WNBA requires domestic players to either have graduated or turn 22 in the same calendar year as the draft so the Nike deal won't change anything with her leaving. That could change with the new cba, but even then she'd still have 2 more years minimum at USCWe won’t be seeing JuJu Watkins in the W anytime soon. Shams reporting she just signed a shoe contract with Nike that will give her one of the richest shoe deals in women’s basketball. Happy for her but it’s tough for the W to compete when there’s not a real financial incentive to leave school.
https://www.espn.com/womens-college-basketball/story/_/id/41684352/sources-usc-juju-watkins-nike-reach-lucrative-extension
Alyssa Thomas got absolutely abused on defense tonight, from what I saw. Moments where she wasn't giving the effort to bother contesting a shot, failed switches, a step slow on a drive. It wasn't just her, but she seemed to get picked on.Sun just don’t seem to have it tonight.
She's a power player. Really interesting but odd skill set. Incredibly strong but not quick, that's not odd. But poor shooter with great passing skills. A lot of her passing is her understanding and feel for the game. I really like her toughness. I thought she physically and mentally dominated the Fever forwards. I am partial to tough smart forwards so if I was a GM in the WNBA I would probably giver her too much money, despite the last game.Alyssa Thomas got absolutely abused on defense tonight, from what I saw. Moments where she wasn't giving the effort to bother contesting a shot, failed switches, a step slow on a drive. It wasn't just her, but she seemed to get picked on.
I did not know that. Not sure the thinking there, although I’m sure the NCAA will fight changing the rule.WNBA requires domestic players to either have graduated or turn 22 in the same calendar year as the draft so the Nike deal won't change anything with her leaving. That could change with the new cba, but even then she'd still have 2 more years minimum at USC
This summer, a WNBA game was held at TD Garden in Boston for the first time, as the Connecticut Sun and Los Angeles Sparks faced off before a sold-out crowd.
“Hopefully this isn’t the last,” Sun star DiJonai Carrington said following the game. “Hopefully this is the first of many.”
There's some really good stuff there about touching on why we don't already have one, how one might be "owned" and who might "own" a team, and more.If Boston were to get a team, it’d have a fan currently in the state’s highest office.
“I wish we had [a WNBA team] here already,” Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey, a former collegiate and professional basketball player herself, recently told Boston.com in a statement. “I know we’d have tons of fans and huge interest here — in the state where both the women’s and men’s game was invented. I’d love to see this.”
Huh. I assumed that the Sun arena's capacity would force the Sun to move to a bigger venue with the league's surge in popularity. I was surprised that it's actually 10k. I thought it was 6k or so. At least get them a real practice facility!Thought folks might be interested in this article on the possibility of a Boston WNBA team - Boston.com Article
There's some really good stuff there about touching on why we don't already have one, how one might be "owned" and who might "own" a team, and more.
https://www.espn.com/wnba/story/_/id/41724849/wnba-announces-move-best-7-finals-starting-next-seasonThe WNBA will move to a best-of-seven series for the WNBA Finals starting next season, commissioner Cathy Engelbert said Thursday.
In her address to the media before Game 1 of the Finals between the New York Liberty and the Minnesota Lynx, Engelbert also said the league will go to a 1-1-1 setup for the best-of-three first round, giving all playoff teams at least one home game, and the regular season will expand to 44 games.
It wasn't about common sense...it was about $$. They ran the series schedule the way they did because it was more cost effective. Now that Clark has brought in tons of $$ to the W, they have the money, finally, to do it the correct way.She must've appointed a VP of Common Sense, like Bill Simmons has always suggested.
One of those five is not like the others. Clark, Collier, Wilson, and Stewart all are dominant scorers in addition to being good/great in other aspects of the game. Thomas isn't, and it's one reason why the Sun aren't a championship team.All-WNBA selections announced.
First Team:
Caitlin Clark (IND)
Napheesa Collier (MIN)
Alyssa Thomas (CON)
A'ja Wilson (LVA)
Breanna Stewart (NYL)
A bit surprising since they played so well after the Olympics, But, in the playoffs they were not together. Maybe it is easier to get new coach than trade NaLyssa Smith. I expect a hard nosed coach to emphasize toughness because they played soft in the playoffs, and watched Clark get hammered on all year.
Yup, she gone: https://www.espn.com/wnba/story/_/id/42057067/stephanie-white-sun-head-coach-two-seasonsA bit surprising since they played so well after the Olympics, But, in the playoffs they were not together. Maybe it is easier to get new coach than trade NaLyssa Smith. I expect a hard nosed coach to emphasize toughness because they played soft in the playoffs, and watched Clark get hammered on all year.
Rumours, from many source think Stephanie White is coming back to the Fever.
https://nypost.com/2024/10/27/sports/stephanie-white-could-become-caitlin-clarks-next-coach-after-christie-sides-firing/
Always really, really good, just never quite good enough. Feels like the Jim Kelly era Buffalo Bills.Yup, she gone: https://www.espn.com/wnba/story/_/id/42057067/stephanie-white-sun-head-coach-two-seasons
That sucks, and based on Jen Rizzotti's comments I'm getting the vibe of a teardown and rebuild with a probably inexperienced or non-sought after coach who has the appetite to stick around through some losing seasons. It would be a bummer to have the first non-competitive team in around a decade next season, still without a title to show for their sustained run.
AT will be 33 next season with some chronic and some nagging injuries, so I would not blame her for not sticking it out for a rebuild. I'll cheer her on to get a 'ship wherever she goes, though.Always really, really good, just never quite good enough. Feels like the Jim Kelly era Buffalo Bills.
I'm definitely seeing a teardown and rebuild, but the issue is, they don't have the draft picks to do it. So it's going to be some real lean years here at first. I fully expect a last-place finish in 2025 unless they re-sign AT, Bonner, and Brionna.
It is like the Bulls hiring Chuck Daly.As expected, White returns to Indiana.
https://www.espn.com/wnba/story/_/id/42131275/sources-wnba-fever-hire-stephanie-white-new-head-coach
Baller move for Paige would be to announce that she’s staying another year because of the draconian laws in TX regarding women’s health care.The Wings win the draft lottery and gets to select #1 in April.
Paige Bueckers, welcome to Dallas!
Can she make more NIL money staying put than WNBA money + endorsements?Baller move for Paige would be to announce that she’s staying another year because of the draconian laws in TX regarding women’s health care.
It’s close I would bet. She’s not going to get the big endorsement money immediately, like Caitlin did.Can she make more NIL money staying put than WNBA money + endorsements?
Yes, this will be interesting to see how it plays out. She's easy to support, love her game.Baller move for Paige would be to announce that she’s staying another year because of the draconian laws in TX regarding women’s health care.
She could totally pull an Eli Manning, except while Eli's family wealth was good he wasn't personally wealthy (above board, at least). Paige knows she has a backstop the next season for sure. Of course if Dallas can't select Paige, do they just wind up missing the playoffs then getting the first pick again next year and we're in the same place.Baller move for Paige would be to announce that she’s staying another year because of the draconian laws in TX regarding women’s health care.
Unrivaled starts up in January….I know we have to wait a bit, but I'm ready to watch some WNBA. Viewing some of these NBA games has become so boring. Too many 3's and the isolation game just puts me to sleep. At least I can some watch some decent college hoops for a while.
When you just keep singling out one player, it creates hard feelings,” added Johnson, co-owner of three Washington sports franchises – the NHL’s Capitals, the NBA’s Wizards and the WNBA’s Mystics.
I read that the WNBA lost $40 million this past season and am aware that the NBA is funding the league. Has the WNBA made money in any year? Will it make money going forward with the new TV contract?I mean who is in charge over there? There is no comish to tell people to STFU up and cash the cheques? The WNBA deserve to fail if the can't cut out this crap.
Short answer: They may have broken even for a few years, but the league in total has collectively lost an average of $10M / yr since founding. That changed ~2-3 years ago, with attendance declines reversed and much more attention paid even pre-Clark, and they likely made money on a gross-margin basis this year, before CapEx that took it to the $40M net number you've seen. Yes, very likely they will be quite profitable on an EBITDA basis going forward with the new TV deal, but may still deficit-spend for growth in spite of that. It just doesn't indicate weakness anymore, rather the opposite.I read that the WNBA lost $40 million this past season and am aware that the NBA is funding the league. Has the WNBA made money in any year? Will it make money going forward with the new TV contract?
The vast majority of her popularity isn’t racist, but there is a very loud online minority who only care about her because it lets them punch down on the black and queer women who have been the W’s biggest stars for most of the league’s history.And I really hope people don't come back with Clark's popularity being racist. She isn't the first white star. Rebecca Lobo was huge in college. Sue Bird was incredible. I have been intrigued by Cc becasue her highlights are more exciting than any other female players. A'ja is great but her highlight package is like watching clips of that really nice non jumping Mormon kid in a small city going off to sit on the bench in D3. Great footwork and mid range jumpers don't fill aenas, despite the off the charts charism of the player. But Caitlin Clark makes shots most players male or female would never make in a game. She's different. She's the first female player I ever watched where I knew she was doing things I could never have done. Also maybe look at how much money semi retired Venus Williams makes, Coco Grauf makes, before saying race is the factor in CC's draw.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/13/sport/sheila-johnson-caitlin-clark-time-magazine-spt-intl/index.html
Some of it is the privilege and habit of complaining by the WNBA players. Plum's silly desire that she wants same % of revenue as Lebron when the NBA generates 100s of Billions profits come from the privilege of playing in league that has guaranteed existence. The W players have a better experience, in a league that has done nothing but lose money, in much better than the NBA players of the 70s. They stay in better hotels, have better more comfortable, travel, have their health looked after better, etc. So when Larry and Magic came along those guys were happy, because a league losing money may fold, while the WNBA has had their losses absorbed by the NBA. I am a basketball purist, so I have always enjoyed WNBA games, but the near constant complaining about being under appreciated was and is tiresome. The W X and Os are more applicable to level I coach, and I (an old white man) cannot count the times while searching for an OOB play, or ball screen coverage in W videos I came across compaints about how old white men refuse to watch. So many post game interviews were filled with anger at the people not watching. While I believe racism and jealousy are #1 motivators in the Cc hate, a habit of looking the gift horse in the mouth is also a factor.The vast majority of her popularity isn’t racist, but there is a very loud online minority who only care about her because it lets them punch down on the black and queer women who have been the W’s biggest stars for most of the league’s history.
That loud minority is FURIOUS at her online right now because that Time article repeated her quote about her popularity having an element of privilege to it (a quote from months ago, BTW, that the fans who are mad-online now just hadn’t noticed when it happened).
Which is a perfectly fair and correct thing for her to acknowledge, being traditionally-pretty midwestern white woman has definitely contributed to a broader population (including more white and relatively conservative people) becoming fans of her and the W, even the vast majority of those who are real fans of her as a player and aren’t being racist at all in their fandom.
More people just see themselves in her (and to your point, what they see is really exciting) which we know it’s important in new fandoms, even compared to recent white stars like Sue Bird or Breanna Stewart (who played together, and are both more fun than A’ja, IMO, I’d not quite as good, but are both gay) or Sabrina (who’s game is the most similar to CC, but is a west coast kid from an immigrant family with a foreign-sounding name). I think Lobo was too long ago to be comparable, the league wasn’t ready for a true breakout star in the 90s/early-2000s, and she was also a big with a less interesting game.
That wider interest is a good thing, though (the most part; again, the ugly parts of her fandom are also real, but they’re a small part of it, IMO) and the league should be leaning into it, not saying silly things to minimize it.