My god.I honestly thought this was one of his better games. He made good decisions. He took a bad sack or two but it’s hard to know how many of those were on him.
I agree, but did he make a single play one would need to be at least an average NFL QB to make?I honestly thought this was one of his better games. He made good decisions. He took a bad sack or two but it’s hard to know how many of those were on him.
You're probably right.I honestly thought this was one of his better games. He made good decisions. He took a bad sack or two but it’s hard to know how many of those were on him.
I agree that this may be the consensus by talking heads, but good god, the offense scored 3 points! He took 6 sacks and made multiple bad decisions that killed drives. Despite compiling yards and completing a high percentage of passes, he was ineffective.I honestly thought this was one of his better games. He made good decisions. He took a bad sack or two but it’s hard to know how many of those were on him.
This.My god.
'one of his better games'
If "good decisions" means he let the defense and special teams do everything by going three and out and punting, then yes, I guess.
Sacked what, six times? And most of those were due to lack of pocket awareness. 3 offensive points.23/27 for 246 yards. Under duress a lot. No bad decisions. No near picks. Made some nice throws.
He’s also cleaned up his mistakes from earlier in the season. I know no one wants to hear this and expects POINTZ but he’s gone from making multiple mistakes trying to go deep or do too much every game from before the injury to being maybe a little overly cautious now – which looks worse when the OL isn’t holding up bc the chunk plays he was getting earlier in the season aren’t there. And with all due respect to @Smiling Joe Hesketh, he had several nice passes where he went through his progression today and ended on third or fourth option. They also designed some nice bootlegs and play action calls which they hadn’t done as much of earlier in the season.I honestly thought this was one of his better games. He made good decisions. He took a bad sack or two but it’s hard to know how many of those were on him.
I'm still on Team Mac. The OL was atrocious and I'm glad he took the sacks rather than force throws, especially against the elements.23/27 for 246 yards. Under duress a lot. No bad decisions. No near picks. Made some nice throws.
Send in the houndsI honestly thought this was one of his better games. He made good decisions. He took a bad sack or two but it’s hard to know how many of those were on him.
He didn't have time to go deep today, so how do we know he cleaned up his mistakes. Anything over a three step drop was a sack.He’s also cleaned up his mistakes from earlier in the season. I know no one wants to hear this and expects POINTZ but he’s gone from making multiple mistakes trying to go deep or do too much every game from before the injury to being maybe a little overly cautious now – which looks worse when the OL isn’t holding up bc the chunk plays he was getting earlier in the season aren’t there. And with all due respect to @Smiling Joe Hesketh, he had several nice passes where he went through his progression today and ended on third or fourth option. They also designed some nice bootlegs and play action calls which they hadn’t done as much of earlier in the season.
What I’d like to see in the games going forward is Mac pushing the ball downfield a bit more.
One thing they looked like a new wrinkle today was all the TEs in the backfield with the RB. They seemed to do well on one drive with that and then got away from it when they got further downfield.
I honestly thought this was one of his better games. He made good decisions. He took a bad sack or two but it’s hard to know how many of those were on him.
I'm with you, I think he was OK today. No chukcing the ball up for grabs. Poor line play.23/27 for 246 yards. Under duress a lot. No bad decisions. No near picks. Made some nice throws.
Probably not, but effective NFL QBs simply don’t score 3 points and take 6 sacks a game. Period. Pocket awareness, throw the ball away, etc. The same arguments are made for similar terrible quarterbacks all the time. It doesn’t matter how many yards you are completing if you are consistently making bad decisions (bad audibles, not throwing the ball away, not coming off initial reads, poor pocket movement/ awareness, etc.) deep in opponent’s territory.Most of his sacks, so 4/6 were on him? Let’s see the replay because I think that’s way off.
Why do you get to decide the conversation is over and decided?Let's save some pixels and Nip's server. If you were uncertain on Mac coming into this game, you are uncertain on Mac after this game.
If you are one of the half-dozen or so folks in this thread who feel like we are irrationally putting any hope that Jones can be anything other than a holder of clip-boards and you need to keep selling that here, nothing has changed. He is still not the guy.
I mean we can all post the same posts over and over again but BB/Patricia/Judge are too busy cooking up baby offenses to read this thread and Mac would have to close the browser three seconds into reading so...
Nothing has changed.
I’d leave it.…he can’t run through his professions quickly enough.
Did he make some nice throws?23/27 for 246 yards. Under duress a lot. No bad decisions. No near picks. Made some nice throws.
Yeah and for the record I’m not sold on Mac. You look at the last 3 games and the pass pro and run blocking and penalties and play calling and and and I’m not sure you can really get much out of it other than Mac actually looked decent today given his shit sandwich everywhere else.Send in the hounds
There ought to be hounds
Don't bother ... they're here
They usually don’t! And maybe Mac isn’t that guy. Cajuste, Ferentz, Wynn/Hurt-Brown, and rookie Strange who is regressing played like shit in pass pro. This is a dog shit line and has been the last 3 games.Probably not, but effective NFL QBs simply don’t score 3 points and take 6 sacks a game. Period. Pocket awareness, throw the ball away, etc. The same arguments are made for similar terrible quarterbacks all the time. It doesn’t matter how many yards you are completing if you are consistently making bad decisions (bad audibles, not throwing the ball away, not coming off initial reads, poor pocket movement/ awareness, etc.) deep in opponent’s territory.
Only in New England can a 3 point 6 sack be seen as improvement, but with Mac any no turnover game is progress.
It’s also where the sacks/bad plays occurred; often either in the scoring area or the plus side of the field. He seems to lack some awareness in those moments. His line sucked today (on run blocking as well) but again they probably looked worse because in some of the deep sets Mac was a beat slow to move up or around in the pocket.He needs to learn to throw the ball away when nothing's there. Taking 6 sacks (most after several seconds) without any throwaways is pretty terrible. It seems like he tries to sneak out of it to buy time instead, but he's not that type of QB.
They moved the ball fairly well, but those sacks just killed drives.
Pretty consistently the story yeah? Week after week.I find it really difficult to asses Mac’s play when the OL was so awful, and Patricia did him no favors. 3 points means he wasn’t good. But I can’t quite figure out how much of the bad was him, and how much was a myriad of other factors.
Yeah, but that’s because the OL stinks and Patricia is proving to not be a good OC (to me, anyway).Pretty consistently the story yeah? Week after week.
I'm left wondering why they didn't utilize Jakobi and Henry more on quick, over the middle stuff.
yes. I will say on the one people were most upset on he definitely could have just dumped it at the RB's feet, not sure about some of the others.He can't just "throw it away" when he's inside the tackles, like he was several times. Doesn't he have to at least chick it in the area of an eligible receiver?
They have been slicing through us all day so let’s call a stretch outside play on 4th and 3. Surely this time they won’t penetrate…Yeah, but that’s because the OL stinks and Patricia is proving to not be a good OC (to me, anyway).
Very few QBs can overcome the kind of garbage OL the Pats have. And Patricia has no feel for the game. There was a stretch where he called Stevenson’s number four straight times. Surprise, he got stuffed the last 2.
It’s kind of his schtick. That said, the larger point remains: We don’t know much more than we did prior to the game on Mac. His Tackles are turnstiles, but he also does not step up in the pocket to extend anything. So in a game where one big mistake could have cost them, credit to Mac for not making one.Why do you get to decide the conversation is over and decided?
But good quarterbacks do have terrible games sometimes especially when their lines play like crap against good defenses. Now whether he’s consisntly making bad decisions that’s a different question. I frankly don’t think he was but opinions varyProbably not, but effective NFL QBs simply don’t score 3 points and take 6 sacks a game. Period. Pocket awareness, throw the ball away, etc. The same arguments are made for similar terrible quarterbacks all the time. It doesn’t matter how many yards you are completing if you are consistently making bad decisions (bad audibles, not throwing the ball away, not coming off initial reads, poor pocket movement/ awareness, etc.) deep in opponent’s territory.
Only in New England can a 3 point 6 sack be seen as improvement, but with Mac any no turnover game is progress.
THis is over the top. Patricia is no genius, and the line is hurt. However... Patricia did okay with Bailey Zappe, and the line was the same for that as many of Mac's failures.Yeah, but that’s because the OL stinks and Patricia is proving to not be a good OC (to me, anyway).
Very few QBs can overcome the kind of garbage OL the Pats have. And Patricia has no feel for the game. There was a stretch where he called Stevenson’s number four straight times. Surprise, he got stuffed the last 2.
He’s terrible. That call was atrocious.They have been slicing through us all day so let’s call a stretch outside play on 4th and 3. Surely this time they won’t penetrate…
I cant reconcile Mac being “terrible” with Patricia being OK. Mac completed most of the pass calls that Patricia called. He did call a few good screens, and then we didn’t go back to them. The whole O was disjointed and it seemed like Patricia forgot the OL stunk as the game went along.THis is over the top. Patricia is no genius, and the line is hurt. However... Patricia did okay with Bailey Zappe, and the line was the same for that as many of Mac's failures.
Today the line was quite bad, Mac did nothing to help but didn't hurt, so not one of his worse performances.
I will say in a slight defense of Patricia... what do you call when your line is hurt/bad and you can't trust your QB to make the right read? He dialed up a lot of effective screens and runs considering the defense had zero fear of Mac throwing downfield.
It’s almost like you could say he’s the Nick Folk of QB’s.There’s no way this was a good game from Mac. He still has zero ability to read the field quickly. If everything is perfect he’s ok, but nothing is perfect in the NFL and he can’t run through his professions quickly enough.
Only in New England? Boston/New England sports fans can be as critical as it gets.Probably not, but effective NFL QBs simply don’t score 3 points and take 6 sacks a game. Period. Pocket awareness, throw the ball away, etc. The same arguments are made for similar terrible quarterbacks all the time. It doesn’t matter how many yards you are completing if you are consistently making bad decisions (bad audibles, not throwing the ball away, not coming off initial reads, poor pocket movement/ awareness, etc.) deep in opponent’s territory.
Only in New England can a 3 point 6 sack be seen as improvement, but with Mac any no turnover game is progress.
Brian Daboll and Mike Kafka.Which (available or possibly available) offensive coordinator would SOSH like to see work with Mac in 2023?
Find me one that has 5 years experience as an OC at any level and I’ll probably be OK with it. A real QB coach would be cool too.Which (available or possibly available) offensive coordinator would SOSH like to see work with Mac in 2023?
Where in my post did I decide the conversation is over? We literally have the same posters posting the same things over and over in this thread. It won't change what the Patriots coaching staff is going to do. I was simply seeing if we can redirect the conversation. Barring injury, we are likley stuck with Mac Jones as the QB of the Patriots for the rest of the season. And he may not be the guy longterm.Why do you get to decide the conversation is over and decided?
This is the Mac Jones thread.Where in my post did I decide the conversation is over? We literally have the same poster posting the same things over and over in this thread. It won't change what the Patriots coaching staff is going to do. I was simply seeing if we can redirect the conversation. Barring injury, we are likley stuck with Mac Jones as the QB of the Patriots for the rest of the season. And he may not be the guy longterm.
I will ask this question though - if the Patriots make the playoffs and win a game or two, even with Jones putting up numbers like this, does that change anyone's opinion?
It might for me depending on how it plays out. I don't need great QB aesthetics if I get wins but I suspect there are others who would be unhappy with another Superbowl championship if its off the back of Jones terrible YPA etc etc.