Why Do I Continue to Read Peter King?

PBDWake

Member
SoSH Member
May 1, 2008
3,686
Peabody, MA
GeorgeCostanza said:
Crimes, criminal acts, criminal behaviors. He mentions those terms many times as if getting popped for a DUI or possession of blow is the same as serial rape. Some crimes are because of stupid decisions, some crimes are just evil. Try not to vote in the evil people yeah? Seems reasonable.

I'm just going to assume at this point that King is a huge Cosby fan.
BUT THE SANCTITY OF THE HALL DEMANDS NEUTRALITY IN NON-FOOTBALL MATTERS
 
At some point being a monster off the field negates the privilege of being honored for your contributions on it. Of course, Peter King is likely the kind of person who would vote Mussolini into the Global Railways Hall of Fame for his contributions to punctuality in Europe, so fuck him.
 

mascho

Kane is Able
SoSH Member
Nov 30, 2007
14,952
Silver Spring, Maryland
PBDWake said:
BUT THE SANCTITY OF THE HALL DEMANDS NEUTRALITY IN NON-FOOTBALL MATTERS
 
At some point being a monster off the field negates the privilege of being honored for your contributions on it. Of course, Peter King is likely the kind of person who would vote Mussolini into the Global Railways Hall of Fame for his contributions to punctuality in Europe, so fuck him.
Tremendous
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,503
PBDWake said:
BUT THE SANCTITY OF THE HALL DEMANDS NEUTRALITY IN NON-FOOTBALL MATTERS
 
At some point being a monster off the field negates the privilege of being honored for your contributions on it. Of course, Peter King is likely the kind of person who would vote Mussolini into the Global Railways Hall of Fame for his contributions to punctuality in Europe, so fuck him.
 
Hopefully that's the only time I will ever laugh at a Mussolini reference.  
 

GeorgeCostanza

tiger king
SoSH Member
May 16, 2009
7,286
Go f*ck yourself
snowmanny said:
Do you guys think OJ should be removed from the HOF?
I was just thinking that. And I'm going to have to say toss him out. He wasn't convicted of murder, but was found liable in the wrongful death suit, everyone knows he did it. He's in jail anyway for another violent crime. Fuck him.
 

PBDWake

Member
SoSH Member
May 1, 2008
3,686
Peabody, MA
snowmanny said:
Do you guys think OJ should be removed from the HOF?
OJ was tougher for me, because he wasn't convicted. I believe he did it, but without a conviction I'd have a hard time of it, but would certainly be open to any discussion on it. A conviction and I absolutely would be in favor of it. There's a certain point of self importance that the people involved with the Hall have that I just don't understand, where they think that the glorifying of a proven monster off the field is fine because they "separate it", like they're above it, or think that the field and non-football are basically church and state.
 
What Peter King and those like him don't understand that the two are inexorably tied. Darren Sharper may not have raped anyone on the field (that we know of), but he certainly exploited the benefits provided to him by the NFL to aid in his continued raping. Aside from the money, the travel, and the access, he was Darren Sharper, Pro Bowl NFL DB. That's the sort of person hangers on cover for, and victims are terrified to come forward against. King *should* be livid that someone exploited the Shield to aide in criminal activity, however indirectly. Instead he cowers away and digs his head in the sand while ignoring that Darren Sharper, used car salesman, is almost certainly incapable of travelling the country as a serial rapist for so long without a manhunt.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,503
snowmanny said:
Do you guys think OJ should be removed from the HOF?
 
I don't think those who were voted in should be removed. But I'm having a hard time articulating why.
 
I think "who would decide?" complicates things, but it isn't what you were asking.
 

Leather

given himself a skunk spot
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
28,451
For christ's sake, even most states' lawyers boards have to make determinations on what constitutes a "crime of moral turpitude" for purposes of denying admission the Bar, or for meting out discipline.
 
King acts as if never, in the history of man, has the issue of judging the relative seriousness of bad acts come up before.
 

Kenny F'ing Powers

posts way less than 18% useful shit
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2010
14,472
pappymojo said:
It's a shitty sentence regardless.  Does anyone anywhere think that Marshawn Lynch will not be playing football next year?  That he has to qualify his opinion with the word 'probably' is only more braind dead.
 
He'll probably play, but there certainly is a possibility he retires. If the cartilage in my spinal cord was compressed, I'd be considering it as well.
 

Bunt4aTriple

Member (member)
Silver Supporter
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
4,382
North Yarmouth, ME
This contributes nothing, but my father loves PK, so I forwarded this video to him saying, "I'd probably leave [my wife] for her."  He responded, "I'd probably leave your mother for her mother."
 

GeorgeCostanza

tiger king
SoSH Member
May 16, 2009
7,286
Go f*ck yourself
Peter King tricks little kids into thinking they got the right foul ball, ridicules people with service dogs if they don't look disabled enough to him, and supports the hall of fame candidacy of serial rapists. Idiot, is being very kind.
 

Corsi

isn't shy about blowing his wad early
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 3, 2010
12,955
Boston, MA
1. I think Roger Goodell would be a more popular commissioner—and God knows he needs to work on that this offseason—if he told the league’s compensation committee: “Just pay me $10 million next year.”
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,503
Buster Olney the Lonely said:
That's crazy! Goodell can't survive on Campbell's Soup and Ramen noodles!
 
if Goodell was a smart man, which he isn't, he would say something to the effect of, "I had a really bad year, you should pay me one dollar," knowing full well that the commitee would never do that. 
 

lostjumper

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 27, 2009
1,279
Concord, NH
Corsi said:
1. I think Roger Goodell would be a more popular commissionerand God knows he needs to work on that this offseasonif he told the leagues compensation committee: Just pay me $10 million next year.
So general incompetence at $40 million per year is unacceptable, but at $10 million its fine. PK is trying so hard to defend him here. See, its not Rogers fault, its his salary!
 

Reverend

for king and country
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2007
64,387
I've been calling Peter King a wanna-be Tory for years, but I never imagined a full blown "Let them eat cake," moment.
 
The spirit of this is pretty much just that in terms of a total lack of perspective on the value of things.
 

John Marzano Olympic Hero

has fancy plans, and pants to match
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2001
24,622
He really thinks people don't like Goodell because of his salary? That's just the cherry on the turd sundae.

The NFL commissioner is, hollow, thoughtless, wishy-washy, reactionary, arbitrary, a bit of a bully and doesn't seem to have a long-term plan on solving the league's ills.

But it's the money. That's the reason. Go eat some chili.
 

Reverend

for king and country
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2007
64,387
John Marzano Olympic Hero said:
He really thinks people don't like Goodell because of his salary? That's just the cherry on the turd sundae.

The NFL commissioner is, hollow, thoughtless, wishy-washy, reactionary, arbitrary, a bit of a bully and doesn't seem to have a long-term plan on solving the league's ills.

But it's the money. That's the reason. Go eat some chili.
 
No.
 
He thinks people don't like Goodell because of the last $34 million of his salary. The first $10 million is, apparently, totally cool.
 

John Marzano Olympic Hero

has fancy plans, and pants to match
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2001
24,622
Good point.

I can't honest am shocked he wrote that. We talk about Simmons not knowing his audience but King is completely clueless.
 

mwonow

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 4, 2005
7,120
joe dokes said:
 
I don't think those who were voted in should be removed. But I'm having a hard time articulating why.
 
I think "who would decide?" complicates things, but it isn't what you were asking.
The only thing like this I can remember is Alan Eagleson getting bounced out of the Hockey HOF (he resigned, but in a Nixon-like quit before you're ousted kind of way). In that case, guys who very clearly mattered (first Brad Park, and then Bobby Orr, Gordie Howe, Jean Beliveau and Bobby Hull, plus others) said they wanted out if Eagleson stayed. That's not a bad precedent imo - and I think if Joe Montana and Deion said "No OJ or take my plaque down" the football HOF would probably be forced into action. Absent that kind of push, though, I doubt there's any way to remove a HOFer - and I sure wouldn't want Peter King to kill more millions of electrons discussing how the panel of 46 was now having closed-door debates on evictions, too
 

Reverend

for king and country
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2007
64,387
Just implement an indictment process and have the committee vote on indictments that clear the process.
 
Like with appeals in the judicial system, just in reverse.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,419
Oregon
There is no Rev said:
He thinks people don't like Goodell because of the last $34 million of his salary. The first $10 million is, apparently, totally cool.
 
Peter giving himself a buffer zone of how much money it is okay for himself to make
 

Average Reds

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 24, 2007
35,405
Southwestern CT
Papelbon's Poutine said:
I think it's just his simple mind thinking "I'd bet the owners would be happy to save $1M each" and poorly expressing it in words, per usual.
 
Even if you are right it is (massive understatement alert) a profoundly tone deaf suggestion. 
 
Goodell does not have a PR problem.  He has an incompetence problem.  That Peter King thinks the answer is to suggest that Goodell propose a salary cut to a mere $10 million per year is pretty fucking hilarious.
 

Leather

given himself a skunk spot
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
28,451
If only Richard Nixon had offered to cut his salary after Watergate, everything would have been ok!  
 

mpx42

New Member
Apr 23, 2010
2,684
Seattle, WA
c. Coffeenerdness: Too many Starbucks are careless with the milk in the Flat White, I’m finding. It’s whole milk, not 2 percent. Only a true coffeenerd would understand the difference.    
 
I feel like he has to be trolling at this point.
 

Corsi

isn't shy about blowing his wad early
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 3, 2010
12,955
Boston, MA
If you can't taste the difference between whole milk and 2%, you're a fucking idiot.
 

SydneySox

A dash of cool to add the heat
SoSH Member
Sep 19, 2005
15,605
The Eastern Suburbs
If you drink anything at Starbucks and call yourself a true coffee nerd you're an asshole.
 
I mean, if you drink anything at Starbucks you're an asshole anyway, but especially if you then lecture people on how much you like coffee.
 

Corsi

isn't shy about blowing his wad early
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 3, 2010
12,955
Boston, MA
He fucking discovered the 'flat white' LAST WEEK!
 
k. Coffeenerdness: The Tweeter who told me the tall Flat White is best—because more espresso is concentrated in smaller drink (two shots to a tall, three to a grande)—was absolutely right. So I have adjusted: Now I’ll go four shots in a grande. And you just couldn’t live without that news!
 
 
So he goes from discovering the drink one week and lecturing Starbucks/his readers on it the next.  Is there anything about which this guy isn't an overnight know-it-all?
 

SydneySox

A dash of cool to add the heat
SoSH Member
Sep 19, 2005
15,605
The Eastern Suburbs
Flat whites are way fucking better than 99% of the shit in America you guys call coffee.
 
Peter King is right on that one.
 
Hence the irony that he's buying them from Starbucks and calling them out on making them.
 

Leather

given himself a skunk spot
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
28,451
Corsi said:
He fucking discovered the 'flat white' LAST WEEK!
 
 
So he goes from discovering the drink one week and lecturing Starbucks/his readers on it the next.  Is there anything about which this guy isn't an overnight know-it-all?
 
You know how he discovered the flat white*?
 
Because Starbucks is in the middle of a new campaign to hype it.  
 
He literally walked into a Starbucks, saw a poster for a "new" drink*, tried it, and then criticized the barrista for making it wrong, citing his status as a "coffee nerd" as authority.
 
*Whether he discovered it himself or had it pointed  out to him is immaterial.
 

Reverend

for king and country
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2007
64,387
SydneySox said:
If you drink anything at Starbucks and call yourself a true coffee nerd you're an asshole.
 
I mean, if you drink anything at Starbucks you're an asshole anyway, but especially if you then lecture people on how much you like coffee.
 
I'm more fixated on how, yet again, he is calling out low wage entry level service employees for not taking pride in their work.