In their favor, Oregon has played like shit since losing to Stanford. A couple of weeks ago, one of them was bitching to the press about the prospect of only playing in the Rose Bowl instead of the championship game. Are they going to bother to show up for the mere Alamo Bowl?canderson said:Texas might lose by 40.
DrewDawg said:Who's the guy that runs the Yahoo Picks contest?
I need to come in near the bottom again and keep my streak alive.
If UT loses Brown's extremely likely definitely gone. If they win, ehhhhhhhhhhhh. I hope they lose on purpose.Philip Jeff Frye said:In their favor, Oregon has played like shit since losing to Stanford. A couple of weeks ago, one of them was bitching to the press about the prospect of only playing in the Rose Bowl instead of the championship game. Are they going to bother to show up for the mere Alamo Bowl?
The current story out there is that back 2007 BC could have had a spot in the Chicken bowl against Auburn if they guaranteed 10000 tix but GDF and the school refused. Looks like Duke had to strike a similar deal.Dan to Theo to Ben said:Duke might be a "small" school, but it has generous alumni:
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/duke-students-chick-fil-bowl-free-214021864--ncaaf.html
Current students have Chick-Fil-A tickets donated to them.
WayBackVazquez said:USC just executes a perfect onsides kick, and gets it taken away because of the rule that treats one-bounce kicks the same as on the fly kicks. I have no love for USC, but I really hate that rule. Onsides kicks should be encouraged and not made harder. They are really the only good reason for the continued existence of the kickoff, IMO.