Trading for Starting Pitching

ivanvamp

captain obvious
Jul 18, 2005
6,104
Mods, merge this if you think it should go in an existing thread.
 
Thinking about the next shoe to drop.  Gotta be signing Lester, but then a trade of their excess supply of OF and pitching prospects for hopefully a #2 caliber starter (or better).  Looking at the possibilities, I think we're talking about Cespedes + a pitching prospect (Webster, etc.) for that guy.  But what will that fetch?  I'm thinking three criteria:  (1) the SP needs to be a FA after 2015.  (2) He needs to be good and so will likely command a pretty hefty salary in 2016 as a free agent, and (3) he needs to be on a team that probably isn't a top contender for 2015 (on paper), or at least needs offense more than SP. 
 
So step 1:  who is a FA in 2016 that's any good?  http://www.spotrac.com/free-agents/mlb/2016/starting-pitcher/  gives us a good list.
 
Buehrle, Tor
Zimmerman, Was
Kazmir, LAA
Gallardo, Mil
Cueto, Cin
Iwakuma, Sea
Lackey, StL
Samardzija, Oak
Norris, Bal
Price, Det
Porcello, Det
Medlen, Atl
Leake, Cin
Latos, Cin
Fister, Was
 
Guys I'd cross off the list right off the top, for various reasons:  
 
- Cueto - probably not available
- Price - not sure Detroit would trade him to Boston
- Lackey - don't think StL would deal him to Boston after acquiring him; plus, he only makes $500k in 2015
- Buehrle - again, not sure Toronto would trade him to Boston
 
So that leaves:  Zimmerman, Kazmir, Gallardo, Iwakuma, Samardzija, Norris, Porcello, Medlen, Leake, Latos, and Fister.
 
That's a pretty decent group of starters, actually.  But let me narrow it down further.  Here are four guys I don't want: 
 
Norris
Porcello
Leake
Kazmir
 
I'm just not a fan of any of these guys and don't think any of them can be relied upon.  Some others of you might feel the same way about Latos.  I happen to think he's pretty solid.  So we're down to this list (with some quick and dirty basic numbers):
 
Zimmerman - 14-5, 2.66 era, 1.07 whip, 182 k
Gallardo - 8-11, 3.51 era, 1.29 whip, 146 k
Iwakuma - 15-9, 3.52 era, 1.05 whip, 154 k
Samardzija - 7-13, 2.99 era, 1.07 whip, 202 k
Medlen - 15-12, 3.11 era, 1.22 whip, 157 k
Latos - 5-5, 3.25 era, 1.15 whip, 74 k
Fister - 16-6, 2.41 era, 1.08 whip, 98 k
 
The skinny on each situation:
 
- Zimmerman/Fister.  Putting the two together since they're on the same team.  The Nationals have quality OF already in Harper, Span, and Werth.  So the Sox don't seem like a good fit in terms of what they have to offer.
 
- Gallardo.  The Brewers have Gomez, Braun, and Khris Davis, a somewhat promising young OF who hit 22 homers last year (low OBP of .299).  I don't see them looking at Cespedes as an upgrade in their OF.
 
- Iwakuma.  Seattle has a glaring need in the OF, and a deal like this could really work for them.  Cespedes gives them a big bat that they need in the lineup to support Seager.  Iwakuma seems expendable for them, as they have dynamite SP.
 
- Samardzija. Tough to deal Cespedes right back to Oakland, but the reality is that their offense dropped off a lot without Cespedes.  The problem here is that they already are losing Lester (almost certainly), and losing another top pitcher may be a real problem for them.  However, if you gave them Cespedes and Webster, who might thrive in the canyons and huge foul territory of Oakland, for Shark, that might be a good deal for both teams.  Still, I don't see it as likely given the first thing I said here.
 
- Latos.  I see this as a real possibility.  They could use a big bat and have four SP due to become FA after 2015.  Giving them a young, cost-controlled pitcher like Webster in addition to the bat they need might make a lot of sense.  
 
- Medlen.  Atlanta looks to be shedding OF, not adding them.  So Cespedes doesn't work for them.  I'd love Medlen though.  Quality pitcher, still just 29.  Don't see it happening.
 
Long story short, I think Iwakuma is the most likely guy for Boston to get in a trade.  Which would be just fine.  He's a good pitcher.  Career era+ of 120.  Solid in every way.  Latos or Leake would be next in line, IMO. Of course, I'd love for them to throw in a bit more (depending on what that bit is) to get Cueto.  Cespedes + Webster + two more good (not elite) prospects (Ranaudo/Marrero?) for Cueto. Still might not be enough.  But worth a push.
 

TomRicardo

rusty cohlebone
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 6, 2006
20,683
Row 14
Medlen might be non-tendered.  Don't think you need to trade Cespedes to get him.  He is already on his second tommy john (can't have a third...)
 

MakMan44

stole corsi's dream
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2009
19,363
I've seen it suggested that the A's are more likely to deal Kazmir than Shark. I also don't see Medlen as a real target, he's still recovering from his second TJS.
 

opes

Doctor Tongue
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Fister would be great, but yes we'd have to package something other than OF depth.  JBJ could be a possibly in a multi player deal.  Werth is getting up there, and JBJ would be great OF depth for them.  But I honestly couldnt guess the other pieces that could get it done.
 

MakMan44

stole corsi's dream
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2009
19,363
I think Niese has a decent contract as well. I like him of the 3 but don't know if they'll want to deal him.
 

ivanvamp

captain obvious
Jul 18, 2005
6,104
I didn't realize Medlen had another TJ, my bad.  Also, we could surely expand this list to other pitchers who aren't slated to be free agents after 2015.  I just thought it made sense to start there, since Cespedes, with one year left on his deal, is likely to be the guy heading out of Boston.  But yeah, there could be other trade targets too.  Who knows?
 

ivanvamp

captain obvious
Jul 18, 2005
6,104
opes said:
But isnt the obvious answer the Phils?  Their outfield could definitely use an upgrade at any position. Hamels for Cespedes/Craig/prospect.
 
If that's all it took to get Hamels, I'd say yes in a moment.  Depending on the prospect.  But no way Amaro would do this deal without Bogaerts, Betts, Owens, or Swihart involved.  I might do Cespedes/Craig/Owens for Hamels though.
 

MakMan44

stole corsi's dream
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2009
19,363
opes said:
But isnt the obvious answer the Phils?  Their outfield could definitely use an upgrade at any position. Hamels for Cespedes/Craig/prospect.
Zero chance Amaro agrees to that. 
 

TigerBlood

Banned
Mar 10, 2011
330
opes said:
But isnt the obvious answer the Phils?  Their outfield could definitely use an upgrade at any position. Hamels for Cespedes/Craig/prospect.
 
That's a fairly odd package. A rental outfielder, a reclamation project, and a prospect (not even sure if you mean Betts/Swihart level or Barnes/Webster level). I'm pretty sure Phila wants big prospect/big prospect/big prospect. I'd give them Owens/JBJ/Margot.
 

MakMan44

stole corsi's dream
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2009
19,363
opes said:
 
Its going to be hard to guess exactly what he thinks is a good price honestly.  This is Ruben Amaro we are talking about.
Totally. I think any deal starts with pre arb talent though. 
 

ElcaballitoMVP

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 19, 2008
3,937
I'd add Cashner and Tyson Ross to the list of trade candidates. If the Padres are interested in one season of Cespedes and his power, plus a handful of prospects to restock their system in the 6-20 range, I think there could be a match. I'd also look to expand the deal to include Rene Rivera to fill the backup C spot. 
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,761
MakMan44 said:
Amaro. Again, guys on 1 year deals have no value to the Phillies. 
To be fair most of the guys on the roster have negative value to the Phillies, but he refuses to dump them for a reasonable return, so who knows how Ruben thinks.
 

67WasBest

Concierge
SoSH Member
Mar 17, 2004
2,442
Music City USA
MakMan44 said:
Amaro. Again, guys on 1 year deals have no value to the Phillies. 
They would have value in the deal only if it was a pure salary dump by the Sox, and with a prospect added to offset the salary dump.
 
The Sox have no need to "dump" Cespedes and therefore he should not be mentioned in deals to any rebuilding teams.
 

grimshaw

Member
SoSH Member
May 16, 2007
4,231
Portland
Phil Hughes was pretty freaking great last year and is stupidly cheap (8mill through 2016).
Even with the best farm system in baseball I don't see them ready by then.
 

Wingack

Yankee Mod
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
34,569
In The Quivering Forest
If the Red Sox want Zimmerman or Fister really, then they better come correct and that doesn't mean a package that is headed up by JBJ. 
 
San Diego seems like a good trading partner since the Red Sox have been trading for their better players for years now and Ross is really underrated.
 

TigerBlood

Banned
Mar 10, 2011
330
I honestly think what its going to take for Hamels to come to Boston is some sort of 3 or 4 team deal. Our available pieces like Cespedes, Victorino, Craig, maybe Napoli, etc. don't have much value to a team in the first phases of rebuilding like Philly. And Hamels does not bring the right type of value back that would entice Boston to trade the big four (Bog/Betts/Swihart/Owens). Boston needs to find a way to send a couple Cespedes/Craig pieces somewhere, and a couple JBJ/Ranaudo/Shaw/Coyle types to Philly, get the third/fourth teams to ante up  and send couple of their top 5-10 to Philly. Philly ships Hamels to Boston. Maybe some lottery tickets change hands as well, who the hell knows how those random nobodies get included in these deals. Voila. Hopefully Philly eats a few million/year on Hamel's contract too.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,340
Santa Monica
Wingack said:
If the Red Sox want Zimmerman or Fister really, then they better come correct and that doesn't mean a package that is headed up by JBJ. 
well that package isn't containing Betts, Xander, Swihart or Owens either...  1 year of Zimmerman at $16.5MM is nice but it doesn't get our A list studs
 

67WasBest

Concierge
SoSH Member
Mar 17, 2004
2,442
Music City USA
Taking out betts, Swihart and Bogaerts from the Zimmerman discussion means there is only one guy the Sox could trade to obtain him and that's Vazquez.  I don't think they do that deal however, even with Swihart a possible mid season arrival.  Catcher is the only roster spot where the Sox could provide an upgrade for them with likely trading pieces.
 

plucy

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 2, 2006
427
a rock and a hard place
SD is a good match. Preller is desperate to upgrade the offense; he's in on Pablo and Tomas.
However, if Cespedes is our main piece, then Kennedy is probably the match. Ross and Cashner have two years of control left, Kennedy one @ ~$10M. Kennedy would have value as an innings eater; he's been close to 200 for five years.
Ross would be great but SD probably asks for Owens or Rodriguez vs. Webster/Ranaudo for Kennedy.
 

Wingack

Yankee Mod
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
34,569
In The Quivering Forest
benhogan said:
well that package isn't containing Betts, Xander, Swihart or Owens either...  1 year of Zimmerman at $16.5MM is nice but it doesn't get our A list studs
 
Zimmerman was the ace of a team that is going to be a World Series contender this year. They won't, and shouldn't, trade him for anything less than top tier young talent. The Cubs are probably a better match for the Nats then Boston is. 
 

SoxFanForsyth

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 19, 2010
258
plucy said:
SD is a good match. Preller is desperate to upgrade the offense; he's in on Pablo and Tomas.
However, if Cespedes is our main piece, then Kennedy is probably the match. Ross and Cashner have two years of control left, Kennedy one @ ~$10M. Kennedy would have value as an innings eater; he's been close to 200 for five years.
Ross would be great but SD probably asks for Owens or Rodriguez vs. Webster/Ranaudo for Kennedy.
Cots has Cashner as a FA after the 2015 season
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,340
Santa Monica
Wingack said:
 
Zimmerman was the ace of a team that is going to be a World Series contender this year. They won't, and shouldn't, trade him for anything less than top tier young talent. The Cubs are probably a better match for the Nats then Boston is. 
Doesn't dealing Zimmerman hurt their World Series ambitions in 2015?  Why would they deal him?
 
Fister may be a better target for the Sox, cost wise and looking at it from the Nats perspective.
 

MakMan44

stole corsi's dream
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2009
19,363
They want to resign Fister though, and seem to feel that Zimmerman is hitting FA no matter what. 
 

Wingack

Yankee Mod
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
34,569
In The Quivering Forest
benhogan said:
Doesn't dealing Zimmerman hurt their World Series ambitions in 2015?  Why would they deal him?
 
Fister may be a better target for the Sox, cost wise and looking at it from the Nats perspective.
 
It certainly does, but there are still rumors floating around about Zimmerman being traded (apparently he wants to go back to the midwest, so the Cubs are an obvious match.)
 

sean1562

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 17, 2011
3,658
Wingack said:
 
Zimmerman was the ace of a team that is going to be a World Series contender this year. They won't, and shouldn't, trade him for anything less than top tier young talent. The Cubs are probably a better match for the Nats then Boston is. 
 
yea all this "we are going to trade fister or zimmermann" stuff is much more focused on trying to get some team to massively overpay with some really elite prospects. the nationals really dont need to trade either of them and the only immediate hole they have is 2B. they have some decent OF prospects and werth was great last year. He had an OPS+ of 134 and 153 the year before. he will be hard to bench in coming years making $21 mil a year, especially with ryan zimmerman at 1B. With the OF prospects i dont really see them jumping at JBJ. Deven marrero probably isnt good enough as it makes the team worse. we dont match up well with them at all, we would need some third team 
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,498
I think, after the Sandoval and Ramirez signing, that this is the most fascinating part of the offseason.
There are so many different ways the Sox could go with this and they have so many possible trade chips.
I am always interested in seeing if my thought up trade proposals or fair, or more in the realm of Marrero+ spare parts for Sale but...
Who says no to Cespedes, Ranaudo, Coyle, and Cecchini for Cueto? Seems like a good deal for both teams
 

CaskNFappin

rembrat's protegé
May 20, 2013
254
Woonsocket, RI
tbb345 said:
I think, after the Sandoval and Ramirez signing, that this is the most fascinating part of the offseason.
There are so many different ways the Sox could go with this and they have so many possible trade chips.
I am always interested in seeing if my thought up trade proposals or fair, or more in the realm of Marrero+ spare parts for Sale but...
Who says no to Cespedes, Ranaudo, Coyle, and Cecchini for Cueto? Seems like a good deal for both teams
It seems decent to us because we romanticize the potential of all the prospects involved. Cueto is one of the top pitchers in baseball; as the Reds GM, could you explain that package to your fanbase without getting crucified?
 

LondonSox

Robert the Deuce
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
8,956
North Bay California
All this talk about Amaro is guess work.
 
Last year he was totally delusional and thought the Phillies were on the verge of another world series run. That was crazy pants then but he could still be crazy like that. In which case win now players might be a nice component for them.
Or the reason Amaro has demanded such prospect hauls is that he value prospects lower than some (most) others. In which case he might value veterans higher etc.
 
We just don't know. Saying there's no chance he'll take this or he should take that is finger flapping nonsense.
 

grimshaw

Member
SoSH Member
May 16, 2007
4,231
Portland
I'm starting to think Fister makes the most sense if the Nats move Werth.  Werth is signed through 2017 and is 35 (but still productive now).
Cespedes is a good one year stop gap for them to Michael Taylor and Souza.
My guess is, out of their crew of impending free agents they want to lock up Desmond the most, and possibly also lock up Rendon to a lengthy team friendly deal to buy out arbitration years.
 
Whichever of the two starters they keep between Zimmerman and Fister they would also be in position to lock up.  I think Zimmerman is the tougher one and teams may know he wants to play in the Midwest and really is just a rental.  Good luck to them with Boras and Strasburg too.
 

BeantownIdaho

New Member
Dec 5, 2005
481
Nampa, Idaho
It seems as though with Betts and Castillo that JBJ may be the odd man out - in order to sell high he will have to re-establish his value. Once untouchable, I think he may be the trade chip down the road to acquire a need at the deadline. Of course anything could happen.
 

moretsyndrome

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 24, 2006
2,219
Pawtucket
Either Zimmerman or Fister would be very appealing.  It would take serious balls, but you have to look at what a wonderful fit Pedroia would be in Washington. Start by looking at saving almost $12M by turning 2B over to Betts and unclogging the Sox OF a little.  Then think about what a black hole 2B is for Washington.
 

sean1562

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 17, 2011
3,658
grimshaw said:
I'm starting to think Fister makes the most sense if the Nats move Werth.  Werth is signed through 2017 and is 35 (but still productive now).
Cespedes is a good one year stop gap for them to Michael Taylor and Souza.
My guess is, out of their crew of impending free agents they want to lock up Desmond the most, and possibly also lock up Rendon to a lengthy team friendly deal to buy out arbitration years.
 
Whichever of the two starters they keep between Zimmerman and Fister they would also be in position to lock up.  I think Zimmerman is the tougher one and teams may know he wants to play in the Midwest and really is just a rental.  Good luck to them with Boras and Strasburg too.
 
this makes no sense for the nationals. Jayson Werth's last few years are very comparable to David Ortiz's. He has been really good. Cespedes is nowhere near the hitter that Jayson Werth has recently been. Werth is signed through 2017 but could still be a solid player through that time, if a little overpaid. Trading Werth so they can make room to trade a good pitcher for a year of Cespedes makes no sense. The Nationals will have no interest in Cespedes. Any scenario involving him going to Washington is not a realistic one
 
edit: my ortiz werth comparison isnt really a solid one, ortiz has been better, but there are examples of players who have continued to be solid hitters through their 30s. werth is a great hitter and, while occasionally injured, hasnt really declined.