Depends if we get politician Brady, no not in the literal sense but the guy who is very neutral and non-critical, or candid Brady like the guy that killed it on the HBO special that I forget the name of. I have a feeling we will get the former not the latter and he will be pretty lackluster.I love Tom Brady but this seems ballsy given we've never seen him as an analyst. My instinct is he will not be very good (based on his SNL appearances mostly).
He can’t be worse than BreesMeh. I fear just another recently retired player with too many friends in the game to be overly critical. Inevitably super saccharinic.
He does that weekly hit with Jim Gray on Westwood One that is sort of broad football, but it certainly was never very critical of anything.I love Tom Brady but this seems ballsy given we've never seen him as an analyst. My instinct is he will not be very good (based on his SNL appearances mostly).
Agreed, I kind of wanted him to go away and be a real estate tycoon or something. This feels... needy? It's too Manning for me.Man, I really thought once it was over for him...it was over. I know I am biased, but I see this being "beneath" him?
The difference is Romo and Manning have charisma and are funny and self deprecating.I'm pretty sure Tom Brady will be very good at pretty much anything he decides to do, especially when it comes to competitive environments. I think he probably sees the acclaim Romo is getting in the booth, and Manning gets for his various TV work, and wants to beat them in those arenas as well. And I wouldn't bet against him. But as far as I'm concerned, the bloom is really off the rose with this guy. Jordan ended up taking a lot of later-career shit for his competitiveness crashing over the lines of taste and appropriateness, and I see similar issues with Brady. The whole scheme to get himself and his preferred coach to Miami in exchange for an ownership stake. The biopic or documentary or whatever he was said to be commissioning. The announcement that at some unspecified date in the future he'll be joining the Fox booth as the network's lead analyst--which certainly elbows aside other potentially worthy candidates who may already be paying their dues. I'll be the first the celebrate Brady's greatness, but I have personally grown weary of his act.
I don't think he'd go that way. What gets people swooning about Romo is OMG! HE SEES THE PLAY DEVELOPING BEFORE IT HAPPENS! I think he'll work to out-do Romo in that regard. More Aikman in demeanor than Romo or Manning. And, again, when competition is involved, I wouldn't bet against Brady.The difference is Romo and Manning have charisma and are funny and self deprecating.
The most interesting thing about Tom Brady outside of football is that he drinks wheatgrass and doesn’t eat tomatoes.
Tom can’t hustle his way into comedic timing and wit.
I think when Romo first started, people were amazed he was calling out plays, but his contract got renewed because he’s funny and has great chemistry with Nantz.I don't think he'd go that way. What gets people swooning about Romo is OMG! HE SEES THE PLAY DEVELOPING BEFORE IT HAPPENS! I think he'll work to out-do Romo in that regard. More Aikman in demeanor than Romo or Manning. And, again, when competition is involved, I wouldn't bet against Brady.
How is competition involved here, I'm asking genuinely? NFL broadcasts even on different networks don't really compete with each other for viewers or rating points. And whether or not someone is good at it is pretty subjective, other than in extreme cases where people are objectively terrible at it. Take Romo who is probably the top color guy out there right now, tons of people hate him and think he's annoying and sucks at his job. I'm not sure how Brady's competitiveness helps him here except maybe a little in the margins.I don't think he'd go that way. What gets people swooning about Romo is OMG! HE SEES THE PLAY DEVELOPING BEFORE IT HAPPENS! I think he'll work to out-do Romo in that regard. More Aikman in demeanor than Romo or Manning. And, again, when competition is involved, I wouldn't bet against Brady.
I'd be surprised if FOX had him "audition". I suspect the FOX producers and talent execs think they can make him into something competent, which is all they're looking for. Again, this is largely about placating the NFL and wooing clients.Fox almost certainly had him audition or do some kind of trial with Burkhardt to get a sense of his ability and how they two pair together.
I think he'll be fine. His biggest problem will be that more than half the viewers likely hate his guts and won't give him the time of day.
His social media team is super corny too. Not even good at paying for it!Tom can’t hustle his way into comedic timing and wit.
I think a fair amount of Brady's success in the broadcast booth as a rookie color guy will be linked to the relationship/chemistry he has with his partner, (Kevin Burkhardt) and KB's ability to get TB12 engaged and not to be afraid of being overshadowed by a rookie.
I think those of us who aren't hyper-competitive ourselves may overlook the degree to which people who *are* wired that way see the world as one big competition. If Romo is lauded for his play-recognition acumen, that is exactly the kind of thing that would motivate someone like Brady to show the world that he's even better. To someone like Brady--a standout competitor in an industry where freakish competitiveness is the requirement--literally everything is a competition. I think @sodenj5 is on solid ground when he points out that Romo and Manning have more natural charm, which makes them more likeable and accessible than Brady may be. But it's my belief that this is a guy who will work his ass off to be good. That's because I find his competitiveness to be motivated largely by pride and vanity, and those can be very powerful motivators. Just reiterating that none of this means I personally am looking forward to Tom Brady in the booth, or anywhere else. As I mentioned, his act has worn thin for me.How is competition involved here, I'm asking genuinely? NFL broadcasts even on different networks don't really compete with each other for viewers or rating points. And whether or not someone is good at it is pretty subjective, other than in extreme cases where people are objectively terrible at it. Take Romo who is probably the top color guy out there right now, tons of people hate him and think he's annoying and sucks at his job. I'm not sure how Brady's competitiveness helps him here except maybe a little in the margins.
Yeah, audition wasn't the right word. He probably gets signed regardless. I would just be surprised if Fox didn't put him through some kind of test with Burkhardt to get A) a baseline of of his ability and B) make sure he's not a complete disaster.I'd be surprised if FOX had him "audition". I suspect the FOX producers and talent execs think they can make him into something competent, which is all they're looking for. Again, this is largely about placating the NFL and wooing clients.
It's likely schmoozing with the network's corporate clients is what makes the deal. Being good at the broadcasts will be almost a bonus.That's absolutely insane. At least guys like Draymond made guest appearances before getting hired. Spending nearly $400M blind, my goodness.
Someone on the radio this morning compared him to Joe Montana, and I see it. I just don't think Brady's locker room charisma translates to TV. It really never has, across the multitude of things he's done. Which is fine, he can be competent and that's all FOX wants, really.People doubt Tom Brady and he always proves them wrong. So Brady will be awesome at this, he's a great leader and obviously that means he's got oodles of charisma. Just because he's flat in interviews doesn't mean he doesn't have charisma. It means he doesn't want his words on a bulletin board.
That said, that dollar amount is absurd.
You gotta pay up if you want Tom in Detroit on Thanksgiving and skipping Giselle's chestnut stuffing and homemade pecan pie.
Yeah, he really seems not to want to spend a lot of time with the family in his retirement.So much for wanting a mostly quiet retirement with his family
Ownership seemed like a far more logical next step for Brady than broadcasting.I'm sure there is some clause in it that "if" he becomes part owner of a team both sides can back out without penalty due to conflict of interest.
In other words, he does it one year after he retires as a stop gap to finalize paperwork before he becomes a minority owner of the Phins