as well.

Additionally, TL is an RFA after next year so his value is probably as high as it’s going to be for a while.

A big 3 of Vuc/Jayson/Jaylen may not be the best big 3 around but you’re talking 3 all stars. That’s about the best we can hope for at this point. It’s not like we’ll be able to trade Kemba and picks for Beal this offseason or something.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,094
Well, we don’t know if they’re selling low on both. If I’m a skeptical Magic fan, I see an injured shooting guard who can’t shoot and a mid-round pick who hasn’t shown much beyond energy. I think those two in particular plus a couple of (likely late round) picks is a pretty bad return for an All Star with 2.5 years left on a good contract. If I’m John Hammond, I’m looking hard elsewhere, and I think OKC, for one, could pretty easily put together a more attractive offer.
Is OKC really interested in a guy who turns 31 this October though? They obviously could beat any offer the Celtics make but...would they want to? Collins would seemingly make a lot more sense for them.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,467
Well, we don’t know if they’re selling low on both. If I’m a skeptical Magic fan, I see an injured shooting guard who can’t shoot and a mid-round pick who hasn’t shown much beyond energy. I think those two in particular plus a couple of (likely late round) picks is a pretty bad return for an All Star with 2.5 years left on a good contract. If I’m John Hammond, I’m looking hard elsewhere, and I think OKC, for one, could pretty easily put together a more attractive offer.
I think MIA is the sneaky team for him... Olynyk, Precious, Herro and Harkless works under the cap. Those are better young assets, then add some picks. Hornets maybe with Graham or Rozier as the best player plus picks?
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,467
View: https://twitter.com/KeithSmithNBA/status/1369287633151664129


This makes me think Vucevic doesn't get moved. While Smith covers the Celtics the most, he lives in ORL and seems to have good sources there.

If Vuc isn't really available, I think the Celtics don't do much at the deadline, it's hard to see another real impact player out there. I don't think they burn the TPE on Barnes, and I don't think DET will trade Grant.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,094
View: https://twitter.com/KeithSmithNBA/status/1369287633151664129


This makes me think Vucevic doesn't get moved. While Smith covers the Celtics the most, he lives in ORL and seems to have good sources there.

If Vuc isn't really available, I think the Celtics don't do much at the deadline, it's hard to see another real impact player out there. I don't think they burn the TPE on Barnes, and I don't think DET will trade Grant.
Yeah, sounds like Vucevic is only available if you're willing to overpay. Gordon doesn't really move the needle for this team. Puts up decent numbers but just isn't that impactful. Fournier is a nice player and would help the team but we're not burning a good chunk of the TPE for an expiring Fournier.

I think all signs point to a pretty uneventful trade deadline for this team, which would be disappointing, but understandable.