The Yoshida Conundrum

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,988
Yeah, I just think it is a longshot to think we could get a team to take 50% of his contract at this point. I hope I am wrong, but I think it would be more like we subsidize 50% and take on a contract or two that fits the Sox roster better. I would be surprised if we got someone to take him in a scenario where it freed up tangible money to put towards pitching.
50% of his deal is 27 mil for 3 years.

I'm going heavy on the over. He would do better than that.

He's a flawed player, I have pointed that out many times on this thread. But he's hitting 297/372/442. On one hand they've sat him a number of times vs lefties so it's a little bit cherry picked. But he was also playing hurt for a part of the season.
 

jbupstate

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2022
720
New York, USA
Yes, sure... and I get that. What is your point? He's got a month and a half of superb performance. But his career wrc+ is 115.

I'm not going to bet that his future performance is going to reflect one of his hottest months in his entire career. If I did that, I'd be insane.

EDIT: I see what you're getting at now.
He had almost 4 months in 2023 where he was excellent with a big slow down the last two months. Decent month to start 2024 followed by June nosedive coming back from injury. The last two months are stellar. Yoshida when healthy hits his way into most lineups.

Yes he’s overpriced… but shouldn’t the Sox pay what it takes to get a player they want? Isn’t that what everyone demands from JWH money?
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
22,866
Santa Monica
Yeah, I just think it is a longshot to think we could get a team to take 50% of his contract at this point. I hope I am wrong, but I think it would be more like we subsidize 50% and take on a contract or two that fits the Sox roster better. I would be surprised if we got someone to take him in a scenario where it freed up tangible money to put towards pitching.
Plenty of teams need hitting. If Masa could finish the year healthy/hitting like this, eating 50% of his contract could
1. help get them some pitching (even if it's vet bullpen)
2. open up PT for several young OFs
3. improve the team defense
4. get Devers a few more games at DH, which may be helpful for his health

Masa's a good hitter, but just a bad roster fit with all the young positional talent emerging on this roster/upper minors.
Combined with the lack of pitching. Story OTOH is a complete sunk cost
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
8,534
He had almost 4 months in 2023 where he was excellent with a big slow down the last two months. Decent month to start 2024 followed by June nosedive coming back from injury. The last two months are stellar. Yoshida when healthy hits his way into most lineups.

Yes he’s overpriced… but shouldn’t the Sox pay what it takes to get a player they want? Isn’t that what everyone demands from JWH money?
Look, I'm happy as hell with how he's playing. A 115 wrc+ really lengthens the lineup. I'm happy about that.

I'm just not sure if it's the best allocation of resources for this team. He's being protected against left-handed pitching for the most part this year, and I just don't know how well a DH-only guy who can't hit lefties on a roster that's already crammed with lefties fits. And I recognize that he CAN play the field, I just don't see a future in which he does. If the Sox want to promote Anthony and extend O'Neill, for example, and make him a mostly DH guy, then Yoshida is an awkward fit at best.

Happy to have him on the team this year and into next year, but I won't be surprised at all if they shop him, and I kind of hope they do. I try to live in reality, and since it seems like this ownership group doesn't want to pay out the nose for free agents anymore, freeing up Yoshida's money might allow them to spend on pitching, which they need far more.

What @benhogan said, basically.
 

Apisith

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 19, 2007
3,264
Bangkok
He has no range so he's bad in the outfield but would he be better at 1B or 2B? Maybe he takes a lot of grounders this winter and is a passable backup for Casas and whoever we have at 2B this year.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
23,066
Maine
He has no range so he's bad in the outfield but would he be better at 1B or 2B? Maybe he takes a lot of grounders this winter and is a passable backup for Casas and whoever we have at 2B this year.
The number of players who move up the defensive spectrum in their 30s, particularly to positions they've never played professionally before, is vanishingly small. I don't think there's a chance he attempts 2B, and that's not even taking into account that the organization already has about 150 guys in line for that spot. First base is a bit more realistic a move but Masa is 5' 8" which is rather short for the position. Pablo Reyes is listed at the same height and he played some 1B so perhaps it's a possibility. I don't expect them to go that way though.
 

Jason Bae

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2021
733
NJ
He's hitting far fewer grounders this year. He had a 54.6% GB% last year, down to 41.4% this year.
 

doctorogres

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 27, 2010
165
Look, I'm happy as hell with how he's playing. A 115 wrc+ really lengthens the lineup. I'm happy about that.

I'm just not sure if it's the best allocation of resources for this team. He's being protected against left-handed pitching for the most part this year, and I just don't know how well a DH-only guy who can't hit lefties on a roster that's already crammed with lefties fits. And I recognize that he CAN play the field, I just don't see a future in which he does. If the Sox want to promote Anthony and extend O'Neill, for example, and make him a mostly DH guy, then Yoshida is an awkward fit at best.

Happy to have him on the team this year and into next year, but I won't be surprised at all if they shop him, and I kind of hope they do. I try to live in reality, and since it seems like this ownership group doesn't want to pay out the nose for free agents anymore, freeing up Yoshida's money might allow them to spend on pitching, which they need far more.

What @benhogan said, basically.
I agree that they're lefty-heavy and Yoshida is probably stuck at DH considering the OF we have and who's on the way. However, he's been a 164 wRC+ hitter through July and August. Do you feel the same way if we can expect something like 125-130 wRC+ over the next few seasons?

Over that time, he's at 108 wRC+ vs. LHP. His splits on the season are really, really dragged down by his 12 wRC+vs. LHP through June. Currently, I'm not sure they're protecting him vs. lefties so much as someone has to sit and if it's him you can play your best defensive lineup. Still an argument for him being an odd roster fit.

We definitely need to trade our way into a more balanced lineup but I can't help but think that it needs to be an OF who goes. Not that they should do this and I love these guys as Sox, but imagine what they could get with Duran or Anthony as the centerpiece of a deal. Or Abreu, for that matter.

Also not sold that their budget constraints remain in place next year. This year was a push but, if nothing else, our young talent has proven they're worth betting on.
 

Hank Scorpio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 1, 2013
8,196
Salem, NH
Question about his contract... Baseball reference has this:

2024 Contract Status: Signed thru 2027, 5 yrs/$90M (23-27)
Service Time (01/2024): 1.000 • Arb Eligible: 2028 • Free Agent: 2029
Him being Arb Eligible after his contract runs out doesn't seem correct. That's not right, is it?
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
20,617
Question about his contract... Baseball reference has this:



Him being Arb Eligible after his contract runs out doesn't seem correct. That's not right, is it?
He's technically eligible for arbitration after 3 years in the majors. There's no restriction that his contract must cover all his arbitration years. In this case, it appears his contract covers 2 of his 3 arb eligible seasons. Ohtani, for example, was arbitration eligible in 2023, and signed $30M one-year deal with the Angels (set a record for arb eligible players, since passed by Soto).
 

scottyno

late Bloomer
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2008
11,817
He's technically eligible for arbitration after 3 years in the majors. There's no restriction that his contract must cover all his arbitration years. In this case, it appears his contract covers 2 of his 3 arb eligible seasons. Ohtani, for example, was arbitration eligible in 2023, and signed $30M one-year deal with the Angels (set a record for arb eligible players, since passed by Soto).
I'm not sure if Yoshida is arb eligible in 2029 or not, but Ohtani was a totally different case because he came over to the US at a younger age. He had the same 6 year team control situation that any other regular young player would have, just with a slightly higher signing bonus than most.
 

SirPsychoSquints

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 13, 2005
6,559
Pittsburgh, PA
I'm not sure if Yoshida is arb eligible in 2029 or not, but Ohtani was a totally different case because he came over to the US at a younger age. He had the same 6 year team control situation that any other regular young player would have, just with a slightly higher signing bonus than most.
Age has nothing to do with it, every player has the same rules.
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
He has no range so he's bad in the outfield but would he be better at 1B or 2B? Maybe he takes a lot of grounders this winter and is a passable backup for Casas and whoever we have at 2B this year.
The MI is log jammed with players who are younger, more athletic, and make less money than Yoshida. And while they play the position at varying degrees of skill I don't see a 31 year old Yoshida transitioning to 2nd base in order to keep his spot on the team. As for 1st base, the Sox just released a competent LH hitting first basemen because of redundancy. Yoshida would be nothing more than a break glass in case of emergency type fill-in which is fine, but not a reason to keep him. If he stays in Boston it's because they are fine with paying him to be a dedicated DH who may very occasionally play in LF.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
10,153
Age has nothing to do with it, every player has the same rules.
Yup, the rule from mlb is:
If a player with fewer than six years of service time signs with a club, he remains under the control of that club until reaching the requisite service time to reach free agency -- even if the contract he signed does not cover the remaining years until that point.

The Ohtani situation all about what sort of contract he could command: NPB players (and other "foreign professionals") under 25 are subject to international bonus pool restrictions, which is why he could only get a $2.3m signing bonus and a standard rookie contract as opposed to Yamamoto's $325m.

One thing I'm not clear on is whether his sixth year will be Arb 1 or Arb 3, but that also may not matter; there's a rule that salary can't be cut by more than 20% in arbitration, so he can get $14.4m no matter what (I guess unless a new CBA changes that before then).
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
23,066
Maine
Yup, the rule from mlb is:
If a player with fewer than six years of service time signs with a club, he remains under the control of that club until reaching the requisite service time to reach free agency -- even if the contract he signed does not cover the remaining years until that point.

The Ohtani situation all about what sort of contract he could command: NPB players (and other "foreign professionals") under 25 are subject to international bonus pool restrictions, which is why he could only get a $2.3m signing bonus and a standard rookie contract as opposed to Yamamoto's $325m.

One thing I'm not clear on is whether his sixth year will be Arb 1 or Arb 3, but that also may not matter; there's a rule that salary can't be cut by more than 20% in arbitration, so he can get $14.4m no matter what (I guess unless a new CBA changes that before then).
Functionally, I don't think there's any difference at all between Arb1 and Arb3. Arbitration is arbitration. The numbers just distinguish which year the player is in. Like you say, the key is the 20% cut limit. And presumably, as long as year 5 Yoshida isn't a disaster, he's not going to see a cut in salary for year 6. Maybe he doesn't get a raise, but cuts are fairly rare. I imagine players headed for a salary cut in arbitration are usually non-tendered before they get to that point.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
10,153
Oh, I'd always thought there were some sort of escalators in the formula to determine the arb number that increased year to year.
 

Harry Hooper

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
35,796
From MassLive:

Both Yoshida and Sox manager Alex Cora acknowledged after Sunday’s season finale that Yoshida has been dealing with nagging shoulder soreness all season. The plan is for him to have an MRI (likely Tuesday) as part of Boston’s end-of-season process and go from there. It appears some sort of surgery is on the table but the severity of the issue remains unclear.

“I’ll get a physical and try to come up with the best solution,” Yoshida said through translator Yutaro Yamaguchi.
...
He told Japanese reporters that his shoulder injury limited his ability to throw at a long distance. But Cora was adamant that the organization’s decision to make Yoshida the full-time DH was not related to his physical issues and was more about the team’s glut of outfielders (including a few who are better defenders than Yoshida.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
23,066
Maine
Perhaps I am mis-reading something or its just a poor translation, but are we supposed to believe that Yoshida's shoulder has been bothering him ALL season and he still has NOT had an MRI
What's so unbelievable about it? From the story, it seems it really only hindered his ability to throw and he was not being used in the outfield anyway. I wouldn't be surprised if Yoshida feared/knew what the MRI would show and that as long as he could still swing the bat effectively, he'd tolerate the pain/discomfort in order to keep playing. In fact, it sounds remarkably like what Devers did for the majority of the season. Ballplayers play through nagging things all the time.
 

Green Monster

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2000
2,293
CT
What's so unbelievable about it? From the story, it seems it really only hindered his ability to throw and he was not being used in the outfield anyway. I wouldn't be surprised if Yoshida feared/knew what the MRI would show and that as long as he could still swing the bat effectively, he'd tolerate the pain/discomfort in order to keep playing. In fact, it sounds remarkably like what Devers did for the majority of the season. Ballplayers play through nagging things all the time.
Okay, fair point. If Yoshida and similarly Devers kept things to themselves then that would make sense. If however, the team was aware of an ongoing issue for the entire season as Cora alludes to then I would expect them to investigate (MRI) to assure that "playing through" it wouldn't do more harm. In fact, Yoshida's comments to Japanese reporters suggests (possible poor translation) they do have knowledge and surgery is planned which would mean either Cora is out of the loop or he is not being truthful

he told Japanese reporters (including Carlos Yamazaki of Tokyo Sports Press) that he undergo right shoulder surgery shortly after the season.
 

Harry Hooper

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
35,796
"The plan is for him to have an MRI (likely Tuesday) as part of Boston’s end-of-season process"

For all we know, Yoshida has already had an MRI (or three) during the season, but now he's getting one as a wrapup with the season ended.
 

The Gray Eagle

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2001
17,851
Labrum surgery is no small thing.
https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2024/10/masataka-yoshida-undergoes-shoulder-surgery.html

The Red Sox described the procedure as “successful,” though it’s unclear what that means regarding Yoshida’s timeline to return. The usual recovery period for position players who undergo a labrum repair is somewhere between four to six months. Reds infielder Matt McLain had labral repair surgery this past March and initially hoped to return in August before suffering a setback. Meanwhile, Padres shortstop Ha-Seong Kim had a labrum repair of his own this offseason, and he is hoping to return sometime between mid-April and early May. Kim’s anticipated timeline is slightly longer than McLain’s, but it’s worth noting that Kim’s injury was in his throwing shoulder while McLain’s was not. Yoshida’s injury is also in his throwing shoulder, but as a designated hitter and a left-handed batter, perhaps his recovery timeline will be on the shorter end of the spectrum. If his timeline is similar to McLain’s original goal, he could be ready to return to game action sometime next March.
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
7,626
Is this making the idea of moving him even less likely, considering other possibly interested trading partners would know this?
 

NDame616

will bailey
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
2,646
Is this making the idea of moving him even less likely, considering other possibly interested trading partners would know this?
Moving him in the off season would be practically impossible. Other teams will want to see how he reacts to live pitching following the surgery
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
8,534
Luckily Yoshida's not totally underwater as a contract or a player. I'm not delighted to have him taking up a roster spot when we probably would have been better of extending JD Martinez, but we can carry him and his 115-ish wrc+ for another year, or at least until the trade deadline.

Pitching/bullpen is the main problem, not the offense.
 

jbupstate

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2022
720
New York, USA
Luckily Yoshida's not totally underwater as a contract or a player. I'm not delighted to have him taking up a roster spot when we probably would have been better of extending JD Martinez, but we can carry him and his 115-ish wrc+ for another year, or at least until the trade deadline.

Pitching/bullpen is the main problem, not the offense.
Extending JD for what amount?
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
12,892
Luckily Yoshida's not totally underwater as a contract or a player. I'm not delighted to have him taking up a roster spot when we probably would have been better of extending JD Martinez, but we can carry him and his 115-ish wrc+ for another year, or at least until the trade deadline.

Pitching/bullpen is the main problem, not the offense.
With this labrum surgery, that’s a pretty damn awful contract. Maybe not totally underwater but close to it
 

bnyc

New Member
Oct 7, 2024
46
I'm starting to see him as another Rusney Castillo and I can see him being DFA at some point next year. I mean what if someone actually claims him? Would the subtraction hurt our playoff chances? And if not claimed, he would be in Worcester and we would have some roster flexibility.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
22,866
Santa Monica
With this labrum surgery, that’s a pretty damn awful contract. Maybe not totally underwater but close to it
Yep. Damn awful. Just got harder to subsidize Masa and move for a prospect, but that should still be the next move. Along with Story or should we wait for Trevor's next surgery?

Red Sox free agency is the gift that keeps on giving.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
8,534
The preemptive postmortems on this board sometimes. He played through this injury apparently, right? And still produced a wrc+ of 115? Should be ready by opening day?

So maybe he needs an extended spring training, but it's not like he's a pitcher and his career is over.

Obviously the contract isn't great and we're underwater with it, but it's not a dead weight like the Javy Baez contract or something. He's unequivocally a positive contributor with the bat.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
23,066
Maine
I'm starting to see him as another Rusney Castillo and I can see him being DFA at some point next year. I mean what if someone actually claims him? Would the subtraction hurt our playoff chances? And if not claimed, he would be in Worcester and we would have some roster flexibility.
This is nuts. Rusney Castillo wasn't good enough to be a major leaguer. If he was, he would have actually had a major league career. Masa has put up two above average seasons as a major league hitter (111 OPS+). They're not going to DFA him. He's not going to be outrighted to the minor leagues. He won't be playing out his contract in Worcester.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
8,534
This is nuts. Rusney Castillo wasn't good enough to be a major leaguer. If he was, he would have actually had a major league career. Masa has put up two above average seasons as a major league hitter (111 OPS+). They're not going to DFA him. He's not going to be outrighted to the minor leagues. He won't be playing out his contract in Worcester.
They are both outfielders!
 

Max Power

thai good. you like shirt?
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
9,043
Boston, MA
Luckily Yoshida's not totally underwater as a contract or a player. I'm not delighted to have him taking up a roster spot when we probably would have been better of extending JD Martinez, but we can carry him and his 115-ish wrc+ for another year, or at least until the trade deadline.

Pitching/bullpen is the main problem, not the offense.
Both are problems. The team OPS+ was 104, slightly above average. You're not going to win a division with that kind of offense unless you have great pitching and defense. When you have none of those things, you have a .500 team.

I wrote this before in some other thread, but the Red Sox are going to have a tough time improving the team since nearly everyone on the roster is a decent player, but none are really great. Every possible upgrade will be seen as marginal with a chance of not being an upgrade at all, but you can't just run back the same bunch of decent players and expect better than decent results.
 

LogansDad

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
33,266
Alamogordo
There have been a lot of crazy and dumb things posted on this board over the years. Calling Masa Yoshida "another Rusney Castillo" probably doesn't crack the top 100, but it's also probably not very far off from that.

What are we even doing here?
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
8,534
Both are problems. The team OPS+ was 104, slightly above average. You're not going to win a division with that kind of offense unless you have great pitching and defense. When you have none of those things, you have a .500 team.

I wrote this before in some other thread, but the Red Sox are going to have a tough time improving the team since nearly everyone on the roster is a decent player, but none are really great. Every possible upgrade will be seen as marginal with a chance of not being an upgrade at all, but you can't just run back the same bunch of decent players and expect better than decent results.
I'm not sure I agree. We had a top ten guy in Duran, a 4 fWAR player in Devers, a 3 fWAR rookie in Abreu, and Tyler O'Neill gave us 2.5 fWAR in 113 games.

And then we had Dom Smith, the corpse of Garrett Cooper, and Dom Smith at first base most of the year. Casas should be a major improvement over that group. Story at SS should be a major improvement (a 3-4 win player) over Ceddanne if he can manage a OPS of around 100, which was what he did when he was healthy. The healthy Grissom we saw in September should be a major upgrade (2fWAR would be my projection, with upside) on the poopoo platter from last year. And Yoshida was out about a third of the year, too. The only person I see as majorly likely to regress offensively is Wong.

Now, we can trot out the same argument about how I'm assuming health, and that's fair. There's been a history with these Red Sox teams for the last seven years or so of being in the bottom third in terms of time lost to injuries. Hopefully there's no more freak injuries on diving balls or cartilage tears. If we reprise that, we'll be in trouble obviously. But I'm optimistic that we might actually get good health.

And the depth should be better: I think we haven't had a pair of guys as likely to have smooth transitions to the big leagues as Campbell and Anthony in a long time. Xander and Devers were great prospects, but they didn't really do the same sort of damage to major league pitching. Teel is nice insurance for regression for Wong, too.
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
Luckily Yoshida's not totally underwater as a contract or a player. I'm not delighted to have him taking up a roster spot when we probably would have been better of extending JD Martinez, but we can carry him and his 115-ish wrc+ for another year, or at least until the trade deadline.

Pitching/bullpen is the main problem, not the offense.
If we're going to go the hindsight route we also have to look back at his 2022 season when the majority of the membership here was pissed that Bloom didn't unload him at the trade deadline for anything that he he might get. And while he had a great bounce back in '23 with the Dodgers, I'm not sure I'd rather him of Yoshida this past season other than him hitting from the right side
 

Yo La Tengo

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 21, 2005
1,395
The preemptive postmortems on this board sometimes. He played through this injury apparently, right? And still produced a wrc+ of 115? Should be ready by opening day?

So maybe he needs an extended spring training, but it's not like he's a pitcher and his career is over.

Obviously the contract isn't great and we're underwater with it, but it's not a dead weight like the Javy Baez contract or something. He's unequivocally a positive contributor with the bat.
Agreed. Obviously, the Sox wish Yoshida was healthy and at peak performance, but they are extremely well positioned to absorb the cost and let him rehab, with the hope that he can put up numbers above and beyond this year's stats when healthy.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
8,534
Agreed. Obviously, the Sox wish Yoshida was healthy and at peak performance, but they are extremely well positioned to absorb the cost and let him rehab, with the hope that he can put up numbers above and beyond this year's stats when healthy.
Yeah. We saw comparable contracts handed out to guys like Soler, who got 3/42 from the Giants.

It's just not a terrible contract. I wish we'd spent the money more wisely, but the Giants moved Soler's contract no problem last year for a decent prospect in Sabin Ceballos. If Anthony and Campbell and Grissom are all ripping the cover off the ball next year and we're having trouble getting them all playing time, we'll be able to move Yoshida. I'm not worried about it.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
10,153
If we're going to go the hindsight route we also have to look back at his 2022 season when the majority of the membership here was pissed that Bloom didn't unload him at the trade deadline for anything that he he might get. And while he had a great bounce back in '23 with the Dodgers, I'm not sure I'd rather him of Yoshida this past season other than him hitting from the right side
His '23 year was also fueled by going back to his old hitting coach in LA, I don't think those results would have been guaranteed here.
 

Big Papi's Mango Salsa

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2022
1,888
Yeah. We saw comparable contracts handed out to guys like Soler, who got 3/42 from the Giants.

It's just not a terrible contract. I wish we'd spent the money more wisely, but the Giants moved Soler's contract no problem last year for a decent prospect in Sabin Ceballos. If Anthony and Campbell and Grissom are all ripping the cover off the ball next year and we're having trouble getting them all playing time, we'll be able to move Yoshida. I'm not worried about it.
Also, a bad contract, signed by a GM that has since been fired (and somehow did even less with what many of us would consider a "smart" organization than Bloom did in his time in Boston). Though for what it's worth (on AAV) Soler is signed for a year less and at $4m less than Yoshida, for better production (at least using career OPS+ and wRC scores). The Braves will pay 2/$32 in real money (but only 2/$28m/$14m in terms of AAV).

Yoshida's deal is really bad. Doesn't mean he will be (or should be) DFA'ed, to be clear, but it's a really bad contact.

FWIW, I think that if Boston did offer to send Yoshida somewhere and cover about $15m (thus making Yoshida about $13m in terms of AAV, and thus similar to Soler's cost) they could probably get someone a little less valuable than Ceballos since Yoshida is a little bit less valuable than Soler (in a vacuum). MLB.com has Atlanta with the 27th best system in baseball, so lets say in terms of players we know, Ceballos inside their top 20 is probably about on par with Conrad Cason (23rd on Sox Prospects). Based on the current roster, I'd much rather have another version of Cason and $14m in savings toward the AAV than Yoshida.

If that deal exists for Yoshida, I'd want the Sox to jump on it. I wouldn't even care if they got the prospect back.


All of this, of course, operates under the assumption that Duran, Rafaela, Abreu, Anthony, Story, Campbell and Grissom are all with the organization on Opening Day, 2025. If someone (most notably Abreu) is moved a spot opens up where a LHH DH only isn't a huge drag on the roster, the equation changes a little, though it would be far better if said DH could hit LHP, but it wouldn't be as bad, fit wise. This all has more to do with Yoshida being an incredibly bad fit on Boston's roster than on the player on his own accord, for the record.

Labrum issues aside, while I hate going back to Seattle all the time, I could see a scenario with a deal like Yoshida + $20m (covers roughly 35% of the contract) to the Mariners for someone like Cole Phillips or Dylan Wilson (19th and 26th in their system overall, 9th and 13th in terms of pitching prospects, but both are incredibly far away) making sense for both teams.
 
Last edited:

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
8,534
Also, a bad contract, signed by a GM that has since been fired (and somehow did even less with what many of us would consider a "smart" organization than Bloom did in his time in Boston). Though for what it's worth (on AAV) Soler is signed for a year less and at $4m less than Yoshida, for better production (at least using career OPS+ and wRC scores). The Braves will pay 2/$32 in real money (but only 2/$28m/$14m in terms of AAV).

Yoshida's deal is really bad. Doesn't mean he will be (or should be) DFA'ed, to be clear, but it's a really bad contact.

FWIW, I think that if Boston did offer to send Yoshida somewhere and cover about $15m (thus making Yoshida about $13m in terms of AAV, and thus similar to Soler's cost) they could probably get someone a little less valuable than Ceballos since Yoshida is a little bit less valuable than Soler (in a vacuum). MLB.com has Atlanta with the 27th best system in baseball, so lets say in terms of players we know, Ceballos inside their top 20 is probably about on par with Conrad Cason (23rd on Sox Prospects). Based on the current roster, I'd much rather have another version of Cason and $14m in savings toward the AAV than Yoshida.

If that deal exists for Yoshida, I'd want the Sox to jump on it. I wouldn't even care if they got the prospect back.


All of this, of course, operates under the assumption that Duran, Rafaela, Abreu, Anthony, Story, Campbell and Grissom are all with the organization on Opening Day, 2025. If someone (most notably Abreu) is moved a spot opens up where a LHH DH only isn't a huge drag on the roster, the equation changes a little, though it would be far better if said DH could hit LHP, but it wouldn't be as bad, fit wise. This all has more to do with Yoshida being an incredibly bad fit on Boston's roster than on the player on his own accord, for the record.

Labrum issues aside, while I hate going back to Seattle all the time, I could see a scenario with a deal like Yoshida + $20m (covers roughly 35% of the contract) to the Mariners for someone like Cole Phillips or Dylan Wilson (19th and 26th in their system overall, 9th and 13th in terms of pitching prospects, but both are incredibly far away) making sense for both teams.
If the Soler contract is so terrible, then why did Atlanta trade for it?

I think the Yoshida contract and Soler contracts are bad, to be clear, I just struggle to see them as a disaster or terrible. Teams make these sort of deals to round out a lineup even though they're not the best resource allocation. It's not the end of the world. And given the resource allocations the Sox have had the last few years, it sucks more than it should, but my larger point was just that we should be able to offload it if we need to, especially if Yoshida hits well this offseason.

And I don't see us trading him this offseason, sorry. Not unless we're bringing in someone else to replace him immediately or resigning Tyler O'Neill. I expect them to try to incorporate Anthony and Campbell next year almost immediately but I also don't think they're going to go in without depth.
 

Big Papi's Mango Salsa

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2022
1,888
If the Soler contract is so terrible, then why did Atlanta trade for it?

I think the Yoshida contract and Soler contracts are bad, to be clear, I just struggle to see them as a disaster or terrible. Teams make these sort of deals to round out a lineup even though they're not the best resource allocation. It's not the end of the world. And given the resource allocations the Sox have had the last few years, it sucks more than it should, but my larger point was just that we should be able to offload it if we need to, especially if Yoshida hits well this offseason.

And I don't see us trading him this offseason, sorry. Not unless we're bringing in someone else to replace him immediately or resigning Tyler O'Neill. I expect them to try to incorporate Anthony and Campbell next year almost immediately but I also don't think they're going to go in without depth.
1) Because it fit a very specific need for them (RH bat to in replace Duvall as he was something worse than a black hole of suck as the supposed RH bat).
2) Because 2/$28m/$14m for a slightly better player is a "less bad" contract than 3/$54/$18m for a slightly worse player, by a significant margin, and because Soler is decent against same handed pitching as opposed to basically unusable (Soler has a .770OPS in his career against RHP and .869 vs LHP - Yoshida is .669 against LHP and .810 against RHP)
3) Which is why I said that (labrum injury aside) if the Sox moved somewhere around $15m-$20m along with Yoshida they could probably get something a little worse than Ceballos (since Yoshida is a little worse than Soler).
4) However, I agree he won't be traded - he basically can't be because of the labrum injury. I don't think anyone would take him at even 50% of the cost because of that. So it's really a moot point. He's going to be in Boston.

It really isn't even so much the "DH only" that hurts Yoshida. It's that he's a DH only that is useless against LHPs. A team could get by with one of those factors. Both of them really hurts from a roster construction perspective. Even more so when he is the team's 3rd highest paid player.
 
Last edited:

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
8,534
1) Because it fit a very specific need for them (RH bat to in replace Duvall as he was something worse than a black hole of suck as the supposed RH bat).
2) Because 2/$28m/$14m for a slightly better player is a "less bad" contract than 3/$54/$18m for a slightly worse player, by a significant margin, and because Soler is decent against same handed pitching as opposed to basically unusable (Soler has a .770OPS in his career against RHP and .869 vs LHP - Yoshida is .669 against LHP and .810 against RHP)
3) Which is why I said that (labrum injury aside) if the Sox moved somewhere around $15m-$20m along with Yoshida they could probably get something a little worse than Ceballos (since Yoshida is a little worse than Soler).
4) However, I agree he won't be traded - he basically can't be because of the labrum injury. I don't think anyone would take him at even 50% of the cost because of that. So it's really a moot point. He's going to be in Boston.

It really isn't even so much the "DH only" that hurts Yoshida. It's that he's a DH only that is useless against LHPs. A team could get by with one of those factors. Both of them really hurts from a roster construction perspective. Even more so when he is the team's 3rd highest paid player.
Yeah, this is pretty persuasive. I don't think we're in as much disagreement as it might appear. You're probably right that it'll be harder to move him than I think, but we'll see!
 

Max Power

thai good. you like shirt?
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
9,043
Boston, MA
I'm not sure I agree. We had a top ten guy in Duran, a 4 fWAR player in Devers, a 3 fWAR rookie in Abreu, and Tyler O'Neill gave us 2.5 fWAR in 113 games.

And then we had Dom Smith, the corpse of Garrett Cooper, and Dom Smith at first base most of the year. Casas should be a major improvement over that group. Story at SS should be a major improvement (a 3-4 win player) over Ceddanne if he can manage a OPS of around 100, which was what he did when he was healthy. The healthy Grissom we saw in September should be a major upgrade (2fWAR would be my projection, with upside) on the poopoo platter from last year. And Yoshida was out about a third of the year, too. The only person I see as majorly likely to regress offensively is Wong.

Now, we can trot out the same argument about how I'm assuming health, and that's fair. There's been a history with these Red Sox teams for the last seven years or so of being in the bottom third in terms of time lost to injuries. Hopefully there's no more freak injuries on diving balls or cartilage tears. If we reprise that, we'll be in trouble obviously. But I'm optimistic that we might actually get good health.

And the depth should be better: I think we haven't had a pair of guys as likely to have smooth transitions to the big leagues as Campbell and Anthony in a long time. Xander and Devers were great prospects, but they didn't really do the same sort of damage to major league pitching. Teel is nice insurance for regression for Wong, too.
Sure, if everyone is healthy, the team will be better. But there's still some wishing and hoping going on. Cedanne wasn't hurt and looked incapable of letting a pitch go without swinging, Casas has never had a .900 OPS in a season at any level in his career. There are stretches where he looks like someone who should be a top 5 hitter in the league, but it hasn't happened yet. Devers always seems to have nagging injuries that kill his Septembers. Story hasn't hit for power since leaving Colorado. Duran could be the guy he was from April to August this year, or he could be the one from September and the rest of his career.

Looking up and down the lineup, I see a lot of guys who could be great, but none that you'd bet the ranch on. There is no Judge, Soto, Ohtani, Freeman, Alvarez, or Harper in the group.