Good catch. You would think that hit movies from the 80's would be in his wheelhouse but nope. Can't even do that right.
Me too. But now I have to read what a-x was before he got to Irene Cara.I completely forgot that Peter King still writes a weekly column. He's completely fallen off the face of the Earth for me.
In typical lazy fashion, some topics will stretch over 2-3 lettersMe too. But now I have to read what a-x was before he got to Irene Cara.
That is very weird.He used the word weird eight times in the column. Weird.
That's a really awkward sentence for a professional writer. "Amazing how important, in so many ways, lithium is." Or "Amazing how important lithium is in so many ways." How hard was that?I have to say, he does make you think sometimes, though:
n. Amazing how important, in so many ways, that lithium is. What is it? How is it found?
It is very awkwardly written, but it's the questions "what is it" and "how is it found" that make me roll my eyes.That's a really awkward sentence for a professional writer. "Amazing how important, in so many ways, lithium is." Or "Amazing how important lithium is in so many ways." How hard was that?
Also his reliance on "weird," seemingly unabated over the past 15 years (Jesus it's been that long we've been doing this?) is really something. It's such a useless word and reminds me of my 10-year old using "Okay" as a default descriptor, which I recently told him to stop doing. If only someone gave King some helpful criticism once in awhile.
Magnets. How do they work?It is very awkwardly written, but it's the questions "what is it" and "how is it found" that make me roll my eyes.