Lurkers are blissfully unaware of that forum.Many who post in V&N subforum are boycotting the Gray Lady
Lurkers are blissfully unaware of that forum.Many who post in V&N subforum are boycotting the Gray Lady
I did a little research. Prefer my current blissful state.Lurkers are blissfully unaware of that forum.
I don’t think it’s a catastrophe if a national publication doesn’t have beat reporters covering, say, the Kansas City Royals or the Nashville Predators.https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/12/business/media/the-athletic-layoffs.html
Layoffs and a coverage switch to more general vs. local.... so basically going from what made the Athletic unique to "wanna pay for the same thing most places have for free?"
Some of them have already posted on Twitter. These are the ones I've seen so far...Any idea on who got laid off?
Interesting. There’s certainly significant overlap between the two, but I guess I don’t full understand how the print copy of the NYT sports section is going to function.The Athletic Becomes NYT Sports Dept (gift link)
Over the weekend, the WSJ had a story on Athletic-NYT (gift link)
High school me quoted Red Smith in a cover letter for a local newspaper looking for someone to cover HS sports.The Athletic Becomes NYT Sports Dept (gift link)
Over the weekend, the WSJ had a story on Athletic-NYT (gift link)
This doesn't seem promising.
“We plan to focus even more directly on distinctive, high-impact news and enterprise journalism about how sports intersect with money, power, culture, politics and society at large,” the editors wrote in an email to The Times’s newsroom on Monday morning. “At the same time, we will scale back the newsroom’s coverage of games, players, teams and leagues.”
The shuttering of the sports desk, which has more than 35 reporters and editors, is a major shift for The Times.
This isn't really any different - the Times doesn't do many game stories or day-to-day beat coverage as-is. With this move, that'll increase exponentially. What I'm unsure of is how the non-Sports desks will cover the typical sports stories the NYT staff the last few months has covered.This doesn't seem promising.
It seems obvious that some game stories all over the place are being written entirely or heavily assisted by AI. The Athletic has what I consider to be good Jets reporting but it’s never about game stuff.This isn't really any different - the Times doesn't do many game stories or day-to-day beat coverage as-is. With this move, that'll increase exponentially. What I'm unsure of is how the non-Sports desks will cover the typical sports stories the NYT staff the last few months has covered.
FWIW the LA Times just announced it's no longer doing game stories and moving the sports deadline up to mid-afternoon.
I had been seeing ads pop up for $2/month (billed monthly, cancel anytime) for up to 12 months recently. Not sure if that's still available.Guess there is no Black Friday deal anymore?
No, it's an add-on, like NYT Cooking or their other special sections. (it's an extra $2/week, billed as $8/4 weeks.)Question: if you subscribe to the NYT, do you get access to the Athletic (and vice versa)?
Because I subscribe to the Athletic and my wife subscribes to the Times and I feel like I may be paying twice for the same thing.
I think so. I it get it thru a university and think athletic is included. Games is not.Question: if you subscribe to the NYT, do you get access to the Athletic (and vice versa)?
Because I subscribe to the Athletic and my wife subscribes to the Times and I feel like I may be paying twice for the same thing.
FWIW, if you are an old man and get home delivery, you get all the add-ons for free.Gotcha. Thank you both for the quick replys.
I feel seen.FWIW, if you are an old man and get home delivery, you get all the add-ons for free.
Huh, I had no idea how I had it. Turns out I have “All Access”, which includes games, cooking, and the Athletic. It was $20(!) a month, but when I went to cancel it, they gave me a year of All Access at $1 a week.No, it's an add-on, like NYT Cooking or their other special sections. (it's an extra $2/week, billed as $8/4 weeks.)
Yes, I saw that's the current deal, but it jumps to $25/month when the promotion ends in a year.Huh, I had no idea how I had it. Turns out I have “All Access”, which includes games, cooking, and the Athletic. It was $20(!) a month, but when I went to cancel it, they gave me a year of All Access at $1 a week.
And I'll be unsubscribing again. By that time I will have probably done every Sat and Sun crossword for the past 30 years.Yes, I saw that's the current deal, but it jumps to $25/month when the promotion ends in a year.
That's the point I am at. I had canceled and took the one year discounted rate. Guess the only Black Friday deal is going in at $2/mo for a yearYes, I saw that's the current deal, but it jumps to $25/month when the promotion ends in a year.
I just want Puns and Anagrams.And I'll be unsubscribing again. By that time I will have probably done every Sat and Sun crossword for the past 30 years.
I would pay $25 a month if they gave me the damn acrostic back.
When I cancel it immediately offers me a new deal for $2 a month each time or I just wait till the next deal which is never more than a month awayYes, I saw that's the current deal, but it jumps to $25/month when the promotion ends in a year.
You talked me into it. I used to get WSJ daily (it’s cheap for academics). But I cancelled as they piled up some days. But now I’m back in NYT Saturday Sunday. My 12 year old mentioned he liked to read some of the old newspapers so I figure this is good to have around. I do occasionally make him read me stories from other periodicals so we will give this a shot.FWIW, if you are an old man and get home delivery, you get all the add-ons for free.