I don't know what is funnier, that you perceive that a hysterectomy would do anything to a woman's sexual activity, that an 82 year old woman doesn't have sexual needs, or that you can't spell hysterectomy.
If he cost his team the game with his sideline antics, then you're reinforcing my point. That side line stuff NEVER gets called, and Urban did the exact same thing with no call. The ref who called it said, "well they call it in basketball." Are you serious!?
He smashed and literally broke his headset, and he threw his playsheet onto the field. This wasn't a case of jawing hard, or getting a bit animated, this was extreme. Plus, he had doubtless been a douche the entire game.
Turns out two of the officials, the head ref and the back judge are Ohio residents and OSU fans. Don't know about the sideline "basketball" referee. Would have thought the Big 10 would be more circumspect about assigning officiating crews. Not saying the refs were dishonest, just homers, and there's no way a ref from Ohio could reverse the bad spot and end the game with a Michigan win... and not have to move out of state afterwards.
Have you seen the picture from the overhead camera which shows the ball over the 15 yard line, you know, THE LINE TO GAIN!!! You whinerines do nothing but cry, bitch and moan. Capron's is easily the best group in the conference.
He's a poster that has been run out of here multiple times, has had to change his name to pretend not to be a shitty poster/person and is now pretending to not know where you are from to score internet points.
No. I haven't seen that photo. I've seen several other photos though that clearly show Barrett was short.
Let it go brotato chip. The refs didn't lose the game for UM, it was the fact that your team couldn't do anything on offense in the 4th quater, had 3 really bad turnovers and allowed Curtis Samual to score untouched for the winning touchdown.
The case for PSU is simple: if they win next week, they'll be the champion of what has widely been regarded as the strongest conference in the country this season. (If they don't beat Wisconsin, then obviously they have no case.) 2-loss conference champion + H2H win >> 1-loss non-champion.
That's how sports rivalries work. It's Harvard/Yale, Army/Navy, Texas/Oklahoma, and Boston/New York, not Harvard/Oklahoma, Army/BYU, and New York/San Diego.
If Penn State makes it over Ohio State, then the playoff should just be the four best conference champions and Ohio State shouldn't bother scheduling games like at Oklahoma because they would clearly mean nothing. We're only in this position because Michigan lost to Iowa, or else Penn State would be in the Capital One Bowl where they belong. Forget even the lopsided OOC differential - Ohio State has a better conference resume despite the head-to-head loss. They beat a team that absolutely shellacked Penn State and played a much tougher slate from the West. You think Penn State wins at Camp Randall?
Dude, we get it. both teams were awful and would be crushed by anyone in the SEC. Blah blah blah......stop, you are becoming as silly as the UM goobs.
It was a different system. The Committee has specifically says it gives weight to conference championships and H2H results. I don't relish the thought of Penn State in the tournament, but based on what the Committee has said about its own process, it's a distinct possibility.
Yes, just as they did in 2011 when Alabama was - rightfully - put into the BCS championship.
I notice you didn't bother to bring up the 1yard TD that only happened because the refs didn't bother to whistle the play dead.
Oh. Well. As long as you put it that way. All of the whining that surrounded this sentence made that a bit unclear to be honest.
It was obvious it was a close call. Why don't you back away from the thread for a little bit? You're starting to make Ohio State fans look rational and sympathetic.
Pretty sure Ohio realizes that its flagship school is a glorified, open-enrollment degree factory that identifies primarily with its football team. Meanwhile, UM is capable of success in the B1G/nationally in academics and sport. Post Cooper, OSU has the football upper-hand, but when it comes to playing Michigan they still see themselves as some sort of gritty, upstart MAC team that will kick its mother out of the trailer in order win the boys another set of gold pants (which can conveniently flipped for tats or upgrades on their "loaner" cars). OSU fans make up clever songs about 'not giving a damn about the whole state of Michigan' or somesuch and actually institute the removal of "M" from signage. And try to drive a car with Michigan plates around Ohio without getting a "do you know how fast you were going" on 75 or the turnpike.
You seem to projecting your fan fervor onto me. I'm completely okay with the loss. That doesn't change the fact that Barrett didn't make it to the 16-yard line. To me, it's similar to Deflategate. The facts say one thing, officials and fanatics say another. That Patriots were fined, Brady suspended, and Ohio won the game doesn't mean that there was a ball-deflating conspiracy or that Ohio actually got that game-changing first down.
30-27, obviously. Just as obviously, the better team didn't win. Happens sometimes, especially when the inferior team is playing at home and the refs are homers.
The idea that the score of one game "definitionally" tells you which team is better is nuts. The "better team" loses to bad teams, even horrible teams, all the time in baseball. (You're familiar with the concept of "an upset," no?) The Pats have lost to the Bills and Seahawks this year. Are the Bills and Seahawks better teams? If the Pats had somehow lost to the Jets yesterday, perhaps due to a series of bad calls from the refs, would you be claiming that the Jets are better than the Patriots, by definition? Don't think so.
I thought I hated OSU. Now I hope they never lose another game.
Ah more whining but with a new flavor.
I'm not an Ohio State fan. Far from it. Hated them since they beat Miami in the BCS Championship Game awhile back. Also spent the last two years in AA cheering for Michigan, in fact. You're just projecting your insecurity and faulty logic on me not liking Michigan.
Yeah, sometimes the better team loses, and I get upsets, but this wasn't an upset. Ohio State was favored, and they won. Also, the Bills were probably a better team than the Pats with an injured Brissett, and it's entirely possible the Seahawks are a better team in general.
Sure, and if the officials had spotted the ball correctly in Ohio's last OT possession, Michigan would have won.
