Yep. But if US doesnt win later, Iran can advance with draw versus US which slightly complicates it.Wow x2. So take it to England today and then hope to just beat Iran Tuesday and we get through?
Yep. But if US doesnt win later, Iran can advance with draw versus US which slightly complicates it.Wow x2. So take it to England today and then hope to just beat Iran Tuesday and we get through?
Wow x2. So take it to England today and then hope to just beat Iran Tuesday and we get through?
If US loses by less than 4 goals today, they will control their destiny and go through with a win versus Iran.Well now its all pretty clear for the US, they need to win one of the next two games and not lose to Iran.
Weird that head to head isn’t first tiebreakerIf US loses by less than 4 goals today, they will control their destiny and go through with a win versus Iran.
That might be the strangest sentence I’ve ever written.
Exactly how I would look at it.I think an Iran win is actually preferable to a draw.
Sure the US could draw all 3 games and go through but so could have Wales.
Now the US can lose to England and still have a good chance of going through.
frankly if we can’t be Iran we don’t deserve the knockout stage anyway.
It basically makes today irrelevant and Tuesday a knockout match against a team that can bunker and counter. Going to interesting if Gregg rests a bunch on yellows.I think an Iran win is actually preferable to a draw.
Sure the US could draw all 3 games and go through but so could have Wales.
Now the US can lose to England and still have a good chance of going through.
frankly if we can’t be Iran we don’t deserve the knockout stage anyway.
Dest and McKennie yellows scare me. Is #7 on Iran good, seeing as he is now out vs the US?It basically makes today irrelevant and Tuesday a knockout match against a team that can bunker and counter. Going to interesting if Gregg rests a bunch on yellows.
Huge worry about Tim Ream being able to survive for me. Not as worried about Dest or McKennie who arguably shouldn’t be starting based on form/fitness.It basically makes today irrelevant and Tuesday a knockout match against a team that can bunker and counter. Going to interesting if Gregg rests a bunch on yellows.
Point taken but we may not need a defense against a bunkering Iran.Huge worry about Tim Ream being able to survive for me. Not as worried about Dest or McKennie who arguably shouldn’t be starting based on form/fitness.
Point taken but oh god is that Aaron Long’s music I hear?Point taken but we may not need a defense against a bunkering Iran.
This only changes with US win today.On one hand, if we get no points from England… d
Right, was not mathing correctly there.This only changes with US win today.
Where is the 4 goals coming from?If US loses by less than 4 goals today, they will control their destiny and go through with a win versus Iran.
That might be the strangest sentence I’ve ever written.
I believe if the teams are level on pts, GD, GS, and h2h, they then look at the results in a table absent the 4th place team, where it becomes:A few things because I am a fatalist. If we lose say 2-0 to England today then beat Iran 1-0 and Wales beats England 1-0, then you have
England 6 points
Wales 4 points (-1 goal differential)
US 4 points (-1 goal differential)
How does that shake out?
In that case, the next tiebreaker is goals scored. So a 2-1 win is better than 1-0.A few things because I am a fatalist. If we lose say 2-0 to England today then beat Iran 1-0 and Wales beats England 1-0, then you have
England 6 points
Wales 4 points (-1 goal differential)
US 4 points (-1 goal differential)
How does that shake out?
This makes Wales direct red very costly today though the US had two more yellows in their head to head game.If any teams still have an identical record after the head-to-head stage, positions are decided by fair play record.
- yellow card: minus 1 point
- indirect red card: minus 3 points
- direct red card: minus 4 points
- yellow card and direct red card: minus 5 points
Only one of the above deductions is applied to a player in one match.
England resting players/not going all out having clinched 1st in the group?I don’t see a scenario where Wales suddenly come alive and beat England.
I was looking at the same thing and not sure where you got that they'd drop the 4th place team results. Are you thinking of if it's a 3 way tie? Don't think that scenario qualifies here.I believe if the teams are level on pts, GD, GS, and h2h, they then look at the results in a table absent the 4th place team, where it becomes:
Wales - 4 pts, +1 GD, win over England
England - 3 pts, +1 GD, win over US
US - 3 pts, -1 GD, win over Iran
Might be wrong but sourcing it off of this
I was looking at the same thing and not sure where you got that they'd drop the 4th place team results. Are you thinking of if it's a 3 way tie? Don't think that scenario qualifies here.
If three teams identical
This is more complicated, as you can't just use individual results because there's three matches to take into account. Effectively, you create a mini-league of just the three games involving the three nations.
Other than Bale, what Wales player is better than anybody on England’s bench? It’s not like England is a thin squad.England resting players/not going all out having clinched 1st in the group?
But in the process scenario there's only two teams identical: US and Wales.If three teams identical
This is more complicated, as you can't just use individual results because there's three matches to take into account. Effectively, you create a mini-league of just the three games involving the three nations.
The goalie can't handle if the defender passed the ball with his foot. Any other part of the body and it's fair game.I’m going to avoid researching the letter of the rule and just submit to the wisdom of the forum: Why was the Qatari goalie allowed to handle with his hands that header back to him from a teammate?
Thanks, I've been wondering about that every match.The goalie can't handle if the defender passed the ball with his foot. Any other part of the body and it's fair game.
Ah fair, I took that to mean all three teams that could advance, so def misinterpreting itBut in the process scenario there's only two teams identical: US and Wales.
I mean, I'm not betting money on it, but Argentina lost to Saudi Arabia with higher stakes.Other than Bale, what Wales player is better than anybody on England’s bench? It’s not like England is a thin squad.
By the way, if the player flicks the ball up and then heads it back to the keeper it's still a(n indirect) foul.Thanks, I've been wondering about that every match.
For those of us who could not see the match, please elaborate.She’s not going to be able to go back home. Nice job, camera person.
They kept showing an Iranian woman, wearing the garb of any free woman, heartily enjoying the festivities and cheering for her home nation’s team after their first goal. It was a political swipe at the government of Iran in a football thread, but I accept with pride any yellow card shown to me.For those of us who cpouls not see the match, please elaborate.
You are correct - I was thinking of Iran as the key threat for the second spot.Where is the 4 goals coming from?
If we lose 2-0 today. We'll be at 1 point with -2 GD, which will be the same as Wales. If they beat Iran 1-0 and Wales beats England 2-0, then we'll have:
England 6 points
Wales 4 points, 0 GD
US 4 points, -1 GD
Iran 3 points
And Wales would go through.
No one is stopping you from commenting on it.There is a match going on now.
You don’t say?Host side getting embarrassed once again.
If Ecuador could get something from Netherlands today, I’d love to what kind of horsing they would lay on Qatar in the final game.South Africa didn’t get out of their group in 2010, but they at least had a win and a draw. Qatar setting up to be the worst performing hosts in history.