2016 Broncos Thread: Elway or the Highway

Gunfighter 09

wants to be caribou ken
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2005
8,550
KPWT

What is ridiculous, that they only offered $15M in a world where Sam Bradford gets $18M per and Kurt Cousins gets almost $20M? Bill OBrien or Jeff Fischer will pay BrockO $16M per in half a heartbeat. You are misreading the QB market.

What are the Bronco's alternatives? I fucking love the idea of RG3 starting at QB for the Broncos next year. Are they going to outbid the Jets for Ryan Fitzpatrick? Are they going to trade half of their draft for Paxton Lynch, when they are losing 5-6 players to free agency and need to rebuild their depth? Osweiler has them over a barrel (complete with naked dude inside of it) and they have to pay him to beat the market. This is the cost of negotiating hard with Von Miller.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,024
Mansfield MA
What is ridiculous, that they only offered $15M in a world where Sam Bradford gets $18M per and Kurt Cousins gets almost $20M? Bill OBrien or Jeff Fischer will pay BrockO $16M per in half a heartbeat. You are misreading the QB market.

What are the Bronco's alternatives? I fucking love the idea of RG3 starting at QB for the Broncos next year. Are they going to outbid the Jets for Ryan Fitzpatrick? Are they going to trade half of their draft for Paxton Lynch, when they are losing 5-6 players to free agency and need to rebuild their depth? Osweiler has them over a barrel (complete with naked dude inside of it) and they have to pay him to beat the market. This is the cost of negotiating hard with Von Miller.
Exactly. I wrote about this for ITP last year: http://insidethepylon.com/nfl/long-form-editorial/2015/08/28/the-nfl-qb-merry-go-round/

Every time a mediocre / average QB gets a huge deal, there's a hue and cry that the guy is overpaid, but it's not like good quarterbacks grow on trees. What are the Broncos supposed to do, hand the keys to the fourth-best QB in this draft class, or a Nick Foles type?
 

jablo1312

New Member
Sep 20, 2005
988

Donald Stephenson signs for 3 years 14 million (10 guaranteed).

Meanwhile, CJ Anderosn is apparently drawing a lot of free agent interest, and the Broncos's are ready to walk away from the Osweiler sweepstakes:

 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,764
Hingham, MA
Rumor has it Brock to Houston. If that is true Denver is going to join the Ravens as a recent champ to not even make the playoffs.

They should try to sign Fitz on a 1 or 2 year deal as a stopgap
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
35,920
Deep inside Muppet Labs
What is ridiculous, that they only offered $15M in a world where Sam Bradford gets $18M per and Kurt Cousins gets almost $20M? Bill OBrien or Jeff Fischer will pay BrockO $16M per in half a heartbeat. You are misreading the QB market.

What are the Bronco's alternatives? I fucking love the idea of RG3 starting at QB for the Broncos next year. Are they going to outbid the Jets for Ryan Fitzpatrick? Are they going to trade half of their draft for Paxton Lynch, when they are losing 5-6 players to free agency and need to rebuild their depth? Osweiler has them over a barrel (complete with naked dude inside of it) and they have to pay him to beat the market. This is the cost of negotiating hard with Von Miller.
Nailed it. Brock got 4/$72 from Houston.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
35,920
Deep inside Muppet Labs
James Palmer ‏@JamesPalmerTV 6m6 minutes ago
I'm told Osweiler was "very distant" during negotiations. showed Broncos he didn't want to come back. Elway refused to play top 10 QB money.
Can you blame him (Osweiler)? He got benched after playing very well in favor of a dead guy. He sat for all those years getting no reps, and just when he did good work and played well down the stretch and into the playoffs, back to the bench he goes. He probably felt that Elway and the team didn't believe in his abilities.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,713
Oregon
Along with everything SJH said, he also doesn't have to deal with the "the guy who followed Peyton" crap. He gets his money, gets to start, gets out oif the Manning 1 A.D. foolishness, and only has to worry about being better than Brian Hoyer
 

NortheasternPJ

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 16, 2004
19,439
If you're one of the two QB's on the market, why would he go back to Denver who benched him over a corpse?

There's a good chance he blows but fuck Denver if you're him.

It's sad the QB market is him and Fitzpatrick.
 

Slow Rheal

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 29, 2001
1,780
Maine
Can you blame him (Osweiler)? He got benched after playing very well in favor of a dead guy. He sat for all those years getting no reps, and just when he did good work and played well down the stretch and into the playoffs, back to the bench he goes. He probably felt that Elway and the team didn't believe in his abilities.
I agree with all of this except that he was not playing "very well". Compared to Manning he was out of this f-ing world, but to the rest of the league, he was maybe slightly above average (at best).
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
35,920
Deep inside Muppet Labs
I agree with all of this except that he was not playing "very well". Compared to Manning he was out of this f-ing world, but to the rest of the league, he was maybe slightly above average (at best).
For a guy getting his first real game action, and taking care of his team and getting them the number 1 seed in the playoffs, I'd say that's a tad more than "slightly above average." That's damn impressive.

Hey, maybe he's Scott Mitchell 2.0, but clearly Houston thinks he's better than that.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,291
For a guy getting his first real game action, and taking care of his team and getting them the number 1 seed in the playoffs, I'd say that's a tad more than "slightly above average." That's damn impressive.

Hey, maybe he's Scott Mitchell 2.0, but clearly Houston thinks he's better than that.
Scott Mitchell 2.0 would probably be the best QB in Texans franchise history.
 

Sox and Rocks

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 16, 2013
5,874
Northern Colorado
Clearly, Elway has his work cut out for him. He's done a good job thus far as GM, but he also had the deck stacked in his favor when Manning fell in his lap, a once in a lifetime kind of QB acquisition given Manning's injury history and the Colts getting the #1 pick with a sure-thing QB coming out. It Manning isn't QB of the Broncos, do they land all of the free agents they acquired in recent years?

It will be interesting to see how he navigates this new situation.
 

Slow Rheal

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 29, 2001
1,780
Maine
SJH, I hear ya, and agree he did a good job. The league sucked for the most part QB-wise, and he was better than that for sure. Either way, I'm glad he's in HOU.
 

Gunfighter 09

wants to be caribou ken
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2005
8,550
KPWT
Flags fly forever, if you are a Bronco fan you take your 7 win season next year with a fucking smile. Elway built this team to peak in 2015/16 and nailed his objective.


James Palmer ‏@JamesPalmerTV 6m6 minutes ago
I'm told Osweiler was "very distant" during negotiations. showed Broncos he didn't want to come back. Elway refused to play top 10 QB money.
The Red Sox really need to give Elway and the Bolens lessons on how to trash a guy on his way out the door.

The Broncos might get 3 compensatory 3rd round picks next year with Osweiler, Jackson and Travathian. Now that you can trade those, that is nice to have.

In terms of a starting QB, Kaepernick is going to cost a 3rd-5th round pick plus comes with a $12M cap number, though only one year of commitment. RG3 or Fitzpatrick cost no pick, but are still going to be expensive and Fitzpatrick will want 2-3 years of security, whereas RG3 will want an out back onto the market if he plays well. The Bengals will probably trade AJ McCarron, but not for anything less than something like a 2 and a 4. Unlike the other guys, McCarron is cheap and under contract through 2017.

There are four teams looking for a QB - St Louis, Denver, the Jets and Cleveland. Cleveland probably would want Fitzpatrick but not RGIII to caretake for Wentz/Goff. Of the other three teams, the Rams have a ton of cap room and the Jets and Broncos have little to none. All of this leads me to think that Cincy is going to get a surprisingly large price in picks for McCarron, and Denver seems like the best fit for me with their coming surplus of picks and limited salary cap room.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,024
Mansfield MA
For a guy getting his first real game action, and taking care of his team and getting them the number 1 seed in the playoffs, I'd say that's a tad more than "slightly above average." That's damn impressive.

Hey, maybe he's Scott Mitchell 2.0, but clearly Houston thinks he's better than that.
The Broncos got the #1 seed, but that was on their defense. The six complete games Osweiler started, they scored 123 points, and that includes two overtime games. Ultimately, the offense was just as bad at scoring as it was under Manning, though Osweiler turned the ball over less: http://insidethepylon.com/film-study/film-study-nfl/offense-film-study-nfl/2016/01/05/why-the-broncos-went-back-to-peyton-manning/

At the end of the day, there are guys who are so bad in their initial action that you know they will never be good, guys who are so good right away that you're pretty sure they will be good (though RGIII and Kaepernick suggest that even this may be a mirage), and guys in the middle, which is the vast majority. Osweiler's in the middle. He was below-average, but not so much so that he can't develop into something better.
 

Leather

given himself a skunk spot
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
28,451
Frankly, and not without some merit, Osweiler probably feels like he should have "Super Bowl Winning QB" on his resume right now, and it was taken from him for no good reason except the Broncos didn't give him a chance, even when one was warranted.

And who knows what kind of locker room situation he feels he'd be going back to. Even when he was starting QB, does anybody doubt that Manning was probably undermining him and running the show? Maybe he feels like any possibility of gaining the respect of the team (and now with a defense that will, perhaps rightfully, claim all the credit for success for the next year, at least), and emerging as a leader, has been shot to shit.

At the end of the day, there are guys who are so bad in their initial action that you know they will never be good, guys who are so good right away that you're pretty sure they will be good (though RGIII and Kaepernick suggest that even this may be a mirage), and guys in the middle, which is the vast majority. Osweiler's in the middle. He was below-average, but not so much so that he can't develop into something better.
True, but it goes beyond a few games last season. In 2014, when Manning was clearly starting his precipitous decline, Osweiler got to attempt a whopping 10 passes. He saw Manning's end coming, we all did, but they kept him on the bench instead of giving him some time to develop for the inevitable 2015 changing of the guard.

I mean, as GF09 says, the Broncos wouldn't change a thing. But I think Osweiler is justified, on a personal level, for feeling like he was set up to fail.
 
Last edited:

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,024
Mansfield MA
Frankly, and not without some merit, Osweiler probably feels like he should have "Super Bowl Winning QB" on his resume right now, and it was taken from him for no good reason except the Broncos didn't give him a chance, even when one was warranted.

And who knows what kind of locker room situation he feels he'd be going back to. Even when he was starting QB, does anybody doubt that Manning was probably undermining him and running the show? Maybe he feels like any possibility of gaining the respect of the team (and now with a defense that will, perhaps rightfully, claim all the credit for success for the next year, at least), and emerging as a leader, has been shot to shit.

True, but it goes beyond a few games last season. In 2014, when Manning was clearly starting his precipitous decline, Osweiler got to attempt a whopping 10 passes. He saw Manning's end coming, we all did, but they kept him on the bench instead of giving him some time to develop for the inevitable 2015 changing of the guard.

I mean, as GF09 says, the Broncos wouldn't change a thing. But I think Osweiler is justified, on a personal level, for feeling like he was set up to fail.
I see what you're saying, but I don't think Osweiler's leaving because he took it personally. The Broncos couldn't make him a serious offer until Manning retired, which only happened Sunday. At that point, why not wait a couple days and see what else is out there in a favorable market? The other major factor is that Elway couldn't hammer out a deal with Miller and had to franchise him. If he had worked something out, they could have kept the tag for Osweiler or Malik Jackson, or at least use it as leverage. Instead they lost both those guys.
 

Gunfighter 09

wants to be caribou ken
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2005
8,550
KPWT
If Olivier Vernon is worth more than $16M/per with over $52M guaranteed, Von Miller is going to be worth $20M per. I think he not only stays on the tag this year, but Denver tags him next year at the 20% increase. His $14M this year is 30% below his market value if not more. At this rate, Khalil Mack is going to get no less than $19 or 20M per next winter and Justin Houston's deal is going to look like a massive bargain.
 

86spike

Currently enjoying "Arli$$"
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2002
25,082
Procrasti Nation
Flags fly forever, if you are a Bronco fan you take your 7 win season next year with a fucking smile. Elway built this team to peak in 2015/16 and nailed his objective.




The Red Sox really need to give Elway and the Bolens lessons on how to trash a guy on his way out the door.

The Broncos might get 3 compensatory 3rd round picks next year with Osweiler, Jackson and Travathian. Now that you can trade those, that is nice to have.

In terms of a starting QB, Kaepernick is going to cost a 3rd-5th round pick plus comes with a $12M cap number, though only one year of commitment. RG3 or Fitzpatrick cost no pick, but are still going to be expensive and Fitzpatrick will want 2-3 years of security, whereas RG3 will want an out back onto the market if he plays well. The Bengals will probably trade AJ McCarron, but not for anything less than something like a 2 and a 4. Unlike the other guys, McCarron is cheap and under contract through 2017.

There are four teams looking for a QB - St Louis, Denver, the Jets and Cleveland. Cleveland probably would want Fitzpatrick but not RGIII to caretake for Wentz/Goff. Of the other three teams, the Rams have a ton of cap room and the Jets and Broncos have little to none. All of this leads me to think that Cincy is going to get a surprisingly large price in picks for McCarron, and Denver seems like the best fit for me with their coming surplus of picks and limited salary cap room.
Totally where I'm at. They won the SB and Brock's play was a big part of getting HFA and making that win a reality. Elway had a 3-4 year window with Manning and he got another ring out of it. Mission Accomplished, thanks to everyone who made it happen, and next year is next year.

I hoped to bring back Brock, but not at such a big cap hit. I'm fine with not matching that one. I hope he plays well next year (aside from their game in Denver where I will hope to see him get sacked 8 times!) and Denver gets a nice comp pick out of it. Thanks for the contribution, Brock and I do not begrudge you taking the pay day!

I feel the same way about Malik Jackson and Danny Trevathan. Wish them well and glad Denver didn't overpay. I like Elway's philosophy not to go overboard and hamstring the cap in general.

As for the next QB, nothing will surprise me. I'd rather not have it be RG3 (mainly due to his struggles to play in Shanny's WCO in his second year since Kubiak uses a similar scheme) and I worry that Kaepernick isn't a true leader and isn't all that bright (Frank Gore made some telling comments when he left SF). I'd be cool with Fitzpatrick for a few years but only at an affordable rate (which he may not have to settle for so and could get more elsewhere). I'd be intrigued by AJ McCarron but not if he costs too high of a pick or multiple picks. Outside of that, what's left? Christian Ponder? Seek another blocked back-up like Mettenberger or Mike Glennon? Maybe try to move up and draft a QB early? Not a ton of sure things in this draft. Try to swing a long shot trade for Stafford or Brees?

That said, they did just win the SB with some of the worst QB play ever, so maybe they don't feel they need a top talent to compete again (shaky proposition, IMO).

Elway has some work to do.
 

Mooch

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
4,573
Losing Jackson and Travathan puts a major dent in this defense. Jackson was a key part of their interior line, getting a great push inside against the pass and Travathan is one of the best coverage linebackers in the league. Those are pretty valuable commodities in Wade's scheme and aren't easily replaced, especially against the Patriots with their quick passing game in the middle of the field.
 

steveluck7

Member
SoSH Member
May 10, 2007
4,003
Burrillville, RI
Losing Jackson and Travathan puts a major dent in this defense. Jackson was a key part of their interior line, getting a great push inside against the pass and Travathan is one of the best coverage linebackers in the league. Those are pretty valuable commodities in Wade's scheme and aren't easily replaced, especially against the Patriots with their quick passing game in the middle of the field.
This is what I think a lot of the pundits are underestimating. the common refrain seems to be "They won the Superbowl with 2 below average QB's. Their defense won it before, why not again?" Even before the personnel losses, relying on a repeat of that defensive performance for another full season is risky.
 

Sox and Rocks

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 16, 2013
5,874
Northern Colorado
Denver was also incredibly lucky with injuries last year, especially on defense. IIRC, Ware missed 2-3 games, Ward missed one, and Talib missed 1-2. Otherwise, every other major contributor played every game. That is really amazing.

Now, they could get that kind of health again next year, but chances are their injuries will revert to the mean.
 

pappymojo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2010
6,688
I feel like the Raiders continued improvement also adversely impacts the Broncos ability to repeat last years success. Of course, if they falter, ESPN will just point to their decline as further proof of Peyton's greatness.
 

Mooch

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
4,573
Sounds like Miami is going to force the Broncos into a decision on matching CJ Anderson's offer. No word on $$/terms but this is shaping up to be a brutal offseason for the champs.
 

Hoodie Sleeves

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 24, 2015
1,204
Every time a mediocre / average QB gets a huge deal, there's a hue and cry that the guy is overpaid, but it's not like good quarterbacks grow on trees. What are the Broncos supposed to do, hand the keys to the fourth-best QB in this draft class, or a Nick Foles type?
Right, but what's a better decision? Spending $15+ million a year on a guy who probably isn't much better than replacement level, or taking a risk on a guy who is probably replacement level (but might have a higher ceiling) and spending the $15m on improvements elsewhere?


If the Broncos can win with the shitshow that was Manning - they can win with anybody - so there's no sense in spending a ton of money for mediocrity. Take the current high performance floor your defense is giving you, and try to find somebody who might actually be good.


Edit: to clarify - my feeling is that the range of talent in the "isn't a franchise quarterback" market is significantly smaller than the range of contracts given out in the same market - I think the marked is decidedly non-linear in this segment, and some teams are paying drastically higher rates for performance than others.

In baseball you see guys in the 1 WAR range sign for anything from minor league deals, to getting $10M. Its a bit like that.
 
Last edited:

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,024
Mansfield MA
Right, but what's a better decision? Spending $15+ million a year on a guy who probably isn't much better than replacement level, or taking a risk on a guy who is probably replacement level (but might have a higher ceiling) and spending the $15m on improvements elsewhere?
I don't think there's a clear-cut answer to this question, to be honest. Every season, we see NFL teams have their seasons ruined by awful quarterback or backup quarterback play. One major difference is the amount of friction that comes with bringing in a new signal-caller - he's got to learn the playbook, his teammates, etc. It's not like baseball where if you don't get replacement-level performance you can just send your second baseman down to AAA and call up another one and plug him in the next day.

If the Broncos can win with the shitshow that was Manning - they can win with anybody - so there's no sense in spending a ton of money for mediocrity. Take the current high performance floor your defense is giving you, and try to find somebody who might actually be good.
That works is you have a historically good defense like Denver had, but the smart money is on some regression in 2016. The 2001 Ravens were still a very good defense - fourth in points, second in yards - but that was a whopping 100 points worse than the 2000 squad. The Broncos will likely have a terrific D again, but they almost certainly won't be as successful unless they get more from the offense.
 

86spike

Currently enjoying "Arli$$"
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2002
25,082
Procrasti Nation
Losing Jackson and Travathan puts a major dent in this defense. Jackson was a key part of their interior line, getting a great push inside against the pass and Travathan is one of the best coverage linebackers in the league. Those are pretty valuable commodities in Wade's scheme and aren't easily replaced, especially against the Patriots with their quick passing game in the middle of the field.
The thing about Malik Jackson is that last season was his first dominant year. Prior to that he was mainly notable for getting 15 yard personal fouls at super inopportune times. Last year as a part of a dominant front 7, he played great. i'm sure some of that was growth/improvement, but some was the scheme and some was his superb teammates demanding double teams. Coaching was also better last year.

I'm not saying that the guy's 2015 production will be easy to replace, but he was far from consistent for most of his career so I'm not sure paying him $15M is a wise choice and not one that Denver could make anyway. the draft is very deep in D-Linemen, so I assume the team will look a a value replacement there and roll with the second stringers they already have in house.

Trevathan is a solid player, but he's not a guy you break the bank on either. They have a LBer named Todd Davis who backed up Trevathan and apparently is well regarded by the coaches.

All that said, yes, the defense will almost assuredly take a step back next season. It's damn near impossible to keep something like that 100% in tact for long in the modern NFL.
 

86spike

Currently enjoying "Arli$$"
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2002
25,082
Procrasti Nation
Sounds like Miami is going to force the Broncos into a decision on matching CJ Anderson's offer. No word on $$/terms but this is shaping up to be a brutal offseason for the champs.
I don't think Denver should pay CJ much, so if Miami wants to give him a poison pill deal that Elway will have trouble matching, they should let him go. He had some good games, but he struggled as well and had injury issues this year. I don't get too attached to RBs. So many can only produce for a few years at a top level. Moving on and drafting a new RB doesn't bother me much at all.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,545
deep inside Guido territory
I don't think Denver should pay CJ much, so if Miami wants to give him a poison pill deal that Elway will have trouble matching, they should let him go. He had some good games, but he struggled as well and had injury issues this year. I don't get too attached to RBs. So many can only produce for a few years at a top level. Moving on and drafting a new RB doesn't bother me much at all.
It's a 4 year/$18 million offer sheet with at least $10 million of it guaranteed. I wouldn't think Denver would match it.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,764
Hingham, MA
Elway gets credit for all he did over the last four years, but it was relatively easy to just throw wads of cash at guys like Ware, Ward, Talib, Peyton, etc. Now he is experiencing the other side of the coin - guys are leaving to go play for losers like Jacksonville and Miami. If Denver is going to contend any time soon Elway will certainly earn it
 

NortheasternPJ

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 16, 2004
19,439
And he just had an asset that was worth $18 million a year under his control and got nothing for it. That's a bad deal.

Elway had one goal. Win with Manning and he did that. But the Brock thing is a mess.
 

j-man

Member
Dec 19, 2012
3,703
Arkansas
my 02 cents denver got burned about oz but i think the week 17 beaching seal his fate he was never coming back here once he got beached

i hate to lose CJ but in kubiak sys most rb are interchangeable i ex to get A Foster or A Morris RB or a high rated rook

unless we panic and get kap i am going to throw something out there Jimmy G in 2018 but i wouild pass on most QB offer TJ Yates a 1 or 2 year deal
 

j-man

Member
Dec 19, 2012
3,703
Arkansas
about the afc west it couild be a 4-team race where the winner is 9-7 and 4th place is 7-9

if NE does not win the AFC next year its only because brady gronk got hurt or brady plays like manning 2014 2nd haif
 

86spike

Currently enjoying "Arli$$"
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2002
25,082
Procrasti Nation
Elway gets credit for all he did over the last four years, but it was relatively easy to just throw wads of cash at guys like Ware, Ward, Talib, Peyton, etc. Now he is experiencing the other side of the coin - guys are leaving to go play for losers like Jacksonville and Miami. If Denver is going to contend any time soon Elway will certainly earn it
Kinda like how Revis went to play for a loser team like the Jets after winning his SB?

That's what happens after you win a SB. Some guys want the money after getting their ring.