The Michael McCorkle "Mac" Jones Thread

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
24,896
Unreal America
And yet they won. People can choose not to count his contribution and furthermore nobody here seems to be suggesting that Jones played well.

However, is irrefutable that Mac did enough for the Patriots to win a game that they inarguably won.

Nobody here is disputing that Jones made some bad decisions or has looked like he is lost in spots.

Some of us disagree about what it means going forward. And some of us have been around these parts long enough to know that debating how the future plays out in the present is essentially madness.

If you are right - and many people are so certain that they are - you will be proven so in the fullness of time.
So people can’t comment on what’s happening right now, because we had Brady previously and don’t watch enough NFL. And they can’t speculate what it means for the future, because it’s the future. Why exactly does a message board exist then? I guess we should just read the box scores and wait for the next game quietly?
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,552
This is a terrible take, based on this season alone. Mac is getting support is due to his past performance and potential, not on how he has played this season.

Currently, Mac ranks 34th out 35 QBs in ANY/A -- in between Baker Mayfield and Kenny Pickett.

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2022/passing.htm
I stand by my statement that erratic QB play is pretty common around the league. My take may be the worst ever seen in these forums but I don't see me arguing that Jones is good in any way at present. I have seen the data and its not pretty.


Where we differ is that to me there are potential factors that may lead to improvement going forward. Others feel that we've seen enough.

But yes, mine is a terrible take. I can live with it.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,330
Hingham, MA
I stand by my statement that erratic QB play is pretty common around the league. My take may be the worst ever seen in these forums but I don't see me arguing that Jones is good in any way at present. I have seen the data and its not pretty.


Where we differ is that to me there are potential factors that may lead to improvement going forward. Others feel that we've seen enough.

But yes, mine is a terrible take. I can live with it.
All due respect, but this is getting tiresome. Who is saying improvement isn't possible?

Meanwhile, BB is playing the positivity game.

View: https://twitter.com/MikeReiss/status/1587066922604154880
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,039
Yeah, I knew it wasn’t probable but up until today I had thought it was possible. He’s not the guy I hoped. Realized it today. He’s the guy we got and of course I will root for him. And I can’t say I am surprised because like you say good quarterbacks are rare.
What specifically today? His OL wasn't good and BB said he did a good job making decisions, etc.
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,015
Joe Judge was hired in part to work with the QBs. Daniel Jones is finally looking like a potential starting QB now that Judge is not with the Giants. Jones is succeeding despite the fact they have a far worse starting WR/TE Corps than NE and just as bad if not worse OL. Judge was the HC of a bottom 2 passing game last season and he seems to be a common denominator to terrible QB play in NY and a significant regression by Jones.
 

Gash Prex

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 18, 2002
6,836
A couple of things I think are all true:

1) Mac Jones hasn't been good enough this year - which includes decision making and happy feet. Its not what you want from your 2nd year QB.
2) The OL and play calling for Mac have been subpar
3) He has faced some of the better defenses in the league while Zappe has faced the 2 worst
4) The Pats are going to work through a new offensive system and see if Mac is the guy this year and next.
5) The overly negative takes on Mac every time Mac takes a sack or makes a bad throw is ridiculous. Every QB takes a sack and makes a bad throw. Its not productive commentary.

Personally, I'm still a believer - but he has to settle down in the pocket and stop making WTF decisions. Mac seems to pre-read the field and thinks he knows what is going to happen - and when that doesn't happen and he is under pressure, it goes poorly.

I actually think the Ravens game that he was hurt in was one of his better passing games as a pro - the INT were bad but not as bad people make them out to be.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,665
In the second half yesterday, Mac was basically just a game manager:

13 yard completion
9 yard completion
Incomplete pass
5 yard completion (TD)
6 yard completion
8 yard completion
7 yard completion
5 yard completion
2 yard completion
Incomplete pass
6 yard completion
4 yard completion
Incomplete pass
Incomplete pass
7 yard completion

TOTAL: 11-15 (73.3%), 72 yds, 4.8 y/a, 1 td, 0 int
 

sezwho

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
1,993
Isle of Plum
How has Mac Jones been coached poorly? I’m not at practices or in the film rooms so seriously wondering what specifics lead you to this conclusion. If this is true how has Zappe been able to have stretches of success under these same conditions?
i appreciate the rhetorical device: I’m not there either and we are all just message boarding.

Option 1: Mac has crumbled to the ground and shown he’s incapable of executing a series of drives.
Option 2: Losing an epically talented OC and replacing him with two buddies who have zero experience, let alone success, was a bad choice and set their prized rookie back to the dark ages.

I also watch lots of Giants games and they basically ruined Daniel Jones with appalling coaching (before you ask, I wasn’t I those film rooms either :). i don’t watch Detroit, but bad coaching was all over that team too.

I’m going option 2. Btw, I know it’s heresy to challenge BBs supremacy in all things, so I’ll note he he actually could still be right here….ie Matt P might eventually learns to be a good OC: he’s reportedly brilliant. I just didn’t want to flush another year (like the Cam year) because Bill lo longer trusts his ability to retain young talented coaches so he needs the BoBos back.

it’s the job of the QB to elevate and maximize the team: and its the coaches to maximize the QB.

fwiw, if your specific point is no one told Mac to throw the pick that should have ended the game, that’s true too. Mac is seeing ghosts on the field, and I think off it.

I love the pats so much, and was there for them in the Hart Lee Dykes era and cringed for the Veris, Tippet and Lippett week so it’s a little raw feeling this way….as others have communicated as well I think.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,646
In the second half yesterday, Mac was basically just a game manager:

13 yard completion
9 yard completion
Incomplete pass
5 yard completion (TD)
6 yard completion
8 yard completion
7 yard completion
5 yard completion
2 yard completion
Incomplete pass
6 yard completion
4 yard completion
Incomplete pass
Incomplete pass
7 yard completion

TOTAL: 11-15 (73.3%), 72 yds, 4.8 y/a, 1 td, 0 int
I thought it looked like they dialed the offense way back in the 2nd half, like early 2021 stuff of "how do we keep the QB from fucking this up".
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,646
i appreciate the rhetorical device: I’m not there either and we are all just message boarding.

Option 1: Mac has crumbled to the ground and shown he’s incapable of executing a series of drives.
Option 2: Losing an epically talented OC and replacing him with two buddies who have zero experience, let alone success, was a bad choice and set their prized rookie back to the dark ages.

I also watch lots of Giants games and they basically ruined Daniel Jones with appalling coaching (before you ask, I wasn’t I those film rooms either :). i don’t watch Detroit, but bad coaching was all over that team too.

I’m going option 2. Btw, I know it’s heresy to challenge BBs supremacy in all things, so I’ll note he he actually could still be right here….ie Matt P might eventually learns to be a good OC: he’s reportedly brilliant. I just didn’t want to flush another year (like the Cam year) because Bill lo longer trusts his ability to retain young talented coaches so he needs the BoBos back.

it’s the job of the QB to elevate and maximize the team: and its the coaches to maximize the QB.

fwiw, if your specific point is no one told Mac to throw the pick that should have ended the game, that’s true too. Mac is seeing ghosts on the field, and I think off it.

I love the pats so much, and was there for them in the Hart Lee Dykes era and cringed for the Veris, Tippet and Lippett week so it’s a little raw feeling this way….as others have communicated as well I think.
Except.... it's not a binary, it's a complex situation with many factors, which you have both reduced to a binary then chosen the option that appeals to what you hope is the case without any evidence (arguably against what little evidence there is).
 

sezwho

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
1,993
Isle of Plum
I thought it looked like they dialed the offense way back in the 2nd half, like early 2021 stuff of "how do we keep the QB from fucking this up".
As some have noted, and maybe you too CD, this is also how they started Brady. Not checking game logs, but I remember thinking he never threw past line of scrimmage the first month.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
42,837
AZ
What specifically today? His OL wasn't good and BB said he did a good job making decisions, etc.
Well, Bill would obviously know better than me. And look I get what everyone is saying and I hope that was just post game eye test shit reaction. But he looks awful to me. Just terrible. I am not an advanced metrics guy or an Xs and Os guy but the pass he made that could have lost the game was one of the worst passes I have ever seen. It is not fair to judge a player on one play or even 20 plays and even Tom Brady and Patrick Mahomes has made terrible passes like that. But that is in the context of an otherwise great body of work where is stands out. Nothing about that pass stands out. I could see him doing it next week. It seemed consistent not inconsistent. That was kind of the realization I had yesterday that bummed me out. There was nothing shocking about that pass.

I understand what people are saying about this not being an overnight thing and we always knew it would be like this. And I will watch every week and am definitely not one of those guys who secretly hopes he screws up to be right. I want to be wrong. But I have shifted from irrationally optimistic to pessimistic.

Part of it is that I probably have been too exuberantly a Mac fanboy in the first place and this is just chickens coming home to roost. Not that I thought he was “elite“ whatever that means, but that I thought we had a real keeper and viewed everything through that lens. The lens has changed is all. What the fuck do I know, though.
 

sezwho

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
1,993
Isle of Plum
Except.... it's not a binary, it's a complex situation with many factors, which you have both reduced to a binary then chosen the option that appeals to what you hope is the case without any evidence (arguably against what little evidence there is).
Quite so, and yes it’s complex.

Except…the introduction of at minimum completely inexperienced (and in both cases potentially also very bad) coaches who have taken a player with a track record of sustained success (including NFL) and reduced him to shambles on their watch. That’s not complex in my mind, and was actually widely forecast.

Genuinely curious: what did I project im hoping? All I really want is a good Pats team again.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,039
In the second half yesterday, Mac was basically just a game manager:

13 yard completion
9 yard completion
Incomplete pass
5 yard completion (TD)
6 yard completion
8 yard completion
7 yard completion
5 yard completion
2 yard completion
Incomplete pass
6 yard completion
4 yard completion
Incomplete pass
Incomplete pass
7 yard completion

TOTAL: 11-15 (73.3%), 72 yds, 4.8 y/a, 1 td, 0 int
True, but they were also protecting a lead on every drive in the second half after scoring on the first drive, and a 2 possession lead for a few of them. Safe throws are perfect. And on that first drive, there were 6 plays--4 passes and 2 runs, including a pass called on 4th and 1, when a FG would tie the game. Additionally, many of those passes were on 1st down--picking up 5, 6, 9 yards on 1st down is okay with me when protecting a lead.

It seems like they worked on getting Mac more comfortable yesterday with easy throws.

Jets are a top 10 pass defense this year by yards allowed (as are the Colts next week), so playing it safe is fine.
 
Last edited:

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,646
Quite so, and yes it’s complex.

Except…the introduction of at minimum completely inexperienced (and in both cases potentially also very bad) coaches who have taken a player with a track record of sustained success (including NFL) and reduced him to shambles on their watch. That’s not complex in my mind, and was actually widely forecast.

Genuinely curious: what did I project im hoping? All I really want is a good Pats team again.
You're hoping that it's coaching and not predominately Mac's failings. I agree that there should be some concern about the coaches, but.... Mac has been bad beyond that, and his struggles really started last year when he had an excellent O-Coordinator/QB coach.
The track record... meh. College doesn't translate at all to the pros in terms of success, and his success last year was inconsistent and within the scope of a limited role. Lots of QBs had pretty good rookie years then never made it.
Listen maybe Mac is so fragile that a coaching change completely destroyed him, but... if that's the case I don't know how he projects as an NFL QB. There are a lot of issues that are well beyond coaching. My concern would be... this is the first time ever Mac has faced adversity really. He played in college behind the best line by far with the best playmakers, he came to the league and slotted into a team that had a very good line and built the whole offense around protecting him and giving him the easiest looks it could, trying to avoid playing from behind, etc. Now he's got a mediocre line and the offense is asking him to make some plays and he collapsed, his footwork is a mess, he's missing easy reads, he's jumpy. Hopefully he works through it, but I don't see how we can pin all of that on the coaches.
 

wilked

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
4,063
In the second half yesterday, Mac was basically just a game manager:

13 yard completion
9 yard completion
Incomplete pass
5 yard completion (TD)
6 yard completion
8 yard completion
7 yard completion
5 yard completion
2 yard completion
Incomplete pass
6 yard completion
4 yard completion
Incomplete pass
Incomplete pass
7 yard completion

TOTAL: 11-15 (73.3%), 72 yds, 4.8 y/a, 1 td, 0 int
OL was very shaky, nearly had a pick-6 based on QB-WR communication, and they were playing with a lead. Game-management was the task, manage the lead to a win, and that's what the team (and QB) did.

If Mac started taking deep shots I'd question the coaching honestly. It was clear to me that after the Pats scored the opening TD second half that the goal was to slow things down, play mistake-free football and grind out the win, which is what they did.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
35,849
Deep inside Muppet Labs
OL was very shaky, nearly had a pick-6 based on QB-WR communication, and they were playing with a lead. Game-management was the task, manage the lead to a win, and that's what the team (and QB) did.

If Mac started taking deep shots I'd question the coaching honestly. It was clear to me that after the Pats scored the opening TD second half that the goal was to slow things down, play mistake-free football and grind out the win, which is what they did.
They did have a very confusing series after stopping the Jets on 4th down where they threw three times to no avail despite the rather obvious need to burn some clock. That's the first time in a while I wondered about the play calling.

The frustrating thing about Mac and the offense is that if they get down by any amount it's hard to have confidence in their ability to dig out of it. They have no explosive plays at all. I did like that they went uptempo for a bit, that seemed to really help. I'd like to see more of that.
 

BigJimEd

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
4,441
Except…the introduction of at minimum completely inexperienced (and in both cases potentially also very bad) coaches who have taken a player with a track record of sustained success (including NFL) and reduced him to shambles on their watch.
Let's actually be factual or try not exaggerate everything. At least for me, I tend to tune out people who take the over the top extreme method. As said, this isn't a binary situation.

These coaches do not have zero experience as you've said twice now. They may not have as much as many would like (including me) but that's not zero.
As for Mac, I'm not sure I'd call 2/3rds of a season in a very controlled offense sustained success. I also wouldn't say he's in shambles. Mac's being challenged to improve and up his game. Hopefully, he gets there.

I don't think the game planning and play calling has been bad. I've also seen many that watch the all 22 and analyze the game feel the same way. There are always questions about some play calls. That's just the nature of the job. People complained about the 4th and 1 call Sunday but the play was there. They just didn't execute it. I was not a big fan of the Patricia hire but haven't seen much evidence that he's the issue. Sure, he and the organization are asking Mac to do more but that's what they need if they are going to be true contenders on a regular basis.

The individual QB coaching is much more subjective and tough to tell without knowing what's going on during the week. That falls more on Judge but I'm not going to hold his head coaching experience against him. very different role. Look at McDaniels current struggles.
Jones certainly doesn't look like he's ready for the next step but time will tell. I'm with others that feel fixing the OL is the highest priority and would be most beneficial to Jones development.
 

Bergs

funky and cold
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2005
21,695
Well, Bill would obviously know better than me. And look I get what everyone is saying and I hope that was just post game eye test shit reaction. But he looks awful to me. Just terrible. I am not an advanced metrics guy or an Xs and Os guy but the pass he made that could have lost the game was one of the worst passes I have ever seen. It is not fair to judge a player on one play or even 20 plays and even Tom Brady and Patrick Mahomes has made terrible passes like that. But that is in the context of an otherwise great body of work where is stands out. Nothing about that pass stands out. I could see him doing it next week. It seemed consistent not inconsistent. That was kind of the realization I had yesterday that bummed me out. There was nothing shocking about that pass.

I understand what people are saying about this not being an overnight thing and we always knew it would be like this. And I will watch every week and am definitely not one of those guys who secretly hopes he screws up to be right. I want to be wrong. But I have shifted from irrationally optimistic to pessimistic.

Part of it is that I probably have been too exuberantly a Mac fanboy in the first place and this is just chickens coming home to roost. Not that I thought he was “elite“ whatever that means, but that I thought we had a real keeper and viewed everything through that lens. The lens has changed is all. What the fuck do I know, though.
This is exactly where I'm at. Every bit of it.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,543
View: https://twitter.com/chatham58/status/1587071715330465795?s=20&t=4RdxnlxWfsoprA6KUmzhoQ


Mac needs to pull the trigger. Henry was open. We've seen this a lot this year from both Mac and Zappe. Pull the damn trigger.
Yeah. That was terrible situational awareness in terms of down and distance. Just get the first down. But.........on any other down and distance, it looks like he nicely waved Meyers into a wide open space past the guy that jumped the route. 4th and 1 was not the time for that, though.
 

Nator

Member
SoSH Member
Mac is clearly struggling, but I have not lost hope in him. He started by really getting after his physical conditioning in the offseason. Then they installed an offense that he has at times (not directly of course, just what I am inferring) criticized. He really struggled ever since the opening drive interception vs. Miami. After gutting one out against the Steelers, he had his best statistical game vs. Baltimore where he made some terrific throws, and also some awful ones. He dealt with an injury, got to see his back-up become a folk-hero for 3 games and two drives, and endure Patriots fans chanting for Zappe a week ago.


Maybe they don't make the playoffs this year, and even if they do, they will probably draw Kansas City and get smoked easily in round 1 again. But, it is time to see how he deals with this adversity. If he can get through this and improve as the season goes on, he'll be a more resilient and confident QB. If he can't, he knows that holding a clipboard is maybe a season or two away. But it is time to find out.
 

sezwho

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
1,993
Isle of Plum
You're hoping that it's coaching and not predominately Mac's failings. I agree that there should be some concern about the coaches, but.... Mac has been bad beyond that, and his struggles really started last year when he had an excellent O-Coordinator/QB coach.
The track record... meh. College doesn't translate at all to the pros in terms of success, and his success last year was inconsistent and within the scope of a limited role. Lots of QBs had pretty good rookie years then never made it.
Listen maybe Mac is so fragile that a coaching change completely destroyed him, but... if that's the case I don't know how he projects as an NFL QB. There are a lot of issues that are well beyond coaching. My concern would be... this is the first time ever Mac has faced adversity really. He played in college behind the best line by far with the best playmakers, he came to the league and slotted into a team that had a very good line and built the whole offense around protecting him and giving him the easiest looks it could, trying to avoid playing from behind, etc. Now he's got a mediocre line and the offense is asking him to make some plays and he collapsed, his footwork is a mess, he's missing easy reads, he's jumpy. Hopefully he works through it, but I don't see how we can pin all of that on the coaches.
Ha, you should get my therapy co-pay this week! Yes, I suppose that’s what I’m hoping and it’s a good point that college is a pretty loose prediction, but Mac has already showed ‘pro style ‘ success under Daniels.

Where I can’t follow is the strawman that it’s just a coaching change and Mac should suck it up if he’s a ‘real man/QB’ (my words).

It’s a complete reconstruction of a new offensive system installed by people (Matt and Judge) who have no experience and only sustained failure in their rear view.

It’s what happens to other high draft QBs that go to shit organizations, then get blamed lack of success when I’m convinced at least some could have success with a real program. Mac did.

Maybe next year thePats will have functional offensive coaches during the preseason and can move forward not just install what rookie coaches could handle installing while running an open competition for play caller. I thought It was a joke.

Dont forget BBs #1 media HONK, Lombardi, has been shelling Mac from jump: “better stop throwing picks ‘cause you aren’t good enough kid!”. (Subtext being coaches are awesome you suck). Sure it’s true, at moment but its a team game. It’s not helpful tobe backing your coaches over your players, and not strengthening the team with a ‘we’ statement.

I’d have Lombardi soften the rhetoric, and hope the BoBos can get the train on the tracks next year
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
35,849
Deep inside Muppet Labs
Yeah. That was terrible situational awareness in terms of down and distance. Just get the first down. But.........on any other down and distance, it looks like he nicely waved Meyers into a wide open space past the guy that jumped the route. 4th and 1 was not the time for that, though.
If Meyers moves a second earlier it's a walk in TD. But, as you say, that's not the proper read.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
43,973
Here
I'm about ready to give up on Mac because I think his pocket presence/internal clock is innately terrible. It gets exposed a lot more when you aren't running the vanilla dinky dunk 1 read/check down offense they ran in the second half yesterady and the first 6-8 games of last season. The OL has had a couple bad games with him at QB against some good DLs, but there are many plays where Mac has a pocket to shift around in a bit and instead he just breaks down and scrambles or holds it way too long and takes a sack. With Mac, there are just too many game-changing bad decisions. Zappe appears to have the tools I'd prefer to try to mold, even if it's far from certain he'll ever be The Guy.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,665
If Meyers moves a second earlier it's a walk in TD. But, as you say, that's not the proper read.
Correct on both counts. That play was there to be had. Meyers heads upfield a second earlier and it's absolutely an easy TD. Mac saw the opening and was trying to get Meyers to see it too. Just a bit too late. But also...yeah, on that play, all they needed was the little easy flip to Henry for the automatic first down and keep the drive going. THAT play was also there to be had. Not sure how Mac didn't see it.
 

sezwho

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
1,993
Isle of Plum
Let's actually be factual or try not exaggerate everything. At least for me, I tend to tune out people who take the over the top extreme method. As said, this isn't a binary situation.

These coaches do not have zero experience as you've said twice now. They may not have as much as many would like (including me) but that's not zero.
As for Mac, I'm not sure I'd call 2/3rds of a season in a very controlled offense sustained success. I also wouldn't say he's in shambles. Mac's being challenged to improve and up his game. Hopefully, he gets there.

I don't think the game planning and play calling has been bad. I've also seen many that watch the all 22 and analyze the game feel the same way. There are always questions about some play calls. That's just the nature of the job. People complained about the 4th and 1 call Sunday but the play was there. They just didn't execute it. I was not a big fan of the Patricia hire but haven't seen much evidence that he's the issue. Sure, he and the organization are asking Mac to do more but that's what they need if they are going to be true contenders on a regular basis.

The individual QB coaching is much more subjective and tough to tell without knowing what's going on during the week. That falls more on Judge but I'm not going to hold his head coaching experience against him. very different role. Look at McDaniels current struggles.
Jones certainly doesn't look like he's ready for the next step but time will tell. I'm with others that feel fixing the OL is the highest priority and would be most beneficial to Jones development.
Ok, yes it’s hyperbolic and yes they have tons of experience in the NFL. That said, they clearly didn’t have adequate experience for the job they are doing.now and the team is just as clearly suffering for it.

The O line is just as desperate for leadership and coaching, but that’s maybe their individual faults too.

I will also state the play calling and game planning doesn’t loom awful now either, it’s just the Mac damage seeems done.

Hopefully they can get Humpty Dumpty back together or next year is the 4th post Brady year 1 rebuild year.
 
Last edited:

Gash Prex

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 18, 2002
6,836
Correct on both counts. That play was there to be had. Meyers heads upfield a second earlier and it's absolutely an easy TD. Mac saw the opening and was trying to get Meyers to see it too. Just a bit too late. But also...yeah, on that play, all they needed was the little easy flip to Henry for the automatic first down and keep the drive going. THAT play was also there to be had. Not sure how Mac didn't see it.
Isn't that part of the process of learning? Sure its disappointing to see - but its also a teachable moment for a young QB that needs to make good decisions to be successful.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,330
Hingham, MA
Honestly I wonder if the 4th and 1 play was an arm confidence issue. If he is moving right to left his arm strength will naturally decrease throwing across his body. The defender knows the Pats only need a yard. If he makes a soft throw there it might be a pick-6 and the prior almost pick-6 might have totally scarred him.

Edit: it also looks like it might have been an RPO, I wonder if Mac thought he was going to be able to easily run for it when he first made the play fake
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
35,849
Deep inside Muppet Labs
Correct on both counts. That play was there to be had. Meyers heads upfield a second earlier and it's absolutely an easy TD. Mac saw the opening and was trying to get Meyers to see it too. Just a bit too late. But also...yeah, on that play, all they needed was the little easy flip to Henry for the automatic first down and keep the drive going. THAT play was also there to be had. Not sure how Mac didn't see it.
I'm guessing lack of game play and confidence. We saw Zappe do the same thing in OT against GB when he had Henry open for the 1st. Just not processing the game fast enough and not confident enough to zip that throw in there. That's a throw that needs to be made, and that's a throw Mac has to learn to make.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,275
i appreciate the rhetorical device: I’m not there either and we are all just message boarding.

Option 1: Mac has crumbled to the ground and shown he’s incapable of executing a series of drives.
Option 2: Losing an epically talented OC and replacing him with two buddies who have zero experience, let alone success, was a bad choice and set their prized rookie back to the dark ages.

I also watch lots of Giants games and they basically ruined Daniel Jones with appalling coaching (before you ask, I wasn’t I those film rooms either :). i don’t watch Detroit, but bad coaching was all over that team too.

I’m going option 2. Btw, I know it’s heresy to challenge BBs supremacy in all things, so I’ll note he he actually could still be right here….ie Matt P might eventually learns to be a good OC: he’s reportedly brilliant. I just didn’t want to flush another year (like the Cam year) because Bill lo longer trusts his ability to retain young talented coaches so he needs the BoBos back.

it’s the job of the QB to elevate and maximize the team: and its the coaches to maximize the QB.

fwiw, if your specific point is no one told Mac to throw the pick that should have ended the game, that’s true too. Mac is seeing ghosts on the field, and I think off it.

I love the pats so much, and was there for them in the Hart Lee Dykes era and cringed for the Veris, Tippet and Lippett week so it’s a little raw feeling this way….as others have communicated as well I think.
Most of us in this thread also love the Pats and want more of the recent successes. It’s hard to read how it’s the coaches fault for a QB making terrible decisions on the field. If Mac would stop throwing to wide open DB’s so we don’t have to kneel on 3rd down to ensure a FGA it would be helpful for all of us to achieve the goal of the Pats winning games.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,217
Correct on both counts. That play was there to be had. Meyers heads upfield a second earlier and it's absolutely an easy TD. Mac saw the opening and was trying to get Meyers to see it too. Just a bit too late. But also...yeah, on that play, all they needed was the little easy flip to Henry for the automatic first down and keep the drive going. THAT play was also there to be had. Not sure how Mac didn't see it.
I think it was the perfect example of a QB who's swimming. We all watched the GOAT make that simple read to Edelman/Welker/Brown countless times. That was a play that any NFL QB should be able to make. You know when calling the play that Henry is your primary read. His brain should have already been thinking Henry. Then, that safety comes up and rushes him a bit and he completely loses his head and panics when there was absolutely no reason to do so.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
35,849
Deep inside Muppet Labs
I think it was the perfect example of a QB who's swimming. We all watched the GOAT make that simple read to Edelman/Welker/Brown countless times. That was a play that any NFL QB should be able to make. You know when calling the play that Henry is your primary read. His brain should have already been thinking Henry. Then, that safety comes up and rushes him a bit and he completely loses his head and panics when there was absolutely no reason to do so.
This is also a situation where being in shotgun hurts him. The DBs know it's going to be a pass, so they can key in from the snap. I would have vastly preferred Mac being under center, then they can run play-action or have other, better options.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,543
Honestly I wonder if the 4th and 1 play was an arm confidence issue. If he is moving right to left his arm strength will naturally decrease throwing across his body. The defender knows the Pats only need a yard. If he makes a soft throw there it might be a pick-6 and the prior almost pick-6 might have totally scarred him.

Edit: it also looks like it might have been an RPO, I wonder if Mac thought he was going to be able to easily run for it when he first made the play fake
It's possible he was worried about Meyers's guy jumping Henry's route. The DB *did* sort of head in that direction, which is what gave Meyers the open space behind. But the play there is the immediate-release pass to Henry.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,646
I'm guessing lack of game play and confidence. We saw Zappe do the same thing in OT against GB when he had Henry open for the 1st. Just not processing the game fast enough and not confident enough to zip that throw in there. That's a throw that needs to be made, and that's a throw Mac has to learn to make.
Yeah to me that looks like a lot of indecision not being sure where the defender coming is, and also... his feet are a disaster that whole play,at no point are they in a position to throw to anybody. Just pure Bambi-legs. He's just deep in his head and to quote Sam Darnold "seeing ghosts", he's getting pressure, but then he's not sure when/where there is pressure so sometimes he's feeling pressure that isn't there, and his footwork which already wasn't great (way too many fadeaway Aaron Rodgers attempts last year without Rodgers' arm) has gotten way worse. He shuffles and chops, he never really plants and he rarely steps into his throws... that's a bad idea even if you have a cannon, it's really bad if you're on the low end of arm strength like Mac.

This is also a situation where being in shotgun hurts him. The DBs know it's going to be a pass, so they can key in from the snap. I would have vastly preferred Mac being under center, then they can run play-action or have other, better options.
Yeah, I think the move to shotgun is actually them accomodating him. He played almost all Shotgun in college and it seems like they are trying to make him comfortable to figure out what is going wrong with him so they're simplifying things for him in terms of getting him back in his familiar spot, making it easier for him to see the defense and eliminating any worry about dropping back. Not sure it's working, but definitely seems like that and adding in some Sarkesian plays is about Mac's comfort level.
 

sezwho

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
1,993
Isle of Plum
Most of us in this thread also love the Pats and want more of the recent successes. It’s hard to read how it’s the coaches fault for a QB making terrible decisions on the field. If Mac would stop throwing to wide open DB’s so we don’t have to kneel on 3rd down to ensure a FGA it would be helpful for all of us to achieve the goal of the Pats winning games.
Yes, I hear you, it’s hard to attribute and I wish he could stop chucking picks too!

It’s certainly possible there’s more to his failure this year than bad coaching and O line, and hopefully all three improve.
 

MuppetAsteriskTalk

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2015
5,405
I'm about ready to give up on Mac because I think his pocket presence/internal clock is innately terrible. It gets exposed a lot more when you aren't running the vanilla dinky dunk 1 read/check down offense they ran in the second half yesterady and the first 6-8 games of last season. The OL has had a couple bad games with him at QB against some good DLs, but there are many plays where Mac has a pocket to shift around in a bit and instead he just breaks down and scrambles or holds it way too long and takes a sack. With Mac, there are just too many game-changing bad decisions. Zappe appears to have the tools I'd prefer to try to mold, even if it's far from certain he'll ever be The Guy.
About where I'm at. Mac looks like his hair is on fire on every single play, hold the ball too long, makes too many dumb throws, and takes terrible sacks.
 

PedrosRedGlove

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 5, 2005
670
I'm about ready to give up on Mac because I think his pocket presence/internal clock is innately terrible. It gets exposed a lot more when you aren't running the vanilla dinky dunk 1 read/check down offense they ran in the second half yesterady and the first 6-8 games of last season. The OL has had a couple bad games with him at QB against some good DLs, but there are many plays where Mac has a pocket to shift around in a bit and instead he just breaks down and scrambles or holds it way too long and takes a sack. With Mac, there are just too many game-changing bad decisions. Zappe appears to have the tools I'd prefer to try to mold, even if it's far from certain he'll ever be The Guy.
This is where I'm trending. I'm all for being patient with Mac, but also at some point he has to start showing more improvement... instead he actually appears to be going backwards for whatever reason. The biggest concern is that the things he's lacking in right now: awareness, reads, pocket presence, were supposed to be his strengths.

He's supposed to be a heady QB who can get by on his smarts and processing. It felt like he was good at game management and risk aversion last year, but it seems that if you add any layers to the offense that starts to go out the window.
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,787
Who has the best post in this thread stating the positive case for Mac? I watched a lot of his games and read a lot of this forum. I have a tough time believing if he was on any other team people would be saying “you know who the pats should try to get”…and the answer being Mac Jones. Last year I thought he played smart, but that went away. If he can’t play with great vision what is the case for him? Arm, below average, way way worse than Wilson (who doesn’t seem to have the brain or composure to play in the NFL so don’t think I’m saying he’s good). Legs, bad, he’s slow. Pocket presence, bad awareness, goes down easy. The kid from the Dolphins Skylar(?) and Rypien on the Broncos played about the same against the Jets. I’m not seeing the positive case.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,454
This is where I'm trending. I'm all for being patient with Mac, but also at some point he has to start showing more improvement... instead he actually appears to be going backwards for whatever reason. The biggest concern is that the things he's lacking in right now: awareness, reads, pocket presence, were supposed to be his strengths.

He's supposed to be a heady QB who can get by on his smarts and processing. It felt like he was good at game management and risk aversion last year, but it seems that if you add any layers to the offense that starts to go out the window.
100%.

Mac was supposed to be a guy who excelled at the things he could control really. He’s not a top shelf athlete and he’s got a mediocre arm..but, he was also supposed to excel pre-snap, know where to put the ball, and go through his reads.

If he’s not excelling at those things then we are talking about a thoroughly average QB with the potential to lose games on his own

Overall, I am disappointed with his year this year but not to the extent of some people here. I was also never super high on Mac in the first place. I still think his ceiling is like a Chad Pennington type (before his arm strength completely evaporated). A good player but one who probably won’t win many games by himself and needs a damn good team around him to have a chance at making the Super Bowl
 

sezwho

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
1,993
Isle of Plum
It will be the one that directly connects Mac's struggles with the team's various issues (new OC, OL, etc.), rather than just being like South Park gnome underpants speculation.
Physically he's not a difference maker (foot or arm) but as Brady showed the head is most important and thats in there for Mac somewhere still. To me, the case for eventual success is 1) last year's success 2) pedigree and 3) better coaching as the new guys learn on the job.

The best chance (at least for someone like me who heavily implicates coaching) is the vast experience in other aspects of football for Patricia and Judge cause something to click eventually and either they get on the same page this year or perhaps they can have a functional offseason to build off next year.

About where I'm at. Mac looks like his hair is on fire on every single play, hold the ball too long, makes too many dumb throws, and takes terrible sacks.
Slight difference (though the outcomes I agree with) from where I'm sitting: I'm not sure he was constantly plagued by happy feet, but there is something going on and he then sure does the dumb thing anyway.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,646
One thing I do think is also worth considering.... teams have a lot more tape on Mac now, they've seen what defenses have done that he struggles with, they've seen what throws he doesn't like/struggles to make, and I think they're adjusting accordingly. Mac likes to throw to the middle, Mac loves to throw looping drop in the bucket long balls. Mac does not like outs, he doesn't like sideline deep balls where he has to put it up there for his WR before the safety gets over. I think of the Bears game where they ran essentially the same play twice with the different QBs and got the same look... Mac didn't even consider a deep throw to Parker that had to get there before the safety, instead checking down immediately. Zappe who has no better arm just fired it as hard as he could (not all that hard) and let Parker make the play. That to me has been part of it... defenses are saying to Mac.... "we'll let you have these throws all day, but we're taking away anything you like. Also we're gonna bring pressure and make you decide quick on what to do when there isn't an easy first read on the things you like.
On the playcalling side, maybe one thing they need to do more is find ways to get Thornton the ball in space on short throws, add some more McDaniels WR screens back in.

Edit- we actually talked about this a bit last year, particularly late year and against the Bills... that the D basically doesn't believe Mac has the arm to make certain throws, so they focus on all the stuff they think he can make, and on getting in his face.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,665
Well, I'm as discouraged as many of you are about Mac. He seems all out of sorts. I am also, of course, one of the biggest Mac proponents and was calling for them to draft him. Some things have definitely changed since last year. New offensive coaches (who are just learning how to lead the offense), trying a bunch of new stuff in camp, some new personnel (Strange, Parker). The OL has struggled protecting the QB. They've had Mac (at least early in the season) throw much deeper more often, and until he got hurt we cited the statistics of him being among the league leaders in yards downfield per pass attempt. Taking more chances to get more chunk plays came with some downsides - more turnovers.

Then Mac got hurt. And then he tried to come back to quickly and the Pats let him. He's not 100%, but my guess is that he has felt the pressure from Zappe and rushed back into action. Then he had a bad first half against the Bears and got pulled. It's a lot of stuff contributing to Mac's diminished play this year. There's no question there's been some disappointing signs, but I think it's also foolish to bail on Mac right now. He needs this season to play out and see if he improves. Hopefully for all of us, he does.
 

Shelterdog

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2002
15,375
New York City
100%.

Mac was supposed to be a guy who excelled at the things he could control really. He’s not a top shelf athlete and he’s got a mediocre arm..but, he was also supposed to excel pre-snap, know where to put the ball, and go through his reads.

If he’s not excelling at those things then we are talking about a thoroughly average QB with the potential to lose games on his own

Overall, I am disappointed with his year this year but not to the extent of some people here. I was also never super high on Mac in the first place. I still think his ceiling is like a Chad Pennington type (before his arm strength completely evaporated). A good player but one who probably won’t win many games by himself and needs a damn good team around him to have a chance at making the Super Bowl
Right. In year one he looked like the guy who was going to make consistently great decisions and reads and all indicia were that he was doing well there; while we don't have all the information it seems like he's not at good at that stuff five games into his second year. Is it playing under pressure, being under pressure from a wonky line, bad game planning, bad playcalling, Jones being too aggressive trying to make plays in a way that can be reeled back, Jones being too aggressive trying to make plays in a way that can't be reeled back? Hard to tell. I did take yesterday as a moderate step forward in that he looked ok with not too many mistakes on the road against a good defense with his o-line struggling in a division game after having been benched quickly the previous week and coming off an injury. But ok obviously isn't good enough; he's got to at least get to "pretty decent with almost no mistakes" for this team to have a chance at winning playoff games.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
24,896
Unreal America
Well, I'm as discouraged as many of you are about Mac. He seems all out of sorts. I am also, of course, one of the biggest Mac proponents and was calling for them to draft him. Some things have definitely changed since last year. New offensive coaches (who are just learning how to lead the offense), trying a bunch of new stuff in camp, some new personnel (Strange, Parker). The OL has struggled protecting the QB. They've had Mac (at least early in the season) throw much deeper more often, and until he got hurt we cited the statistics of him being among the league leaders in yards downfield per pass attempt. Taking more chances to get more chunk plays came with some downsides - more turnovers.

Then Mac got hurt. And then he tried to come back to quickly and the Pats let him. He's not 100%, but my guess is that he has felt the pressure from Zappe and rushed back into action. Then he had a bad first half against the Bears and got pulled. It's a lot of stuff contributing to Mac's diminished play this year. There's no question there's been some disappointing signs, but I think it's also foolish to bail on Mac right now. He needs this season to play out and see if he improves. Hopefully for all of us, he does.
No one should bail, that'd be silly.

What's discouraging is that it seemed the prevailing thought about Mac coming out of the draft was that he might be the most "NFL ready" QB from day one, but that he had much less future upside than Lance, Fields, etc. Now, draft narratives are often wrong, of course. But it seems like this is one of the seasons where we should be benefitting from that readiness. And due to all the factors that you noted, we aren't, and that's a bummer.
 

snowmanny

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
15,747
Stipulating that there are numerous variables including O-Line, coaching, injury, the other team…he looks indecisive and he often looks more indecisive as the game goes on. He often looks rattled by pressure and too quick to run and too slow to pass. Those are lethally bad qualities, if he indeed is inflicted by them.

On the actual interception, yes it was tipped but there was no pressure in front of him, and pressure from behind would be unsurprising, so some quarterbacks step up in that situation.

Anyway, it is fine to keep starting him and see what you’ve got. I was strongly confident he’d be a Top 16 QB this year, and right now that looks very shaky. I’m also doubting that he will turn into someone we want to see on a $30,000,000 contract - which means the team would be looking for a new QB soon. But, sure, time will tell.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,646
Stipulating that there are numerous variables including O-Line, coaching, injury, the other team…he looks indecisive and he often looks more indecisive as the game goes on. He often looks rattled by pressure and too quick to run and too slow to pass. Those are lethally bad qualities, if he indeed is inflicted by them.

On the actual interception, yes it was tipped but there was no pressure in front of him, and pressure from behind would be unsurprising, so some quarterbacks step up in that situation.

Anyway, it is fine to keep starting him and see what you’ve got. I was strongly confident he’d be a Top 16 QB this year, and right now that looks very shaky. I’m also doubting that he will turn into someone we want to see on a $30,000,000 contract - which means the team would be looking for a new QB soon. But, sure, time will tell.
He'd probably have to be top 5 from here out to get to top 16 overall, depending what metric you use he's arguably not top 30 right now:
ANY/A: 34/35
QBR: 30/35
Rating: 32/35
EPA: 30/33 (site I got this from uses a higher snap qualifier)
I don't have PFF+ but from some tweets I've seen I'm pretty sure he's bottom 3-5 among the QBs there on grade

Edit: it also looks like it might have been an RPO, I wonder if Mac thought he was going to be able to easily run for it when he first made the play fake
Definitely another thing the staff added this week to try and get him on track, most RPO run of any Mac Jones game so far in his career
View: https://twitter.com/ezlazar/status/1587134279254949890