QUOTE (rembrat @ Mar 28 2010, 04:41 PM)
index.php?act=findpost&pid=2868109
I don't really see how you can compare this to Penn/Sanchez. THAT was total domination. This was a clinic on how to pass guard and take someone's back.
Easy, because GSP dominated a facet of the game so completely that Hardy never had a chance and was in survival mode for the entire fight.
QUOTE
Hardy/GSP was merely St. Pierre zeroing in on Dan Hardy's weak grappling and ground game
Whose fault is that? Is that a criticism?
QUOTE
attacking it, then spending 20 minutes trying to submit Dan. Usually GSP delivers vicious GnP but he didn't or couldn't last night.
He didn't because he was so intent on getting a submission. Why? I don't know. That is the only disappointing aspect I had with his performance.
QUOTE
Dan Hardy is the biggest WW he has fought in quite some time and it's clear that GSP wanted no part in exchanging, both standing and on the ground.
Where do you get that from? His advantage with takedowns and his top position is so extreme and he is so much better, why wouldn't he use that? Why does he have to stand and bang? Do great strikers need to take fights to the ground to prove something? The criticism that is being lobbed at him is so misdirected and so unfortunate.
QUOTE
Maybe wrestling really does it for you but I get no joy in watching a guy pass guard and attempt failed subs all night long.
Its apart of the sport. Its not boxing. What GSP did is a huge part of MMA. If you don't like grappling, maybe its really not for you.
QUOTE
And you are kidding yourself if you think Anderson wouldn't absolutely wreck GSP. Anderson has some of the best timing and hands in MMA. I have a hard time believing GSP could close the distance on Silva trying to get a takedown and not get a nice counter knee right to his shiny forehead.
GSP is also the quickest and most explosive athlete in MMA. His wrestling, takedowns, and top game are absolutely the best in the business. I have see absolutely no reason to think he couldn't take Silva down. I think it'd be a tremendous fight.
QUOTE
And yea, frankly, I am blowing off some steam because I really don't like what GSP has become. Safe and predictable.
Become arguably the best fighter in MMA? I mean jesus, if he gets the subbed on Hardy, no one says a word. But since he wasn't able to sink one in deep enough and Dan Hardy is one tough motherfucker, GSP is criticized for dominating his opponent. In what other sport does that happen? What is safe about what he did last night? When he was going for the subs he got reversed and even ended up on his back for a few seconds.
QUOTE
I don't know if this is coming from Jackson or if the Serra fight has affected him so deeply where he isn't willing to take risks any more against guys that are strikers.
Again, why does he have to take the risk? The only reason I can see is to shut up the unfair criticism, but fuck me, he is doing what he is best at. He lost to Serra close to two years ago and in that time has dominated Koscheck, Fitch, Hughes, Serra, Penn, Alves and now Hardy. This stuff about him being affected is so absolutely ridiculous to me. Nothing that I see from him suggests that he is affected.
QUOTE
But I just don't like the dude. I also don't like that he walks around 190 lbs, is a
huge WW, and has zero interest in moving up to MW to test himself against bigger/equal sized competition. Penn did it and is going to do it again. Silva did it. Let's go "best P4P fighter int he world."
Hes not a huge WW, for christ sake, Hardy walks around at like 200 something. He doesn't have zero interest in it, White has stated he doesn't want GSP moving up and GSP has said its not something he is focusing on right now. It will come in the future, watch.